12 year old becomes youngest transexual

Just as most normal heterosexual males in modern society are homophobic, to one degree or another, so are we also made uncomfortable by those unfortunate people who find it necessary to change sex. If the change has been from male to female, and the new female appearance is attractive, our homophobia fights with our natural male instincts.

No particular legal or social prescriptions should necessarily follow from that, other than the general requirement to act like a gentleman and, hopefully, like a sophisticated person. The world is not all like Kansas.

In any case, we on the Right have a prominent transexual among our best intellectual defenders. You can read about her here and here.

And, although the relevance to this topic is only a faint and distant one, have you noticed that Ann Coulter's Adam's Apple is often a target of derision among Lefty hypocrites who accuse her of being unfeminine? Apparently it is okay for Lefties to be male chauvinists when attacking our side, just as the obscene racism and anti-Semitism of Karl Marx gets a pass.
 
Just as most normal heterosexual males in modern society are homophobic, to one degree or another, so are we also made uncomfortable...

I totally disagree. A "phobia" is a FEAR of something. I am not "afraid" of queers. Do I find them disgusting? Very. But that is NOT "fear."

Calling someone a homophobe is a liberal tactic. Homophobe is a "buzz word." 98% of the worlds population find queers "disgusting." That is NOT a "phobia."
 
Well, analyzing one's reactions to homosexuals -- whether or not 'fear' in any simple sense is involved -- is interesting.

For instance, I suspect most heterosexual men are, to one degree or another, repelled or at least disturbed by present-day male homosexuals, and would have no interest whatsoever in watching gay male porn. However, I also believe that quite a few heterosexual men are turned on by girl-on-girl porn. So it is not the same-sex aspect of homosexuality that is found repulsive, it is the male-on-male aspect.

Why do you think that is the case?
 
The article said he was diagnosed. Diagnosed of being a transexual? Please, any gay or transexual will tell you it is not a disease and cannot be cured.
 
Well, analyzing one's reactions to homosexuals -- whether or not 'fear' in any simple sense is involved -- is interesting.

For instance, I suspect most heterosexual men are, to one degree or another, repelled or at least disturbed by present-day male homosexuals, and would have no interest whatsoever in watching gay male porn. However, I also believe that quite a few heterosexual men are turned on by girl-on-girl porn. So it is not the same-sex aspect of homosexuality that is found repulsive, it is the male-on-male aspect.

Why do you think that is the case?

I think you are absolutely correct. :thup:
 
This stuff goes to the core of what we are as humans. That he knew he wasn't dressed right points to the biological determinants of our behavior. A famous case that shows the power of biology is David Reimer, a boy who had a botched circumcision and was raised a girl.

[ame]http://www.amazon.com/As-Nature-Made-Him-Raised/dp/0061120561[/ame]
 
Bash the twelve year old? hardly. It time to bash the parents and doctors who mutilated this kid. He, and i emphasize he, is far to young to understand the rammifications of anything this severe.

Isnt it amazing how liberals dont seem to care what child gets hurt as long as its done to forward their sick agenda?
And isn't it amazing how people like you think a dead man is the answer for every situation in the world.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #32
Well, analyzing one's reactions to homosexuals -- whether or not 'fear' in any simple sense is involved -- is interesting.

For instance, I suspect most heterosexual men are, to one degree or another, repelled or at least disturbed by present-day male homosexuals, and would have no interest whatsoever in watching gay male porn. However, I also believe that quite a few heterosexual men are turned on by girl-on-girl porn. So it is not the same-sex aspect of homosexuality that is found repulsive, it is the male-on-male aspect.

Why do you think that is the case?

Did you ever consider that guys like girl on girl action because they like girls and not because of any thoughts of homosexuality?
 
Did you ever consider that guys like girl on girl action because they like girls and not because of any thoughts of homosexuality?

Well, I doubt they are thinking about homosexuality when they are looking at girl-on-girl porn. But there is no doubt that men like it, and that they choose to look at it.

Now you may say, oh, it's just because they like to look at girls. But you will notice that they like to look at two girls -- same sex -- having sex with each other. They could look at menage-a-trois, or just groups of naked women -- the market will provide them with whatever they want -- but in fact girl-on-girl is quite popular.

So we have to conclude that normal men are not turned off by same-sex sex, only by male-on-male same-sex sex.

However, if there are any men here who want to tell us how repulsed they are by girl-on-girl, and how they wouldn't be caught dead watching it, please step right up and witness.

Which is to say, normal men are homophobic only in the Latin, and not the Greek, sense.
 
Bash the twelve year old? hardly. It time to bash the parents and doctors who mutilated this kid. He, and i emphasize he, is far to young to understand the rammifications of anything this severe.

Isnt it amazing how liberals dont seem to care what child gets hurt as long as its done to forward their sick agenda?
What a stupid-ass approach
 

Forum List

Back
Top