$105 Billion of Funding Already Included in Obamacare

[Zoom-boing]

Does anyone have anymore info on this?

 

[Greenbeard]

The honorable Congresswoman is mistaken as to what her countrymen want:

And, yes, of course it contained implementation funding.

 

[Two Thumbs]

You seem surprised

Why?

The only thing that should be a surprise is that it took this long for someone to go public with it

 

[Two Thumbs]

The honorable Congresswoman is mistaken as to what her countrymen want:

And, yes, of course it contained implementation funding.

From your link, for those that like to read instead of look at pictures

Meanwhile, views on repeal continue to be very mixed: with four in ten backing repeal 40% want it removed (but half of those hoping the law will be replaced with a Republican alternative) 20 want something else., three in ten backing an expansion of the law 30% (libs) want it bigger , and two in ten hoping to see it implemented as is 20% want it . And most Americans continue to report they want to keep many of the key provisions of the law. There is more agreement when it comes to the strategy of using the legislative budgeting process to stop implementation of the law: six in ten continue to oppose the idea.

Your pie chart is non-sense for the gullible.

 

[Greenbeard]

The only thing that should be a surprise is that it took this long for someone to go public with it

Has it not been public information that states have been applying for and receiving various federal grants for the past ten months or so? Is it a secret that high-risk pools have been set up under the law and are currently paying out benefits? Did I just dream that a few hundred million in Prevention and Public Health Fund Workforce Grants were released last year to bolster our primary care workforce? Yes, implementation is being funded.

This isn't exactly Men in Black, just read the newspaper.

Your pie chart is non-sense for the gullible.

Defunding has never been a popular idea. Those who prefer to burn the village remain fringe characters.

 

[WillowTree]

Does anyone have anymore info on this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNL9xIiwB1E

Can you catch Meet the Press? She was just on telling the whole world about it. Seems like the demonRats hid 105 billion dollars in the hcra and nobody knew it,, cause nobody read it. oh,, and somewhere around here I posted her interview with greta,, I'll see if I can find it.. hang right here..

 

[Polk]

Does anyone have anymore info on this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNL9xIiwB1E

Can you catch Meet the Press? She was just on telling the whole world about it. Seems like the demonRats hid 105 billion dollars in the hcra and nobody knew it,, cause nobody read it. oh,, and somewhere around here I posted her interview with greta,, I'll see if I can find it.. hang right here..

It's not that no one knew about it. It's that those wanting to make a fuss about the bill didn't take the time to read.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Typical dimwit games, lie to you and do the opposite what they say.

 

[averagewhiteman]

Not to mention that seniors who comprise a good portion of the sample the poll was derived from, are being brainwashed by AARP into thinking that Obamacare will be their best alternative.

 

[jeffrockit]

Does anyone have anymore info on this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNL9xIiwB1E

Can you catch Meet the Press? She was just on telling the whole world about it. Seems like the demonRats hid 105 billion dollars in the hcra and nobody knew it,, cause nobody read it. oh,, and somewhere around here I posted her interview with greta,, I'll see if I can find it.. hang right here..

It's not that no one knew about it. It's that those wanting to make a fuss about the bill didn't take the time to read.

Apparently you don't remember Pelosi stating that "we have to pass the bill to see what is in it". Also, they were give a whopping 24 hours to read a 2000+ page bill. Can't see why they did not get to all of it before it was passed.

 

[Greenbeard]

Apparently you don't remember Pelosi stating that "we have to pass the bill to see what is in it". Also, they were give a whopping 24 hours to read a 2000+ page bill. Can't see why they did not get to all of it before it was passed.

Where does this perception come from? The House passed the exact same text that the Senate passed (remember the significance of the Scott Brown election? They knew a conference bill would be filibustered so there was no choice but to pass the Senate's bill in the House, unaltered).

That means from the time the Senate passed the bill (December 24, 2009) to the time the House passed the bill (March 21, 2010), members of the House had about 3 months to read it. And, of course, there was time to read it before the time the Senate actually voted on it in late December, if anyone in the House cared to: Harry Reid's manager's amendment was publicly released on November 19, 2009. And if you want to go back even further, you can note that, in terms of content, the Senate's bill is virtually the same as Max Baucus's Chairman's mark in the Finance committee, released on September 16, 2009.

The only change for the House was their 150-page reconciliation bill that amended the Senate bill they had passed to make it look a little more like the House bill that had been passed but abandoned: you can see the timeline for that bill on the Library of Congress's website. It was released on March 17, 2010 and came to a vote on March 21, 2010 (and then came back for another vote on March 25, 2010).

This "24 hours" nonsense is urban myth. The House actually had several months to familiarize itself with the content in the bill.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Apparently you don't remember Pelosi stating that "we have to pass the bill to see what is in it". Also, they were give a whopping 24 hours to read a 2000+ page bill. Can't see why they did not get to all of it before it was passed.

Where does this perception come from? The House passed the exact same text that the Senate passed (remember the significance of the Scott Brown election? They knew a conference bill would be filibustered so there was no choice but to pass the Senate's bill in the House, unaltered).

That means from the time the Senate passed the bill (December 24, 2009) to the time the House passed the bill (March 21, 2010), members of the House had about 3 months to read it. And, of course, there was time to read it before the time the Senate actually voted on it in late December, if anyone in the House cared to: Harry Reid's manager's amendment was publicly released on November 19, 2009. And if you want to go back even further, you can note that, in terms of content, the Senate's bill is virtually the same as Max Baucus's Chairman's mark in the Finance committee, released on September 16, 2009.

The only change for the House was their 150-page reconciliation bill that amended the Senate bill they had passed to make it look a little more like the House bill that had been passed but abandoned: you can see the timeline for that bill on the Library of Congress's website. It was released on March 17, 2010 and came to a vote on March 21, 2010 (and then came back for another vote on March 25, 2010).

This "24 hours" nonsense is urban myth. The House actually had several months to familiarize itself with the content in the bill.

So why didn't anyone say anything prior to now about the $105 Billion in funding?

 

[Liability]

Congress -- especially those put there in the Tea Party revolt movement -- need to stop passing these damnable funding resolutions EXACTLY to the extent that any part of the plotting -- err -- planning for the implementation of Obamacare thereby gets funded. GRIND the Government to a halt.

Fund the military. Fund the judicial branch. There are obviously a few other more or less necessary or even urgent matters that require on-going funding. So, my suggestion is proceed appropriately, but by and large, government should be shut the fuck down.

President Obama and his hench-stooges do not get to dictate to the American people. They have already spoken. President Obama should be bending to the clearly expressed will of the people.