Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is the progressive way.
BS! More like the "Let him die" Conservative way. I note it's you conservatives who are proposing suicide and euthanasia, not liberals.
That is a completely False statement, The only groups pushing for Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia are Liberal Democrats. You are either completely miss informed, or a liar.
Are you going to tell us the Liberal Democrats who pushed for Assisted suicide in Oregon for example were really Conservatives?
Pathetic.
May I assume they've already called you to testify as an expert witness. ?The brakes didn't fail, he pressed the accelerator instead of the brakes, obviously. The older you get, the slower your responses. Old people - over the age of 80 - should not have a license. They are dangerous drivers, IMO.
I have been driving for two years, and in that two years, I have never had an incident with a younger driver, but I have had multiple incidents with the elderly drivers. That is enough for me to steer clear of these terrible drivers.
well aside from Shoot Speeders, of course. Seconal at Walmart?
Stop being a fool. This geezer's story about the brakes failing is nonsense.
All cars have separate brakes for front and rear and there's no way both can simultaneously fail.
Anyway a mechanic can check the brakes and see if there is anything wrong. Hopefully the cops impounded the car for evidence before the geezer had a chance to cut the brake lines.
Stop being a fool. This geezer's story about the brakes failing is nonsense.
Prove it.
Stop being a fool. This geezer's story about the brakes failing is nonsense.
Prove it.
No - the burden of proof is on the geezer to show the brakes failed. If he had claimed space aliens made him run over those kids would you insist i prove his story false? THINK
Prove it.
No - the burden of proof is on the geezer to show the brakes failed. If he had claimed space aliens made him run over those kids would you insist i prove his story false? THINK
No, it's not. In order to convict him of a crime, the state has the burden of proof. In order to charge him with a crime, the state must show probable cause.
No - the burden of proof is on the geezer to show the brakes failed. If he had claimed space aliens made him run over those kids would you insist i prove his story false? THINK
No, it's not. In order to convict him of a crime, the state has the burden of proof. In order to charge him with a crime, the state must show probable cause.
I guess in Shootspeeder's world "innocent until Provence guilty" doesn't apply when it involves someone behind a wheel of a car....hence his name.
I think he has some personal trauma somewhere in his life that is skewing his rationality on the issue.
No, it's not. In order to convict him of a crime, the state has the burden of proof. In order to charge him with a crime, the state must show probable cause.
I guess in Shootspeeder's world "innocent until Provence guilty" doesn't apply when it involves someone behind a wheel of a car....hence his name.
I think he has some personal trauma somewhere in his life that is skewing his rationality on the issue.
Isn't that somewhere in France?
I guess in Shootspeeder's world "innocent until Proven guilty" doesn't apply when it involves someone behind a wheel of a car....hence his name.
.
I guess in Shootspeeder's world "innocent until Proven guilty" doesn't apply when it involves someone behind a wheel of a car....hence his name.
.
He ran over 11 people, you peabrain. At that point, the burden of proof shifts to him to show he is not to blame. "Innocent until proven guilty" does NOT mean the state must disprove every hair-brained alternate theory the accused comes up with. Please learn how to think or i will be forced to again report you to the stupidity police.
Bullshit. It's the burden of proof of the courts to provide evidence that a crime was committed....if there is evidence....THEN he gets charged. Of course, you are so fucked in the head about this shit that you want to throw away the rule of law.
Just found out this driver was black. That's why the cops didn't arrest him and why all the liberals here support him.
I guess in Shootspeeder's world "innocent until Proven guilty" doesn't apply when it involves someone behind a wheel of a car....hence his name.
.
He ran over 11 people, you peabrain. At that point, the burden of proof shifts to him to show he is not to blame. "Innocent until proven guilty" does NOT mean the state must disprove every hair-brained alternate theory the accused comes up with. Please learn how to think or i will be forced to again report you to the stupidity police.
I guess in Shootspeeder's world "innocent until Proven guilty" doesn't apply when it involves someone behind a wheel of a car....hence his name.
.
He ran over 11 people, you peabrain. At that point, the burden of proof shifts to him to show he is not to blame. "Innocent until proven guilty" does NOT mean the state must disprove every hair-brained alternate theory the accused comes up with. Please learn how to think or i will be forced to again report you to the stupidity police.
I would settle for some proof that he committed a crime.
your also a fucking asshole.....and quit dodging what i asked you earlier.....are you going to get in front of the line and ask the elders in your family to commit suicide?....or was that all just more Bullshit?...
I would settle for some proof that he committed a crime.
your also a fucking asshole.....and quit dodging what i asked you earlier.....are you going to get in front of the line and ask the elders in your family to commit suicide?....or was that all just more Bullshit?...
No i won't do that. I hope the elders will make the choice themselves. If not - so be it.
But i want the option of suicide easily available. Only AMA shills disagree.
The brakes didn't fail
