- Thread starter
- #81
Bullshit again. If a 10 year old girl is raped and becomes pregnant, of course the pregnancy is outside the bounds of normality, poses a significant threat to her life and physical well-being. There's a chance with such a young mother, the baby wouldn't be carried to term anyway.
Pro-lifers have never argued that people should be forced to have children if it threatens their lives. That's a pro abortion stance that has been attributed to us. And now you're trying to tell us that if we choose life, we must choose the infant over a raped child. That's pretty much the same as telling the pro abortionists that if they choose death, they must of course allow that unwanted children be killed as well.
No, we don't. And it is a stupid premise.
"Bullshit!"
"Stupid!!"
"CHILDISH!!!"
Using hyterics to justify hypocracy is a common tactic when your position becomes undefensible.
But using it OVER and OVER is just laughable.
"That's pretty much the same as telling the pro abortionists that if they choose death, they must of course allow that unwanted children be killed as well."
Um.....you're beginning to babble incoherently.....Lemme try:
That's pretty much the same as telling everyone that you are smarter than they are, and they cannot make that decision for themselves as well then hyterically calling their premise "stupid."