US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Tea Party Terrorism Narrative

This is a discussion on Tea Party Terrorism Narrative within the Tea Party forums, part of the US Discussion category; Homeland Security-Funded Study Pushing Tea Party Terrorism Narrative 6/11/12 By Patrick Poole In an era of agenda-driven academic research, who watches the watchers? Or more ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Tea Party



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2012, 12:17 AM
American_Jihad's Avatar
Trash Koranimals/Liberals
Member #36934
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
Posts: 3,862
Thanks: 954
Thanked 837 Times in 612 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 857
American_Jihad has disabled reputation
Tea Party Terrorism Narrative

Homeland Security-Funded Study Pushing Tea Party Terrorism Narrative

6/11/12 By Patrick Poole

In an era of agenda-driven academic research, who watches the watchers? Or more accurately, who gets to designate and categorize the “objective” data? This is the question raised after examining a study and related dataset recently published by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) at the University of Maryland.

START was launched in 2005 with a $12 million grant from the Department of Homeland Security, and is recognized by DHS as one of its “Centers for Excellence.” In December, DHS announced it had renewed START’s funding to the tune of $3.6 million.

A recent START study titled “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970 to 2008” puts the “excellence” description in question. A press release announcing the report states the study concluded that nearly a third of all terrorist attacks between 1970 and 2008 occurred in just five major metropolitan areas. The study was based on a START database called “Profiles of Perpetrators of Terrorism in the United States,” and both the report and database are supported by the DHS Science and Technology Directorate’s Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division.

Reading through the study, some baffling issues arose. In Table 4 (p. 22), titled “Hot Spots of Religious Terrorism by Decade”, three “hot spot” areas — Los Angeles, Manhattan, and Wasco, Oregon (former home of the Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh) — are identified:


---

But looking at the START dataset’s codebook, other startling problems emerge.

Compare how the START researchers define “left wing” and “right wing” extremism. Left-wing extremism is defined at follows:

Extreme left-wing groups want to bring about change through violent revolution rather than through established political processes. In addition, this category includes secular left-wing groups that rely heavily on terrorism to overthrow the capitalist system and either establish “a dictatorship of the proletariat” (Marxist-Leninists) or, much more rarely, a decentralized, non-hierarchical sociopolitical system (anarchists).

Fair enough. Now, right-wing extremism:

The extreme far-right is composed of groups that believe that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under attack and is either already lost or that the threat is imminent (for some the threat is from a specific ethnic, racial, or religious group), and believe in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism. Groups may also be fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation), anti-global, suspicious of centralized federal authority, reverent of individual liberty, and believe in conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty. (Emphasis added)


If you’re fiercely nationalistic (pro-American), anti-global (anti-UN), suspicious of centralized federal authority (like the Framers), reverent of individual liberty (like Patrick Henry), and believe in “conspiracy” theories (like the federal government allowing the sale of assault weapons to Mexican drug cartels to justify limiting American’s rights under the Second Amendment, a la Fast and Furious), then according to these taxpayer-funded researchers, you too are on the “extreme right-wing.” Many Americans would be surprised to find themselves so categorized by the researchers at START.

It should be no surprise that two subgroups identified in the codebook under “extreme right-wing” include “gun rights” and “tax protest.” Tea Party terrorists, anyone?

---

The PJ Tatler » Homeland Security-Funded Study Pushing Tea Party Terrorism Narrative



"we got some of that loot"
__________________
USMB Badlands ----> The Liberal Mind and how it's occupied
xXx Tell The Children The Truth xXx
WARNING---> xXx Muslim Sexual Perversion xXx
MooHamMudd = Drunken Murdering Lunatic & Child Molesting BEAST
ACORN = American Communist Organization of Radical Negroids
CAIR = Criminal Association of Islamic Radicals
SEIU = Stupid Emigrants & Ignoramuses Unleashed
SHOVE Political Correctness, Environmentalism, Multiculturalism & progressives!
'Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself.'
Comrade Obongo
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
USMessageBoard.com is the premier Political Forum Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Tea Party
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.