US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Conservative bioethics

This is a discussion on Conservative bioethics within the Science and Technology forums, part of the US Discussion category; "How did the United States, the world's scientific powerhouse, reach a point at which it grapples with the ethical challenges of twenty-first-century biomedicine using Bible ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Science and Technology

Science and Technology Developments that shape how we live our lives

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 12:50 PM
midcan5's Avatar
liberal / progressive
Member #5464
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 9,343
Thanks: 858
Thanked 1,637 Times in 1,211 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Conservative bioethics

"How did the United States, the world's scientific powerhouse, reach a point at which it grapples with the ethical challenges of twenty-first-century biomedicine using Bible stories, Catholic doctrine, and woolly rabbinical allegory?"

Conservative bioethics' latest, most dangerous ploy

The Stupidity of Dignity by Steven Pinker

"...what's not to like? The advances do not raise the traditional concerns of bioethics, which focuses on potential harm and coercion of patients or research subjects. What, then, are the ethical concerns that call for a presidential council?"

"...The general feeling is that, even if a new technology would improve life and health and decrease suffering and waste, it might have to be rejected, or even outlawed, if it affronted human dignity.

Whatever that is. The problem is that "dignity" is a squishy, subjective notion, hardly up to the heavyweight moral demands assigned to it."

This volume of 28 essays and commentaries by Council members and invited contributors is their deliverable, addressed directly to President Bush. The report does not, the editors admit, settle the question of what dignity is or how it should guide our policies. It does, however, reveal a great deal about the approach to bioethics represented by the Council. And what it reveals should alarm anyone concerned with American biomedicine and its promise to improve human welfare. For this government-sponsored bioethics does not want medical practice to maximize health and flourishing; it considers that quest to be a bad thing, not a good thing."

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.ht...7-f5059cd0bfbd
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
USMessageBoard.com is the premier Political Forum Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 08:45 PM
Banned
Member #2435
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 44,693
Thanks: 170
Thanked 4,048 Times in 2,717 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1084
Gunny has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by midcan5 View Post
"How did the United States, the world's scientific powerhouse, reach a point at which it grapples with the ethical challenges of twenty-first-century biomedicine using Bible stories, Catholic doctrine, and woolly rabbinical allegory?"

Conservative bioethics' latest, most dangerous ploy

The Stupidity of Dignity by Steven Pinker

"...what's not to like? The advances do not raise the traditional concerns of bioethics, which focuses on potential harm and coercion of patients or research subjects. What, then, are the ethical concerns that call for a presidential council?"

"...The general feeling is that, even if a new technology would improve life and health and decrease suffering and waste, it might have to be rejected, or even outlawed, if it affronted human dignity.

Whatever that is. The problem is that "dignity" is a squishy, subjective notion, hardly up to the heavyweight moral demands assigned to it."

This volume of 28 essays and commentaries by Council members and invited contributors is their deliverable, addressed directly to President Bush. The report does not, the editors admit, settle the question of what dignity is or how it should guide our policies. It does, however, reveal a great deal about the approach to bioethics represented by the Council. And what it reveals should alarm anyone concerned with American biomedicine and its promise to improve human welfare. For this government-sponsored bioethics does not want medical practice to maximize health and flourishing; it considers that quest to be a bad thing, not a good thing."

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.ht...7-f5059cd0bfbd
Her's a good plan ... let the world worry about itself and we get rid of this bleeding heart bullshit we've been fed by those who don't ever seem to be doing without while they bleed everyone else dry.

You lefties whine and cry about poverty in this nation and the level of education and lack of healthcare and blah, blah, blah while you send billions in freebies overseas.

We need to take care of our own first and you people lost in your ideals that have not a damned thing to do with reality need to either wake up or shut up. Either works for me.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 04:06 PM
Chester Burnett's Avatar
Registered User
Member #11365
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
Chester Burnett is an unknown quantity at this point
I was born in the 80's. you both sound stupid to me
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 04:11 PM
Banned
Member #6709
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 33,779
Thanks: 4,701
Thanked 3,231 Times in 2,459 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve
AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve AllieBaba could run the Federal Reserve
That's because the people who had you in the 80s were doing drugs, dear, and it affected you.

I don't see how lefties consider killing babies, and allowing people to decide for their loved ones whether or not to keep them on life support, as life-affirming behavior, myself. And that's what this comes down to.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Science and Technology
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:50 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.