 | | 
11-13-2008, 06:49 PM
|  | Levity Member #13753 | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Michigan
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 2 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Pale Rider BULLSHIT. It was, is, and always will be a mental disorder. Homosexual Activists Intimidate American Psychiatric Association into Removing Homosexuality from List of Disorders
BY RYAN SORBA
“It was never a medical decision—and that’s why I think the action came so fast…It was a political move.”
“That’s how far we’ve come in ten years. Now we even have the American Psychiatric Association running scared.”
-Barbara Gittings, Same-gender sex activist
Let us, for a moment, rewind to the year1970. In this year, same-gender sex activists began a program of intimidation aimed at the American Psychiatric Association (APA). Activist Frank Kameny states the movement’s objective clearly, “I feel that the entire homophile movement…is going to stand or fall upon the question of whether or not homosexuality is a sickness, and upon our taking a firm stand on it…” (The Gay Crusaders, by Kay Tobin and Randy Wicker, p. 98)
In 1970, psychiatrists generally considered sexual desires toward members of one’s own gender to be disordered. Karoly Maria Kertbeny’s term, “homosexual” was the official descriptor for those inflicted by this mental-physical disassociative disorder. Psychiatry’s authoritative voice influenced public opinion, which at the time was negative toward same-gender sex. Of course, public sexual activity in parks and public restrooms contributed to societies negative views about the types of people that did such things, but “scientific opinion” was crucial in the public attitude.
Led by radicals like Frank Kameny, same-gender sex activists attacked many psychiatrists publicly, as Newsweek describes, “But even more than the government, it is the psychiatrists who have experienced the full rage of the homosexual activists. Over the past two years, gay-lib organizations have repeatedly disrupted medical meetings, and three months ago—in the movements most aggressive demonstration so far—a group of 30 militants broke into a meeting of the American Psychiatric Association in Washington, where they turned the staid proceedings into near chaos for twenty minutes. ‘We are here to denounce your authority to call us sick or mentally disordered,’ shouted the group’s leader, Dr. Franklin Kameny, while the 2,000 shocked psychiatrists looked on in disbelief. ‘For us, as homosexuals, your profession is the enemy incarnate. We demand that psychiatrists treat us as human beings, not as patients to be cured!’” (Newsweek, 8-23-71, p.47)
Ironically, at the very moment Franklin Kameny was claiming that same-gender sex was healthy, safe, and natural, a deadly virus was silently passing through communities of men all over the nation as a result of the promiscuous, unhealthy nature of the sex they were having. Only a decade later, thousands of men would be dead or dying, of AIDS.
On June 7, of the following year, 1971, Franklin Kameny wrote a letter to the Psychiatric News threatening the APA with not only more, but worse, disruptions. In this letter he states, “Our presence there was only the beginning of an increasingly intensive campaign by homosexuals to change the approach of psychiatry toward homosexuality or, failing that, to discredit psychiatry.” (The Gay Crusaders p. 130-131) LMAO. You post a blog as evidence of -- ANYTHING!!!!!!
LOL.
It is not a mental disorder. Only bigots think it is.
Last edited by Macintosh; 11-13-2008 at 06:52 PM.
| 
11-13-2008, 06:50 PM
|  | Zoom. Zoom. Zoom. Member #13941 | | Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 22,351
Thanks: 19
Thanked 533 Times in 418 Posts
Rep Power: 366 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Macintosh LMAO. You post a blog as evidence of -- ANYTHING!!!!!!
LOL.
It is not a metnal disorder. Only bigots think it is. Hey, if Rayboy can post YouTube, and call THAT proof.. | 
11-13-2008, 07:10 PM
|  | Administrator Member #2435 | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 37,616
Thanks: 58
Thanked 1,802 Times in 1,297 Posts
Rep Power: 692 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Charlie Bass The sealybobo is wrong. Being "discriminated" against because of gay sex acts[which are voluntary, willful sex acts] vs being discriminated against because of skin colour/race/ethnicity is *NOT* the same. Damn. Wonders never cease. That's twice in two days I agree with Charles.
__________________ She helped me with my suitcase, She stands before my eyes
Driving me to the airport, And to the friendly skies.
Going through security I held her for so long.
She finally looked at me in love, And she was gone.
Just a song before I go, A lesson to be learned.
Travelling twice the speed of sound It's easy to get burned. | 
11-13-2008, 07:15 PM
|  | Registered User Member #11674 | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,968
Thanks: 803
Thanked 276 Times in 226 Posts
Rep Power: 73 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Gunny Damn. Wonders never cease. That's twice in two days I agree with Charles. I also agree with you and Charles. | 
11-13-2008, 07:16 PM
|  | Zoom. Zoom. Zoom. Member #13941 | | Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 22,351
Thanks: 19
Thanked 533 Times in 418 Posts
Rep Power: 366 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Sunni Man I also agree with you and Charles.  You probably still ain't coming out of the red-rep zone. | 
11-13-2008, 08:19 PM
|  | Administrator Member #2435 | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 37,616
Thanks: 58
Thanked 1,802 Times in 1,297 Posts
Rep Power: 692 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Sunni Man I also agree with you and Charles. 
__________________ She helped me with my suitcase, She stands before my eyes
Driving me to the airport, And to the friendly skies.
Going through security I held her for so long.
She finally looked at me in love, And she was gone.
Just a song before I go, A lesson to be learned.
Travelling twice the speed of sound It's easy to get burned. | 
11-13-2008, 08:21 PM
|  | Very Metal Member #12867 | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: The Emerald City (Seattle), USA
Posts: 487
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 4 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by sealybobo By the way, back in the 50's and 60's, whites used the bible to argue why blacks and whites should not marry. It was illegal not just talked about and the Name of the case that overtured it...wait...its classic Virginia vs. Loving
__________________ **************************
Roll On! | 
11-13-2008, 08:31 PM
|  | Administrator Member #2435 | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 37,616
Thanks: 58
Thanked 1,802 Times in 1,297 Posts
Rep Power: 692 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Turboswede It was illegal not just talked about and the Name of the case that overtured it...wait...its classic Virginia vs. Loving It's still a dishonest comparison. Being black is hereditary and really cannot be hidden. One cannot choose their skin color.
Homosexuality is manifested solely by behavior. Nothing more has been conclusively proven, and that behavior can be kept hidden. One can choose whether to or not to engage in homosexual behavior; regardless what you want to claim in regard to orientation. It requires a conscious decision; therefore, is a choice.
__________________ She helped me with my suitcase, She stands before my eyes
Driving me to the airport, And to the friendly skies.
Going through security I held her for so long.
She finally looked at me in love, And she was gone.
Just a song before I go, A lesson to be learned.
Travelling twice the speed of sound It's easy to get burned. | 
11-13-2008, 09:28 PM
|  | Registered User Member #3851 | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
Posts: 10,778
Thanks: 2
Thanked 204 Times in 175 Posts
Rep Power: 77 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Gunny It's still a dishonest comparison. Being black is hereditary and really cannot be hidden. One cannot choose their skin color.
Homosexuality is manifested solely by behavior. Nothing more has been conclusively proven, and that behavior can be kept hidden. One can choose whether to or not to engage in homosexual behavior; regardless what you want to claim in regard to orientation. It requires a conscious decision; therefore, is a choice. but apparently there is good news and if this choice leads to a touch of the old aids you just have to feed them a fetus in the morning and they will be right as rain by the after....its like a miracle.......from god...
HIGH HOPES FOR AIDS THERAPY ... Stem Cells - News - HIGH HOPES FOR AIDS THERAPY / Experimental Treatment Fortifies the Body's own Stem Cells with an Enzyme that Could Block the Virus' Relentless Advance
__________________ "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember it or overthrow it." -- Abraham Lincoln, 4 April 1861
Remember, remember, the 11th of september The Gunpowder Treason and plot;
I see of no reason why Gunpowder Treason
Should ever be forgot..... | 
11-13-2008, 09:42 PM
|  | Very Metal Member #12867 | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: The Emerald City (Seattle), USA
Posts: 487
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 4 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Gunny It's still a dishonest comparison. Being black is hereditary and really cannot be hidden. One cannot choose their skin color.
Homosexuality is manifested solely by behavior. Nothing more has been conclusively proven, and that behavior can be kept hidden. One can choose whether to or not to engage in homosexual behavior; regardless what you want to claim in regard to orientation. It requires a conscious decision; therefore, is a choice. No sense of humor Gunny?
__________________ **************************
Roll On! | 
11-13-2008, 10:34 PM
|  | Levity Member #13753 | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Michigan
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 2 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Gunny It's still a dishonest comparison. Being black is hereditary and really cannot be hidden. One cannot choose their skin color.
Homosexuality is manifested solely by behavior. Nothing more has been conclusively proven, and that behavior can be kept hidden. One can choose whether to or not to engage in homosexual behavior; regardless what you want to claim in regard to orientation. It requires a conscious decision; therefore, is a choice. Engaging in homosexual acts - or, heterosexual acts - is a choice, yes. But one cannot choose his or her sexual orientation. And the last time I checked, engaging in sex acts is not a requirement for marriage. So, if you're argument is that being black cannot be helped, then it is my factual contention that being homosexual cannot be helped.
One cannot choose his or her sexual orientation, notwithstanding the ignorance of the blog writer cited a few pages back.
I'm not sure I understand what point you're trying to make.
Last edited by Macintosh; 11-13-2008 at 10:36 PM.
| 
11-13-2008, 11:17 PM
|  | Right of Center True Con Member #11320 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Vicksburg, Missisippi
Posts: 5,223
Thanks: 28
Thanked 66 Times in 61 Posts
Rep Power: 10 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Shogun that certainly is your ignorant negrocentric opinion, now isn't it? Face it, the exact same excuses to limit gays also once limited chicken lovers from getting hitched to white women just the same. THAT, you licorice jelly bean, is the historic fact of the matter. Jackass, your so comparison is weak, very weak and makes no damn sense, you use the logic of racist to justify what basically amounts to government support of a lifestyle of voluntary sex acts. Gays are *NOT* limited, period, they are not suffering, they are *NOT* considered nor were ever considered as subhumans like blacks. Their lifestyle is based on sex acts which is *NOT* a sexual lifestyle thats pre-determined from the womb, no evidence exists for it. What and who they are is solely determined by their actions, not biology, so it isn't the same.
You're a damn hypocrites because on one hand you're insulting blacks with your obvious racism and using the logic of racists[which is already wrong from the start] while simultaneously trying to justify support of the homosexual lifestyle by comparing homosexual so-called struggles to those of blacks, you can't have your head up your rectum and on top of your head at the same time moron. Interracial marriage isn't unnatural, any man with a penis and woman with a vagina who have sex produces life, which is nature's way of putting life on the planet. Besides providing sexual pleasure what function does homosexual sex serves? If it is so natural and predetermined why haven't gays naturally evolved organs that do the same as heterosexuals? The answer is that their lifestyle is a lifestyle they live because they get sexual pleasure for what they do and like it so much that they're under the delusion that it must be natural. | 
11-13-2008, 11:34 PM
|  | Levity Member #13753 | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Michigan
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 2 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Charlie Bass You're a damn hypocrites because on one hand you're insulting blacks with your obvious racism and using the logic of racists[which is already wrong from the start] while simultaneously trying to justify support of the homosexual lifestyle by comparing homosexual so-called struggles to those of blacks, you can't have your head up your rectum and on top of your head at the same time moron. Interracial marriage isn't unnatural, any man with a penis and woman with a vagina who have sex produces life, which is nature's way of putting life on the planet. Besides providing sexual pleasure what function does homosexual sex serves? If it is so natural and predetermined why haven't gays naturally evolved organs that do the same as heterosexuals? The answer is that their lifestyle is a lifestyle they live because they get sexual pleasure for what they do and like it so much that they're under the delusion that it must be natural. So then any couple who has sex for pleasure rather than procreation is behaving unnaturally? Or, what about sterile couples? Are they behaving unnaturally? Clearly if sex is for procreation solely, then we shouldn't allow sterile couples to wed; and, most importantly, we should have an official from the government in the bedroom of every married couple - at all times - making sure any and all sexual acts performed are for the purpose of procreation only.
Or, maybe, you're just wrong.
Courtesy of National Geographic. (Because I am a new member and cannot yet post links, I will post the article in its entirety. If you want to see the article for yourself, type "Homosexuality In The Wild" in a Google search bar and the first hit should be this article.) Homosexual Activity Among Animals Stirs Debate
From National Geographic
Birds do it, bees do it, even educated fleas do it. So go the lyrics penned by U.S. songwriter Cole Porter.
Porter, who first hit it big in the 1920s, wouldn't risk parading his homosexuality in public. In his day "the birds and the bees" generally meant only one thing—sex between a male and female. But, actually, some same-sex birds do do it. So do beetles, sheep, fruit bats, dolphins, and orangutans. Zoologists are discovering that homosexual and bisexual activity is not unknown within the animal kingdom. Roy and Silo, two male chinstrap penguins at New York's Central Park Zoo have been inseparable for six years now. They display classic pair-bonding behavior—entwining of necks, mutual preening, flipper flapping, and the rest. They also have sex, while ignoring potential female mates. Wild birds exhibit similar behavior. There are male ostriches that only court their own gender, and pairs of male flamingos that mate, build nests, and even raise foster chicks.
Filmmakers recently went in search of homosexual wild animals as part of a National Geographic Ultimate Explorer documentary about the female's role in the mating game. (The film, Girl Power, will be screened in the U.S this Saturday at 8 p.m. ET, 5 p.m PT on MSNBC TV.) The team caught female Japanese macaques engaged in intimate acts which, if observed in humans, would be in the X-rated category.
"The homosexual behavior that goes on is completely baffling and intriguing," says National Geographic Ultimate Explorer correspondent, Mireya Mayor. "You would have thought females that want to be mated, especially over their fertile period, would be seeking out males."
Well, perhaps, in a roundabout way, they are seeking males, suggests primatologist Amy Parish.
She argues that female macaques may enhance their social position through homosexual intimacy which in turn influences breeding success. Parish says, "Taking something that's nonreproductive, like mounting another female—if it leads to control of a resource or acquisition of a resource or a good alliance partner, that could directly impact your reproductive success." Sexual Gratification
On the other hand, they could just be enjoying themselves, suggests Paul Vasey, animal behavior professor at the University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. "They're engaging in the behavior because it's gratifying sexually or it's sexually pleasurable," he says. "They just like it. It doesn't have any sort of adaptive payoff."
Matthew Grober, biology professor at Georgia State University, agrees, saying, "If [sex] wasn't fun, we wouldn't have any kids around. So I think that maybe Japanese macaques have taken the fun aspect of sex and really run with it."
The bonobo, an African ape closely related to humans, has an even bigger sexual appetite. Studies suggest 75 percent of bonobo sex is nonreproductive and that nearly all bonobos are bisexual. Frans de Waal, author of Bonobo: The Forgotten Ape, calls the species a "make love, not war" primate. He believes bonobos use sex to resolve conflicts between individuals.
Other animals appear to go through a homosexual phase before they become fully mature. For instance, male dolphin calves often form temporary sexual partnerships, which scientists believe help to establish lifelong bonds. Such sexual behavior has been documented only relatively recently. Zoologists have been accused of skirting round the subject for fear of stepping into a political minefield.
"There was a lot of hiding of what was going on, I think, because people were maybe afraid that they would get into trouble by talking about it," notes de Waal. Whether it's a good idea or not, it's hard not make comparisons between humans and other animals, especially primates. The fact that homosexuality does, after all, exist in the natural world is bound to be used against people who insist such behavior is unnatural.
In the U.S., in particular, the moral debate over this issue rages on. Many on the religious right regard homosexuality as a sin. And only this month, President Bush vowed to continue his bid to ban gay marriages after the Senate blocked the proposal. Already, cases of animal homosexuality have been cited in successful court cases brought against states like Texas, where gay sex was, until recently, illegal.
Yet scientists say we should be wary of referring to animals when considering what's acceptable in human society. For instance, infanticide, as practiced by lions and many other animals, isn't something people, gay or straight, generally approve of in humans. Human Homosexuality
So how far can we go in using animals to help us understand human homosexuality? Robin Dunbar is a professor of evolutionary psychology at the University of Liverpool, England. "The bottom line is that anything that happens in other primates, and particularly other apes, is likely to have strong evolutionary continuity with what happens in humans," he said.
Dunbar says the bonobo's use of homosexual activity for social bonding is a possible example, adding, "One of the main arguments for human homosexual behavior is that it helps bond male groups together, particularly where a group of individuals are dependent on each other, as they might be in hunting or warfare."
For instance, the Spartans, in ancient Greece, encouraged homosexuality among their elite troops. "They had the not unreasonable belief that individuals would stick by and make all efforts to rescue other individuals if they had a lover relationship," Dunbar added.
Another suggestion is that homosexuality is a developmental phase people go through. He said, "This is similar to the argument of play in young animals to get their brain and muscles to work effectively and together. Off the back of this, there's the possibility you can get individuals locked into this phase for the rest of their lives as a result of the social environment they grow up in."
But he adds that homosexuality doesn't necessarily have to have a function. It could be a spin-off or by-product of something else and in itself carries no evolutionary weight." He cites sexual gratification, which encourages procreation, as an example. "An organism is designed to maximize its motivational systems," he adds.
In other words, if the urge to have sex is strong enough it may spill over into nonreproductive sex, as suggested by the actions of the bonobos and macaques. However, as Dunbar admits, there's a long way to go before the causes of homosexuality in humans are fully understood.
He said, "Nobody's really investigated this issue thoroughly, because it's so politically sensitive. It's fair to say all possibilities are still open." So there goes your argument that homosexuality is "unnatural." Now, it is of course necessary to mention that many things in the animal kingdom are not acceptable in human society, such as infanticide. But does infanticide cause someone harm? Of course. Does homosexuality cause someone harm? Of course NOT.
The bottom line:
Homosexuality is natural, beneficial, and you should quit spewing your nonsense. Although, anyone with Idi Amin as their avatar shouldn't be taken seriously anyway.
Last edited by Macintosh; 11-13-2008 at 11:50 PM.
| 
11-14-2008, 05:30 AM
|  | Registered User Member #11674 | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,968
Thanks: 803
Thanked 276 Times in 226 Posts
Rep Power: 73 | | | So a few animals get confused and start humping everything in sight.
Heck, have you ever seen a dog start humping someones leg?
If the leg the dog is humping a man. Does that make the dog a homo??
No, the animal is just excited or confused. And we are talking about animals not people.
Homosexuality is subhuman behavior and animalistic.
Animals have no choice, and are operating on stimulus response.
Homos are making a conscious choice to engage in degenerate activities. | 
11-14-2008, 05:39 AM
|  | Levity Member #13753 | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Michigan
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 2 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Sunni Man So a few animals get confused and start humping everything in sight. Did you bother to read the article? Quote: Homosexuality is subhuman behavior and animalistic. Oh, oh, oh. I see. First homosexuality was "unnatural" but now it is "animalistic."
So is breathing. Quote: Animals have no choice, and are operating on stimulus response. This is false. Quote: Homos are making a conscious choice to engage in degenerate activities. Who says they are "degenerate activities"? I don't think they are degenerate activities. A lot of people don't believe that. Tell me, where does that come from? |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |