|
View Poll Results: Employing science in a debate about God's existence most commonly betrays? | |
A profound ignorance for scientific discipline
|     | 2 | 28.57% | |
An ulterior motive
|    | 0 | 0% | |
Both a profound ignorance of scientific discipline AND an ulterior motive
|    | 5 | 71.43% |
 | | 
09-29-2008, 08:53 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,697
Rep Power: 0 | | | God arguments based on science.
Whenever anyone tries to prove (or disprove) the existence of God based purely on science, that person:
A. Is profoundly ignorant of scientific discipline
B. Has an ulterior motive
C. Both A & B
Which do you think is most common? |
Login to remove all ads
09-29-2008, 08:56 AM
|  | The Anti Mod | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,180
Rep Power: 81 | | | What's your ulterior motive? |
09-29-2008, 09:03 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,697
Rep Power: 0 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Anguille  What's your ulterior motive? | It's always the same and I'm surprised you'd even need to ask.
Getting people to question what they know.
Last edited by manifold; 09-29-2008 at 09:07 AM.
|
09-29-2008, 09:09 AM
| | The Anti Mod | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,180
Rep Power: 81 | | | So why didn't you include a "None of the above" in your poll?
Agenda ho! |
09-29-2008, 09:11 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,697
Rep Power: 0 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Anguille So why didn't you include a "None of the above" in your poll?
Agenda ho! |
Because that's not a possiblity. This is a poll question, not a multiple choice question.  |
09-29-2008, 09:14 AM
| | The Anti Mod | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,180
Rep Power: 81 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by manifold Because that's not a possiblity. This is a poll question, not a multiple choice question. | I guess it's just a poll for people who already feel a certain way then.  |
09-29-2008, 09:22 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,697
Rep Power: 0 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Anguille I guess it's just a poll for people who already feel a certain way then. |
I'm listening.
Explain to me how it could be none of the above please? |
09-29-2008, 09:30 AM
| | The Anti Mod | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,180
Rep Power: 81 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by manifold I'm listening.
Explain to me how it could be none of the above please? |
" Employing science in a debate about God's existence most commonly betrays?"
That's vague, employing science to prove or disprove or as part of some point on the side?
"A profound ignorance for scientific discipline"
Must one be categorized as profoundly ignorant, there is no other category?
" An ulterior motive"
Such as?
Shat-head is right, you need to re-take Polls 101. |
09-29-2008, 09:31 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Maine
Posts: 5,955
Rep Power: 39 | | | OTOH, although I often take our board resident Darwin thumping athetsts to task for bothering to whine about believers, I ALSO recognize that the bible thumpers, if left to their own devices, would turn our nation into a repressive theocracy, too.
Keep your religion (or your lack of it) out of my lifestyle, please
Thank you in advance for shutting the fuck up.
Yours, completely indifferent to your believe systems,
editec |
09-29-2008, 09:39 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,697
Rep Power: 0 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Anguille "Employing science in a debate about God's existence most commonly betrays?"
That's vague, employing science to prove or disprove or as part of some point on the side?
"A profound ignorance for scientific discipline"
Must one be categorized as profoundly ignorant, there is no other category?
"An ulterior motive"
Such as?
Shat-head is right, you need to re-take Polls 101. |
Perhaps I should have replaced "profound" with "fundamental." |
09-29-2008, 09:41 AM
| | crack baby | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,255
Rep Power: 203 | | | A
__________________ Do test tube babies have navels? |
09-29-2008, 09:42 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,697
Rep Power: 0 | | btw Ang:
Shit-herd doesn't know her ass from a hole in the ground.  |
09-29-2008, 10:43 AM
|  | pagan by choice | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: blue ridge mountains
Posts: 2,445
Rep Power: 20 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by manifold It's always the same and I'm surprised you'd even need to ask.
Getting people to question what they know. | can we all say "rep ho"?
__________________  There is no greater sorrow
Than to be mindful of the happy time
In misery.
Dante |
09-29-2008, 10:45 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,697
Rep Power: 0 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by strollingbones can we all say "rep ho"? | Well yes, I am a rep ho, that much is true.
But that post wasn't a rep grubbing attempt, and that's worked out pretty well since it hasn't been repped.  |
09-29-2008, 10:49 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 21,698
Rep Power: 366 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by manifold Whenever anyone tries to prove (or disprove) the existence of God based purely on science, that person:
A. Is profoundly ignorant of scientific discipline
B. Has an ulterior motive
C. Both A & B
Which do you think is most common? | What is most common is people trying to refute religion using scitentific theories of origin that have as much real evidence to support them as Creationism does.
__________________ You can't always be first .... but you CAN be NEXT  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | | |
|
