 | | 
11-09-2009, 08:18 AM
|  | Registered User Member #19018 | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,954
Thanks: 195
Thanked 332 Times in 241 Posts
Rep Power: 23 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by mudwhistle 
Quote: Originally Posted by Bfgrn
Quote: Originally Posted by DiamondDave
True.. and when that is pointed out I stand against those earmarks too...
Funny.. the GI Bill bill could have simply stood alone and easily passed with bipartisan support... but the lefties decided to include things that they knew would otherwise never pass... which then put many like myself in opposition of the bill
Funny, Diamond Dave made the accusation about earmarks in the GI Bill, so I asked him to NAME 'EM...he couldn't...
Funny, In his opposition to the GI Bill, John McCain only talked about retention issues, BUT let's go with your reason for not supporting our troops... those earmarks 
The chart serves two purposes... the tiny little red sliver represents those earmarks in the Federal budget, and the tiny little red sliver represents HOW much Bush and McCain care about our troops...
You right wingers support WAR, not troops, the human beings that fight 'em! You must think we're currently in the Bush Administration. This is the OBAMA Administration.
The sliver you speak of is how much Obama seems to care about the military, not Bush. Quote: While the world was watching and waiting for a strong President -- what they got were comments about how good some little conference was and shout outs to a buddy of the President. The media was reporting on a terrorist (though many are afraid to use that term) killing US soldiers on our own soil and they went to the President live, setting him up for one of those great Obama speech moments. But this is what we got as his first words:
"Let me first of all just thank Ken and the entire Department of the the Interior Staff for organizing just an extraordinary conference. Uh, I want to thank my cabinet members and senior administration officials who participated today. Uh, I hear that Dr. Joe "Medicine" Crow was around. So I want to give a shout out...My understanding is, is that you uh had an extremely productive conference."You have got to be kidding me! Those type of comments go on for two minutes. He ignores Ft. Hood while below his video feed, every cable news channel talks about a massacre and soldiers dead. When he finally gets to talking of Ft. Hood there is no sign of a President ready to respond to terrorism. As details scrolled on news feeders below him, his first words on the incident were:
"We don't yet know all the details at this moment. We will share them as we get them... We will make sure we get answers to every single question about this horrible incident... I hope all of you recognize the scope of this tragedy."
President Obama then goes on to make closing comments about the conference he was at. He shows no grasp of "the scope of this tragedy." YouTube - Fort Hood Tragedy -- Barack Obama Gives Odd "Shout-Out" Before He Comments on Massacre -- FOX News Forum Listing Blogger for Horowitz website: Obama's response to Fort Hood shootings "far worse" than Bush's "Pet Goat" moment | Media Matters for America So the pea brain who continues to falsely attribute words to Abraham Lincoln, even though Lincoln never SAID them replies.. I know you are, but what am I?
And post Marxist blogs? --- Blogger for Horowitz
David Joel Horowitz (born January 10, 1939) is an American conservative writer and right wing activist. The son of two life-long members of the Communist Party, and a former supporter of Marxism as well as a former member of the New Left in the 1960s, Horowitz later renounced his "left-wing political radicalism" and became an advocate for conservatism.
__________________
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
John Kenneth Galbraith |
11-09-2009, 08:22 AM
|  | Morel Enthusiast Member #20102 | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 3,789
Thanks: 270
Thanked 395 Times in 316 Posts
Rep Power: 64 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Bfgrn
Quote: Originally Posted by mudwhistle
Quote: Originally Posted by Bfgrn
Funny, Diamond Dave made the accusation about earmarks in the GI Bill, so I asked him to NAME 'EM...he couldn't...
Funny, In his opposition to the GI Bill, John McCain only talked about retention issues, BUT let's go with your reason for not supporting our troops... those earmarks
The chart serves two purposes... the tiny little red sliver represents those earmarks in the Federal budget, and the tiny little red sliver represents HOW much Bush and McCain care about our troops...
You right wingers support WAR, not troops, the human beings that fight 'em! You must think we're currently in the Bush Administration. This is the OBAMA Administration.
The sliver you speak of is how much Obama seems to care about the military, not Bush. Quote: While the world was watching and waiting for a strong President -- what they got were comments about how good some little conference was and shout outs to a buddy of the President. The media was reporting on a terrorist (though many are afraid to use that term) killing US soldiers on our own soil and they went to the President live, setting him up for one of those great Obama speech moments. But this is what we got as his first words:
"Let me first of all just thank Ken and the entire Department of the the Interior Staff for organizing just an extraordinary conference. Uh, I want to thank my cabinet members and senior administration officials who participated today. Uh, I hear that Dr. Joe "Medicine" Crow was around. So I want to give a shout out...My understanding is, is that you uh had an extremely productive conference."You have got to be kidding me! Those type of comments go on for two minutes. He ignores Ft. Hood while below his video feed, every cable news channel talks about a massacre and soldiers dead. When he finally gets to talking of Ft. Hood there is no sign of a President ready to respond to terrorism. As details scrolled on news feeders below him, his first words on the incident were:
"We don't yet know all the details at this moment. We will share them as we get them... We will make sure we get answers to every single question about this horrible incident... I hope all of you recognize the scope of this tragedy."
President Obama then goes on to make closing comments about the conference he was at. He shows no grasp of "the scope of this tragedy." YouTube - Fort Hood Tragedy -- Barack Obama Gives Odd "Shout-Out" Before He Comments on Massacre -- FOX News Forum Listing Blogger for Horowitz website: Obama's response to Fort Hood shootings "far worse" than Bush's "Pet Goat" moment | Media Matters for America So the pea brain who continues to falsely attribute words to Abraham Lincoln, even though Lincoln never SAID them replies.. I know you are, but what am I?
And post Marxist blogs? --- Blogger for Horowitz
David Joel Horowitz (born January 10, 1939) is an American conservative writer and right wing activist. The son of two life-long members of the Communist Party, and a former supporter of Marxism as well as a former member of the New Left in the 1960s, Horowitz later renounced his "left-wing political radicalism" and became an advocate for conservatism. You're ether blind or a compulsive liar.
Try looking at it numbnuts, and see if the source is still listed as Abraham Lincoln.
__________________ 
"We will go through the gate. If the gate is closed, we will go over the fence. If the fence is too high,we will pole vault in. If that doesn't work, we will parachute in. But we are going to get health care reform passed... - Nancy Pelosi Too bad that ain't what the American people want. The Rabbi is right.....the Dems are the party of Fuck You. We don't have a national crisis today. Obama is our national crisis. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...arcissism.html |
11-09-2009, 08:22 AM
|  | Army Vet Member #11393 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 480
Thanked 378 Times in 274 Posts
Rep Power: 61 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by mudwhistle
Quote: Originally Posted by Bfgrn
Quote: Originally Posted by DiamondDave
True.. and when that is pointed out I stand against those earmarks too...
Funny.. the GI Bill bill could have simply stood alone and easily passed with bipartisan support... but the lefties decided to include things that they knew would otherwise never pass... which then put many like myself in opposition of the bill
Funny, Diamond Dave made the accusation about earmarks in the GI Bill, so I asked him to NAME 'EM...he couldn't...
Funny, In his opposition to the GI Bill, John McCain only talked about retention issues, BUT let's go with your reason for not supporting our troops... those earmarks
The chart serves two purposes... the tiny little red sliver represents those earmarks in the Federal budget, and the tiny little red sliver represents HOW much Bush and McCain care about our troops...
You right wingers support WAR, not troops, the human beings that fight 'em! You must think we're currently in the Bush Administration. This is the OBAMA Administration.
The sliver you speak of is how much Obama seems to care about the military, not Bush. Quote: While the world was watching and waiting for a strong President -- what they got were comments about how good some little conference was and shout outs to a buddy of the President. The media was reporting on a terrorist (though many are afraid to use that term) killing US soldiers on our own soil and they went to the President live, setting him up for one of those great Obama speech moments. But this is what we got as his first words:
"Let me first of all just thank Ken and the entire Department of the the Interior Staff for organizing just an extraordinary conference. Uh, I want to thank my cabinet members and senior administration officials who participated today. Uh, I hear that Dr. Joe "Medicine" Crow was around. So I want to give a shout out...My understanding is, is that you uh had an extremely productive conference."You have got to be kidding me! Those type of comments go on for two minutes. He ignores Ft. Hood while below his video feed, every cable news channel talks about a massacre and soldiers dead. When he finally gets to talking of Ft. Hood there is no sign of a President ready to respond to terrorism. As details scrolled on news feeders below him, his first words on the incident were:
"We don't yet know all the details at this moment. We will share them as we get them... We will make sure we get answers to every single question about this horrible incident... I hope all of you recognize the scope of this tragedy."
President Obama then goes on to make closing comments about the conference he was at. He shows no grasp of "the scope of this tragedy." YouTube - Fort Hood Tragedy -- Barack Obama Gives Odd "Shout-Out" Before He Comments on Massacre -- FOX News Forum Listing Blogger for Horowitz website: Obama's response to Fort Hood shootings "far worse" than Bush's "Pet Goat" moment | Media Matters for America Funny too how the little idiot cannot understand how an ignore list on here works... I purposely don't see the fucker's posts... if I would want to here from an asshole, I would fart
__________________ Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system). http://obamaclock.org/ |
11-09-2009, 08:32 AM
| | Registered User Member #19018 | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,954
Thanks: 195
Thanked 332 Times in 241 Posts
Rep Power: 23 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by mudwhistle
Quote: Originally Posted by Bfgrn
Quote: Originally Posted by mudwhistle
You must think we're currently in the Bush Administration. This is the OBAMA Administration.
The sliver you speak of is how much Obama seems to care about the military, not Bush.
So the pea brain who continues to falsely attribute words to Abraham Lincoln, even though Lincoln never SAID them replies.. I know you are, but what am I?
And post Marxist blogs? --- Blogger for Horowitz
David Joel Horowitz (born January 10, 1939) is an American conservative writer and right wing activist. The son of two life-long members of the Communist Party, and a former supporter of Marxism as well as a former member of the New Left in the 1960s, Horowitz later renounced his "left-wing political radicalism" and became an advocate for conservatism. You're ether blind or a compulsive liar.
Try looking at it numbnuts, and see if the source is still listed as Abraham Lincoln. Well kudos to you and my sincere apology...
__________________
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
John Kenneth Galbraith |
11-09-2009, 09:22 AM
|  | Tricky Bitch Member #21210 | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Where trouble is, I am there
Posts: 7,203
Thanks: 1,521
Thanked 1,393 Times in 968 Posts
Rep Power: 228 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by DiamondDave And again.. the winger midcan posts more links to winger sites.... about as reliable as the sites the truthers can't stop posting..
midcan is like Pavlov's dog... one mention of anything close to what he has heard as a left-wing talking point and WHAMMO, out comes a link to a winger site Thanks Dave, you're a Diamond. You saved me from having to respond.
__________________  Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action. George Washington Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. George Washington |
11-09-2009, 09:27 AM
| | Tricky Bitch Member #21210 | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Where trouble is, I am there
Posts: 7,203
Thanks: 1,521
Thanked 1,393 Times in 968 Posts
Rep Power: 228 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger
Quote: Originally Posted by mudwhistle
Quote: Originally Posted by Zona
Any pics of Bush at Dover? Hmmm? Cheney maybe? Hmmm?
Bush doesn't usually do his grieving in front of cameras for the edification of the media. OH really??
What was his visit to Ground Zero??
Are you saying George Bush did not grieve on that day? The rest of America did Ground Zero - a show of a country united by tragedy. That's what POTUS does.
Idiot. Idiot. Idiot.
__________________ Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action. George Washington Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. George Washington |
11-09-2009, 09:28 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #21287  | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: right of center
Posts: 792
Thanks: 253
Thanked 85 Times in 69 Posts
Rep Power: 19 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by CrusaderFrank If Obama visits and there's no press to photograph it, did it really happen?
LOL ~ I like this post! |
11-09-2009, 09:35 AM
| | Tricky Bitch Member #21210 | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Where trouble is, I am there
Posts: 7,203
Thanks: 1,521
Thanked 1,393 Times in 968 Posts
Rep Power: 228 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Bfgrn
Quote: Originally Posted by DiamondDave
Quote: Originally Posted by Harry Dresden exactly Dave....and you notice Bfgrn did not include that in his post....now to be fair about this the Republicans do the same with many of their bills...... True.. and when that is pointed out I stand against those earmarks too...
Funny.. the GI Bill bill could have simply stood alone and easily passed with bipartisan support... but the lefties decided to include things that they knew would otherwise never pass... which then put many like myself in opposition of the bill Funny, Diamond Dave made the accusation about earmarks in the GI Bill, so I asked him to NAME 'EM...he couldn't...
Funny, In his opposition to the GI Bill, John McCain only talked about retention issues, BUT let's go with your reason for not supporting our troops... those earmarks
The chart serves two purposes... the tiny little red sliver represents those earmarks in the Federal budget, and the tiny little red sliver represents HOW much Bush and McCain care about our troops... You right wingers support WAR, not troops, the human beings that fight 'em!
When you make this sort of stupidly pathetic and offensive statement, all you demonstrate is that there is no depth to which you will not sink to point score.
It is rare that I resort to actually considering anyone on a forum pondscum - I genuinely believe you are the first. I guess I should congratulate you on being more offensive than total assclowns like Huggy and Gaybiker.
__________________ Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action. George Washington Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. George Washington |
11-09-2009, 09:41 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20321 | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,251
Thanks: 473
Thanked 1,160 Times in 837 Posts
Rep Power: 72 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by California Girl
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger
Quote: Originally Posted by mudwhistle
Bush doesn't usually do his grieving in front of cameras for the edification of the media.
OH really??
What was his visit to Ground Zero??
Are you saying George Bush did not grieve on that day? The rest of America did Ground Zero - a show of a country united by tragedy. That's what POTUS does.
Idiot. Idiot. Idiot.
So wait a minute here..
You are claiming that President Obama paying his respects to returning dead American hero's is not what a President does? Are you saying it is not a tragedy?
Are you claiming our war dead are not as deserving as 9-11 dead?
What a cold hearted callous Bitch you are!
__________________
The only "Fair and Balanced" poster on USMB |
11-09-2009, 09:44 AM
| | Tricky Bitch Member #21210 | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Where trouble is, I am there
Posts: 7,203
Thanks: 1,521
Thanked 1,393 Times in 968 Posts
Rep Power: 228 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger
Quote: Originally Posted by California Girl
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger
OH really??
What was his visit to Ground Zero??
Are you saying George Bush did not grieve on that day? The rest of America did
Ground Zero - a show of a country united by tragedy. That's what POTUS does.
Idiot. Idiot. Idiot.
So wait a minute here..
You are claiming that President Obama paying his respects to returning dead American hero's is not what a President does? Are you saying it is not a tragedy?
Are you claiming our war dead are not as deserving as 9-11 dead?
What a cold hearted callous Bitch you are!
Do please fuck off and stop you're stupid accusations.
Did I claim that our war dead are not deserving of honor? No. Actually, I have a rather big dog in that particular hunt - several of them actually. I care far more about our troops that an asshole like you will ever comprehend. Fucking, fucking, fucking idiot. You have absolutely no idea of what you speak.
__________________ Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action. George Washington Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. George Washington |
11-09-2009, 09:48 AM
| | Registered User Member #21303 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,875
Thanks: 87
Thanked 212 Times in 164 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by California Girl
Quote: Originally Posted by Bfgrn
Quote: Originally Posted by DiamondDave
True.. and when that is pointed out I stand against those earmarks too...
Funny.. the GI Bill bill could have simply stood alone and easily passed with bipartisan support... but the lefties decided to include things that they knew would otherwise never pass... which then put many like myself in opposition of the bill
Funny, Diamond Dave made the accusation about earmarks in the GI Bill, so I asked him to NAME 'EM...he couldn't...
Funny, In his opposition to the GI Bill, John McCain only talked about retention issues, BUT let's go with your reason for not supporting our troops... those earmarks
The chart serves two purposes... the tiny little red sliver represents those earmarks in the Federal budget, and the tiny little red sliver represents HOW much Bush and McCain care about our troops... You right wingers support WAR, not troops, the human beings that fight 'em!
When you make this sort of stupidly pathetic and offensive statement, all you demonstrate is that there is no depth to which you will not sink to point score.
It is rare that I resort to actually considering anyone on a forum pondscum - I genuinely believe you are the first. I guess I should congratulate you on being more offensive than total assclowns like Huggy and Gaybiker.
Oh please. The far right does support war over the Troops and that camp has always tried to equate Policy to our Troops by saying anyone who doesn't support our occupations in iraq and afghanistan don't support our Troops. Another glaring piece is keeping our Troops in needless wars. If your camp cared even one millimeter for our Troops you would never support optional wars that force them to die and lose limbs for no viable reason.  |
11-09-2009, 10:08 AM
| | Supporting Member Member #20321 | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,251
Thanks: 473
Thanked 1,160 Times in 837 Posts
Rep Power: 72 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by California Girl
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger
Quote: Originally Posted by California Girl
Ground Zero - a show of a country united by tragedy. That's what POTUS does.
Idiot. Idiot. Idiot.
So wait a minute here..
You are claiming that President Obama paying his respects to returning dead American hero's is not what a President does? Are you saying it is not a tragedy?
Are you claiming our war dead are not as deserving as 9-11 dead?
What a cold hearted callous Bitch you are!
Do please fuck off and stop you're stupid accusations.
Did I claim that our war dead are not deserving of honor? No. Actually, I have a rather big dog in that particular hunt - several of them actually. I care far more about our troops that an asshole like you will ever comprehend. Fucking, fucking, fucking idiot. You have absolutely no idea of what you speak. I think I detect a weasel here....
So now you wrap yourself in the flag while you deny our returning war dead a Presidential honor.
Your hatred of Obama is clouding your reasoning.
President Bush honoring 9-11 is a good thing
so is President Obama honoring our war dead
__________________
The only "Fair and Balanced" poster on USMB |
11-09-2009, 10:12 AM
|  | Super Moderator Member #11827 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: half a bubble off
Posts: 16,061
Thanks: 628
Thanked 1,758 Times in 1,160 Posts
Rep Power: 425 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger
Quote: Originally Posted by California Girl
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger
So wait a minute here..
You are claiming that President Obama paying his respects to returning dead American hero's is not what a President does? Are you saying it is not a tragedy?
Are you claiming our war dead are not as deserving as 9-11 dead?
What a cold hearted callous Bitch you are!
Do please fuck off and stop you're stupid accusations.
Did I claim that our war dead are not deserving of honor? No. Actually, I have a rather big dog in that particular hunt - several of them actually. I care far more about our troops that an asshole like you will ever comprehend. Fucking, fucking, fucking idiot. You have absolutely no idea of what you speak. I think I detect a weasel here....
So now you wrap yourself in the flag while you deny our returning war dead a Presidential honor.
Your hatred of Obama is clouding your reasoning.
President Bush honoring 9-11 is a good thing
so is President Obama honoring our war dead we've got bingo!   
nice work!
__________________
"Nothing is more unreliable than the populace, nothing more obscure than human intentions, nothing more deceptive than the whole electoral system."- Marcus Tullius Cicero |
11-09-2009, 10:17 AM
| | Tricky Bitch Member #21210 | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Where trouble is, I am there
Posts: 7,203
Thanks: 1,521
Thanked 1,393 Times in 968 Posts
Rep Power: 228 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger
Quote: Originally Posted by California Girl
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger
So wait a minute here..
You are claiming that President Obama paying his respects to returning dead American hero's is not what a President does? Are you saying it is not a tragedy?
Are you claiming our war dead are not as deserving as 9-11 dead?
What a cold hearted callous Bitch you are!
Do please fuck off and stop you're stupid accusations.
Did I claim that our war dead are not deserving of honor? No. Actually, I have a rather big dog in that particular hunt - several of them actually. I care far more about our troops that an asshole like you will ever comprehend. Fucking, fucking, fucking idiot. You have absolutely no idea of what you speak. I think I detect a weasel here....
So now you wrap yourself in the flag while you deny our returning war dead a Presidential honor.
Your hatred of Obama is clouding your reasoning.
President Bush honoring 9-11 is a good thing
so is President Obama honoring our war dead
To spot the weasel, look in the mirror, asshole.
It's pathetic that you think this is about Obama - how very typical that you are too fucking stupid to see past your labels for others. To me, it's personal - not a theoretical debate on a stupid internet forum.
You are a fucking idiot.
__________________ Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action. George Washington Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. George Washington |
11-09-2009, 10:18 AM
| | Army Vet Member #11393 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 480
Thanked 378 Times in 274 Posts
Rep Power: 61 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Quote: Originally Posted by California Girl
Quote: Originally Posted by Bfgrn
Funny, Diamond Dave made the accusation about earmarks in the GI Bill, so I asked him to NAME 'EM...he couldn't...
Funny, In his opposition to the GI Bill, John McCain only talked about retention issues, BUT let's go with your reason for not supporting our troops... those earmarks
The chart serves two purposes... the tiny little red sliver represents those earmarks in the Federal budget, and the tiny little red sliver represents HOW much Bush and McCain care about our troops... You right wingers support WAR, not troops, the human beings that fight 'em!
When you make this sort of stupidly pathetic and offensive statement, all you demonstrate is that there is no depth to which you will not sink to point score.
It is rare that I resort to actually considering anyone on a forum pondscum - I genuinely believe you are the first. I guess I should congratulate you on being more offensive than total assclowns like Huggy and Gaybiker.
Oh please. The far right does support war over the Troops and that camp has always tried to equate Policy to our Troops by saying anyone who doesn't support our occupations in iraq and afghanistan don't support our Troops. Another glaring piece is keeping our Troops in needless wars. If your camp cared even one millimeter for our Troops you would never support optional wars that force them to die and lose limbs for no viable reason. 
Squawk... War is unnecessary... Squawk... Occupation... Squawk.. No Reason.. Squawk
Got anymore left wing talking points you have not spouted off about war??
I'll give you a hint... serve and find out about it.. peace does not come at a kumbaya and ours and our allies freedoms do not come from happy thoughts about puppies and rose petals
__________________ Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system). http://obamaclock.org/ | | |
Lower Navigation
| | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
|
| » Site Navigation | | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |
