It's Not Just One IG, At Least 3

If one case you can fire someone for refusing to have sex with you. In one case you can't.

Well, that was easy. Of course you are likely too stupid to be able to comprehend that simple difference, but ah well.

what would that difference be, ace?

this should be weak.

ahh, but you can fire someone for not having sex with you. you just have to be intelligent enough to give a different reason, or no reason at all.

if they can prove the firing was illegal, which is highly unlikely, they may get a monetary settlement or if it's a civil service job, they may get their job back.

you ever been to the real world?

If one case you can fire someone for refusing to have sex with you. In one case you can't.

Well, that was easy. Of course you are likely too stupid to be able to comprehend that simple difference, but ah well.

ahh, but you can fire someone for not having sex with you. you just have to be intelligent enough to give a different reason, or no reason at all.

if they can prove the firing was illegal, which is highly unlikely, they may get a monetary settlement or if it's a civil service job, they may get their job back.

you ever been to the real world?

He sounds naive and young enough that I'm guessing he hasn't experienced much of the 'real' world yet.

So you acknowledge that there is a difference then? Good, congratulations on acknowledging reality.

We were talking about the law, not about how hard or easy it is to prove the laws been broken. But nice attempt at backtracking there though.

Elvis, you found a poodle friend!

Maggie's not my friend.

See Nik, education is a good thing. Get off of the Huffington post and really understand the issues, maybe you'll learn something.

If he's still being paid for the next 30 days, it doesn't matter that his stuff was packed, IMO. And if this is true, then one would understand why he'd be out....

Yes, it does matter. The POTUS cannot remove these IGs until after the 30 days has expired. The law is clear, counselor.

And as to the smears Obama has put out on Walprin being "confused" and maybe even senile? No dice, he passed the test on that just yesterday.

And even if so, Jillian, he now has a ADA claim does he not? Yes, he does.

First off, I posted the LAW earlier. The one that spells it out clearly, these IGs cannot be removed until AFTER the 30-day notice has expired.

Under the Americans with Disabilities act, dementia and senility -- and even AGE -- are protected. The employer is required to attempt to make accommodations. This applies to the hiring process as well as to the termination process.

Here's an account of the firing, from Walprin himself:

Gerald Walpin speaks: The inside story of the AmeriCorps firing | Washington Examiner

Here's Hot Air's take on the test, not that you'll read it or watch the video:

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Sweet: Glenn Beck gives Gerald Walpin a senility test

I know none of you Obamaphiles really care what Obama does. That's a given. But my own optimism of the human being allows me to at least try to get your brain cells working again. Because I am optimistic that you still have them, somewhere in the foggy haze of Obama cult worship.

Not to sway from the topic, but when you consider Biden is your VP, they have a lot of nerve implying Walprin maybe be confused and even senile.

So may we presume you have some sort of proof for that asinine comment? Oh my, did something "leak out" about Biden that's now making the rounds of the right-wing blogosphere??