It's Not Just One IG, At Least 3

Nope. But then your just making that up with no evidence.

My bad. Try here.

US CODE: Title 5a,INSPECTOR GENERAL ACT OF 1978

Still waiting for you to provide me with evidence he broke the law.

Yeah, you go with that. Stupid is as stupid does.

Oh, then do please prove me wrong. Cite evidence. Or are you incapable of that?

Do you even read what you post? Today is June 17th, not July 17th. Can you read?

And, you keep avoiding the central question:

You don't find it even a least little bit alarming that he's systematically and without due lawful process removing anyone who's investigating one of his cronies?

__________________
Click below to listen!

Another Brick in the Wall (Demo Version) -- Midnight Marauder | Excellence in Podcasting Networks

That's no better. Newest amendments to that are 1994 and doesn't include the 30 day notice clause he's violating.

__________________
Click below to listen!

Another Brick in the Wall (Demo Version) -- Midnight Marauder | Excellence in Podcasting Networks

Yes, I'm away that today is June 17th. Your point?


Try asking a question that doesn't have a massive amount of doubtful, if not clearly false, premises if you want an answer.

Read the emboldened and enlarged portions. He cannot, under the law, fire any of the IGs until AFTER the 30 day notice expires.


There are no false premises there. If you don't want to answer the question, that is okay just say so. I know for you cult followers, anything The Obama does is fine. Even if it clearly breaks the law.

__________________
Click below to listen!

Another Brick in the Wall (Demo Version) -- Midnight Marauder | Excellence in Podcasting Networks

S.2324: Inspector General Reform Act of 2008 -... OpenCongress

a) i don't put much stock in wingnut bloggers;

2) i don't think even the wingnut blogger went that far.

so you might want to re-evaluate that statement and replace it with something that might accurately represent what was written.

just saying.

I'm pretty sure that if it turns out that's what he was doing, you'll hear a lot more criticism about it than we ever did from the right about Bush using the AG as his own little private GOP enforcement arm....

__________________
"Trust none of what you hear And less of what you see" Springsteen

When the Founding Fathers protected our right to free speech, I think that meant we were supposed to use it.

Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was the world's most unhinged lunatic. He's now dead. So that moves Ann Coulter up to first place - David Letterman

O, when she is angry she is keen and shrewd; / She was a vixen when she went to school, / And though she be but little, she is fierce. — Shakespeare

You do know that Obama hasn't actually fired Walperin, yes? Only that he is going too?

If you are going to claim that Obama broke the law, please cite the exact law and then cite exactly which action of his broke the law.

And yes, there are false premises in the question.

(Sec. 3) Requires the President, the heads of designated federal entities, the Librarian of Congress, the Capitol Police Board, and the Public Printer to communicate to Congress in writing the reasons for removing or transferring an IG no later than 30 days before such removal or transfer.

Which means, he CANNOT remove an IG until AFTER the 30 day's notice!

__________________
Click below to listen!

Another Brick in the Wall (Demo Version) -- Midnight Marauder | Excellence in Podcasting Networks

Yes, he has fired him. He has been removed from office and barred from entering.

This new clause was designed to PREVENT exactly what you're seeing, to PREVENT a POTUS from removing IGs that are getting a little too close to the truth on some issues that might reflect badly on the CinC.

__________________
Click below to listen!

Another Brick in the Wall (Demo Version) -- Midnight Marauder | Excellence in Podcasting Networks

Walperin still, at this very moment, has a job. He just won't in 30 days. (well 25 or something now)