US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum  

Could We Please Stop Calling Obama, Reid, and Pelosi Liberals?

This is a discussion on Could We Please Stop Calling Obama, Reid, and Pelosi Liberals? within the Politics forums, part of the US Discussion category; left-leaning centrists... HA HA HA HA HA HA You must be kidding. They are not 'centrist' at all, they are the heart of the left....


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Politics


Politics Discuss government policies and candidates...


View Poll Results: Are Obama, Reid, and Pelosi Liberals?
No, they're centrists, you nazis! 3 13.04%
Not really, but kinda: they do lean to the left a little. 2 8.70%
Yes...no...I guess so - not? I don't know. I'm a Centrist. 0 0%
Kinda, but not really: they do lean to the left a lot. 2 8.70%
Yes, they're socialist hippies in suits, you pinkos! 16 69.57%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 02:56 AM
Xenophon's Avatar
With the Old Guard
Member #15282
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: In your head
Posts: 14,702
Thanks: 56
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,412 Posts
Rep Power: 395
Xenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religion
Xenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religionXenophon could successfully start his own religion
left-leaning centrists...

HA HA HA HA HA HA

You must be kidding.

They are not 'centrist' at all, they are the heart of the left.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 04:05 AM
Mr. Forgot-it-All
Member #11278
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 16,820
Thanks: 1,071
Thanked 1,022 Times in 778 Posts
Rep Power: 161
editec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religion
editec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religion
This semantics game continues, I see.

Extreme right wingers inform us that BUSH II is a liberal for christ's sake.

To them anyone who is not a brownshirt is a liberal.

So who cares if these totalitarians think they're liberals?

Liberals know they're not liberals.

Instead of getting hung up on labels, why not just fault these people for what they actually do?

I'll tell you why they don't.

Because that requires that these people actually pay attention to the facts and details of policies, and it's way more fun to just label people so they don't have to pay attention.

Face it, if they were really paying attention they'd know that these labels are meaningless.

Last edited by editec; 05-14-2009 at 04:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to editec For This Useful Post:
MaggieMae (05-14-2009)
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:19 AM
Skull Pilot's Avatar
Trap or Die
Member #7407
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,544
Thanks: 69
Thanked 559 Times in 364 Posts
Rep Power: 101
Skull Pilot has disabled reputation
[quote=sealybobo;1213305]
Quote: Originally Posted by Skull Pilot View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post

It's just so damned laughable that not a single soul on this board will admit to ever supporting George W. Bush. George who? Sorry, folks, but the odds say that most of the "conservatives" who post here most certainly DID support him at one time. But it's not a happy place to be, so you pretend you were off somewhere else during his 8 years.
you're funny. believe it or not i am one of the most liberal people here in that I believe personal liberties and freedoms are of the utmost importance.

What Is Classical*Liberalism?

Quote:
People who call themselves classical liberals today tend to have the basic view of rights and role of government that Jefferson and his contemporaries had. Moreover, they do not tend to make any important distinction between economic liberties and civil liberties.
that any democrat can call themselves liberal is laughable
Quote:
No, you are laughable, because you probably agree with progressives/liberals more than you do Republicans yet I always see you here bashing liberals. The right has brainwashed you into thinking the word liberal is a dirty word.
who you call liberals are not liberals. In the classical sense, liberals favor personal freedom and economic freedom above all else. you are in favor of a government that restricts freedoms, via legislation and confiscatory taxes all in the name of "fairness". that is NOT liberalism.

And I bash people like you who are constantly calling for bigger more expensive government. That has nothing to do with liberalism.

Quote:
The same way fake conservatives have turned me off to all conservatives. I like some of what real conservatives have to say, I just don't believe them because I heard Bush and the GOP from 2000-2006 say the right things but they didn't deliver shit. Yet you don't hate them like you hate liberals.
I don't hate anyone. that is for you lefties to do. My position on smaller government and lower taxes has always been consistent. But you on the other hand are OK with spend happy, tax happy Democrats while you disapprove of spend happy, tax happy republicans. that is hypocrisy plain and simple. And for the umpteenth time, I did not vote for Bush either time he ran. i am not and have never been a member of the Republican party.

Quote:
The stop thinking that us liberals want to socialize the country and take away your guns. We don't. And stop thinking we are anti corporations just because they are anti labor. We gotta fight back when we are attacked. Its not that we hate them. They hate us. Is there any doubt the GOP considers us "the rabble"?
I don't remember ever saying those things to you. But you fail to realize that you can't be pro-jobs and anti-business.

Quote:
Just like you might not relate to the most radical right wingers, we don't relate to the radical lefties.
says you.

Quote:
Ron Paul was on AIR AMERICA last night and the host said, "if more conservatives were reasonable like you Dr. Paul, we might be able to work with them on common ground.

But the GOP branded the one honest guy in your party a lunitic. So what should that tell me about that party?
Think what you want about the GOP. I am not a member. I think we need a new third party movement which is why I have not voted for a republican or a democrat if there is another option.

Quote:
Glenn Beck rolled his eyes to Ron Paul when he interviewed him and Ron Paul didn't say anything wrong. And how come Rush doesn't interview Ron Paul? Because he doesn't want to piss off the Ron Paul fans in the party.
I don't watch beck, nor do I watch any other talking head stuffed shirt on the boob tube. Maybe you should start reading and forming your own opinions instead.

Quote:
You do realize that the GOP will never admit Ron Paul is right?
Once again, I don't give a flying fuck what the repudlican party does or does not do.

i will say that Ron Paul should leave the repudlicans. IMO he'd be a good candidate to spearhead a new party. Judd Gregg would be another good choice but we both know it ain't gonna happen.
__________________
“Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it.”

-George Bernard Shaw-
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:21 AM
Skull Pilot's Avatar
Trap or Die
Member #7407
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,544
Thanks: 69
Thanked 559 Times in 364 Posts
Rep Power: 101
Skull Pilot has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Skull Pilot View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post

It's just so damned laughable that not a single soul on this board will admit to ever supporting George W. Bush. George who? Sorry, folks, but the odds say that most of the "conservatives" who post here most certainly DID support him at one time. But it's not a happy place to be, so you pretend you were off somewhere else during his 8 years.
you're funny. believe it or not i am one of the most liberal people here in that I believe personal liberties and freedoms are of the utmost importance.

What Is Classical*Liberalism?

Quote:
People who call themselves classical liberals today tend to have the basic view of rights and role of government that Jefferson and his contemporaries had. Moreover, they do not tend to make any important distinction between economic liberties and civil liberties.
that any democrat can call themselves liberal is laughable
How so? I'm very much a Jefferson liberal, as is every other DEMOCRAT I know.

"The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government." ~~ Thomas Jefferson, March 31, 1809
All except for the economic freedom part
__________________
“Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it.”

-George Bernard Shaw-
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:35 AM
Mr. Forgot-it-All
Member #11278
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 16,820
Thanks: 1,071
Thanked 1,022 Times in 778 Posts
Rep Power: 161
editec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religion
editec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religion
Liberal is in the eye of the beholder.

18th century liberalism and 21st century liberalism are hardly the same thing.

Likewise, conservatism of this century and conservatism of precious ages aren't remotely the same.

These words have become mostly meaningless labels designed, now, mostly to divide us into oppossing camps.
Reply With Quote
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:38 AM
Registered User
Member #5262
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,379
Thanks: 463
Thanked 344 Times in 264 Posts
Rep Power: 54
Immanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddha
Immanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Immanuel View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Coloradomtnman View Post
Look. I'm a liberal. Obama, Reid, and Pelosi are left-leaning centrists. If someone has voted the way Obama, Reid, and Pelosi have, they aren't liberals; they're centrists.

Think of politics as a spectrum. Chomsky is a liberal, Nader is a liberal, the Green Party is liberal, but Democrats are not liberals. Democrats are centrists. Some Democrats voted for the Patriot Act for God's sakes! That isn't liberal. That's as right-wing as you can get from a liberal point of view. Anybody who doesn't immediately act to stop waterboarding isn't liberal. Anybody who supports clean coal isn't liberal. Anybody who maintains a military presence in Afghanistan isn't liberal. Anybody who bails out Wallstreet and the big national banks isn't liberal. If the spectrum goes from blue to red, then liberals are ultra-violet; anyone in the blue is just a liberalistic centrist with some right-wing tendencies.

I know that those of you who see politics from the right-side of the spectrum perceive centrists as liberals, but remember: you have to adjust for bias. Its called Kentucky windage.
Oh oh, here it comes. In a week, they will be calling them right wing nuts. Just watch!

Look, Bush was a flaming liberal, at least on spending and as for social policies, well, he sure wasn't my kind of conservative. We had every right to toss him your way... but, you ain't gonna pawn those three off on us! No way... no how!!!!

Immie
It's just so damned laughable that not a single soul on this board will admit to ever supporting George W. Bush. George who? Sorry, folks, but the odds say that most of the "conservatives" who post here most certainly DID support him at one time. But it's not a happy place to be, so you pretend you were off somewhere else during his 8 years.
I did support him and I have admitted it a thousand times. Where the hell have you been the last eight years?
I voted for him twice. The second time only because I did not like John Kerry because he was an elitist.

I began disliking George Bush's policy the moment he announced the no bid contract to Halliburton and things only went down hill from there.

Dispite all that, I have admitted so often and I still do that I voted for George Bush and no, it is not a happy place to be.

But, it is all the Democrats fault! If they had run a decent human being instead of an asshole in 2004, I would not have to admit to voting for Bush the second time around.

Immie
__________________
Here is to the end of the two tyrannical parties that control this country. Let's all raise our glasses to the thought of keeping this country free for all!

Last edited by Immanuel; 05-14-2009 at 06:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:58 AM
DiamondDave's Avatar
Army Vet
Member #11393
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,573
Thanks: 480
Thanked 379 Times in 275 Posts
Rep Power: 61
DiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddha
DiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by editec View Post
This semantics game continues, I see.

Extreme right wingers inform us that BUSH II is a liberal for christ's sake.

To them anyone who is not a brownshirt is a liberal.

So who cares if these totalitarians think they're liberals?

Liberals know they're not liberals.

Instead of getting hung up on labels, why not just fault these people for what they actually do?

I'll tell you why they don't.

Because that requires that these people actually pay attention to the facts and details of policies, and it's way more fun to just label people so they don't have to pay attention.

Face it, if they were really paying attention they'd know that these labels are meaningless.
No edit.... "not conservative" does not inherently mean liberal... Bush II was indeed further to the left than a 'true' conservative.. and was moderate/cooperating on a lot of things (especially financially)... but you won't ever hear me call him a liberal...

Obama and Pelosi on the other hand, are indeed very far left on the L-R political scale to fall into the 'liberal' scale (and quite a ways into it)

Oh... and I do fault those 2 plenty on what they actually do..
__________________
Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system).
http://obamaclock.org/
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:02 AM
Tech_Esq's Avatar
Thus Always to Tyrants!
Member #11434
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Washington, DC area
Posts: 3,321
Thanks: 133
Thanked 194 Times in 147 Posts
Rep Power: 34
Tech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the president
Tech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the presidentTech_Esq could be the president
Quote: Originally Posted by Coloradomtnman View Post
Look. I'm a liberal. Obama, Reid, and Pelosi are left-leaning centrists. If someone has voted the way Obama, Reid, and Pelosi have, they aren't liberals; they're centrists.

Think of politics as a spectrum. Chomsky is a liberal, Nader is a liberal, the Green Party is liberal, but Democrats are not liberals. Democrats are centrists. Some Democrats voted for the Patriot Act for God's sakes! That isn't liberal. That's as right-wing as you can get from a liberal point of view. Anybody who doesn't immediately act to stop waterboarding isn't liberal. Anybody who supports clean coal isn't liberal. Anybody who maintains a military presence in Afghanistan isn't liberal. Anybody who bails out Wallstreet and the big national banks isn't liberal. If the spectrum goes from blue to red, then liberals are ultra-violet; anyone in the blue is just a liberalistic centrist with some right-wing tendencies.

I know that those of you who see politics from the right-side of the spectrum perceive centrists as liberals, but remember: you have to adjust for bias. Its called Kentucky windage.
If you think the named people are centrist in any way shape or form, you don't understand where you fall in the political spectrum. Believe me, I majored in Poli Sci and I had a 3.9 GPA in those subject. If there's one thing I kinda have down at this point, it's the identification of political ideology.

The only way that you can say they are centrist is if you take every possible ideology in the world into account. In the context of US politics, they are practically falling off the scale to the left. If they are, in turn, to the right of you, you have the ideology of Che Guverra.
__________________
It isn't that Liberals don't know anything, they just know a lot that isn't so. -- Ronald Reagan

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. -- C.S. Lewis
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:02 AM
Hillbilly's Avatar
Registered User
Member #19373
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 132
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Rep Power: 1
Hillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school board
Why is it Bush's fault that no one else put a bid in against Halliburton? Should he have formed a company that can do what Halliburton does so that there would be two?
__________________
Sic semper Tea-rannis!!!
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:09 AM
Registered User
Member #5262
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,379
Thanks: 463
Thanked 344 Times in 264 Posts
Rep Power: 54
Immanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddha
Immanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Hillbilly View Post
Why is it Bush's fault that no one else put a bid in against Halliburton? Should he have formed a company that can do what Halliburton does so that there would be two?
It is not that no one else put a bid in. He didn't take bids. That is the problem.

Now, truthfully, people claim that Halliburton is the only corporation that could have done the job. If that is the case, then fine, put the contract out for bid and then choose Halliburton. They did not put the contract out for bid and there was a connection between the VP and Halliburton giving the entire thing the appearance of being a kickback. There was a conflict of interests involved and even if every 'I' was dotted and every 'T' crossed the whole thing just plain smelled.

It just plain smelled. But as I said, things definitely got worse from there.

Immie
__________________
Here is to the end of the two tyrannical parties that control this country. Let's all raise our glasses to the thought of keeping this country free for all!
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:18 AM
Beavis
Member #11281
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 12,475
Thanks: 1
Thanked 158 Times in 143 Posts
Rep Power: 0
sealybobo could be the presidentsealybobo could be the presidentsealybobo could be the president
sealybobo could be the president
Quote: Originally Posted by editec View Post
Liberal is in the eye of the beholder.

18th century liberalism and 21st century liberalism are hardly the same thing.

Likewise, conservatism of this century and conservatism of precious ages aren't remotely the same.

These words have become mostly meaningless labels designed, now, mostly to divide us into oppossing camps.
The dems throw us an occasional liberal bone, like they'll put a pro choice woman on the Supreme Court and give kids healthcare, but still healthcare, oilmen and bankers run washington.
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:18 AM
Hillbilly's Avatar
Registered User
Member #19373
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 132
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Rep Power: 1
Hillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school board
Quote: Originally Posted by Immanuel View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Hillbilly View Post
Why is it Bush's fault that no one else put a bid in against Halliburton? Should he have formed a company that can do what Halliburton does so that there would be two?
It is not that no one else put a bid in. He didn't take bids. That is the problem.

Now, truthfully, people claim that Halliburton is the only corporation that could have done the job. If that is the case, then fine, put the contract out for bid and then choose Halliburton. They did not put the contract out for bid and there was a connection between the VP and Halliburton giving the entire thing the appearance of being a kickback. There was a conflict of interests involved and even if every 'I' was dotted and every 'T' crossed the whole thing just plain smelled.

It just plain smelled. But as I said, things definitely got worse from there.

Immie
They did take bids. When they went to renew the contract they didn't bother as it was completely pointless. When the government actually does something logical we should all freak out, we should encourage them.
__________________
Sic semper Tea-rannis!!!
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:20 AM
GHook93's Avatar
Aristotle
Member #5035
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,544
Thanks: 417
Thanked 259 Times in 217 Posts
Rep Power: 52
GHook93 could be the buddhaGHook93 could be the buddhaGHook93 could be the buddha
GHook93 could be the buddhaGHook93 could be the buddhaGHook93 could be the buddhaGHook93 could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by editec View Post
This semantics game continues, I see.

Extreme right wingers inform us that BUSH II is a liberal for christ's sake.
Fiscally Bush II was very liberal!
__________________
The difference - Hamas/Hezbollah/Islamic Jihad/Al Qaeda/Kalam hide behind civilians using them as human shields and Israel stands in front of them protecting them like shields!

Help Win the Trade War with China, Japan, India and the 3rd World! Join the Fair Tax Coalition - Repeal the 16h Amendment! http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServ...name=about_faq

Anti-zionism morphs into anti-semitism 100% of the time!
"When people criticize Zionism, they mean Jews - this is God's own truth." - MLK Jr.

Beer, the problem and the solution to all of life's daily problems. - Homer Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:22 AM
Hillbilly's Avatar
Registered User
Member #19373
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 132
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Rep Power: 1
Hillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school boardHillbilly could be on a school board
Immanuel- do you see a conflict of interest between Obama giving $2 billion to Acorn and Obama spending government money to pay for windmills made by the same people who run the news networks, which all supported him?
__________________
Sic semper Tea-rannis!!!
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:47 AM
Registered User
Member #5262
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,379
Thanks: 463
Thanked 344 Times in 264 Posts
Rep Power: 54
Immanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddha
Immanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddhaImmanuel could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Hillbilly View Post
Immanuel- do you see a conflict of interest between Obama giving $2 billion to Acorn and Obama spending government money to pay for windmills made by the same people who run the news networks, which all supported him?
Absolutely, but I didn't vote for Obama and I only support him because he is the President of my country. I voted for and supported President Bush and through the eight years he lost my support. I did not vote for President Obama and have never "backed" his policies except to hope he succeeds. Since that is the case, President Obama did not lose my support.

I was angry that President Bush did not act like he promised. With President Obama, I can only hope that we make it through the next 3 1/2 years.

Immie
__________________
Here is to the end of the two tyrannical parties that control this country. Let's all raise our glasses to the thought of keeping this country free for all!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Politics

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

» Search Forums

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Apple iPad Forum
» Premium Sponsors
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Please visit these our friends at the following forums:
Photography Forum - Celebrity Gossip and News - Conceal Carry and Hand Gun Forum - Parrot Forum - iPhone News - iPhone Forums - Motorola Droid Forum


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management by RedTyger