 | | 
04-23-2009, 10:47 AM
|  | Super Moderator Member #4748 | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Maine
Posts: 10,413
Thanks: 593
Thanked 507 Times in 411 Posts
Rep Power: 189 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Sinatra
Quote: Originally Posted by Annie
Quote: Originally Posted by Skull Pilot Something just occurred to me and it has to do with the so called torture memos. and the resulting hullabaloo.
Now our "leaders" have known about this stuff for years, hell we all knew about it too. So why bring all this fanfare, controversy and speculation of prosecution to the forefront?
All this torture crap is a misdirection, a distraction from something that the Obama administration doesn't want us paying attention to. how much do you want to bet that the administration is trying to slip something by us? Like what's going on with financials? Lots going on, but it's all 'torture and investigate...' Links to WaPo and WSJ at site: Josh Gerstein's Blog: Was Freddie pressured to toe Obama line? - POLITICO.com Quote: April 23, 2009
Categories: Obama Administration
Was Freddie pressured to toe Obama line?
Both the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal are reporting that Freddie Mac's Chief Financial Officer, David Kellermann, who was found dead Wednesday in an apparent suicide, was involved in recent months in a heated dispute with Freddie's regulator over how to reflect costs of President Obama's anti-foreclosure program.
The Post said Kellermann and other Freddie officials "tussled" with the Federal Housing Finance Agency early last month as the company prepared to file a quarterly report with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Top executives, including Kellermann, were insistent that Freddie Mac inform shareholders of the cost to the company of helping carry out the Obama administration's housing recovery plan, the two newspapers reported. The Post, citing several unnamed sources, said the regulators "urged the company not to do so." An unnamed FHFA official who spoke to the Post disputed that, "saying the regulator did not oppose disclosure but how the information was portrayed in the filing."
In the end, FHFA reportedly retreated and Freddie formally disclosed that the Obama anti-foreclosure plan could force the firm, which is in a federal government conservatorship, to take a pre-tax charge of $30 billion.
While the Obama administration might not want to have the pricetag for its foreclosure efforts look too big, the reason regulators may have pressured Fannie to understate the cost of the program is pretty simple: both Obama and Geithner said publicly that it wouldn't have a material financial impact on Fannie or Freddie.
As Obama unveiled his foreclosure program at an event in Mesa, Ariz. on February 18, he said: "While Fannie and Freddie would receive less money in payments, this would be balanced out by a reduction in defaults and foreclosures."
And when Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner briefed reporters at the Mesa speech he said, in response to a question from POLITICO, that officials at Fannie and Freddie had concluded that the program to ease refinancing rules would actually benefit the firms' bottom lines.
“Fannie and Freddie believe that the program we announced--this refinancing program is economically sensible for them and will leave them overall in a better position going forward," Geithner said. The relevant part of the program allowed homeowners with Fannie and Freddie backed loans to refinance even if their loan represented more than 80% of the value of the home, as long as it did not exceed 105% of the home's value.
At the same briefing, Housing Secretary Shaun Donovan did say there would be a cost to Freddie and Fannie to modify some mortgages, but he said that cost would be covered by the federal TARP program.
That said, it's unclear to what degree FHFA would feel obligated to carry water for the Obama administration. FHFA Director James Lockhart had a high ranking post at the Social Security Administration under President Bush and was appointed by Bush in 2006 to head up Fannie and Freddie's regulator at the time, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.
and this: IBDeditorials.com: Editorials, Political Cartoons, and Polls from Investor's Business Daily -- Why Is Venture Capital Under Assault?
and this: GM Is Becoming a Royal Debacle - WSJ.com
and this: TARP Cops - Megan McArdle
I am not prone to conspiracy, but this amount of information does give pause.
And yesterday's suicide of the CFO just seems.......too convenient? The thing is, all of annie's info is out there in the media, it is not hidden or she would not have been able to post anything on it...so this is why I do not believe it is to "cover" what she is stating, because it is NOT being covered up....the info is out there.
the death of the guy from fannie mae is very concerning...I don't see any possible link to the government needing to rid themselves of him though and see this as nothing but extreme speculation....there would equally be a reason for Freddie owners to OUT him and i just can't go there.... other than for a second or two.
care | 
04-23-2009, 11:53 AM
|  | Registered User Member #401 | | Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 44,103
Thanks: 404
Thanked 534 Times in 417 Posts
Rep Power: 379 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Care4all
Quote: Originally Posted by Sinatra
Quote: Originally Posted by Annie
I am not prone to conspiracy, but this amount of information does give pause.
And yesterday's suicide of the CFO just seems.......too convenient? The thing is, all of annie's info is out there in the media, it is not hidden or she would not have been able to post anything on it...so this is why I do not believe it is to "cover" what she is stating, because it is NOT being covered up....the info is out there.
the death of the guy from fannie mae is very concerning...I don't see any possible link to the government needing to rid themselves of him though and see this as nothing but extreme speculation....there would equally be a reason for Freddie owners to OUT him and i just can't go there.... other than for a second or two.
care Actually Care, it's not all that easy to find, have to look for it, as if this change in banking nonsense isn't big news. These are not articles found on the front page. These are often in obscure publications and when in MSM, buried deep. It's not amusing.
__________________ "We are fighting today for our life, for our liberty, for our all, we cannot go on being led as we are. Somehow or other, we must get into the Government men who can match our enemies in fighting spirit, in daring, in resolution and in thirst for victory."~Leo Amery 1940, while staring at Chamberlain | 
04-23-2009, 12:24 PM
|  | Trap or Die Member #7407 | | Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,203
Thanks: 56
Thanked 507 Times in 331 Posts
Rep Power: 90 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by catzmeow
Quote: Originally Posted by Skull Pilot Now our "leaders" have known about this stuff for years, hell we all knew about it too. So why bring all this fanfare, controversy and speculation of prosecution to the forefront? Because it's only recently that it has become clear that Bush & Company signed off on these torture policies at the highest levels. IN fact, the buck stops on W's desk.
And, again, because it always seems to rear it's ugly head, I voted for him. Twice. Only became clear?
We knew it was going on so who do you think did sign off?
And I never voted for Bush. To use liberal logic; You voted for bush and Bush sucks so you suck too.
__________________ “Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it.” -George Bernard Shaw- | 
04-23-2009, 12:30 PM
|  | Administrator Member #2435 | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 36,358
Thanks: 35
Thanked 1,641 Times in 1,174 Posts
Rep Power: 646 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Skull Pilot Something just occurred to me and it has to do with the so called torture memos. and the resulting hullabaloo.
Now our "leaders" have known about this stuff for years, hell we all knew about it too. So why bring all this fanfare, controversy and speculation of prosecution to the forefront?
All this torture crap is a misdirection, a distraction from something that the Obama administration doesn't want us paying attention to. how much do you want to bet that the administration is trying to slip something by us? Yeah it is. Nothing but. | 
04-23-2009, 01:13 PM
| | The Truth is Hard to Find Member #18771 | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 640
Thanks: 87
Thanked 50 Times in 38 Posts
Rep Power: 5 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Skull Pilot Something just occurred to me and it has to do with the so called torture memos. and the resulting hullabaloo.
Now our "leaders" have known about this stuff for years, hell we all knew about it too. So why bring all this fanfare, controversy and speculation of prosecution to the forefront?
All this torture crap is a misdirection, a distraction from something that the Obama administration doesn't want us paying attention to. how much do you want to bet that the administration is trying to slip something by us? What I see is consituency politics and an increasingly irrelevant MSM needing story material. Anyone paying the slightest attention to political events in Washington knew all about the waterboarding. The whole thing is a load, but like many of the insipid things the politician-media run with, there is high potential to do harm. I doubt they care. | 
04-23-2009, 01:20 PM
| | The Truth is Hard to Find Member #18771 | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 640
Thanks: 87
Thanked 50 Times in 38 Posts
Rep Power: 5 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Annie
Quote: Originally Posted by Skull Pilot Something just occurred to me and it has to do with the so called torture memos. and the resulting hullabaloo.
Now our "leaders" have known about this stuff for years, hell we all knew about it too. So why bring all this fanfare, controversy and speculation of prosecution to the forefront?
All this torture crap is a misdirection, a distraction from something that the Obama administration doesn't want us paying attention to. how much do you want to bet that the administration is trying to slip something by us? Like what's going on with financials? Lots going on, but it's all 'torture and investigate...' Links to WaPo and WSJ at site: Josh Gerstein's Blog: Was Freddie pressured to toe Obama line? - POLITICO.com Quote: April 23, 2009
Categories: Obama Administration
Was Freddie pressured to toe Obama line?
Both the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal are reporting that Freddie Mac's Chief Financial Officer, David Kellermann, who was found dead Wednesday in an apparent suicide, was involved in recent months in a heated dispute with Freddie's regulator over how to reflect costs of President Obama's anti-foreclosure program.
The Post said Kellermann and other Freddie officials "tussled" with the Federal Housing Finance Agency early last month as the company prepared to file a quarterly report with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Top executives, including Kellermann, were insistent that Freddie Mac inform shareholders of the cost to the company of helping carry out the Obama administration's housing recovery plan, the two newspapers reported. The Post, citing several unnamed sources, said the regulators "urged the company not to do so." An unnamed FHFA official who spoke to the Post disputed that, "saying the regulator did not oppose disclosure but how the information was portrayed in the filing."
In the end, FHFA reportedly retreated and Freddie formally disclosed that the Obama anti-foreclosure plan could force the firm, which is in a federal government conservatorship, to take a pre-tax charge of $30 billion.
While the Obama administration might not want to have the pricetag for its foreclosure efforts look too big, the reason regulators may have pressured Fannie to understate the cost of the program is pretty simple: both Obama and Geithner said publicly that it wouldn't have a material financial impact on Fannie or Freddie.
As Obama unveiled his foreclosure program at an event in Mesa, Ariz. on February 18, he said: "While Fannie and Freddie would receive less money in payments, this would be balanced out by a reduction in defaults and foreclosures."
And when Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner briefed reporters at the Mesa speech he said, in response to a question from POLITICO, that officials at Fannie and Freddie had concluded that the program to ease refinancing rules would actually benefit the firms' bottom lines.
“Fannie and Freddie believe that the program we announced--this refinancing program is economically sensible for them and will leave them overall in a better position going forward," Geithner said. The relevant part of the program allowed homeowners with Fannie and Freddie backed loans to refinance even if their loan represented more than 80% of the value of the home, as long as it did not exceed 105% of the home's value.
At the same briefing, Housing Secretary Shaun Donovan did say there would be a cost to Freddie and Fannie to modify some mortgages, but he said that cost would be covered by the federal TARP program.
That said, it's unclear to what degree FHFA would feel obligated to carry water for the Obama administration. FHFA Director James Lockhart had a high ranking post at the Social Security Administration under President Bush and was appointed by Bush in 2006 to head up Fannie and Freddie's regulator at the time, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.
and this: IBDeditorials.com: Editorials, Political Cartoons, and Polls from Investor's Business Daily -- Why Is Venture Capital Under Assault?
and this: GM Is Becoming a Royal Debacle - WSJ.com
and this: TARP Cops - Megan McArdle Geither's statement and all from Gerstein sounds like Barney Frank redux. That these people continue to get away with this is perhaps one of the most alarming aspects with all the other alarming things about this economic situation. | 
04-23-2009, 01:20 PM
|  | Yes, I'm just kidding Member #11939 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 10,447
Thanks: 952
Thanked 952 Times in 662 Posts
Rep Power: 240 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Skull Pilot Something just occurred to me and it has to do with the so called torture memos. and the resulting hullabaloo.
Now our "leaders" have known about this stuff for years, hell we all knew about it too. So why bring all this fanfare, controversy and speculation of prosecution to the forefront?
All this torture crap is a misdirection, a distraction from something that the Obama administration doesn't want us paying attention to. how much do you want to bet that the administration is trying to slip something by us? I thought the exact same thing. Let's face it, Obama has been screwing up big-time since January. He's already getting flack for his embarrassing display on his overseas trips. Now he needs a diversion and he's got it. Who cares if he's thrown the CIA under the bus and made the US look like the bad guy... again.
__________________ Liberal activists are "f**king retarded." | 
04-23-2009, 01:23 PM
| | Registered User Member #18427 | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,297
Thanks: 334
Thanked 639 Times in 466 Posts
Rep Power: 54 | | Could the entire torture debate be a ruse to distract from the backdoor government take over of the banking industry? Why the move to convert to common stock? Yikes! OBAMA’S LEAP TO SOCIALISM at DickMorris.com | 
04-23-2009, 03:47 PM
|  | Different perspectives Member #18998 | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,430
Thanks: 399
Thanked 363 Times in 311 Posts
Rep Power: 51 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Skull Pilot Something just occurred to me and it has to do with the so called torture memos. and the resulting hullabaloo.
Now our "leaders" have known about this stuff for years, hell we all knew about it too. So why bring all this fanfare, controversy and speculation of prosecution to the forefront?
All this torture crap is a misdirection, a distraction from something that the Obama administration doesn't want us paying attention to. how much do you want to bet that the administration is trying to slip something by us? Yeah, he's probably secretly setting up those FEMA concentration camps. Hey, I saw it on the Internet so it must be true!!!
__________________ ***
Partisanship should be used to define issues;
bipartisanship to resolve them. | 
04-23-2009, 03:50 PM
|  | European American Member #11947 | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 20,892
Thanks: 1,521
Thanked 1,159 Times in 883 Posts
Rep Power: 195 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by strollingbones there was a wee bit more than sleep deprivation..and no i am not saying it compares with the killing of 6 million jews/poles/gypsies....but all "crimes" by previous admins should be investigated..to say that the current admin is using the sins of the past to cover their own is a bit much...but it could be reality
and you will of course approve of punishment, incarceration and impeachment of every single solitary congresscritter who knew about it, approved it, and said nothing?? even if that includes the obamalama?? welldoyahuh? | 
04-23-2009, 04:24 PM
|  | Different perspectives Member #18998 | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,430
Thanks: 399
Thanked 363 Times in 311 Posts
Rep Power: 51 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae
Quote: Originally Posted by Skull Pilot Something just occurred to me and it has to do with the so called torture memos. and the resulting hullabaloo.
Now our "leaders" have known about this stuff for years, hell we all knew about it too. So why bring all this fanfare, controversy and speculation of prosecution to the forefront?
All this torture crap is a misdirection, a distraction from something that the Obama administration doesn't want us paying attention to. how much do you want to bet that the administration is trying to slip something by us? Yeah, he's probably secretly setting up those FEMA concentration camps. Hey, I saw it on the Internet so it must be true!!! Seriously -- Pat Leahy, et al., have been determined to thoroughly investigate "crimes" of the Bush Administration. I think Obama himself seriously wants to avoid that. He's got enough on his plate. But to appease both the far left and the moderates, and hopefully even the right, he made the decision to at least publish the fact that under the Bush Administration, they had set up possible (NOTE I SAY 'POSSIBLE') illegal justification for the kind of torture not allowed by the Geneva Conventions and against our own time-honored reputation.
Well...you don't piss off Dick Cheney.
He couldn't leave it at that, but opened a can of worms that now actually may backfire on him. The whole country is once again in an upheaval over this debate at a time when it's (a) history and (b) unimportant in the greater scheme of things because THIS president has clearly stated WE WILL NO LONGER TORTURE.
So perhaps if there's a secret mission, it's one that Cheney has orchestrated by poking around an old hornet's nest. Perhaps his rationale is to create suspicion as to Obama's motives, hoping something will dramatically send his (Obama's) popularity spiraling downward.
Who knows? But if a full-fledged investigation occurs, you can be sure it won't cast a shining light on Dick Cheney. Just the opposite. It won't be just about the torture issue, but all of it.
__________________ ***
Partisanship should be used to define issues;
bipartisanship to resolve them. | 
04-23-2009, 04:31 PM
|  | Ready to Rock n' Roll Member #18957 | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 415
Thanks: 20
Thanked 31 Times in 21 Posts
Rep Power: 3 | | | You aren't seeing the entire picture, you are so focussed on just one tiny part.
Think bigger.
Obama is obviously trying to take take over the psuedoconspiracy airwaves and then he will
turn all the Obama hating Tin Foil hatters into his zombie love slaves.
Its gonna happen. You guys are gonna be so screwed and will be smiling.
__________________ from the veranda, Magens Bay | 
04-23-2009, 04:32 PM
|  | Different perspectives Member #18998 | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,430
Thanks: 399
Thanked 363 Times in 311 Posts
Rep Power: 51 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Annie
Quote: Originally Posted by Care4all
Quote: Originally Posted by Sinatra
I am not prone to conspiracy, but this amount of information does give pause.
And yesterday's suicide of the CFO just seems.......too convenient? The thing is, all of annie's info is out there in the media, it is not hidden or she would not have been able to post anything on it...so this is why I do not believe it is to "cover" what she is stating, because it is NOT being covered up....the info is out there.
the death of the guy from fannie mae is very concerning...I don't see any possible link to the government needing to rid themselves of him though and see this as nothing but extreme speculation....there would equally be a reason for Freddie owners to OUT him and i just can't go there.... other than for a second or two.
care Actually Care, it's not all that easy to find, have to look for it, as if this change in banking nonsense isn't big news. These are not articles found on the front page. These are often in obscure publications and when in MSM, buried deep. It's not amusing. Politico is hardly obscure. That said, for one thing, the myriad tentacles reaching up, over, under, and around each other concerning the financial debacles is so convoluted, there are very few members of the reading public (diminishing all the time, btw) who can even begin to understand it all, me included.
__________________ ***
Partisanship should be used to define issues;
bipartisanship to resolve them. | 
04-23-2009, 04:33 PM
|  | Ready to Rock n' Roll Member #18957 | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 415
Thanks: 20
Thanked 31 Times in 21 Posts
Rep Power: 3 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Sinatra Could the entire torture debate be a ruse to distract from the backdoor government take over of the banking industry? Why the move to convert to common stock? Yikes! OBAMA’S LEAP TO SOCIALISM at DickMorris.com Right. It never even existed. Never happened.
Its all made up.
So that Obama can take over banks.
Take another toke, clear you mind, Frank baby .
__________________ from the veranda, Magens Bay | 
04-23-2009, 04:34 PM
|  | Different perspectives Member #18998 | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,430
Thanks: 399
Thanked 363 Times in 311 Posts
Rep Power: 51 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1
Quote: Originally Posted by Skull Pilot Something just occurred to me and it has to do with the so called torture memos. and the resulting hullabaloo.
Now our "leaders" have known about this stuff for years, hell we all knew about it too. So why bring all this fanfare, controversy and speculation of prosecution to the forefront?
All this torture crap is a misdirection, a distraction from something that the Obama administration doesn't want us paying attention to. how much do you want to bet that the administration is trying to slip something by us? I thought the exact same thing. Let's face it, Obama has been screwing up big-time since January. He's already getting flack for his embarrassing display on his overseas trips. Now he needs a diversion and he's got it. Who cares if he's thrown the CIA under the bus and made the US look like the bad guy... again. Flack from whom? The right-wing blogosphere? Fox?
__________________ ***
Partisanship should be used to define issues;
bipartisanship to resolve them. |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |