US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Why aren't the gun-banners upset over 1.2 million deaths - A YEAR???

This is a discussion on Why aren't the gun-banners upset over 1.2 million deaths - A YEAR??? within the Politics forums, part of the US Discussion category; I’m Norma McCorvey, the former Jane Roe of the Roe vs. Wade decision that brought ‘legal’ child killing to America. “I was persuaded by feminist ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Politics

Politics Discuss government policies and candidates...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 08:13 PM
Registered User
Member #32646
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,225
Thanks: 503
Thanked 1,616 Times in 1,172 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1270
healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court
healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court
Why aren't the gun-banners upset over 1.2 million deaths - A YEAR???

I’m Norma McCorvey, the former Jane Roe of the Roe vs. Wade decision that brought ‘legal’ child killing to America.

“I was persuaded by feminist attorneys to lie; to say that I was raped, and needed an abortion.

It was all a lie.

“Since then, over 50 million babies have been murdered. I will take this burden to my grave.

“Please, don’t follow in my mistakes. DO NOT vote for Barack Obama. He murders babies.”

LifeSiteNews Mobile | ?Jane Roe? of Roe v. Wade airs anti-Obama ad in Florida
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to healthmyths For This Useful Post:
Doc91678 (01-15-2013)
Sponsored Links
USMessageBoard.com is the premier Political Forum Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 08:15 PM
Registered User
Member #32646
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,225
Thanks: 503
Thanked 1,616 Times in 1,172 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1270
healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court
healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court
And now Obama the baby killer President... is going to be impeached because he is a dictator in waiting....

“The President’s actions are an existential threat to this nation,” reads a statement by Rep. Steve Stockman. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms is what has kept this nation free and secure for over 200 years. The very purpose of the Second Amendment is to stop the government from disallowing people the means to defend themselves against tyranny. Any proposal to abuse executive power and infringe upon gun rights must be repelled with the stiffest legislative force possible.”
- He has aided America’s enemies, violating his oath, by sending funds to insurgents in Syria who are being commanded by Al-Qaeda terrorists.
- He has violated federal law by overseeing a cover-up surrounding Operation Fast and Furious, the transfer of guns to Mexican drug cartels direct from the federal government.
- He has lied to the American people by overseeing a cover-up of the Benghazi attack which directly led to the deaths of four American citizens. The cover-up has been called “Obama’s Watergate,” yet four months after the incident, no one in the administration has been held accountable.
- He has brazenly undermined the power of Congress by insisting his authority came from the United Nations Security Council prior to the attack on Libya and that Congressional approval was not necessary. “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question,” said Obama. This is an act that “constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution,” according to Congressman Walter Jones.
- He has ignored Congressional rejection of the cybersecurity bill and instead indicated he will pursue an unconstitutional executive order.
- He has signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act which includes provisions that permit the abduction and military detention without trial of U.S. citizens, violating Habeas Corpus. Despite Obama claiming he would not use the provisions to incarcerate U.S. citizens, it was his administration that specifically demanded these powers be included in the final NDAA bill.
- He has enacted universal health care mandates that force Americans to buy health insurance, a clear violation of the Constitution in exceeding congressional power to regulate interstate commerce. Obama has also handed outpreferential waivers to corporations friendly to his administration.
- He has declared war on America’s coal industry by promising to bankrupt any company that attempts to build a new coal plant while using unconstitutional EPA regulations to strangle competition, ensuring Americans see their energy costs rise year after year.
- He has violated the Constitution’s Takings and Due Process Clauses when he bullied the secured creditors of automaker Chrysler into accepting 30 cents on the dollar while politically connected labor unions and preferential others received better deals.
- He has violated Article II of the Constitution by using signing statements as part of his executive usurpation of power.

» Citizens File Articles of Impeachment Against Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 08:21 PM
Luddly Neddite's Avatar
Registered User
Member #32558
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,419
Thanks: 8,794
Thanked 6,965 Times in 4,919 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Who wants to ban guns?

Be specific. Post a link. PROVE who wants to ban guns?
__________________
Don't confuse my personality with my attitude. My personality is who I am. My attitude depends on who you are. ~~ Frank Ocean

Advice to right wingers: Memorize the first five words of the First Amendment.

"Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives." ~~ John Stuart Mill

If you want to live like a Republican, vote like a Democrat.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 08:30 PM
tyroneweaver's Avatar
Registered User
Member #35873
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,628
Thanks: 0
Thanked 680 Times in 473 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 565
tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet tyroneweaver is faster than a speeding bullet
every anti gunner on this forum is an abortion nutter
__________________
License to kill gophers by the government of the United Nations. Man, free to kill gophers at will. To kill, you must know your enemy, and in this case my enemy is a varmint. And a varmint will never quit - ever. They're like the Viet Cong - Varmint Cong. So you have to fall back on superior intelligence and superior firepower. Carl Spackler

In 1966 (this statement was made over 45 years ago) while serving as an apostle, Howard W. Hunter said this:
“The government will take from the “haves” and give to the “have nots.” [When this happens] Both have lost their freedom. Those who “have,” lost their freedom to give voluntarily of their own free will and in the way they desire. Those who “have not”, lost their freedom because they did not earn what they received. They got “something for nothing,” and they will neither appreciate the gift nor the giver of the gift”.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tyroneweaver For This Useful Post:
Doc91678 (01-15-2013)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 08:31 PM
Banned
Member #41087
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Binghamton
Posts: 753
Thanks: 759
Thanked 240 Times in 167 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
Doc91678 could be a Congressman Doc91678 could be a Congressman Doc91678 could be a Congressman Doc91678 could be a Congressman Doc91678 could be a Congressman Doc91678 could be a Congressman Doc91678 could be a Congressman Doc91678 could be a Congressman Doc91678 could be a Congressman Doc91678 could be a Congressman
Quote: Originally Posted by luddly.neddite View Post
Who wants to ban guns?

Be specific. Post a link. PROVE who wants to ban guns?
So when does the confiscation begin? I notice you ignored the original postng. Why is that?
The simple fact that Stalin, Hitler, and Mao Zedong have caused millions of deaths by starvation and murder has nothing on the Progressive Socialist Americans that have killed 50 million plus unborn in this nation.

Last edited by Doc91678; 01-15-2013 at 10:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 08:33 PM
Agnostic Prognosticator
Member #41619
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 96
Thanks: 13
Thanked 37 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 19
neomalthusian could own USMB neomalthusian could own USMB neomalthusian could own USMB neomalthusian could own USMB neomalthusian could own USMB neomalthusian could own USMB
Putting gun control and abortion together in a single thread is a partisan hack's wet dream.

Now if you can only somehow figure out a way to integrate gay marriage and pot legalization into this, you'll really send them over the top.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 08:36 PM
BallsBrunswick's Avatar
Fair and Balanced
Member #39890
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,655
Thanks: 676
Thanked 1,012 Times in 632 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 332
BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness BallsBrunswick may be on a path to greatness
This thread is retarded.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 08:39 PM
Registered User
Member #32646
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,225
Thanks: 503
Thanked 1,616 Times in 1,172 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1270
healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court
healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court
Quote: Originally Posted by neomalthusian View Post
Putting gun control and abortion together in a single thread is a partisan hack's wet dream.

Now if you can only somehow figure out a way to integrate gay marriage and pot legalization into this, you'll really send them over the top.
I' m just trying to understand why as Roe of Roe VS WADE says the killing of 50 million babies IS NOT important..
BUT when 88 people in one year get shot by crazy people you crazy people that favor killing babies want to BAN an inanimate object?

It makes absolutely no sense! YOU crazy people murder 50 million babies YET BLAME a GUN and therefore there should be NO GUNS!!!

DO you people know how absolutely crazy that sounds to intelligent life?

Instead of punishing the few the crazy people that help murder the 50 million want ALL of us to be punished!

Makes no sense!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 08:45 PM
Agnostic Prognosticator
Member #41619
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 96
Thanks: 13
Thanked 37 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 19
neomalthusian could own USMB neomalthusian could own USMB neomalthusian could own USMB neomalthusian could own USMB neomalthusian could own USMB neomalthusian could own USMB
Quote: Originally Posted by healthmyths View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by neomalthusian View Post
Putting gun control and abortion together in a single thread is a partisan hack's wet dream.

Now if you can only somehow figure out a way to integrate gay marriage and pot legalization into this, you'll really send them over the top.
I' m just trying to understand why as Roe of Roe VS WADE says the killing of 50 million babies IS NOT important..
BUT when 88 people in one year get shot by crazy people you crazy people that favor killing babies want to BAN an inanimate object?

It makes absolutely no sense! YOU crazy people murder 50 million babies YET BLAME a GUN and therefore there should be NO GUNS!!!

DO you people know how absolutely crazy that sounds to intelligent life?

Instead of punishing the few the crazy people that help murder the 50 million want ALL of us to be punished!

Makes no sense!
Gun control doesn't have to be contrasted with a moral/ethical dilemma like abortion in order to reveal how little sense it makes. It makes no sense because it makes no sense. Abortion is a different issue entirely. Somewhere around half the country does not consider abortion to be a murder/death, because they do not consider a fetus to meet the legal definition of a person. I'm sure there are other variations of the argument that I don't in fact care to argue, but nonetheless the issue by itself is so complicated and the factors and definitions involved so distinct from the gun control issue that it doesn't make sense to package together.

:two cents:
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to neomalthusian For This Useful Post:
BallsBrunswick (01-15-2013)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 08:55 PM
asaratis's Avatar
Supporting Member
Member #19762
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,884
Thanks: 2,131
Thanked 2,787 Times in 1,800 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3167
asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute
asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by luddly.neddite View Post
Who wants to ban guns?

Be specific. Post a link. PROVE who wants to ban guns?
Nobody...yet! Apparently, you do not understand the meaning of "shall not be infringed".

Work on that. Then get back to me.
__________________
He that does not thank the guards is destined to die in his sleep at the hands of the enemy!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 09:02 PM
Registered User
Member #32646
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,225
Thanks: 503
Thanked 1,616 Times in 1,172 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1270
healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court
healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court
Quote: Originally Posted by neomalthusian View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by healthmyths View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by neomalthusian View Post
Putting gun control and abortion together in a single thread is a partisan hack's wet dream.

Now if you can only somehow figure out a way to integrate gay marriage and pot legalization into this, you'll really send them over the top.
I' m just trying to understand why as Roe of Roe VS WADE says the killing of 50 million babies IS NOT important..
BUT when 88 people in one year get shot by crazy people you crazy people that favor killing babies want to BAN an inanimate object?

It makes absolutely no sense! YOU crazy people murder 50 million babies YET BLAME a GUN and therefore there should be NO GUNS!!!

DO you people know how absolutely crazy that sounds to intelligent life?

Instead of punishing the few the crazy people that help murder the 50 million want ALL of us to be punished!

Makes no sense!
Gun control doesn't have to be contrasted with a moral/ethical dilemma like abortion in order to reveal how little sense it makes. It makes no sense because it makes no sense. Abortion is a different issue entirely. Somewhere around half the country does not consider abortion to be a murder/death, because they do not consider a fetus to meet the legal definition of a person. I'm sure there are other variations of the argument that I don't in fact care to argue, but nonetheless the issue by itself is so complicated and the factors and definitions involved so distinct from the gun control issue that it doesn't make sense to package together.

:two cents:
Explain why 88 deaths in 2012 from PEOPLE not the devices PEOPLE THAT shot people is MORE important to take away a basic Constitutional RIGHT
while it is a "Constitutional RIGHT" to murder 1.2 million babies a year???

If you don't see the moral equivalency you are an immoral person!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 09:04 PM
Mr Clean's Avatar
Registered User
Member #20594
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,653
Thanks: 2,669
Thanked 3,351 Times in 2,175 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1696
Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute
Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute
One has nothing to do with the other.
__________________
Who gives a shit.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mr Clean For This Useful Post:
BallsBrunswick (01-15-2013), Luddly Neddite (01-15-2013)
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 09:11 PM
Luddly Neddite's Avatar
Registered User
Member #32558
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,419
Thanks: 8,794
Thanked 6,965 Times in 4,919 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote: Originally Posted by asaratis View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by luddly.neddite View Post
Who wants to ban guns?

Be specific. Post a link. PROVE who wants to ban guns?
Nobody...yet! Apparently, you do not understand the meaning of "shall not be infringed".

Work on that. Then get back to me.
Stop the chicken little crap.

He said "gun banners".

WHO has said they want to ban guns? WHO are the "gun banners"?

This isn't rocket surgery. All he has to do is answer the question.

Or, explain why he used that terminology - especially for the title of a thread that has nothing to do with guns.

(As if we don't know its just another dog whistle for the nutters.)
__________________
Don't confuse my personality with my attitude. My personality is who I am. My attitude depends on who you are. ~~ Frank Ocean

Advice to right wingers: Memorize the first five words of the First Amendment.

"Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives." ~~ John Stuart Mill

If you want to live like a Republican, vote like a Democrat.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Luddly Neddite For This Useful Post:
BallsBrunswick (01-15-2013)
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 09:28 PM
Registered User
Member #32646
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,225
Thanks: 503
Thanked 1,616 Times in 1,172 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1270
healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court
healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court healthmyths could be on the Supreme Court
Quote: Originally Posted by luddly.neddite View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by asaratis View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by luddly.neddite View Post
Who wants to ban guns?

Be specific. Post a link. PROVE who wants to ban guns?
Nobody...yet! Apparently, you do not understand the meaning of "shall not be infringed".

Work on that. Then get back to me.
Stop the chicken little crap.

He said "gun banners".

WHO has said they want to ban guns? WHO are the "gun banners"?

This isn't rocket surgery. All he has to do is answer the question.

Or, explain why he used that terminology - especially for the title of a thread that has nothing to do with guns.

(As if we don't know its just another dog whistle for the nutters.)

n a 1995 broadcast of CBS’ 60 Minutes, Feinstein made the obvious admission saying she would love to have instituted an “outright ban” on all guns.

Feinstein was the driving force to the failed and now lapsed, 1994 “assault weapons” ban and it was upon her success at getting the law passed that she made her admission.
Reminder: Sen. Feinstein Said She Wants All Guns Banned | Right Wing News

gunbanned.jpg

My next door neighbor wants to ban all guns
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 09:34 PM
asaratis's Avatar
Supporting Member
Member #19762
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,884
Thanks: 2,131
Thanked 2,787 Times in 1,800 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3167
asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute
asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute asaratis has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by asaratis View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by luddly.neddite View Post
Who wants to ban guns?

Be specific. Post a link. PROVE who wants to ban guns?
Nobody...yet! Apparently, you do not understand the meaning of "shall not be infringed".

Work on that. Then get back to me.
Here. I'll make it simpler for you.

infringed past participle, past tense of in·fringe (Verb)
Verb

Actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.): "infringe a copyright".
Act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on: "infringe on his privacy".
__________________
He that does not thank the guards is destined to die in his sleep at the hands of the enemy!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Politics
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.