![]() | |
This is a discussion on The only proper purpose of a government within the Politics forums, part of the US Discussion category; Quote: Originally Posted by Oddball Quote: Originally Posted by g5000 Quote: Originally Posted by bripat9643 What evidence do you have that the FDA improved food ...
| |||||||
| Politics Discuss government policies and candidates... |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links |
|
USMessageBoard.com is the premier Political Forum Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
| ||||
| "; the army, to protect you from foreign invaders; and the courts, to protect your property and contracts from breach or fraud by others, to settle disputes by rational rules, according to objective law. But a government that initiates the employment of force against men who had forced no one, the employment of armed compulsion against disarmed victims, is a nightmare infernal machine designed to annihilate morality: such a government reverses its only moral purpose and switches from the role of protector to the role of man’s deadliest enemy, from the role of policeman to the role of a criminal vested with The only proper purpose of a government is to protect man’s rights, which means: to protect him from physical violence. A proper government is only a policeman, acting as an agent of man’s self-defense, and, as such, may resort to force only against those who start the use of force. The only proper functions of a government are: the police, to protect you from criminalsthe right to the wielding of violence against victims deprived of the right of self-defense. Such a government substitutes for morality the following rule of social conduct: you may do whatever you please to your neighbor, provided your gang is bigger than his"-Ayn Rand Good on you to quote a supporter of Tsarist Russia.
__________________ It really is that simple. |
| ||||
| That all sounds great, and a large part of me agrees. However, Ayn Rand's brand of libertarianism (or if you wish, her godless Objectivism) is one which takes no preventive measures whatsoever. For example, the regulation of our food and drugs. Rand's minions are silent about doing anything preventive before you take food or medicine into your body, and only punishes the wicked after they have killed you with their poison for profit. As if the fear of punishment will stop evildoers. This is an attitude which is the epitome of gullibility and suffers from a profound ignorance of human nature and history. ![]()
__________________ Why nationalize industry when you can nationalize the people? -- Adolph Hitler |
| ||||
| "The only proper purpose of a government is to protect man’s rights, which means: to protect him from physical violence. A proper government is only a policeman, acting as an agent of man’s self-defense, and, as such, may resort to force only against those who start the use of force. The only proper functions of a government are: the police, to protect you from criminals; the army, to protect you from foreign invaders; and the courts, to protect your property and contracts from breach or fraud by others, to settle disputes by rational rules, according to objective law. But a government that initiates the employment of force against men who had forced no one, the employment of armed compulsion against disarmed victims, is a nightmare infernal machine designed to annihilate morality: such a government reverses its only moral purpose and switches from the role of protector to the role of man’s deadliest enemy, from the role of policeman to the role of a criminal vested with the right to the wielding of violence against victims deprived of the right of self-defense. Such a government substitutes for morality the following rule of social conduct: you may do whatever you please to your neighbor, provided your gang is bigger than his"-Ayn Rand Now go take it away from them. ![]() What will happen is the eventual destruction of the Republic. Nothing can stop that now.
__________________ Why nationalize industry when you can nationalize the people? -- Adolph Hitler |
| ||||
| "The only proper purpose of a government is to protect man’s rights, which means: to protect him from physical violence. A proper government is only a policeman, acting as an agent of man’s self-defense, and, as such, may resort to force only against those who start the use of force. The only proper functions of a government are: the police, to protect you from criminals; the army, to protect you from foreign invaders; and the courts, to protect your property and contracts from breach or fraud by others, to settle disputes by rational rules, according to objective law. But a government that initiates the employment of force against men who had forced no one, the employment of armed compulsion against disarmed victims, is a nightmare infernal machine designed to annihilate morality: such a government reverses its only moral purpose and switches from the role of protector to the role of man’s deadliest enemy, from the role of policeman to the role of a criminal vested with the right to the wielding of violence against victims deprived of the right of self-defense. Such a government substitutes for morality the following rule of social conduct: you may do whatever you please to your neighbor, provided your gang is bigger than his"-Ayn Rand Now go take it away from them. ![]() What will happen is the eventual destruction of the Republic. Nothing can stop that now. Nature doesn't recognize any "rights". Rights come from human notions.
__________________ It really is that simple. |
| |||
| Atlas Shrugged and the Lord of the Rings are two of my favorite books. One creates a fastasy land where larger than life heros wage epic battles against mythological evil and has ensnared many a young man into a perpetual state of arrested development. The other one has orcs. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to nodoginnafight For This Useful Post: | ||
Sallow (01-03-2013) | ||
| ||||
| Yeah, I've heard that meme many times. Libertarians like to conjure up the image of the fat heart disease patient who died while waiting for the miracle cure which the FDA was holding up. But they can never provide the number of drugs which are denied by the FDA as being too dangerous for human consumption, and thus saving countless lives. Hmmm... NEWP!....That one gets kicked back to the pharm companies. And asswipe lolberals have the nerve to snivel about the high costs of prescription medications. And what of Vioxx?...Thalidimide?...Their standing in the way of the mainstream use of aspirin for AMI patients? How much pain and suffering and unnecessary deaths are enough for you callous and ghoulish worshipers of Big Daddy Big Gummint? |
| |||
| Caveat Emptor ??? No thanks. Good way to crash the economy. Lot of folks here need a refresher on History 101. |
| ||||
| Good way to completely marginalize your input on the matter. Looks like you need a refresher in logic 101. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Oddball For This Useful Post: | ||
kwc57 (01-03-2013) | ||
| ||||
| Food quality, drug safety. You really need this explained to you? United States Army beef scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The scandal you refer to involved the United States Army, another branch of government. So I fail to see what relevance it has to marketing food in the private market. Cough Syrup, Dead Children, and the Case for Regulation | Speakeasy Science
__________________ A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." -- Stephen Crane |
| |||
| That's EXACTLY what you are proposing. (regardless of cutesy emoticons). How often do you see people resort to personal insults and emoticons when they have no real counter-argument? Last edited by nodoginnafight; 01-03-2013 at 08:46 AM. |
| ||||
| Bear in mind that getting new drugs or med-devices to trials, much less onto the market, in the US, is more difficult than anywhere else on planet earth, by orders of magnitude. And before going off on govmint regulation gettin' in the way, we're talking about Big Pharma, who pretty-much get anything they want, even Medicare not being allowed to bid on their products; they vitually own FDA not to mention the folks on Capitol Hill and Penn Ave. So the cost of drugs, here, are higher than anywhere else in the world, making the US the bulk of Big Pharma's profit. So what the burdensome regulation accomplishes, to the delight of Big Pharma, is that smaller players (new biotech startups) simply cannot raise the venture capital needed to penetrate the US market. Instead what the startups do is get into trials in Europe, China and South America, and prove market viability there, at which time the start up is aquired by Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Glaxo SK, etc, who have the bucks and inroads to get it into the US market and cut a fat hog with it.
__________________ 01010111 01101000 01100101 01110111 00100001 |
| ||||
| That's EXACTLY what you are proposing. (regardless of cutesy emoticons). How often do you see people resort to personal insults and emoticons when they have no real counter-argument? The FDA could very handily be replaced by outfits like Underwriter's Laboratories or an entirely new private testing operation. One of the big problems with the mindset of the lolberal central planner mindset is the completely preposterous noting that if Big Daddy Big Gubmint didn't do X, Y or Z, then nobody would do it. |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Oddball For This Useful Post: | ||
bripat9643 (01-03-2013), kwc57 (01-03-2013) | ||
| ||||
| You fools are advocating a return to the days of the utterly corrupt guild system which was guilty of the very things of which you accuse the federal regulatory system.
__________________ . We have so many people who can't see a fat man standing beside a thin one without coming to the conclusion the fat man got that way by taking advantage of the thin one. - Ronald Reagan Any time you and I question the schemes of the do-gooders, we're denounced as being against their humanitarian goals. They say we're always against things, we're never for anything. The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so. - Ronald Reagan |
![]() |
Lower Navigation
| ||||||
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|