We are approaching 2 years since the Fast and Furious controversy. The right was criticized for staging a witch hunt and were told by the left to sit back and let the investigation come to a completion so all the facts will come out.

Have any facts yet?

The only facts I know of so far are the following:

1) The US government was smuggling arms acrss the border of an ally and selling those guns to the enemy of that ally without the ally government being aware.

2) When a country sells guns to the enemy of another country, it is deemed as an act of war against that country. (trhe Mexican government declared the drug cartels of Mexico enemies of the Mexican Government several years ago)

3) The President of the United States claimed to have known nothing about the fact that we were committing an act of war against an ally.

4) The attorney General claimed that he was a very busy man and therefore could not be aware of all operations...and therefore was not aware of the fact that the united states was engaged in an operation that can be deemed an act of war against an ally.

5) To this day, no one has released the name of the individual who deemed it not important to inform the attorney general that the US goivernment was engaged in an operation that can be deemed an act of war against an ally.

and then, of course, I have this question....

If an operation that can be deemed an act of war against an ally is not important enough for the AG to know about...what operations WOULD be deemed important enough?

And finally...

The GOP was called out for staging a witch hunt becuase they wanted to know how this happened.

And the democratic party mambers of congress made it clear that they had no interest in finding out how it happened.

Perhaps one reason you don't hear any democrats asking about what happened is you don't listen very hard. Another reason might be that if there was a rational, mature inquiry by the republicans one could hear people talk but as the it is all anyone hears is, "OBAMA COVERUP", "THEY LET THEM DIE", "RICE", "RICE", "RICE".

Please list the lies and consiracy theories that you're talking about I"m confused.

So anything coming out of the WH is the truth huh??

Plenty of facts out there right now. Rice did as she was told and lied her ass off about some video no one heard about or saw.

The CIA said it was AQ and some anonymous someone in the administration changed the facts. The administration blamed it on a video. Facts one and all.

If you can't see blatant hypocrisy here, you are blind as hell.

I'm sorry, I thought this was the hundreth or so thread on Benghazi, not Fast and Furious which was another failed witch hunt by the right.

All you have to do is open the hundred or more threads on this to find them but I'll list a couple for you.

1) Obama watched while it went down.

2) The administration covered up the fact AQ was involved so that they didn't look weak on terror before an election.

There are more, but that's a start and I've seen no verifiable proof of either of the above.

Want to provide some links to those democrats trying to find out what happened in Benghazi?

Not only that but there's been embassy attacks under virtually every American President since the beginning of the 20th century. This stuff happens and there's actually been less attacks on embassies under Obama than under Bush or Clinton. Yes it's a tragedy and yes we need to know what happened. But once it got thrown in the right wing spin machine, the majority of the country just tuned out.

I'm sorry, I thought this was the hundreth or so thread on Benghazi, not Fast and Furious which was another failed witch hunt by the right.

Perhaps one reason you don't hear any democrats asking about what happened is you don't listen very hard. Another reason might be that if there was a rational, mature inquiry by the republicans one could hear people talk but as the it is all anyone hears is, "OBAMA COVERUP", "THEY LET THEM DIE", "RICE", "RICE", "RICE".

If you really DON'T think that the Obama Administration covered up the fact that Al Queda was involved in the Benghazi attacks so they didn't look weak on terror right before an election...then I find you to be one VERY naive poster.

Really?

You sure of that?

The same thing happened with Fast and Furious...the right wanted answers and the left said it was a witch hunt. The right asked the left why they dont want answers and the left said we will get them through the investigation.

OK....2 years later.....any answers?

You're kidding me right? You're not serious are you? The post before this you put someone on your ignore list for bringing up fast and furious and then you throw fast and furious at me?

Wow...what a pathetic attempt at a defloection....

Now I will toss a little logic at you...as well as a lesson in debating....

Seeing as you and that other loser continue to talk about this as a witch hunt, it would only make sense to use a situation where the same argument was used as a means to enagge in the debate. Since you continually respond with "witch hunt" and other accusations...my only choice is to cite a similar situation. It is known as engaging in a debate...what this forum is for.

So that being said....in 2 years, have we yet received any answers from fast and furious?

And since we havent, what makes you think we will recieve answers with this situation?

Perhaps one reason you don't hear any democrats asking about what happened is you don't listen very hard. Another reason might be that if there was a rational, mature inquiry by the republicans one could hear people talk but as the it is all anyone hears is, "OBAMA COVERUP", "THEY LET THEM DIE", "RICE", "RICE", "RICE".