apologize for iraq, i don't think so.

the view is the link if you want to hear, i wouldn't bother.
saddam was a monster that wanted to conquer the world.
i'm glad he's dead, we woe the war. the weapons of m d matter not to me. he had plenty of weapons of mass destruction. the policy is payback for the democrat lie telling presidential wind up doll called clinton. apologise? you should be thanking us. nice try.

__________________
give me liberty.... or give me birth...

WASHINGTONAMERICA.COM ....... evolving forward ...

I wouldnt apologize for the Iraq War either. But was it the correct policy decision, no. Should the US face some criticism, yes.

Yeah not really a point in apologizing to dead americans and Iraqis, doesn't do them much good.

I'm glad money is taken out of my paycheck every 2 weeks to pay for unconstitutional wars that result in my american brothers and sisters dead. I wish I had a better job so I could donate more to that great, moral cause.

Well your wrong on all counts. But you are welcome to defend a war crime.

__________________
It really is that simple.

remember 9/11 maybe go back to school, maybe in libya

__________________
give me liberty.... or give me birth...

WASHINGTONAMERICA.COM ....... evolving forward ...

At least you're not letting facts muddy your opinion.

Incidentally, try that button that says "abc" with the check mark underneath. I believe we 'woe' the war too, but I don't think that's precisely what you meant.

__________________
This thing we call 'failure' is not the falling down but the staying down.~ Mary Pickford
'Tis better to have loved and lost than to have loved and caught something.~ Too Much Coffee Guy

I remember 9/11 vividly. I also remember that Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11. I dont believe Libya did either.

thanks. and if it were, i would, but it's not so i won't. no crime, no time, only dim and unrealistic ideas about the way the world's monsters work. go ahead and defend saddam if you like, it's a free country.

__________________
give me liberty.... or give me birth...

WASHINGTONAMERICA.COM ....... evolving forward ...

The only thing I would apologize for is not preparing for the occupation well enough.

You are even more idiotic that I thought.

When did Saddam ever threaten the whole world?

In fact, he was never a threat to America.

Nor did he have the means to invade anyone except one small country called Kuwait.

__________________
"I think this post is definitely worth a positive rep"

I was in school for a long time, maybe your government classes taught you the Constitution says it's ok to use US taxpayer dollars in order to enforce UN sanctions and save foreignors from a dictator.

I mean it's not like we have any budget issues, or economic issues or tax issues here to worry about, let's just spend trillions on foreign adventures, we gotta test our military equipment one way or another.

How come those of you Iraq War supporters aren't demanding war with every brutal dictator? If you truly hated Saddam, why don't you bash the Reagan administration or supporting him? Choose a side and stick to it kids.

Diverting the War on Terrorism to attack Iraq?

4000 American dead, 10s of thousands wounded
Two trillion dollars and counting
No WMDs


One of the biggest strategic blunders in US History

__________________
.



A CEO, a Liberal and a Conservative enter a room. There are ten cookies sitting on the table. The CEO takes nine and whispers to the Conservative........"Liberals trying to take your cookie"

Well, we did prop him up and help put him into power... so it's really the least we can do.

Hussein was a monster and I have no sympathy for him, he got what he deserved. The Iraq people are certainly a lot better off. The Military hugely supports the war, so apologizing to them is a lame political ploy, that's all. So while I agree with Dr. Drock in his opposition to the war, I don't agree with his reasoning and his statements just cater to the Left's revisionist position on the war and their 50/50 culpability with the Republicans in getting into it.

What I do want to ask is why we are there in the first place. Until Nixon in 1969, the Democrats drove US involvement on foreign soil and in foreign wars. The Republicans mostly opposed it. Then the roles largely switched and Republicans drove it all the time and Democrats opposed foreign wars when they weren't in the White House. Why did Republicans abandon that? The fact is that if we weren't all over the middle east, then these wars wouldn't be brought to our house. And we have no business going there.

Again, unlike Dr. Drock and the liberals I'm not saying that in an anti-American way, an anti- military way. We're certainly trying to do the right thing over there and there are endless bad guys to fight I feel nothing for when they die. But still, I ask, why is it our problem at all? Why don't we bring ALL the troops home, not just the fighting units. And let them murder each other. And then if they attack us, I'm all for all out retaliation.

__________________
George Patton: If everyone's thinking alike, someone isn't thinking

Chinese Proverb: Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up

Ronald Reagan: Government isn't the solution to our problem, government is the problem

No need. Our laws, our Constitution..and international law speak strongly against the use of force against a country that did not attack you first.

__________________
It really is that simple.