US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Misrepresenting Libertarianism

This is a discussion on Misrepresenting Libertarianism within the Politics forums, part of the US Discussion category; Looks like we've had a whoooole lotta that there "misrepresentin" thing going on around these here parts, too. The editors of the New York Times ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Politics

Politics Discuss government policies and candidates...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 10:42 AM
Banned
Member #17281
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
Posts: 41,428
Thanks: 7,010
Thanked 18,755 Times in 10,366 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow
Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow
Misrepresenting Libertarianism

Looks like we've had a whoooole lotta that there "misrepresentin" thing going on around these here parts, too.

Quote:
The editors of the New York Times misrepresent libertarianism by way of Rand Paul and his statements about the Civil Rights Act of 1964, saying:
Quote:

"As a longtime libertarian, he espouses the view that personal freedom should supersede all government intervention. Neighborhood associations should be allowed to discriminate on the basis of race, he has written, and private businesses ought to be able to refuse service to anyone they wish. Under this philosophy, the punishment for a lunch counter that refuses to seat black customers would be public shunning, not a court order.

It is a theory of liberty with roots in America’s creation, but the succeeding centuries have shown how ineffective it was in promoting a civil society. The freedom of a few people to discriminate meant generations of less freedom for large groups of others.

It was only government power that ended slavery and abolished Jim Crow, neither of which would have been eliminated by a purely free market. It was government that rescued the economy from the Depression and promoted safety and equality in the workplace."
Let’s start with the most obvious canard, which is the proposition that Jim Crow had anything to do with free markets. They were called “Jim Crow Laws“, not “Jim Crow Markets”, the obvious reason for which is that separate accommodations were mandated by state governments, not organically grown in some mythical garden of free association rights. Indeed, the entire reason for the corrupt deal behind the presidential election of 1876 was to throw the South’s support behind a president who would end Reconstruction.

It was government–in this case, the state governments in the South–that imposed Jim Crow, and government that forced private companies to impose the desired restrictions on blacks. If government intervention was required to [abolish] Jim Crow, that was only because governments had imposed it in the first place....
Misrepresenting Libertarianism | Questions and Observations
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Oddball For This Useful Post:
Big Fitz (05-24-2010), boedicca (05-24-2010), Oscar Wao (05-24-2010), xsited1 (05-24-2010)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 10:55 AM
Ravi's Avatar
Hating hatters
Member #30646
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 60,393
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 6,686 Times in 4,489 Posts
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 7460
Ravi has disabled reputation
Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

They forgot to include the word Federal.

boo hoo
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ravi For This Useful Post:
Old Rocks (05-27-2010)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 10:58 AM
manifold's Avatar
boorish no buddy
Member #8806
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: in your dreams
Posts: 38,735
Thanks: 5,511
Thanked 8,947 Times in 6,262 Posts
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 2448
manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute
manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute manifold has a reputation beyond repute
Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

They forgot to include the word Federal.

boo hoo
Fascinating rebuttal. You clearly pwned the duder on this one.
__________________
For more information, email me at: lewzaar@yahoo.com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 11:24 AM
Ravi's Avatar
Hating hatters
Member #30646
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 60,393
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 6,686 Times in 4,489 Posts
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 7460
Ravi has disabled reputation
Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

They forgot to include the word Federal.

boo hoo
Fascinating rebuttal. You clearly pwned the duder on this one.
His C&P is a non sequitur.

Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 12:18 PM
Banned
Member #19207
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: everywhere and nowhere
Posts: 25,613
Thanks: 2,141
Thanked 2,380 Times in 1,876 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness


Who pays?

Who builds it?

Who owns it?

Who maintains it?
Nobody


And that's why only retards are libertarians.

This thread is complete.
.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 01:00 PM
Quantum Windbag's Avatar
Thou art God.
Member #23420
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 56,399
Thanks: 11,610
Thanked 13,500 Times in 9,778 Posts
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 11181
Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati
Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati
Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

They forgot to include the word Federal.

boo hoo
Fascinating rebuttal. You clearly pwned the duder on this one.
His C&P is a non sequitur.

Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.
Most libertarians actually support the federal governments authority to enforce the constitution, which specifically prohibits states from making Jim Crow laws. If the federal government had done its job there would have been no Jim Crow laws, and no one would be able to now claim that most libertarians supported them. I used to wonder why both parties are unable to man up and admit when they are wrong, now I know it is becasue they simply are never wrong.
__________________
I will accept the rules that you feel necessary to your freedom. I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.

When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know, the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything -- you can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 01:04 PM
Ravi's Avatar
Hating hatters
Member #30646
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 60,393
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 6,686 Times in 4,489 Posts
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 7460
Ravi has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by Quantum Windbag Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

Fascinating rebuttal. You clearly pwned the duder on this one.
His C&P is a non sequitur.

Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.
Most libertarians actually support the federal governments authority to enforce the constitution, which specifically prohibits states from making Jim Crow laws. If the federal government had done its job there would have been no Jim Crow laws, and no one would be able to now claim that most libertarians supported them. I used to wonder why both parties are unable to man up and admit when they are wrong, now I know it is becasue they simply are never wrong.
Does that mean Rand Paul is actually not a libertarian? If so, how could he object to the CRA if it did away with Jim Crow laws?Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 01:14 PM
Quantum Windbag's Avatar
Thou art God.
Member #23420
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 56,399
Thanks: 11,610
Thanked 13,500 Times in 9,778 Posts
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 11181
Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati
Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati Quantum Windbag gives orders to the Illuminati
Quote: Originally Posted by Quantum Windbag Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

His C&P is a non sequitur.

Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.
Most libertarians actually support the federal governments authority to enforce the constitution, which specifically prohibits states from making Jim Crow laws. If the federal government had done its job there would have been no Jim Crow laws, and no one would be able to now claim that most libertarians supported them. I used to wonder why both parties are unable to man up and admit when they are wrong, now I know it is becasue they simply are never wrong.
Does that mean Rand Paul is actually not a libertarian? If so, how could he object to the CRA if it did away with Jim Crow laws?Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
I am pretty sure that if you check you will see that Paul won the Republican primary in Kentucky, not the Libertarian one. Take any issues you have up with him and his positions with the Republicans, not me.
__________________
I will accept the rules that you feel necessary to your freedom. I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.

When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know, the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything -- you can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 02:07 PM
Banned
Member #17281
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
Posts: 41,428
Thanks: 7,010
Thanked 18,755 Times in 10,366 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow
Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow
Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

They forgot to include the word Federal.

boo hoo
Fascinating rebuttal. You clearly pwned the duder on this one.
His C&P is a non sequitur.

Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.
"Probably"??

Care to back that up with anything other than your clearly bigoted surmise?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 02:11 PM
NYcarbineer's Avatar
Registered User
Member #18701
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 44,806
Thanks: 813
Thanked 9,408 Times in 7,020 Posts
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3851
NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute
NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute NYcarbineer has a reputation beyond repute

Fascinating rebuttal. You clearly pwned the duder on this one.
His C&P is a non sequitur.

Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.
"Probably"??

Care to back that up with anything other than your clearly bigoted surmise?
Do you support state's having the right to segregate? If yes in some cases, list the cases.
__________________
Faith is Fear's bodyguard.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 02:16 PM
EriktheRed's Avatar
Eh...
Member #19851
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: IL
Posts: 6,607
Thanks: 972
Thanked 1,168 Times in 944 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 566
EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet EriktheRed is faster than a speeding bullet
This is a better representation:


The lesson of Rand Paul: libertarianism is juvenile - War Room - Salon.com


Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 02:16 PM
Dante's Avatar
cereal offender
Member #15512
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Skid Row
Posts: 40,289
Thanks: 6,113
Thanked 4,089 Times in 3,346 Posts
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Looks like we've had a whoooole lotta that there "misrepresentin" thing going on around these here parts, too.

Quote:
The editors of the New York Times misrepresent libertarianism by way of Rand Paul and his statements about the Civil Rights Act of 1964, saying:
Quote:

"As a longtime libertarian, he espouses the view that personal freedom should supersede all government intervention. Neighborhood associations should be allowed to discriminate on the basis of race, he has written, and private businesses ought to be able to refuse service to anyone they wish. Under this philosophy, the punishment for a lunch counter that refuses to seat black customers would be public shunning, not a court order.

It is a theory of liberty with roots in America’s creation, but the succeeding centuries have shown how ineffective it was in promoting a civil society. The freedom of a few people to discriminate meant generations of less freedom for large groups of others.

It was only government power that ended slavery and abolished Jim Crow, neither of which would have been eliminated by a purely free market. It was government that rescued the economy from the Depression and promoted safety and equality in the workplace."
Let’s start with the most obvious canard, which is the proposition that Jim Crow had anything to do with free markets. They were called “Jim Crow Laws“, not “Jim Crow Markets”, the obvious reason for which is that separate accommodations were mandated by state governments, not organically grown in some mythical garden of free association rights. Indeed, the entire reason for the corrupt deal behind the presidential election of 1876 was to throw the South’s support behind a president who would end Reconstruction.

It was government–in this case, the state governments in the South–that imposed Jim Crow, and government that forced private companies to impose the desired restrictions on blacks. If government intervention was required to [abolish] Jim Crow, that was only because governments had imposed it in the first place....
Misrepresenting Libertarianism | Questions and Observations
Stop whining. We've all been exposed to the dis-ease of libertarian lunacies.

We have all heard the "free markets would get rid of racist businesses' arguments.

Libertarians are Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
__________________
____________
For Leasing Information please contact Wingnut Smackdown Partners LMTD


Space Rented: Short Term Lease: LadyGumFlapper: Hot Stuff or just Warm Diarrhea in a Dixie Cup?

Last edited by Dante; 05-24-2010 at 03:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 02:27 PM
Ravi's Avatar
Hating hatters
Member #30646
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 60,393
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 6,686 Times in 4,489 Posts
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 7460
Ravi has disabled reputation
How many Libertarians does it take to screw in a light bulb? None. The Market will take care of it.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ravi For This Useful Post:
Dante (05-24-2010), EriktheRed (05-25-2010), Old Rocks (05-27-2010)
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 02:28 PM
Banned
Member #17281
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
Posts: 41,428
Thanks: 7,010
Thanked 18,755 Times in 10,366 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow
Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow Oddball is cooler than the underside of a pillow
Quote: Originally Posted by EriktheRed Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
This is a better representation:


The lesson of Rand Paul: libertarianism is juvenile - War Room - Salon.com


Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Wowzers!...The Fabians at Salon smear libertarians?!?!??

Stop the presses! Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Oddball For This Useful Post:
SuMar (05-27-2010)
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2010, 02:29 PM
Ravi's Avatar
Hating hatters
Member #30646
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 60,393
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 6,686 Times in 4,489 Posts
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 7460
Ravi has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by NYcarbineer Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

His C&P is a non sequitur.

Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.
"Probably"??

Care to back that up with anything other than your clearly bigoted surmise?
Do you support state's having the right to segregate? If yes in some cases, list the cases.
Don't expect an answer.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Politics
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.