 | | 
02-08-2010, 01:44 PM
| | Registered User Member #21146 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,482
Thanks: 62
Thanked 111 Times in 87 Posts
Rep Power: 4 | | | How about a flat 10% income tax? How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them. | 
02-08-2010, 02:05 PM
|  | Registered User Member #22215 | | Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 777
Thanks: 69
Thanked 197 Times in 127 Posts
Rep Power: 14 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them. How about just eliminating the federal individual income tax altogether? | 
02-08-2010, 02:07 PM
|  | Oscar Winner:Best Slacker Member #17281 | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Over here! <waves>
Posts: 11,902
Thanks: 963
Thanked 2,468 Times in 1,568 Posts
Rep Power: 251 | | | The income tax started out that way, but politicians started jimmying it to reward or punish certain behaviors and favored/unfavored constituencies.
We're better off with no tax on incomes and the feds controlling their spending instead. | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dude For This Useful Post: | | 
02-08-2010, 02:25 PM
|  | Registered User Member #5217 | | Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,327
Thanks: 1
Thanked 457 Times in 376 Posts
Rep Power: 42 | | | What a bunch of diaper sludge.
__________________ "The essence of the Liberal outlook lies not in what opinions are held, but in how they are held: instead of being held dogmatically, they are held tentatively, and with a consciousness that new evidence may at any moment lead to their abandonment." -Bertrand Russell | 
02-08-2010, 02:42 PM
|  | Army Vet Member #11393 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 480
Thanked 378 Times in 274 Posts
Rep Power: 61 | | | I am all for an equal burden flat % tax on every dollar earned by every US citizen...
But it must be coupled with regulations that eliminate the ability of the government to run in a deficit unless of emergency... AKA reducing government entitlement spending
__________________ Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system). http://obamaclock.org/ | 
02-08-2010, 02:51 PM
|  | Registered User Member #21894 | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 421
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Rep Power: 4 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them. We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't.
__________________ Building a better America by hammering the Right. | 
02-08-2010, 02:55 PM
|  | Registered User Member #5217 | | Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,327
Thanks: 1
Thanked 457 Times in 376 Posts
Rep Power: 42 | | | back in 1962 the top tax rate was 91%
__________________ "The essence of the Liberal outlook lies not in what opinions are held, but in how they are held: instead of being held dogmatically, they are held tentatively, and with a consciousness that new evidence may at any moment lead to their abandonment." -Bertrand Russell | 
02-08-2010, 02:57 PM
|  | Army Vet Member #11393 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 480
Thanked 378 Times in 274 Posts
Rep Power: 61 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them. We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't.
And another left winger shows the support of selective equality... only true equality when it benefits them, punishment systems to make treatment unequal to ensure all else benefits them
What we need is euqal protection and treatment under government and under the law.... not some Robin Hood inspired system
__________________ Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system). http://obamaclock.org/ | 
02-08-2010, 03:03 PM
|  | Registered User Member #21894 | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 421
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Rep Power: 4 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by DiamondDave
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them. We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't.
And another left winger shows the support of selective equality... only true equality when it benefits them, punishment systems to make treatment unequal to ensure all else benefits them
What we need is euqal protection and treatment under government and under the law.... not some Robin Hood inspired system Progressive income taxes equalize the burden of taxation. Flat rates don't.
__________________ Building a better America by hammering the Right. | 
02-08-2010, 03:11 PM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20321 | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,251
Thanks: 473
Thanked 1,160 Times in 837 Posts
Rep Power: 72 | | | I'd agree with a flat tax if it taxes EVERY DOLLAR. No deductions, no deferrals, no write-offs
Make the rich pay taxes on all their income and they will scream to return to the old tax code
__________________ The only "Fair and Balanced" poster on USMB | 
02-08-2010, 03:11 PM
|  | Conservative Role Model Member #19862 | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: the EMPIRE State
Posts: 7,642
Thanks: 664
Thanked 1,221 Times in 914 Posts
Rep Power: 97 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them. We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't. We NEED that, eh?
Wrong.
What we NEED is very much the antithesis of that nonsense.
To the extent that a flat tax is "regressive" (i.e., a couple earning 100,000/year can afford to be taxed 10,000 much less than a couple earning 1,000,000 /yr can afford to be taxed 100,000), I could even get behind a SLIGHT progressive slope in the tax rate.
It would be better, however, to consider a simple flat rate national sales-type-tax. IF I earn 100,000 and SPEND say 75,000 I am taxed on that 75,000 only. No taxation of savings.
IF the couple earning a lot more than I earn spends a lot more, then they get taxed more to the extent they spend more.
You know what? If the truth is ever going to get told, the truth is that this whole thing has become FAR too complicated because of competing "social" theories.
Fuck that. Taxation is just paying the government to conduct the people's business. What we need to control is spending. It is nothing less than outrageous, alarming and ridiculously dangerous to have massive debt -- especially all those unfunded mandates. We need to compel the damn government to cut it out. And it is simple.
The hard part is finding the political will among the people to force it down the reluctant throats of our elected officials.
__________________ If Al Qaeda isn't free to plot mass murder, are any of us truly free? - CF
Last edited by Liability; 02-08-2010 at 03:12 PM.
| 
02-08-2010, 03:13 PM
|  | Registered User Member #13805 | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Federal Way WA
Posts: 3,822
Thanks: 91
Thanked 155 Times in 125 Posts
Rep Power: 46 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them. The problem with it is, it won't work...our government won't get enough money so they'll find other ways and other things to tax that will hurt the low income and middle income families the most.
__________________ 'This has been and will be Mexico again' - Alberto Lozano, an official representative of the Mexican government at the Mexican consulate in San Diego on Mar 13, 2008. | 
02-08-2010, 03:15 PM
|  | Conservative Role Model Member #19862 | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: the EMPIRE State
Posts: 7,642
Thanks: 664
Thanked 1,221 Times in 914 Posts
Rep Power: 97 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Againsheila
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them. The problem with it is, it won't work...our government won't get enough money so they'll find other ways and other things to tax that will hurt the low income and middle income families the most. The national sales tax idea cannot work for that reason UNLESS it is conditioned upon (and made to go into effect only upon the effective date after the passage of) a Constitutional Amendment banning the income tax (again).
__________________ If Al Qaeda isn't free to plot mass murder, are any of us truly free? - CF | 
02-08-2010, 03:15 PM
|  | Registered User Member #21894 | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 421
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Rep Power: 4 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Liability
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them. We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't. We NEED that, eh? Yes.
Tax policy has to be equitable. No one can be taxed at a rate which places more burden on him than on anyone else. Flat taxes and sales taxes both place more burden on the poor than the rich.
__________________ Building a better America by hammering the Right. | 
02-08-2010, 03:19 PM
|  | Army Vet Member #11393 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 480
Thanked 378 Times in 274 Posts
Rep Power: 61 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel
Quote: Originally Posted by DiamondDave
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel
We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't.
And another left winger shows the support of selective equality... only true equality when it benefits them, punishment systems to make treatment unequal to ensure all else benefits them
What we need is euqal protection and treatment under government and under the law.... not some Robin Hood inspired system Progressive income taxes equalize the burden of taxation. Flat rates don't. WRONG
You are looking to equalize the outcome... not equal % burden on every dollar earned.... you are looking for some to pay more of a share than others... you are indeed looking for selective equality... I.E. only equality when it benefits you, punishment systems in all other aspects so the situation benefits you
No.. I'll take equality... knowing there are personal positives AND negatives with actual equality...
__________________ Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system). http://obamaclock.org/ |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |