US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum  

How about a flat 10% income tax?

This is a discussion on How about a flat 10% income tax? within the Politics forums, part of the US Discussion category; How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Politics


Politics Discuss government policies and candidates...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:44 PM
Registered User
Member #21146
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,482
Thanks: 62
Thanked 111 Times in 87 Posts
Rep Power: 4
ihopehefails could be police chiefihopehefails could be police chiefihopehefails could be police chiefihopehefails could be police chiefihopehefails could be police chiefihopehefails could be police chiefihopehefails could be police chiefihopehefails could be police chiefihopehefails could be police chief
How about a flat 10% income tax?

How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them.
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 02:05 PM
MIPS's Avatar
Registered User
Member #22215
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 777
Thanks: 69
Thanked 197 Times in 127 Posts
Rep Power: 14
MIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governor
MIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governorMIPS could be state governor
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails View Post
How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them.
How about just eliminating the federal individual income tax altogether?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 02:07 PM
Dude's Avatar
Oscar Winner:Best Slacker
Member #17281
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Over here! <waves>
Posts: 11,902
Thanks: 963
Thanked 2,468 Times in 1,568 Posts
Rep Power: 251
Dude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religion
Dude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religionDude could successfully start his own religion
The income tax started out that way, but politicians started jimmying it to reward or punish certain behaviors and favored/unfavored constituencies.

We're better off with no tax on incomes and the feds controlling their spending instead.
__________________

Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dude For This Useful Post:
Claudette (02-09-2010), MIPS (02-08-2010)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 02:25 PM
Truthmatters's Avatar
Registered User
Member #5217
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,327
Thanks: 1
Thanked 457 Times in 376 Posts
Rep Power: 42
Truthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the president
Truthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the president
What a bunch of diaper sludge.
__________________
"The essence of the Liberal outlook lies not in what opinions are held, but in how they are held: instead of being held dogmatically, they are held tentatively, and with a consciousness that new evidence may at any moment lead to their abandonment." -Bertrand Russell
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 02:42 PM
DiamondDave's Avatar
Army Vet
Member #11393
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 480
Thanked 378 Times in 274 Posts
Rep Power: 61
DiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddha
DiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddha
I am all for an equal burden flat % tax on every dollar earned by every US citizen...

But it must be coupled with regulations that eliminate the ability of the government to run in a deficit unless of emergency... AKA reducing government entitlement spending
__________________
Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system).
http://obamaclock.org/
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 02:51 PM
Joe Steel's Avatar
Registered User
Member #21894
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 421
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Rep Power: 4
Joe Steel could be town mayor
Joe Steel could be town mayor
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails View Post
How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them.
We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't.
__________________
Building a better America by hammering the Right.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 02:55 PM
Truthmatters's Avatar
Registered User
Member #5217
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,327
Thanks: 1
Thanked 457 Times in 376 Posts
Rep Power: 42
Truthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the president
Truthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the presidentTruthmatters could be the president
back in 1962 the top tax rate was 91%
__________________
"The essence of the Liberal outlook lies not in what opinions are held, but in how they are held: instead of being held dogmatically, they are held tentatively, and with a consciousness that new evidence may at any moment lead to their abandonment." -Bertrand Russell
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 02:57 PM
DiamondDave's Avatar
Army Vet
Member #11393
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 480
Thanked 378 Times in 274 Posts
Rep Power: 61
DiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddha
DiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails View Post
How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them.
We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't.

And another left winger shows the support of selective equality... only true equality when it benefits them, punishment systems to make treatment unequal to ensure all else benefits them

What we need is euqal protection and treatment under government and under the law.... not some Robin Hood inspired system
__________________
Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system).
http://obamaclock.org/
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 03:03 PM
Joe Steel's Avatar
Registered User
Member #21894
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 421
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Rep Power: 4
Joe Steel could be town mayor
Joe Steel could be town mayor
Quote: Originally Posted by DiamondDave View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails View Post
How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them.
We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't.

And another left winger shows the support of selective equality... only true equality when it benefits them, punishment systems to make treatment unequal to ensure all else benefits them

What we need is euqal protection and treatment under government and under the law.... not some Robin Hood inspired system
Progressive income taxes equalize the burden of taxation. Flat rates don't.
__________________
Building a better America by hammering the Right.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 03:11 PM
rightwinger's Avatar
Supporting Member
Member #20321
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,251
Thanks: 473
Thanked 1,160 Times in 837 Posts
Rep Power: 72
rightwinger could be the buddharightwinger could be the buddharightwinger could be the buddharightwinger could be the buddharightwinger could be the buddha
rightwinger could be the buddharightwinger could be the buddharightwinger could be the buddharightwinger could be the buddharightwinger could be the buddharightwinger could be the buddharightwinger could be the buddha
I'd agree with a flat tax if it taxes EVERY DOLLAR. No deductions, no deferrals, no write-offs
Make the rich pay taxes on all their income and they will scream to return to the old tax code
__________________
The only "Fair and Balanced" poster on USMB
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 03:11 PM
Liability's Avatar
Conservative Role Model
Member #19862
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: the EMPIRE State
Posts: 7,642
Thanks: 664
Thanked 1,221 Times in 914 Posts
Rep Power: 97
Liability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddha
Liability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails View Post
How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them.
We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't.
We NEED that, eh?

Wrong.

What we NEED is very much the antithesis of that nonsense.

To the extent that a flat tax is "regressive" (i.e., a couple earning 100,000/year can afford to be taxed 10,000 much less than a couple earning 1,000,000 /yr can afford to be taxed 100,000), I could even get behind a SLIGHT progressive slope in the tax rate.

It would be better, however, to consider a simple flat rate national sales-type-tax. IF I earn 100,000 and SPEND say 75,000 I am taxed on that 75,000 only. No taxation of savings.

IF the couple earning a lot more than I earn spends a lot more, then they get taxed more to the extent they spend more.

You know what? If the truth is ever going to get told, the truth is that this whole thing has become FAR too complicated because of competing "social" theories.

Fuck that. Taxation is just paying the government to conduct the people's business. What we need to control is spending. It is nothing less than outrageous, alarming and ridiculously dangerous to have massive debt -- especially all those unfunded mandates. We need to compel the damn government to cut it out. And it is simple.

The hard part is finding the political will among the people to force it down the reluctant throats of our elected officials.
__________________
If Al Qaeda isn't free to plot mass murder, are any of us truly free? - CF

Last edited by Liability; 02-08-2010 at 03:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 03:13 PM
Againsheila's Avatar
Registered User
Member #13805
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Federal Way WA
Posts: 3,822
Thanks: 91
Thanked 155 Times in 125 Posts
Rep Power: 46
Againsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddha
Againsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddhaAgainsheila could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails View Post
How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them.
The problem with it is, it won't work...our government won't get enough money so they'll find other ways and other things to tax that will hurt the low income and middle income families the most.
__________________
'This has been and will be Mexico again' - Alberto Lozano, an official representative of the Mexican government at the Mexican consulate in San Diego on Mar 13, 2008.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 03:15 PM
Liability's Avatar
Conservative Role Model
Member #19862
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: the EMPIRE State
Posts: 7,642
Thanks: 664
Thanked 1,221 Times in 914 Posts
Rep Power: 97
Liability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddha
Liability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddhaLiability could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Againsheila View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails View Post
How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them.
The problem with it is, it won't work...our government won't get enough money so they'll find other ways and other things to tax that will hurt the low income and middle income families the most.
The national sales tax idea cannot work for that reason UNLESS it is conditioned upon (and made to go into effect only upon the effective date after the passage of) a Constitutional Amendment banning the income tax (again).
__________________
If Al Qaeda isn't free to plot mass murder, are any of us truly free? - CF
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 03:15 PM
Joe Steel's Avatar
Registered User
Member #21894
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 421
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Rep Power: 4
Joe Steel could be town mayor
Joe Steel could be town mayor
Quote: Originally Posted by Liability View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by ihopehefails View Post
How about a flat 10% income tax with a SINGLE DEDUCTION of $85,000? This way it is not complicated and the vary poorest don't have to pay them.
We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't.
We NEED that, eh?
Yes.

Tax policy has to be equitable. No one can be taxed at a rate which places more burden on him than on anyone else. Flat taxes and sales taxes both place more burden on the poor than the rich.
__________________
Building a better America by hammering the Right.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2010, 03:19 PM
DiamondDave's Avatar
Army Vet
Member #11393
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 480
Thanked 378 Times in 274 Posts
Rep Power: 61
DiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddha
DiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddhaDiamondDave could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by DiamondDave View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post

We need a steeply progressive income tax with a maximum rate of over 90%. We also should consider taxing income from different sources at different rates. Those who perform vital services wouldn't pay as much as those who don't.

And another left winger shows the support of selective equality... only true equality when it benefits them, punishment systems to make treatment unequal to ensure all else benefits them

What we need is euqal protection and treatment under government and under the law.... not some Robin Hood inspired system
Progressive income taxes equalize the burden of taxation. Flat rates don't.
WRONG

You are looking to equalize the outcome... not equal % burden on every dollar earned.... you are looking for some to pay more of a share than others... you are indeed looking for selective equality... I.E. only equality when it benefits you, punishment systems in all other aspects so the situation benefits you

No.. I'll take equality... knowing there are personal positives AND negatives with actual equality...
__________________
Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system).
http://obamaclock.org/
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Politics

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

» Search Forums

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Apple iPad Forum
» Premium Sponsors
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Please visit these our friends at the following forums:
Photography Forum - Celebrity Gossip and News - Conceal Carry and Hand Gun Forum - Parrot Forum - iPhone News - iPhone Forums - Motorola Droid Forum


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management by RedTyger