 | | 
02-08-2010, 09:03 PM
| | Supporting Member Member #11951 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: rocky mountains
Posts: 2,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 335 Times in 231 Posts
Rep Power: 29 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by mascale On Fantasize-Along-With-FoxTV, Sunday Chris Wallace: "Wallace: Handicap the 2012 GOP Presidentai Race For Us. Who's the Front Runner?" Palin: No Idea. I have No Idea. Wallace: You're Not A Very Good Analyst. Palin: Fire me then Roger. Sorry. I already failed. . . ." FOXNews.com - TRANSCRIPT: Fox News Sunday Interview With Sarah Palin
Apparently, at Tea-Party Conventions: They put something in the stuff?!?
Anyone guesses that they probably didn't have to put anything in the stuff at all! Actually, This becomes the second or third failure of Sarah Palin, but that would depend upon who on the staff of Senator John McCain is counting!
The 8th grade cheat notes seem to be a give-away: As in previews of coming attractions, or something! The "R" word is still for "Rush," where it seems to apply! They seem to be sensitive, on this issue.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Squaw Need To Leave Garden. . . .alone(?). . . .! Find water for East Africa, with no credit market economy!)
So now because Sarah Palin "has no idea" WHO or WHOM the front runner for the Republican nomination will be---which of course is 3 YEARS from now. Did you actually expect Sarah Palin to declare the front-runner for the Republican nominee 3 years in advance. And prior to anyone even announcing their running for the Presidency?
What would have been really stupid is if she would have given a name--Da-Duh--Da--Duh--Da--Duh---  
You liberals are absolutely void of any intelligence what-so-ever---  | | The Following User Says Thank You to oreo For This Useful Post: | | 
02-08-2010, 09:11 PM
|  | Member of the Illuminati Member #2926 | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Florida via Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,965
Thanks: 124
Thanked 849 Times in 622 Posts
Rep Power: 183 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
and? what does that have to do for the reasons Palin gave for her resigning. She said she's not a quitter, she admires Reagan and its "different than getting political shots fired your way."
Iran-Contra was not "getting political shots fire your way." It was far more serious than anything she would have faced up in Alaska. So making analogies to Reagan is false. Oh brother.
she gave her reasons for why she stepped down. read all you want into them. the majority of Alaskans understood and I do believe when she is able to explain it more to the Amercian people, they will understand too. I'm not reading anything into her words. I'm taking her words straight as she said them. She said her situation was different than Reagan's. You're right they were different. Reagan went through far worse and was far more serious than what she would have gone through, yet he didn't resign. The charges against Reagan - secret double-dealing with a fundamentalist Islamic theocratic government that held American hostages for over a year over to fund a war which Congress had suspended funding - were extremely serious. So comparing her situation to Reagan's is laughable.
__________________ | 
02-08-2010, 09:13 PM
|  | Registered User Member #1668 | | Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,630
Thanks: 1
Thanked 114 Times in 78 Posts
Rep Power: 33 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
She said she's not a quitter, she admires Reagan and its "different than getting political shots fired your way."
Iran-Contra was not "getting political shots fire your way." It was far more serious than anything she would have faced up in Alaska. So making analogies to Reagan is false. Oh brother.
she gave her reasons for why she stepped down. read all you want into them. the majority of Alaskans understood and I do believe when she is able to explain it more to the Amercian people, they will understand too. I'm not reading anything into her words. I'm taking her words straight as she said them. She said her situation was different than Reagan's. You're right they were different. Reagan went through far worse and was far more serious than what she would have gone through, yet he didn't resign. The charges against Reagan - secret double-dealing with a fundamentalist Islamic theocratic government that held American hostages for over a year over to fund a war which Congress had suspended funding - were extremely serious. So comparing her situation to Reagan's is laughable. good grief.
__________________ "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself."
Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC) | 
02-08-2010, 09:15 PM
|  | Member of the Illuminati Member #2926 | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Florida via Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,965
Thanks: 124
Thanked 849 Times in 622 Posts
Rep Power: 183 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
Oh brother.
she gave her reasons for why she stepped down. read all you want into them. the majority of Alaskans understood and I do believe when she is able to explain it more to the Amercian people, they will understand too. I'm not reading anything into her words. I'm taking her words straight as she said them. She said her situation was different than Reagan's. You're right they were different. Reagan went through far worse and was far more serious than what she would have gone through, yet he didn't resign. The charges against Reagan - secret double-dealing with a fundamentalist Islamic theocratic government that held American hostages for over a year over to fund a war which Congress had suspended funding - were extremely serious. So comparing her situation to Reagan's is laughable. good grief. Yes, exactly.
__________________ | 
02-08-2010, 09:17 PM
|  | Registered User Member #1668 | | Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,630
Thanks: 1
Thanked 114 Times in 78 Posts
Rep Power: 33 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
I'm not reading anything into her words. I'm taking her words straight as she said them. She said her situation was different than Reagan's. You're right they were different. Reagan went through far worse and was far more serious than what she would have gone through, yet he didn't resign. The charges against Reagan - secret double-dealing with a fundamentalist Islamic theocratic government that held American hostages for over a year over to fund a war which Congress had suspended funding - were extremely serious. So comparing her situation to Reagan's is laughable. good grief. Yes, exactly. you came up with all that because she mentioned Reagan in her answer. GOOD GRIEF
__________________ "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself."
Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC) | 
02-08-2010, 09:33 PM
|  | Member of the Illuminati Member #2926 | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Florida via Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,965
Thanks: 124
Thanked 849 Times in 622 Posts
Rep Power: 183 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
good grief. Yes, exactly. you came up with all that because she mentioned Reagan in her answer. GOOD GRIEF  No, I came up with all that because you didn't understand the analogy.
Anything I can do to educate a Palin supporter about the history of America, I'm happy to oblige.
__________________ | 
02-08-2010, 09:36 PM
|  | I'm Gonna Need More Rope Member #11819 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Behind You
Posts: 20,716
Thanks: 717
Thanked 1,050 Times in 829 Posts
Rep Power: 180 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro No, I came up with all that because you didn't understand the analogy.
Anything I can do to educate a Palin supporter about the history of America, I'm happy to oblige. Oxymoron.
__________________ "We didn't start the fire
It was always burning
Since the world's been turning
We didn't start the fire
No we didn't light it
But we tried to fight it"
- Billy Joel, "We Didn't Start The Fire" | 
02-08-2010, 09:37 PM
|  | Registered User Member #18694 | | Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,413
Thanks: 182
Thanked 126 Times in 94 Posts
Rep Power: 15 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
I'm not reading anything into her words. I'm taking her words straight as she said them. She said her situation was different than Reagan's. You're right they were different. Reagan went through far worse and was far more serious than what she would have gone through, yet he didn't resign. The charges against Reagan - secret double-dealing with a fundamentalist Islamic theocratic government that held American hostages for over a year over to fund a war which Congress had suspended funding - were extremely serious. So comparing her situation to Reagan's is laughable. good grief. Yes, exactly. What did she go through?
__________________ 
FALSE HOPE FOR THE SOUTH | 
02-08-2010, 09:39 PM
|  | Registered User Member #1668 | | Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,630
Thanks: 1
Thanked 114 Times in 78 Posts
Rep Power: 33 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Yes, exactly. you came up with all that because she mentioned Reagan in her answer. GOOD GRIEF  No, I came up with all that because you didn't understand the analogy.
Anything I can do to educate a Palin supporter about the history of America, I'm happy to oblige. well aren't you a cutie pootie.
__________________ "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself."
Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC)
Last edited by Stephanie; 02-08-2010 at 09:40 PM.
| 
02-08-2010, 10:55 PM
| | Supporting Member Member #11951 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: rocky mountains
Posts: 2,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 335 Times in 231 Posts
Rep Power: 29 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
She said she's not a quitter, she admires Reagan and its "different than getting political shots fired your way."
Iran-Contra was not "getting political shots fire your way." It was far more serious than anything she would have faced up in Alaska. So making analogies to Reagan is false. Oh brother.
she gave her reasons for why she stepped down. read all you want into them. the majority of Alaskans understood and I do believe when she is able to explain it more to the Amercian people, they will understand too. I'm not reading anything into her words. I'm taking her words straight as she said them. She said her situation was different than Reagan's. You're right they were different. Reagan went through far worse and was far more serious than what she would have gone through, yet he didn't resign. The charges against Reagan - secret double-dealing with a fundamentalist Islamic theocratic government that held American hostages for over a year over to fund a war which Congress had suspended funding - were extremely serious. So comparing her situation to Reagan's is laughable.
Just how many "frivilous law suits" were thrown at Reagan?---    Answer NONE. No was a completely different circumstance.
BTW--the Iran/Contra situation didn't not come to realization until Bush 1 was in office. Reagan didn't deal with that one---  | 
02-08-2010, 11:12 PM
|  | Censored for Cynicism Member #13101 | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,748
Thanks: 74
Thanked 128 Times in 115 Posts
Rep Power: 12 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
and? what does that have to do for the reasons Palin gave for her resigning. She said she's not a quitter, she admires Reagan and its "different than getting political shots fired your way."
Iran-Contra was not "getting political shots fire your way." It was far more serious than anything she would have faced up in Alaska. So making analogies to Reagan is false. Oh brother.
she gave her reasons for why she stepped down. read all you want into them. the majority of Alaskans understood and I do believe when she is able to explain it more to the Amercian people, they will understand too. CELEBUTARD Palin's excuses for quitting are just as RETARDED as her rationalizations for Stuttering LimpTard calling her son a RETARD.
__________________ Accuse your opponents of what you are at present doing. Rush Limbaugh You know, when you are a messiah, when you have a messianic attitude about yourself,
nobody's supposed to doubt you. Rush Limbaugh
Don't doubt me. Rush Limbaugh The power of accurate observation is commonly called Cynicism
by those who have not got it. George Bernard Shaw Cynics regarded everybody as equally corrupt... Idealists regarded everybody as equally corrupt, except themselves.
Robert Anton Wilson
Idealism is what precedes experience; cynicism is what follows. David T. Wolf | 
02-08-2010, 11:23 PM
| | Supporting Member Member #11951 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: rocky mountains
Posts: 2,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 335 Times in 231 Posts
Rep Power: 29 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Quote: Originally Posted by Stephanie
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro
Yes, exactly. you came up with all that because she mentioned Reagan in her answer. GOOD GRIEF  No, I came up with all that because you didn't understand the analogy.
Anything I can do to educate a Palin supporter about the history of America, I'm happy to oblige.
Your history is bad. Reagan never had to deal with frivilous law suits--nor did he have to handle the Iran/Contra affair--that fell in Bush 1's lap. | 
02-09-2010, 01:34 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #21173 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,257
Thanks: 332
Thanked 70 Times in 57 Posts
Rep Power: 6 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Jay Canuck Palin Hijacks Teabaggers Link Excerpt:
The tea party movement is dead. The one I was familiar with anyway. Judson Phillips held it down and Sarah Palin drove a stake right through its heart live Saturday night on C-Span in front of an unsuspecting audience. Sarah Palin didn’t give a tea party speech last night. She gave a partisan Republican address. It was a purely political speech designed to position her for a presidential run in 2012 or 2016. Period. She wasn’t there to celebrate the organic nature of a movement she had nothing to do with creating. She was there to co-opt the name and claim the brand as hers. And she did. The movement, that came to be officially recognized almost a year ago but whose roots go back further than that, has been snuffed out and replaced in the public mind. The movement that began as a people’s movement of angry independent, libertarians and conservatives will now be thought as the movement of people like Palin, Dick Armey, Judson Phillips, Mark Skoda, etc. a wholly owned subsidiary of the “Official Conservative Movement” and the Republican Party.
Did those Teabaggers know what they were paying $100,000 for? Thanks, Jay. That's a great article. This is the absolute truth, no doubt about it. | 
02-09-2010, 04:57 AM
|  | Tricky Bitch Member #21210 | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Where trouble is, I am there
Posts: 7,093
Thanks: 1,508
Thanked 1,369 Times in 955 Posts
Rep Power: 224 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by mascale "Fox Views Sunday, on Fantasize Along With FoxTV News: Has now officially introduced their new "Contributor!" The Sunday morning, U.S. television, talk shows include that one. There is "Meet Some Guy," on NBC, There is, "Faced! The Nation," on CBS. CNN has, "Slates Of The Unions." ABC can likely pull ahead, with "Dissin' Dat Week!
So just who is the Fox Views Sunday, GOP Frontrunner?
And anyone sees that probably it's "The Swimming Swan!" (The Talking Dog and Duck are already featured another network(?)!) http://www.eduplace.com/science/hmxs.../3rs_3_2-3.pdf
There is a serious ratings development, here, about to start at Fantasize-Along-With-Fox!
"Crow: James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Fox Chief Heap Big. . . .Hmmmmmm!) When you are intelligent enough to work out how to use a signature, I'll read your posts.
__________________  Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action. George Washington Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. George Washington | 
02-09-2010, 05:05 AM
|  | Tricky Bitch Member #21210 | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Where trouble is, I am there
Posts: 7,093
Thanks: 1,508
Thanked 1,369 Times in 955 Posts
Rep Power: 224 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Rinata
Quote: Originally Posted by Jay Canuck Palin Hijacks Teabaggers Link Excerpt:
The tea party movement is dead. The one I was familiar with anyway. Judson Phillips held it down and Sarah Palin drove a stake right through its heart live Saturday night on C-Span in front of an unsuspecting audience. Sarah Palin didn’t give a tea party speech last night. She gave a partisan Republican address. It was a purely political speech designed to position her for a presidential run in 2012 or 2016. Period. She wasn’t there to celebrate the organic nature of a movement she had nothing to do with creating. She was there to co-opt the name and claim the brand as hers. And she did. The movement, that came to be officially recognized almost a year ago but whose roots go back further than that, has been snuffed out and replaced in the public mind. The movement that began as a people’s movement of angry independent, libertarians and conservatives will now be thought as the movement of people like Palin, Dick Armey, Judson Phillips, Mark Skoda, etc. a wholly owned subsidiary of the “Official Conservative Movement” and the Republican Party.
Did those Teabaggers know what they were paying $100,000 for? Thanks, Jay. That's a great article. This is the absolute truth, no doubt about it. That's just classic, Rinata. You calling Palin partisan is like a turkey calling another turkey a turkey.
__________________  Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action. George Washington Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. George Washington |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |