 | | 
07-01-2009, 04:26 AM
|  | Defend Liberty Member #11774 | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 6,837
Thanks: 14
Thanked 393 Times in 309 Posts
Rep Power: 46 | | | 'Fight them over there vs. over here' a false choice Quote: There is no area in which Republicans have further strayed from our traditions than in foreign affairs.
Generations of conservatives followed the great advice of our Founding Fathers and pursued a restrained foreign policy that rebuffed entangling alliances and advised America, in the words of John Quincy Adams, not to "go abroad looking for dragons to slay."
Sen. Robert Taft, the stalwart of the Old Right, urged America to stay out of NATO. Dwight Eisenhower was elected on a platform promising to get us out of the conflict in Korea. Richard Nixon promised to end the war in Vietnam. PAUL: 'Fight them over there vs. over here' a false choice - Washington Times
__________________ "Nonviolence does not mean non-action. Nonviolence means we act with love and compassion. The moment we stop acting, we undermine the principle of nonviolence." – Thich Nhat Hanh
"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets." – Voltaire | 
07-01-2009, 08:44 AM
|  | With the Old Guard Member #15282 | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: In your head
Posts: 14,624
Thanks: 56
Thanked 2,171 Times in 1,403 Posts
Rep Power: 389 | | | The idiot GoP simply adopted the FDR/Truman thing about being world police and now they can't let go.
Why do we have to 'fight them' anywhere?
I find I really don't care who runs Iran as long as they leave me alone. | | The Following User Says Thank You to Xenophon For This Useful Post: | | 
07-01-2009, 05:20 PM
|  | cool Member #11254 | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Colbert Nation
Posts: 11,709
Thanks: 179
Thanked 340 Times in 257 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Xenophon The idiot GoP simply adopted the FDR/Truman thing about being world police and now they can't let go.
Why do we have to 'fight them' anywhere?
I find I really don't care who runs Iran as long as they leave me alone. | 
07-01-2009, 06:43 PM
|  | See ya guys! Member #11944 | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,082
Thanks: 419
Thanked 207 Times in 148 Posts
Rep Power: 44 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Xenophon The idiot GoP simply adopted the FDR/Truman thing about being world police and now they can't let go.
Why do we have to 'fight them' anywhere?
I find I really don't care who runs Iran as long as they leave me alone. Sounds like the attitude most Americans had just before WWII.
__________________ "Science and Religion are not at odds. Science is simply too young to understand." | 
07-01-2009, 06:51 PM
|  | Defend Liberty Member #11774 | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 6,837
Thanks: 14
Thanked 393 Times in 309 Posts
Rep Power: 46 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Mad Scientist
Quote: Originally Posted by Xenophon The idiot GoP simply adopted the FDR/Truman thing about being world police and now they can't let go.
Why do we have to 'fight them' anywhere?
I find I really don't care who runs Iran as long as they leave me alone. Sounds like the attitude most Americans had just before WWII. Most Americans, not counting the government whose "neutrality" vastly favored the Allies.
__________________ "Nonviolence does not mean non-action. Nonviolence means we act with love and compassion. The moment we stop acting, we undermine the principle of nonviolence." – Thich Nhat Hanh
"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets." – Voltaire | 
07-01-2009, 07:20 PM
| | Registered User Member #16576 | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,944
Thanks: 2
Thanked 248 Times in 217 Posts
Rep Power: 30 | | | And with good reason. There was no good reason to believe that the Nazis (or for that matter the jihadist) are willing to limit the scope of their operations in any way shape or form.
Paul is clearly wrong on several counts. First, we are no longer bogged down in Iraq and will be out of there in a couple of years with any luck at all. We would have been out of there in a couple of years no matter who won the last election. Like it or not we won that little set to. The victory would have been even quicker had not Rumsfeld had his haed up his ass and been more willing to listen to the commanders in the field.
2nd You can never be so strong that no one would dare attack you. 9/11 showed that. The power disparity between the US and the entire third world is such that in a straight stand up fight even fore going the Use of nuclear weapons in an all out total war a la WWII we could kill 90% of them for the loss of not more than 200 or 300 men. Everyone knows that. That's why the Mullahs in Iran are scrambling to build a credible nuclear deterent.
3rd the world is full of assholes. It always has been and very likely always will be. Giving assholes a free hand in the rest of the world simply guarantees that we will eventually be fighting them here whether we like it or not. Even Jeffereson himself founf it necessary to ally with some unsavory types in the middle east to shut down the barbary pirates in 1803.
Paul's first paragraph is dead on. We should surrender no American freedoms whatever because some clown in a foreign country thinks we ought to. After that it's ostrich time. | | The Following User Says Thank You to garyd For This Useful Post: | | 
07-01-2009, 07:51 PM
|  | With the Old Guard Member #15282 | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: In your head
Posts: 14,624
Thanks: 56
Thanked 2,171 Times in 1,403 Posts
Rep Power: 389 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Mad Scientist
Quote: Originally Posted by Xenophon The idiot GoP simply adopted the FDR/Truman thing about being world police and now they can't let go.
Why do we have to 'fight them' anywhere?
I find I really don't care who runs Iran as long as they leave me alone. Sounds like the attitude most Americans had just before WWII. And what did the US get out of WWII, besides killing nearly half a million americans?
How exactly was supporting Stalin better then defeating Hitler?
What was the good benifit for supporting a fascist thug like Chiang Kai Shek?
How did the US benifit by prolonging the two biggest slave empires in the world, the UK and France?
The USA did the heavy lifting, but for what? | 
07-01-2009, 07:56 PM
| | Registered User Member #16576 | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,944
Thanks: 2
Thanked 248 Times in 217 Posts
Rep Power: 30 | | | Because had we not done so The odds are better than even that Hitler wins. And Patton was right as soon as we were done with Hitler we should have just headed East. | 
07-01-2009, 08:02 PM
|  | With the Old Guard Member #15282 | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: In your head
Posts: 14,624
Thanks: 56
Thanked 2,171 Times in 1,403 Posts
Rep Power: 389 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by garyd Because had we not done so The odds are better than even that Hitler wins. And Patton was right as soon as we were done with Hitler we should have just headed East. A 'Hitler win' is the same as a Stalin win.
The only difference is the Russians hid the bodies better. | 
07-01-2009, 08:10 PM
|  | Administrator Member #2435 | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 37,536
Thanks: 56
Thanked 1,788 Times in 1,286 Posts
Rep Power: 689 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Kevin_Kennedy Quote: There is no area in which Republicans have further strayed from our traditions than in foreign affairs.
Generations of conservatives followed the great advice of our Founding Fathers and pursued a restrained foreign policy that rebuffed entangling alliances and advised America, in the words of John Quincy Adams, not to "go abroad looking for dragons to slay."
Sen. Robert Taft, the stalwart of the Old Right, urged America to stay out of NATO. Dwight Eisenhower was elected on a platform promising to get us out of the conflict in Korea. Richard Nixon promised to end the war in Vietnam. PAUL: 'Fight them over there vs. over here' a false choice - Washington Times It's sound strategy. Why mess up your own yard?
__________________ She helped me with my suitcase, She stands before my eyes
Driving me to the airport, And to the friendly skies.
Going through security I held her for so long.
She finally looked at me in love, And she was gone.
Just a song before I go, A lesson to be learned.
Travelling twice the speed of sound It's easy to get burned. | 
07-01-2009, 08:12 PM
|  | Registered User Member #6709 | | Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 21,099
Thanks: 264
Thanked 730 Times in 591 Posts
Rep Power: 211 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Xenophon
Quote: Originally Posted by garyd Because had we not done so The odds are better than even that Hitler wins. And Patton was right as soon as we were done with Hitler we should have just headed East. A 'Hitler win' is the same as a Stalin win.
The only difference is the Russians hid the bodies better. Nor did they enable the Japs to bomb Pearl Harbor.
__________________ A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.
Thomas Jefferson | 
07-01-2009, 08:36 PM
|  | With the Old Guard Member #15282 | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: In your head
Posts: 14,624
Thanks: 56
Thanked 2,171 Times in 1,403 Posts
Rep Power: 389 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by AllieBaba
Nor did they enable the Japs to bomb Pearl Harbor. If the USA had not provoed Japan over China, they never would have attacked.
Funny how the US never provoked the UK or France or even Russia over China, isn't it?
You are a conservative are you not?
You should understand how the left has been hoodwinking you since the 40s to the point that you now support their agenda as your own.
FDR wanted to be 'world cop.' | 
07-01-2009, 08:38 PM
|  | Registered User Member #6709 | | Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 21,099
Thanks: 264
Thanked 730 Times in 591 Posts
Rep Power: 211 | | | What the hell does "provoed" mean????
__________________ A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.
Thomas Jefferson | 
07-01-2009, 08:39 PM
|  | Registered User Member #6709 | | Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 21,099
Thanks: 264
Thanked 730 Times in 591 Posts
Rep Power: 211 | | | P.S. I'm as disgusted with the current fake GOP politicians as I am with the dem ones.
P.P.S. I'm drinking tonight and posting from home. I apologize for any stupidity in advance. Though I don 't think I have enough to become truly stupid. Still, you never know.
__________________ A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.
Thomas Jefferson | 
07-02-2009, 12:55 AM
|  | Defend Liberty Member #11774 | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 6,837
Thanks: 14
Thanked 393 Times in 309 Posts
Rep Power: 46 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by garyd And with good reason. There was no good reason to believe that the Nazis (or for that matter the jihadist) are willing to limit the scope of their operations in any way shape or form.
Paul is clearly wrong on several counts. First, we are no longer bogged down in Iraq and will be out of there in a couple of years with any luck at all. We would have been out of there in a couple of years no matter who won the last election. Like it or not we won that little set to. The victory would have been even quicker had not Rumsfeld had his haed up his ass and been more willing to listen to the commanders in the field.
2nd You can never be so strong that no one would dare attack you. 9/11 showed that. The power disparity between the US and the entire third world is such that in a straight stand up fight even fore going the Use of nuclear weapons in an all out total war a la WWII we could kill 90% of them for the loss of not more than 200 or 300 men. Everyone knows that. That's why the Mullahs in Iran are scrambling to build a credible nuclear deterent.
3rd the world is full of assholes. It always has been and very likely always will be. Giving assholes a free hand in the rest of the world simply guarantees that we will eventually be fighting them here whether we like it or not. Even Jeffereson himself founf it necessary to ally with some unsavory types in the middle east to shut down the barbary pirates in 1803.
Paul's first paragraph is dead on. We should surrender no American freedoms whatever because some clown in a foreign country thinks we ought to. After that it's ostrich time. We'll be "out" of Iraq in a few years assuming that Obama keeps his word and something doesn't pop up between then and now that he decides to leave them there, and even if he does keep his word "out of Iraq" means a permanent military presence.
Yes, if you incite hatred around the world eventually someone is going to take it too far and attack you, 9/11 certainly did prove that.
Yes, the world is a dangerous place. However, we are the most technologically advanced country in the world and no Middle Eastern country poses a serious threat to us.
__________________ "Nonviolence does not mean non-action. Nonviolence means we act with love and compassion. The moment we stop acting, we undermine the principle of nonviolence." – Thich Nhat Hanh
"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets." – Voltaire |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |