 | | 
05-21-2008, 09:55 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,637
Rep Power: 166 | | | Ninny 9th at it again I love it. Gay rights activists are cheering a decision by the one court in the federal system that has the most overturned decisions of any court ever.
The 9th is so out of touch with reality its rulings are a laugh riot. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080522/.../military_gays
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) |
Login to remove all ads 
05-22-2008, 01:04 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,598
Rep Power: 45 | | Really? Most overturned ever? http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletyp...cuitsFinal.pdf
Not quite. Numbers for the most recent year availabile. Circuit score-card. Out of 11 circuits, the 9th court of appeals would come in at #8. | 
05-22-2008, 01:55 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,637
Rep Power: 166 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Larkinn | Now MR. Mensa , go get all the cases for the last 50 years and check out the facts , retard.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
05-22-2008, 02:02 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,598
Rep Power: 45 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt Now MR. Mensa , go get all the cases for the last 50 years and check out the facts , retard. | A case that was decided 50 years ago is relevant to current cases, how exactly? | 
05-22-2008, 02:03 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,637
Rep Power: 166 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Larkinn A case that was decided 50 years ago is relevant to current cases, how exactly? | You are a fucking retard, but then I already knew that.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
05-22-2008, 02:05 PM
|  | Free: Mudholes Stomped | | Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,096
Rep Power: 167 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Larkinn A case that was decided 50 years ago is relevant to current cases, how exactly? | uh, the same as how RvW - a 30 year old decision - still counts, you dumb bastard.  | 
05-22-2008, 02:45 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,598
Rep Power: 45 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt You are a fucking retard, but then I already knew that. |
So, want to cite over the past 50 years that the 9th circuit got overturned the most?
Or is that just more shit you made up? | 
05-22-2008, 02:46 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,598
Rep Power: 45 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Shogun uh, the same as how RvW - a 30 year old decision - still counts, you dumb bastard.  | Aww, its my other little poodle. You jealous fluffy?
So care to tell me how Roe V. Wade effects the inherent political ideology of the court today? | 
05-22-2008, 02:59 PM
|  | Free: Mudholes Stomped | | Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,096
Rep Power: 167 | | I don't need to.. We heard all about that during the last batch of Scotus judge confirmations.
DOH!
yup, you are still one dumb motherfucker. | 
05-22-2008, 03:11 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,598
Rep Power: 45 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Shogun I don't need to.. We heard all about that during the last batch of Scotus judge confirmations.
DOH!
yup, you are still one dumb motherfucker. | So care to cite anything similar for 9th circuit appellate judges? Since that is, after all, the topic.
Doh is right.  | 
05-22-2008, 03:35 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 498
Rep Power: 30 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt I love it. Gay rights activists are cheering a decision by the one court in the federal system that has the most overturned decisions of any court ever.
The 9th is so out of touch with reality its rulings are a laugh riot. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080522/.../military_gays | Hmm. I'm generally for the broad acceptance of homosexuality, but the military is... a unique situation. It isn't a normal job and I think it should have extra leeway in how it chooses to handle things. It ain't Wal Mart; the effects of "moral" and "sexual tension" could be a lot more dramatic.
Of course, those challenges didn't prevent racial and gender integration, but I don't think this, uh, orientation integration should be rushed. Let it permeate the culture more. Tradition is important to the mindspace proper to military service; change there should be gradual.
In the meantime, it sucks to be the person fired just for being open and honest about who s/he's attracted to, but, well, s/he knew the conditions when s/he joined, didn't s/he? (I'd comment specifically on the case in the article, but there are no details, such as what exactly she was fired for) Quote:
Originally Posted by Larkinn | Heh, well they did have 15 decisions reversed in that report, compared to the next highest number for a numbered curcuit, 6.
Of course, proportionally they didn't do terribly bad, an 83% percent reversal rate in cases reviewed vs. four 100%s and an 86%; but one wonders why so many of their rulings came before the Supreme Court to begin with - more than twice as many as the next-most-reviewed numbered circuit and more than all the state courts combined.
RGS's "most ever" claim may be hyperbole (I don't know for sure), but your link sure doesn't make the 9th look all that "in touch."
__________________ The pedigree of honey
Does not concern the bee;
A clover, any time, to him
Is aristocracy. ~Emily Dickinson | 
05-22-2008, 03:49 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,598
Rep Power: 45 | | Thats in part because of this. Quote: |
Headquartered in San Francisco, the Ninth Circuit is by far the largest of the thirteen courts of appeals, with 28 active judgeships. | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_..._Ninth_Circuit | 
05-22-2008, 04:09 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 498
Rep Power: 30 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Larkinn | I see. That is a pretty massive area; the whole west coast, two states deep (compared to the east coast which is divided up among five circuits) plus Alaska and Hawaii.
Point taken. In 2005 the 9th didn't do too bad, relatively speaking, when it comes to having cases reversed.
I have heard that it has a reputation in the legal field for being the most "out there" circuit  , but I will speak no more of things about which I do not know.
__________________ The pedigree of honey
Does not concern the bee;
A clover, any time, to him
Is aristocracy. ~Emily Dickinson | 
05-22-2008, 11:18 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Dixie
Posts: 979
Rep Power: 44 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Larkinn | Bingo. RGS made his point with raw numbers, but raw numbers also show the 9th has the most cases that are affirmed, which disproves his point completely.
In addition, the SCOTUS only grants review in precedent setting cases or cases that present important, unresolved questions of law. More of those cases arise from California than Kansas.
__________________ No one ever asks whether the glass is too big! | 
05-24-2008, 08:05 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Florida
Posts: 2,545
Rep Power: 29 | | Quote: |
Hmm. I'm generally for the broad acceptance of homosexuality, but the military is... a unique situation. It isn't a normal job and I think it should have extra leeway in how it chooses to handle things. It ain't Wal Mart; the effects of "moral" and "sexual tension" could be a lot more dramatic
|
Or not. There have been gays in all militarys since time began. When have you read of a gay revolution or major gay incident in military history.,
No, I spent 21 years in the Corps and was never molested or approached by a gay Marine. This is all homophobic bullshit that some of our really manly men can't deal with.
It was interesting that the onus was on gay male Marines. If a female was suspected of being a lesbian, there wasn't as much an issue by the "male" powers to be.
The "sexual" problems normally dealth with one straight spouse screwing someone else's straight spouse or one of his/her junior troops. Just good old normal fukking around crap.
It's all bullshit. Gay people have as much right to die for their country as anyone else.  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | The Ninny Ninth | RetiredGySgt | Current Events | 2 | 07-23-2007 07:13 PM | | | |