 | | 
04-09-2008, 05:08 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,092
Rep Power: 41 | | | How about Hiring Those Vets? Another example of hypocrisy? Support the Troops? Then Hire a Veteran
By Debra J. Saunders, San Francisco Chronicle
April 6, 2008
A recent survey for the Department of Veterans Affairs found that 18 percent of vets just back from tours of duty are out of work - and a quarter of those with jobs earn less than $21,840 per year. In the first two years after leaving military service, the official unemployment rate for veterans was 9.5 percent - more than double the 4.3 percent rate for a group of demographically similar nonvets.
for full article: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../INLTVQUVR.DTL
__________________ "In war, there is no alternative but to apply every available means to bring it to a swift end. There is no substitute for victory. War's very object is victory, not prolonged indecision." General Douglas MacArthur “Democratic civilization is the first in history to blame itself because another power is trying to destroy it.” Jean-Francois Revel |
Login to remove all ads 
04-09-2008, 05:36 AM
| | 1-20-09 | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: The Other Side of Paradise
Posts: 13,598
Rep Power: 350 | | | Yes... I think the fake patriots with the Support Our Troops magnets on their cars are absolutely being hypocritical.
As for the rest...and what I'd have otherwise gotten out of the article had you not used the term hypocrits (instead of just acknowledging the problem), then I'd say yes... it's important that we take care of the people who are being forced to fight Bush's war. Absolutely.
__________________ "Trust none of what you hear And less of what you see" Springsteen
When the Founding Fathers protected our right to free speech, I think that meant we were supposed to use it.
Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was the world's most unhinged lunatic. He's now dead. So that moves Ann Coulter up to first place - David Letterman
O, when she is angry she is keen and shrewd; / She was a vixen when she went to school, / And though she be but little, she is fierce. — Shakespeare
51 days left http://www.backwardsbush.com/ | 
04-09-2008, 06:03 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 22,188
Rep Power: 369 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by jillian Yes... I think the fake patriots with the Support Our Troops magnets on their cars are absolutely being hypocritical.
As for the rest...and what I'd have otherwise gotten out of the article had you not used the term hypocrits (instead of just acknowledging the problem), then I'd say yes... it's important that we take care of the people who are being forced to fight Bush's war. Absolutely. | You're trying to oversimplify the problem. What skills do those vets possess and what markets are they trying to sell them?
I personally have had NO problem finding a job, and the fact I am a veteran has been to my plus since entering the civilian sector. Employers like vets. If nothing else, we have a disciplined work ethic we bring along pre-instilled and we aren't the ones that start whining when someone has to dig. On time means 0655, not 7:10-7-20 THEN start finding your tools.
There's a WHOLE lot more to this argument than simply blaming the system, that btw, you expect exactly WHAT out of? A guranteed job earning an upper-middle-income salary upon discharge, or what?
Most vets who get out after one hitch are around 22 years old. You were in law school at the time making HOW much, exactly?
__________________ “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing” - Edmund Burke | 
04-09-2008, 06:33 AM
|  | Great promise | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Australia and bloody dry it is too
Posts: 6,531
Rep Power: 160 | | | There's an opening for an HR type entrepreneur. There's a company in the UK that makes a nice little earner out of finding ex-coppers jobs in private industry, I would think with the varied range of skills that military veterans would have that someone in the US should crank up a business finding them work.
__________________ Blowhards-R-Us | 
04-09-2008, 06:42 AM
| | 1-20-09 | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: The Other Side of Paradise
Posts: 13,598
Rep Power: 350 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by GunnyL You're trying to oversimplify the problem. What skills do those vets possess and what markets are they trying to sell them?
I personally have had NO problem finding a job, and the fact I am a veteran has been to my plus since entering the civilian sector. Employers like vets. If nothing else, we have a disciplined work ethic we bring along pre-instilled and we aren't the ones that start whining when someone has to dig. On time means 0655, not 7:10-7-20 THEN start finding your tools.
There's a WHOLE lot more to this argument than simply blaming the system, that btw, you expect exactly WHAT out of? A guranteed job earning an upper-middle-income salary upon discharge, or what?
Most vets who get out after one hitch are around 22 years old. You were in law school at the time making HOW much, exactly? | Actually, I graduated from law school when I was still 22.
My first job? Money was sucky... very sucky. But I worked through law school also for the state's attorney general's office. so I always made some money.
Thing is, after WWII vets came back to the GI Bill... they had cheap mortgages, job training, etc. Nothing wrong with doing that for today's vets.
BTW, I wasn't the one who raised the issue or made it a "hypocrisy" issue. Was merely responding to the point raised. That being said, I still think it's good for us as a society to take care of our vets.
__________________ "Trust none of what you hear And less of what you see" Springsteen
When the Founding Fathers protected our right to free speech, I think that meant we were supposed to use it.
Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was the world's most unhinged lunatic. He's now dead. So that moves Ann Coulter up to first place - David Letterman
O, when she is angry she is keen and shrewd; / She was a vixen when she went to school, / And though she be but little, she is fierce. — Shakespeare
51 days left http://www.backwardsbush.com/ | 
04-09-2008, 07:49 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Northeast US
Posts: 6,788
Rep Power: 79 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by jillian Yes... I think the fake patriots with the Support Our Troops magnets on their cars are absolutely being hypocritical.
As for the rest...and what I'd have otherwise gotten out of the article had you not used the term hypocrits (instead of just acknowledging the problem), then I'd say yes... it's important that we take care of the people who are being forced to fight Bush's war. Absolutely. | So the fake patriots without magnets (like the idiots in Congress) are NOT hypocritical ... got it.
Which of our all volunteer military are being forced to fight? Must be that "secret" military composed of shanghied black/latinio kids that are missing from high schools across the country. That's the military without enough bullets, armor and stuff.
__________________ "Why, it appears that we appointed all of our worst generals to command the armies and we appointed all of our best generals to edit the newspapers. I mean, I found by reading a newspaper that these editor generals saw all of the defects plainly from the start but didn't tell me until it was too late. I'm willing to yield my place to these best generals and I'll do my best for the cause by editing a newspaper." -- Gen. Robert E. Lee | 
04-09-2008, 07:50 AM
|  | Great promise | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Australia and bloody dry it is too
Posts: 6,531
Rep Power: 160 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by CSM So the fake patriots without magnets (like the idiots in Congress) are NOT hypocritical ... got it.
Which of our all volunteer military are being forced to fight? Must be that "secret" military composed of shanghied black/latinio kids that are missing from high schools across the country. That's the military without enough bullets, armor and stuff. | They're ordered to fight aren't they?
__________________ Blowhards-R-Us | 
04-09-2008, 07:56 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,637
Rep Power: 166 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Diuretic They're ordered to fight aren't they? | They ALL VOLUNTEERED to join the military. Further the war has been on since 2002 ( you remember Afghanistan don't you?". Except for career military most of the troops now have joined SINCE then. ALL BY CHOICE.
Let me break it down for you. When you volunteer you sign an 8 year contract. Stop Loss can not keep you even past those 8 years. So we are at the 6 year mark, not to many left from before the fighting began unless they REENLISTED. This would include the Guard as well, in fact more so since they do not generally join for 8 years.
But thanks for playing.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
04-09-2008, 08:07 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Northeast US
Posts: 6,788
Rep Power: 79 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Diuretic They're ordered to fight aren't they? | Like they didn't know they would be ordered to fight BEFORE they signed up. I suppose there are a few soldiers at Camp Dowhatyouwant who are disgruntled and did not expect to do anything except wear a uniform and collect a paycheck but most of those in the military knew and know full well what they were signing up for.
I also presume you are "forced" to do things because of the lifestyle you choose to live. Funny how that works.
__________________ "Why, it appears that we appointed all of our worst generals to command the armies and we appointed all of our best generals to edit the newspapers. I mean, I found by reading a newspaper that these editor generals saw all of the defects plainly from the start but didn't tell me until it was too late. I'm willing to yield my place to these best generals and I'll do my best for the cause by editing a newspaper." -- Gen. Robert E. Lee | 
04-09-2008, 08:12 AM
|  | Great promise | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Australia and bloody dry it is too
Posts: 6,531
Rep Power: 160 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt They ALL VOLUNTEERED to join the military. Further the war has been on since 2002 ( you remember Afghanistan don't you?". Except for career military most of the troops now have joined SINCE then. ALL BY CHOICE.
Let me break it down for you. When you volunteer you sign an 8 year contract. Stop Loss can not keep you even past those 8 years. So we are at the 6 year mark, not to many left from before the fighting began unless they REENLISTED. This would include the Guard as well, in fact more so since they do not generally join for 8 years.
But thanks for playing. | Hey "yes" or "no" are good answers. How about you try one or the other instead of running off at the mouth?
I say again, I say again, "they're ordered to fight aren't they?"
__________________ Blowhards-R-Us | 
04-09-2008, 08:13 AM
|  | Great promise | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Australia and bloody dry it is too
Posts: 6,531
Rep Power: 160 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by CSM Like they didn't know they would be ordered to fight BEFORE they signed up. I suppose there are a few soldiers at Camp Dowhatyouwant who are disgruntled and did not expect to do anything except wear a uniform and collect a paycheck but most of those in the military knew and know full well what they were signing up for.
I also presume you are "forced" to do things because of the lifestyle you choose to live. Funny how that works. | In my job or my lifestyle?
But again, I asked a question for a reason and I'm busting to descend on you blokes with my left hook but you're dancing around. Now, are they ordered to fight or do they pick their battles?
__________________ Blowhards-R-Us | 
04-09-2008, 08:22 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Northeast US
Posts: 6,788
Rep Power: 79 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Diuretic In my job or my lifestyle?
But again, I asked a question for a reason and I'm busting to descend on you blokes with my left hook but you're dancing around. Now, are they ordered to fight or do they pick their battles? | Not dancing...you are by ignoring the fact that they VOLUNTEERED to join KNOWING they would probably be ordered to fight. Also, being ordered to fight is not the same thing as being FORCED to fight.
That aside, they can always REFUSE to fight. Of course that would mean suffering the consequences but they have that choice. Then again, they could always bide their time and get the hell out when their enlistment is up.
I suppose now you are going to make this into an intolerably long and boring thread about semantics, the definition of the word 'forced' and even throw in a few jibes about rednecks, conservatives, warmongers and brain washed soldiers.
__________________ "Why, it appears that we appointed all of our worst generals to command the armies and we appointed all of our best generals to edit the newspapers. I mean, I found by reading a newspaper that these editor generals saw all of the defects plainly from the start but didn't tell me until it was too late. I'm willing to yield my place to these best generals and I'll do my best for the cause by editing a newspaper." -- Gen. Robert E. Lee | 
04-09-2008, 08:28 AM
|  | Great promise | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Australia and bloody dry it is too
Posts: 6,531
Rep Power: 160 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by CSM Not dancing...you are by ignoring the fact that they VOLUNTEERED to join KNOWING they would probably be ordered to fight. Also, being ordered to fight is not the same thing as being FORCED to fight.
That aside, they can always REFUSE to fight. Of course that would mean suffering the consequences but they have that choice. Then again, they could always bide their time and get the hell out when their enlistment is up.
I suppose now you are going to make this into an intolerably long and boring thread about semantics, the definition of the word 'forced' and even throw in a few jibes about rednecks, conservatives, warmongers and brain washed soldiers. | Do you see a social contract between these volunteers and the people who can order them to fight?
And I really find it uncomfortable insulting people for the work they choose to do so, no, I'll leave the personal put-downs out of it.
__________________ Blowhards-R-Us | 
04-09-2008, 08:30 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Northeast US
Posts: 6,788
Rep Power: 79 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Diuretic Do you see a social contract between these volunteers and the people who can order them to fight?
And I really find it uncomfortable insulting people for the work they choose to do so, no, I'll leave the personal put-downs out of it. | Atually, there is a contract signed when you enlist as well as an oath. Both of which are signed/taken VOLUNTARILY.
__________________ "Why, it appears that we appointed all of our worst generals to command the armies and we appointed all of our best generals to edit the newspapers. I mean, I found by reading a newspaper that these editor generals saw all of the defects plainly from the start but didn't tell me until it was too late. I'm willing to yield my place to these best generals and I'll do my best for the cause by editing a newspaper." -- Gen. Robert E. Lee | 
04-09-2008, 08:31 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,637
Rep Power: 166 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Diuretic Do you see a social contract between these volunteers and the people who can order them to fight?
And I really find it uncomfortable insulting people for the work they choose to do so, no, I'll leave the personal put-downs out of it. | What part of freedom and volunteering do you not understand? Or are you suggesting people that willingly volunteer for a military that is currently at war just never expected to be sent to fight that war?
As for those few left that joined before this started, are you suggesting they had a reasonable expectation that joining the military would never involve them fighting in a war they may or may not approve of?
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |