 | | 
04-04-2008, 01:04 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 344
Rep Power: 0 | | | Who Here Supports a Draft? Let's face it, the all volunteer army has been a disaster.
By now, you've heard the report by some army officials requesting a surge for the surge. I don't think it's fair that on an issue as serious as the Iraq war only a tiny majority of American households absorb its misery.
Democrats and Republicans alike say they "support the troops," but is that merely a copout excusing them from aiding their nation?
For the first time ever in U.S. history, the people who clean the armies plates, do the laundry, cook the food etc are contract workers. In fact, there are 165,000 contract workers supplementing American soldiers in Iraq.
These American workers make more money than soldiers in combat and have also absorbed 1,000 deaths and thousands wounded.
If the war continues, that means soldiers currently in Iraq will have tours beyond, according to internal armed forces assesments, what the human mind can take.
I think these unique attributes to the Iraq war has made it almost make believe to most American households. It's 'something that happens to other families.'
I don't think it's fair. A Democrat or Republican can never be serious when he or she says "they support the troops" and not also support a draft.
Every American household should realize war is not make believe. This is a lesson that cannot be told, but rather only shown: by way of a notice from the defense department ordering your attendance at a military base.
War is a serious matter and when your nation gets involved, so do you.
Last edited by TheGoodShepherd; 04-04-2008 at 01:07 AM.
|
Login to remove all ads 
04-04-2008, 01:05 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 344
Rep Power: 0 | | | Who Here Supports a Draft? Who Here Supports a Draft?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's face it, the all volunteer army has been a disaster.
By now, you've heard the report by some army officials requesting a surge for the surge. I don't think it's fair that on an issue as serious as the Iraq war only a tiny majority of American households absorb it's misery.
Democrats and Republicans alike say they "support the troops," but is that merely a copout excusing them from aiding their nation?
For the first time ever in U.S. history, the people who clean the armies plates, do the laundry, cook the food etc are contract workers. In fact, there are 165,000 contract workers supplementing American soldiers in Iraq.
These American workers make more money than soldiers in combat and have also absorbed 1,000 deaths and thousands wounded.
If the war continues, that means soldiers currently in Iraq will have tours beyond, according to internal armed forces assesments, what the human mind can take.
I think these unique attributes to the Iraq war has made it almost make believe to most American households. It's 'something that happens to other families.'
I don't think it's fair. A Democrat or Republican can never be serious when he or she says "they support the troops" and not also support a draft.
Every American household should realize war is not make believe. This is a lesson that cannot be told, but rather only shown: by way of a notice from the defense department ordering your attendance at a military base.
War is a serious matter and when your nation gets involved, so do you. | 
04-04-2008, 01:09 AM
|  | Super Moderator | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: the People's Republic of Illinois
Posts: 3,145
Rep Power: 68 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGoodShepherd Who Here Supports a Draft?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's face it, the all volunteer army has been a disaster.
| Oh I can't wait to hear the explanation for this one. I'm listening.
__________________ "Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the United States was too strong."
President Ronald Reagan
“Equality, rightly understood as our founding fathers understood it, leads to liberty and to the emancipation of creative differences; wrongly understood, as it has been so tragically in our time, it leads first to conformity and then to despotism”
Barry Goldwater | 
04-04-2008, 01:15 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,499
Rep Power: 164 | | | LOL, ya some disaster.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
04-04-2008, 01:16 AM
|  | Super Moderator | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: the People's Republic of Illinois
Posts: 3,145
Rep Power: 68 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGoodShepherd Let's face it, the all volunteer army has been a disaster.
| I can't wait to here an explanation for this one. Go ahead. You have my attention.
__________________ "Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the United States was too strong."
President Ronald Reagan
“Equality, rightly understood as our founding fathers understood it, leads to liberty and to the emancipation of creative differences; wrongly understood, as it has been so tragically in our time, it leads first to conformity and then to despotism”
Barry Goldwater | 
04-04-2008, 01:17 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 344
Rep Power: 0 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt LOL, ya some disaster. |
You really think it's been a success? By the way, nice Bertrand Russell quote. It fits perfectly with this thread and the popular notion the all volunteer army has been a rousing success.
Either way, how about answering the draft question first.
Last edited by TheGoodShepherd; 04-04-2008 at 01:19 AM.
| 
04-04-2008, 01:19 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,499
Rep Power: 164 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGoodShepherd Who Here Supports a Draft?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's face it, the all volunteer army has been a disaster.
By now, you've heard the report by some army officials requesting a surge for the surge. I don't think it's fair that on an issue as serious as the Iraq war only a tiny majority of American households absorb it's misery.
Democrats and Republicans alike say they "support the troops," but is that merely a copout excusing them from aiding their nation?
For the first time ever in U.S. history, the people who clean the armies plates, do the laundry, cook the food etc are contract workers. In fact, there are 165,000 contract workers supplementing American soldiers in Iraq.
These American workers make more money than soldiers in combat and have also absorbed 1,000 deaths and thousands wounded.
If the war continues, that means soldiers currently in Iraq will have tours beyond, according to internal armed forces assesments, what the human mind can take.
I think these unique attributes to the Iraq war has made it almost make believe to most American households. It's 'something that happens to other families.'
I don't think it's fair. A Democrat or Republican can never be serious when he or she says "they support the troops" and not also support a draft.
Every American household should realize war is not make believe. This is a lesson that cannot be told, but rather only shown: by way of a notice from the defense department ordering your attendance at a military base.
War is a serious matter and when your nation gets involved, so do you. | Funny how just 55 years ago the human mind could take 4 years of war without a rotation State side, but now a year long tour is just to much to handle.
As for you, your just wanting a draft to scare up protests for the war. You do not give a good rat's ass about our troops or our Government.
So tell me, have you served? And if so are you STILL serving? If not why wait for a draft, do the right thing and join up to "help out" and learn first hand all about war.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
04-04-2008, 01:24 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,499
Rep Power: 164 | | | I support raising the Army by about 600 k troops and the Marine Corps by about 30k. PERMANENTLY , not just for this little war. We foolishly gutted the military in the 90's.
I suspect those numbers can be sustained over time by an all volunteer force, we did it in the 70's and the 80's and can do it again.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
04-04-2008, 01:29 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 344
Rep Power: 0 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt Funny how just 55 years ago the human mind could take 4 years of war without a rotation State side, but now a year long tour is just to much to handle.
As for you, your just wanting a draft to scare up protests for the war. You do not give a good rat's ass about our troops or our Government.
So tell me, have you served? And if so are you STILL serving? If not why wait for a draft, do the right thing and join up to "help out" and learn first hand all about war. | I won't lie to you. I'm a young healthy 19 year old who has not and will not serve unless forced to. The only way I'm going to fight for the current rabble in Washington is if they issue a draft, at least then I'll feel a sense of duty.
Plus I'm in Canada studying on scholarship. I'm orignally from the Detroit area - dearborn.
Fight for the all volunteer army? Are you kidding me? I wouldn't purposefully fight for them in a million years. Why not? I thought about signing up once while visiting my cousin in Taylor, Michigan. I did research and the more I found out about the experiment that is the all volunteer army, the more it turned me off.
Secondly, are you part of the "if you haven't served, shut the hell up," crowd? Like I told someone else tonight, that line of reasoning is in lockstep with the values of the SS or the clowns running the show in North Korea. | 
04-04-2008, 01:33 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 344
Rep Power: 0 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt I support raising the Army by about 600 k troops and the Marine Corps by about 30k. PERMANENTLY , not just for this little war. We foolishly gutted the military in the 90's.
I suspect those numbers can be sustained over time by an all volunteer force, we did it in the 70's and the 80's and can do it again. | The were not needed because the Soviet Army divisons they were intended to guard against had collapsed and folded. Its interesting to note, by the way, the decision to gut the troops was a direct result of the direction the all volunteer army purposefully took for the future.
This is what you get when you to privatize the army. Like any corporation, there's going to be downsizing.
And that's what happened.
Last edited by TheGoodShepherd; 04-04-2008 at 01:37 AM.
| 
04-04-2008, 01:34 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,499
Rep Power: 164 | | | You made the claim it was only right that people be FORCED to serve. So basically your argument is, if I am not forced to do it, I won't.
Good, the military doesn't need people in it that do not want to be there. The draft is a bad idea. Especially a draft whose only purpose is to scare up protesters.
The all volunteer military is long past "experimental". It is a vibrant functioning entity and has raised the most advanced and most powerful military on the face of the planet.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
04-04-2008, 01:38 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 344
Rep Power: 0 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt You made the claim it was only right that people be FORCED to serve. So basically your argument is, if I am not forced to do it, I won't.
Good, the military doesn't need people in it that do not want to be there. The draft is a bad idea. Especially a draft whose only purpose is to scare up protesters. The all volunteer military is long past "experimental". It is a vibrant functioning entity and has raised the most advanced and most powerful military on the face of the planet. |
I agree with you there, it's now fully operating at a miserable level. | 
04-04-2008, 01:39 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,499
Rep Power: 164 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGoodShepherd The were not needed because the Soviet Army divisons they were intended to guard against had collapsed and folded. Its interesting to note, by the way, the decision to gut the troops was a direct result of the new direction the all volunteer army purposefully took. | You are aware that the "all Volunteer" Army has been around since 1973? LONG before the Soviet Union Collapsed? We had over 2 million troops in all services at one point , all volunteers.
As for the sudden collapse of the Soviet Union removing a need for the forces we had? I beg to differ, even in the 90's we knew we did not have the troops we needed as the force was drawn down.
With the Soviets we had a stable world of sorts, neither side could risk an all out war but had to be prepared for one. With the collapse of the Soviets chaos became the norm in a lot of places in the world. I suggest , and I point to the past 20 years as evidence, that instead of drawing down we should have maintained our military because it was actually needed more AFTER the Soviets Collapsed.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
04-04-2008, 01:43 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,499
Rep Power: 164 | | | Ohh and the decision to gut the military had absolutely nothing to do with the Army and it's direction. It had to do with politicians seeing money signs for pet projects and social programs.
I suggest you do a tad bit of research. Before the Soviet collapse our national Military plan was to be able to fight 2 and a half wars at the SAME TIME. And until very recently that was STILL the National plan. Except we no longer had the Divisions or man power to do so. SO finally someone changed the plan.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
04-04-2008, 01:44 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 344
Rep Power: 0 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt You are aware that the "all Volunteer" Army has been around since 1973? LONG before the Soviet Union Collapsed? We had over 2 million troops in all services at one point , all volunteers.As for the sudden collapse of the Soviet Union removing a need for the forces we had? I beg to differ, even in the 90's we knew we did not have the troops we needed as the force was drawn down.
With the Soviets we had a stable world of sorts, neither side could risk an all out war but had to be prepared for one. With the collapse of the Soviets chaos became the norm in a lot of places in the world. I suggest , and I point to the past 20 years as evidence, that instead of drawing down we should have maintained our military because it was actually needed more AFTER the Soviets Collapsed. | I'm perfecty aware of that. But as the years passed, the AVA took on more of a modern business model. Hence, the downsizing. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |