 | | 
01-24-2010, 11:03 AM
| | Registered User Member #21303 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,845
Thanks: 87
Thanked 212 Times in 164 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight You represent the worst of the Nationalistic hypocrites. Ditto. Thank you for continuing to prove your dishonesty. | 
01-24-2010, 11:07 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20227 | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Somewhere in Southeast Asia
Posts: 5,092
Thanks: 463
Thanked 615 Times in 455 Posts
Rep Power: 134 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Thank you for continuing to prove your dishonesty. Ditto.
__________________  "
It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable, that those who will not risk cannot win."
John Paul Jones
"My Country, May She always be right, but My Country, right or wrong."
Steven Decatur | 
01-24-2010, 11:08 AM
| | Well Chit mang ! Member #19820 | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Not fucking there !
Posts: 1,042
Thanks: 114
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
Rep Power: 8 | | | That'll kick up the unemployment rolls a bit ! | 
01-24-2010, 11:10 AM
|  | Administrator Member #2435 | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 37,536
Thanks: 56
Thanked 1,788 Times in 1,286 Posts
Rep Power: 688 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight The Marines, and all Soldiers who served deserve much better than America. They are way too good for us. We allowed them to be used for Colonialism instead of what they signed up for. The height of our selfishness can be seen in the great divide between the pro war crowd and pro American crowd in that the two groups couldn't even work together to ensure our Troops received the best healthcare available. Too many sit on their ass and whine instead of actually doing something and that is in all camps.
For the amateur heart string pullers, let me point out that no, our Troops did not Sacrifice their lives and limbs in Iraq in Defense of the US. Their Service has been exploited by certain Policymakers, but that can never take away from the honorable Service our Troops have given. I even recommend all Soldiers get out of the military until they get a nation of Citizens that cares just 5 percent as much about them as all US Troops care about America. We don't deserve them. | | The Following User Says Thank You to Gunny For This Useful Post: | | 
01-24-2010, 11:16 AM
|  | INCOMING! Member #19850 | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Out here in the middle.
Posts: 3,204
Thanks: 338
Thanked 464 Times in 358 Posts
Rep Power: 56 | | The Army was playing backgammon the whole time.
They weren't patrolling, taking a bulk of the casualties, and involuntarily mobilizing reservists because they were short handed or anything like that.
The Marines had an extended presence in Korea and Viet Nam too. They have had an extended presence in Afghanistan. They are an expeditionary force first, but they are always prepared to stay longer.
__________________ "Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."
- Friedrich Nietzsche
Last edited by geauxtohell; 01-24-2010 at 11:18 AM.
| 
01-24-2010, 11:17 AM
|  | INCOMING! Member #19850 | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Out here in the middle.
Posts: 3,204
Thanks: 338
Thanked 464 Times in 358 Posts
Rep Power: 56 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Quote: Originally Posted by Samson
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight We are still keeping the occupation in place. This rings the bell of the empty rhetoric on "Iraq had elections!" I'm glad as hell some troops are leaving iraq but this is nothing to celebrate. We have not accomplished anything in iraq and have only given legitimate reasons to attack the US. Good Example, Ding-Dong;
Speaking of "ringing the bell of empty rhetoric." 
Empty rhetoric? We fucking invaded a nation that never attacked us and have caused countless innocent deaths with our occupation. Who the hell is silly enough to believe there won't be a price to pay for all the bloodshed? Know what is truly sick? When we get attacked your camp will sing the we-are-innocent song instead of being mature and honest by admitting we aren't innocent. Just like that guy said years ago......9/11 was our chickens coming home to roost.
Could anyone explain why we sent our troops to die (supposedly) to fight islamic extremists only to use their Sacrifices to set up an Islamic Theocracy in Iraq? I agree with that. We've sowed the seeds for future radicalism out of Iraq.
It was a poor policy move from the onset. That doesn't make it the fault of the soldiers and marines, of course.
__________________ "Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."
- Friedrich Nietzsche | 
01-24-2010, 11:17 AM
| | Registered User Member #21303 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,845
Thanks: 87
Thanked 212 Times in 164 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Thank you for continuing to prove your dishonesty. Ditto. I haven't been dishonest about anything. You, otoh, resort to childish games every time you can't address an issue. So tell us oh great supporter of our troops, what do you say to those who have returned and are against the occupation? What do you say to those who have lost their arms, legs, ears, eyes, and other parts? Do you also accuse them of lying? Do you call them code pink? No. We all know the answer. You don't say a fucking word. | 
01-24-2010, 11:24 AM
|  | Póg Mo Thóin Member #21821 | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: A Higher Plain
Posts: 2,739
Thanks: 172
Thanked 216 Times in 178 Posts
Rep Power: 60 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by geauxtohell The Army was playing backgammon the whole time.
They weren't patrolling, taking a bulk of the casualties, and involuntarily mobilizing reservists because they were short handed or anything like that.
The Marines had an extended presence in Korea and Viet Nam too. They are an expeditionary force first, but they are always prepared to stay longer. I don't argue that the Marines were also mis-deployed to Korea, or Vietnam (although, at least these theatres had coastlines to make their "extended presence justifiable). Nor should they not be prepared to stay "longer"....BUT 7 fucking YEARS longer???
My questions are:
Why are the Marines doing the Army's job?
Are the Marines Equipped to do the Army's Job?
If the Marine Corps is going to do the Army's job, then why seperate the services?
__________________
Quote: Originally Posted by beowolfe None of this makes any sense...... | 
01-24-2010, 11:27 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20227 | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Somewhere in Southeast Asia
Posts: 5,092
Thanks: 463
Thanked 615 Times in 455 Posts
Rep Power: 134 | | | The Marines are NOT doing the Army's job. They are following the orders of the CinC.
Yes. The Marines are equipped with the tools and weapons to complete their mission.
The Marine Corps is acting on orders from the Commander in Chief....just as the Army does. Neither Service does the other's job. They both have specific mission parameters as related to Iraq.
__________________  "
It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable, that those who will not risk cannot win."
John Paul Jones
"My Country, May She always be right, but My Country, right or wrong."
Steven Decatur | 
01-24-2010, 11:30 AM
| | Registered User Member #21303 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,845
Thanks: 87
Thanked 212 Times in 164 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by geauxtohell
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Quote: Originally Posted by Samson
Good Example, Ding-Dong;
Speaking of "ringing the bell of empty rhetoric." 
Empty rhetoric? We fucking invaded a nation that never attacked us and have caused countless innocent deaths with our occupation. Who the hell is silly enough to believe there won't be a price to pay for all the bloodshed? Know what is truly sick? When we get attacked your camp will sing the we-are-innocent song instead of being mature and honest by admitting we aren't innocent. Just like that guy said years ago......9/11 was our chickens coming home to roost.
Could anyone explain why we sent our troops to die (supposedly) to fight islamic extremists only to use their Sacrifices to set up an Islamic Theocracy in Iraq? I agree with that. We've sowed the seeds for future radicalism out of Iraq.
It was a poor policy move from the onset. That doesn't make it the fault of the soldiers and marines, of course. No the soldiers are not to blame but the higher ranks, at least some of them, are to blame for following illegal orders. I've seen some admit they failed to keep their Oath by allowing the occupation to continue. For the past 7 years the pro war crowd has eternally tried to make our Soldiers=Policy and it is for one clear purpose: to accuse war critics of hating our Troops. It's a childish propaganda tool and in many ways it worked and it is still working in some circles.
I guarantee most war supporters either do not know we established a Theocracy or what it means for the region. When Britain tried this a hundred years ago they utterly failed. Some of their Generals told Iraqis they were there to "Liberate" them. Sound familiar? I'm also guessing most don't know it was the West that created Iraq and Kuwait. | 
01-24-2010, 11:31 AM
|  | INCOMING! Member #19850 | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Out here in the middle.
Posts: 3,204
Thanks: 338
Thanked 464 Times in 358 Posts
Rep Power: 56 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Samson
Quote: Originally Posted by geauxtohell The Army was playing backgammon the whole time.
They weren't patrolling, taking a bulk of the casualties, and involuntarily mobilizing reservists because they were short handed or anything like that.
The Marines had an extended presence in Korea and Viet Nam too. They are an expeditionary force first, but they are always prepared to stay longer. I don't argue that the Marines were also mis-deployed to Korea, or Vietnam (although, at least these theatres had coastlines to make their "extended presence justifiable). Nor should they not be prepared to stay "longer"....BUT 7 fucking YEARS longer???
My questions are:
Why are the Marines doing the Army's job?
Are the Marines Equipped to do the Army's Job?
If the Marine Corps is going to do the Army's job, then why seperate the services? Look amigo, infantry is infantry, and when you need infantry badly the branch of service doesn't really matter. All of this might make some sense if the Army AND Marines weren't maxed out and having to recall people as it is. I doubt the Marine Corps would be happy sitting at home while the Army was doing the fighting. It's not really the National Guard's job to fight outside of the nation's borders, but they got sent too.
So to answer your question:
1.) The Marines aren't doing the Army's job. They are pulling part of the DOD's total load.
2.) No. The Marines are perpetually under-equipped. That's not the Army's fault. It's the Navy. If you want to bemoan injustices meted out to the Marine Corps, bemoan the fact that they only get $.03 of every Navy dollar and end up doing 90% of the work. The Army has absolutely nothing to do with the Marine's logistical needs.
3.) Historical reasons. The Marines would be better funded and have access to more training opportunities if they were put under the Department of the Army. That's never going to happen simply for tradition.
I don't see any plausible alternative that you are offering. What would you have the Army do? Permanently deploy every unit for seven years so that we don't screw up some mandate from 1947?
Guess what? The President is Commander In Chief and pretty much has a trump card when it comes to dispersal of his forces.
I am glad we had the 3rd Marines to our north in Afghanistan.
A.) Their Helo pilots have big ones and will fly support in any weather.
B.) My Battalion's AO was the size of Vermont (literally). I suppose we could have tried to cover twice that area while the 3rd Marines sat in K-bay, but it wouldn't have ended up well.
__________________ "Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."
- Friedrich Nietzsche
Last edited by geauxtohell; 01-24-2010 at 11:39 AM.
| 
01-24-2010, 11:32 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20227 | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Somewhere in Southeast Asia
Posts: 5,092
Thanks: 463
Thanked 615 Times in 455 Posts
Rep Power: 134 | | Quote: at least these theatres had coastlines to make their "extended presence justifiable Iraq has 58 kilometers of coastline.
__________________  "
It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable, that those who will not risk cannot win."
John Paul Jones
"My Country, May She always be right, but My Country, right or wrong."
Steven Decatur | 
01-24-2010, 11:33 AM
|  | INCOMING! Member #19850 | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Out here in the middle.
Posts: 3,204
Thanks: 338
Thanked 464 Times in 358 Posts
Rep Power: 56 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Quote: Originally Posted by geauxtohell
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Empty rhetoric? We fucking invaded a nation that never attacked us and have caused countless innocent deaths with our occupation. Who the hell is silly enough to believe there won't be a price to pay for all the bloodshed? Know what is truly sick? When we get attacked your camp will sing the we-are-innocent song instead of being mature and honest by admitting we aren't innocent. Just like that guy said years ago......9/11 was our chickens coming home to roost.
Could anyone explain why we sent our troops to die (supposedly) to fight islamic extremists only to use their Sacrifices to set up an Islamic Theocracy in Iraq? I agree with that. We've sowed the seeds for future radicalism out of Iraq.
It was a poor policy move from the onset. That doesn't make it the fault of the soldiers and marines, of course. No the soldiers are not to blame but the higher ranks, at least some of them, are to blame for following illegal orders. I've seen some admit they failed to keep their Oath by allowing the occupation to continue. For the past 7 years the pro war crowd has eternally tried to make our Soldiers=Policy and it is for one clear purpose: to accuse war critics of hating our Troops. It's a childish propaganda tool and in many ways it worked and it is still working in some circles.
I guarantee most war supporters either do not know we established a Theocracy or what it means for the region. When Britain tried this a hundred years ago they utterly failed. Some of their Generals told Iraqis they were there to "Liberate" them. Sound familiar? I'm also guessing most don't know it was the West that created Iraq and Kuwait. I don't disagree. When the best end state for Iraq is a pseudo-democracy like Saudi Arabia, then the outlook is pretty bleak.
I am glad we are getting out of there.
__________________ "Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."
- Friedrich Nietzsche | 
01-24-2010, 11:37 AM
|  | Administrator Member #2435 | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 37,536
Thanks: 56
Thanked 1,788 Times in 1,286 Posts
Rep Power: 688 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Thank you for continuing to prove your dishonesty. Ditto. I haven't been dishonest about anything. You, otoh, resort to childish games every time you can't address an issue. So tell us oh great supporter of our troops, what do you say to those who have returned and are against the occupation? What do you say to those who have lost their arms, legs, ears, eyes, and other parts? Do you also accuse them of lying? Do you call them code pink? No. We all know the answer. You don't say a fucking word. You certainly to post anything worth bragging about. Nothing new, original nor even noteworthy about your rhetoric, parrot. | 
01-24-2010, 11:41 AM
| | Registered User Member #21303 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,845
Thanks: 87
Thanked 212 Times in 164 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Gunny
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Ditto. I haven't been dishonest about anything. You, otoh, resort to childish games every time you can't address an issue. So tell us oh great supporter of our troops, what do you say to those who have returned and are against the occupation? What do you say to those who have lost their arms, legs, ears, eyes, and other parts? Do you also accuse them of lying? Do you call them code pink? No. We all know the answer. You don't say a fucking word. You certainly to post anything worth bragging about. Nothing new, original nor even noteworthy about your rhetoric, parrot. Never said I do post anything to brag about so what is your point? |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |