 | | 
01-24-2010, 08:35 AM
|  | Póg Mo Thóin Member #21821 | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: A Higher Plain
Posts: 2,809
Thanks: 175
Thanked 219 Times in 180 Posts
Rep Power: 60 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Quote: Originally Posted by Samson
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
First of all you DON'T understand what a Marine is...work that out and come back with an intelligent post. YOU DO know what the Marine Corps' Mission is?
I'll try again, although you'll probably be completely happy to moronically run around in circles after the shiny objects that CurveLight throws into the thread to get your attention. Quote: The official mission of the Marine Corps is established in the National Security Act of 1947, amended in 1952. Marines are trained, organized and equipped for
Offensive amphibious employment and as a “force in readiness.” According to the Act, Marines stand prepared to meet mission requirements. So, wanna have an intelligent discussion, or would you like to entertain the idiot?
What about deploying Marines to Iraq for 7 years is anything like the mission the marine corps the National Security Act of 1947 spells out? Reading the mission statement of the Marine Corps is fine....it doesn't represent reality and the history of The Corps. Now read some history about World War One, World War Two, Korea, Viet Nam, tell me how "lightly armed assault troops" have elite fighter-bomber squadrons, numerous helicopter squadrons, main battle tanks and enough "Alligators" to cover the entire coast of China with heavily armed Divisions of Marines with their own artillery, Commando units, etc. etc.
and if the mission is to hold ground...they hold the ground ...That was their mission. What part of that is bamboozling you.
and what qualifies you to interpret the National Security Act and the orders of the President of the United States as it applies to the service of our Marines in Iraq?? You should stick to simple things like shiny objects, Patek.
You clearly are pretty ignorant when it comes to distinguishing the ARMY from the MARINES missions.
Someone with more than a couple of brain cells here should post to the topic.
__________________
Quote: Originally Posted by beowolfe None of this makes any sense...... | 
01-24-2010, 08:39 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20227 | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Somewhere in Southeast Asia
Posts: 5,125
Thanks: 465
Thanked 623 Times in 458 Posts
Rep Power: 135 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Samson
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Quote: Originally Posted by Samson
YOU DO know what the Marine Corps' Mission is?
I'll try again, although you'll probably be completely happy to moronically run around in circles after the shiny objects that CurveLight throws into the thread to get your attention.
So, wanna have an intelligent discussion, or would you like to entertain the idiot?
What about deploying Marines to Iraq for 7 years is anything like the mission the marine corps the National Security Act of 1947 spells out? Reading the mission statement of the Marine Corps is fine....it doesn't represent reality and the history of The Corps. Now read some history about World War One, World War Two, Korea, Viet Nam, tell me how "lightly armed assault troops" have elite fighter-bomber squadrons, numerous helicopter squadrons, main battle tanks and enough "Alligators" to cover the entire coast of China with heavily armed Divisions of Marines with their own artillery, Commando units, etc. etc.
and if the mission is to hold ground...they hold the ground ...That was their mission. What part of that is bamboozling you.
and what qualifies you to interpret the National Security Act and the orders of the President of the United States as it applies to the service of our Marines in Iraq?? You should stick to simple things like shiny objects, Patek.
You clearly are pretty ignorant when it comes to distinguishing the ARMY from the MARINES missions.
Someone with more than a couple of brain cells here should post to the topic. So...what qualifies you to interpret the National Security Act and the orders of the President of the United States with respect to the Marine's mission in Iraq?
__________________  "
It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable, that those who will not risk cannot win."
John Paul Jones
"My Country, May She always be right, but My Country, right or wrong."
Steven Decatur | 
01-24-2010, 08:44 AM
|  | Póg Mo Thóin Member #21821 | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: A Higher Plain
Posts: 2,809
Thanks: 175
Thanked 219 Times in 180 Posts
Rep Power: 60 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Quote: Originally Posted by Samson
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Reading the mission statement of the Marine Corps is fine....it doesn't represent reality and the history of The Corps. Now read some history about World War One, World War Two, Korea, Viet Nam, tell me how "lightly armed assault troops" have elite fighter-bomber squadrons, numerous helicopter squadrons, main battle tanks and enough "Alligators" to cover the entire coast of China with heavily armed Divisions of Marines with their own artillery, Commando units, etc. etc.
and if the mission is to hold ground...they hold the ground ...That was their mission. What part of that is bamboozling you.
and what qualifies you to interpret the National Security Act and the orders of the President of the United States as it applies to the service of our Marines in Iraq?? You should stick to simple things like shiny objects, Patek.
You clearly are pretty ignorant when it comes to distinguishing the ARMY from the MARINES missions.
Someone with more than a couple of brain cells here should post to the topic. So...what qualifies you to interpret the National Security Act and the orders of the President of the United States with respect to the Marine's mission in Iraq? I can read.
Can you?
__________________
Quote: Originally Posted by beowolfe None of this makes any sense...... | 
01-24-2010, 08:44 AM
| | Registered User Member #21303 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,855
Thanks: 87
Thanked 212 Times in 164 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Quote: Originally Posted by Samson
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Reading the mission statement of the Marine Corps is fine....it doesn't represent reality and the history of The Corps. Now read some history about World War One, World War Two, Korea, Viet Nam, tell me how "lightly armed assault troops" have elite fighter-bomber squadrons, numerous helicopter squadrons, main battle tanks and enough "Alligators" to cover the entire coast of China with heavily armed Divisions of Marines with their own artillery, Commando units, etc. etc.
and if the mission is to hold ground...they hold the ground ...That was their mission. What part of that is bamboozling you.
and what qualifies you to interpret the National Security Act and the orders of the President of the United States as it applies to the service of our Marines in Iraq?? You should stick to simple things like shiny objects, Patek.
You clearly are pretty ignorant when it comes to distinguishing the ARMY from the MARINES missions.
Someone with more than a couple of brain cells here should post to the topic. So...what qualifies you to interpret the National Security Act and the orders of the President of the United States with respect to the Marine's mission in Iraq?
Probably the same thing you use to justify your accusations on others: ARROGANCE | 
01-24-2010, 08:55 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20227 | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Somewhere in Southeast Asia
Posts: 5,125
Thanks: 465
Thanked 623 Times in 458 Posts
Rep Power: 135 | | | All Americans should thank the Marines for their valiant service in Iraq. The last 3000 will be on their way home soon. Then as part of Obama's planned troop increase they will redeploy to Afghanistan TO SECURE AND HOLD VAST SWATH'S OF TERRITORY IN THAT COUNTRY and conduct combat operations AS DIRECTED BY THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF.
__________________  "
It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable, that those who will not risk cannot win."
John Paul Jones
"My Country, May She always be right, but My Country, right or wrong."
Steven Decatur | 
01-24-2010, 09:20 AM
| | Registered User Member #21303 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,855
Thanks: 87
Thanked 212 Times in 164 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe All Americans should thank the Marines for their valiant service in Iraq. The last 3000 will be on their way home soon. Then as part of Obama's planned troop increase they will redeploy to Afghanistan TO SECURE AND HOLD VAST SWATH'S OF TERRITORY IN THAT COUNTRY and conduct combat operations AS DIRECTED BY THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF.
I thank all Soldiers for their Service but I won't applaud the policies that sent them to Iraq nor claim it is a good thing they were used to install an Islamic Theocracy. It also doesn't matter what the POTUS orders if it is not legal. Iraq never was. By international law afghanistan is legal but still another bullshit policy designed for colonialism and ensuring US friendly energy contracts and the growth of illegal drugs. We use law enforcement in the US to imprison people for the drugs cultivated under the protection of our military in afghanistan. But hey, don't let these facts damper your bullshit Nationalism. | 
01-24-2010, 09:26 AM
| | Registered User Member #21303 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,855
Thanks: 87
Thanked 212 Times in 164 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | | | Typical Callygirl leaves her petty insults on the rep button and actually thinks she is doing something. That's why her camp is so fucking pathetic. The bulk of their dialogue is to call people names and do everything possible to avoid addressing facts that shows their positions are pure bullshit. | 
01-24-2010, 09:36 AM
|  | Registered User Member #21357 | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: If I stand on my porch facing East I can Hit PA with a rock
Posts: 3,520
Thanks: 974
Thanked 573 Times in 418 Posts
Rep Power: 69 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt Maybe if we all ignore him he will go away? The problem is some liberal cry babies won't ignore him. LOL, I've had him on ignore the majority of the time I've been on this board. It may be permanent this time.
__________________ Sergeant First Class, US Army, Retired
Rightwinger 19Mar10 07:24 PM  Please God....Take away Healthcare Never forget that your weapon was made by the lowest bidder. | 
01-24-2010, 09:43 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20227 | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Somewhere in Southeast Asia
Posts: 5,125
Thanks: 465
Thanked 623 Times in 458 Posts
Rep Power: 135 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Samson
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Quote: Originally Posted by Samson
You should stick to simple things like shiny objects, Patek.
You clearly are pretty ignorant when it comes to distinguishing the ARMY from the MARINES missions.
Someone with more than a couple of brain cells here should post to the topic. So...what qualifies you to interpret the National Security Act and the orders of the President of the United States with respect to the Marine's mission in Iraq? I can read.
Can you? Yep...but the difference between you and me is I don't pay much attention to bullshit opinions in an MSNBC article like Quote: The Marines' extended stay in Anbar went against the grain of the Corps' usual role as a fighting force designed to quickly seize territory and then turn it over to the Army to maintain control from fixed bases. Their orders to deploy to Iraq in 2003 didn't read "Conduct operations IAW the National Security Act of 1947, amended in 1952." It read what their operational orders were with reference to securing and holding Anbar Province in Iraq.
Now...care to address this or will you find some more cute t-shirts in your closet and post pictures of them.
__________________  "
It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable, that those who will not risk cannot win."
John Paul Jones
"My Country, May She always be right, but My Country, right or wrong."
Steven Decatur | 
01-24-2010, 09:48 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20227 | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Somewhere in Southeast Asia
Posts: 5,125
Thanks: 465
Thanked 623 Times in 458 Posts
Rep Power: 135 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe All Americans should thank the Marines for their valiant service in Iraq. The last 3000 will be on their way home soon. Then as part of Obama's planned troop increase they will redeploy to Afghanistan TO SECURE AND HOLD VAST SWATH'S OF TERRITORY IN THAT COUNTRY and conduct combat operations AS DIRECTED BY THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF.
I thank all Soldiers for their Service but I won't applaud the policies that sent them to Iraq nor claim it is a good thing they were used to install an Islamic Theocracy. Then start a different thread...don't bring your code pink baggage into this one. Now...I'll be civil if you will.
__________________  "
It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable, that those who will not risk cannot win."
John Paul Jones
"My Country, May She always be right, but My Country, right or wrong."
Steven Decatur | 
01-24-2010, 09:49 AM
|  | European American Member #11947 | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21,684
Thanks: 1,595
Thanked 1,241 Times in 940 Posts
Rep Power: 218 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Quote: Originally Posted by WillowTree
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight The Marines, and all Soldiers who served deserve much better than America. They are way too good for us. We allowed them to be used for Colonialism instead of what they signed up for. The height of our selfishness can be seen in the great divide between the pro war crowd and pro American crowd in that the two groups couldn't even work together to ensure our Troops received the best healthcare available. Too many sit on their ass and whine instead of actually doing something and that is in all camps.
For the amateur heart string pullers, let me point out that no, our Troops did not Sacrifice their lives and limbs in Iraq in Defense of the US. Their Service has been exploited by certain Policymakers, but that can never take away from the honorable Service our Troops have given. I even recommend all Soldiers get out of the military until they get a nation of Citizens that cares just 5 percent as much about them as all US Troops care about America. We don't deserve them. I think a nice big FUck You is in Order.. When you denigrate America you speak for your own stupid self.. You don't speak for We The People so fuck you..
If you can't handle my posts put me on ignore. You wouldn't be the first who lacks what it takes. Sucks to be you.l You don't get to tell me to put you on ignore. I do get to give you a big "Fuck You" when you deserve it.. Yep. | | The Following User Says Thank You to WillowTree For This Useful Post: | | 
01-24-2010, 10:53 AM
| | Registered User Member #21303 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,855
Thanks: 87
Thanked 212 Times in 164 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Quote: Originally Posted by PatekPhilippe All Americans should thank the Marines for their valiant service in Iraq. The last 3000 will be on their way home soon. Then as part of Obama's planned troop increase they will redeploy to Afghanistan TO SECURE AND HOLD VAST SWATH'S OF TERRITORY IN THAT COUNTRY and conduct combat operations AS DIRECTED BY THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF.
I thank all Soldiers for their Service but I won't applaud the policies that sent them to Iraq nor claim it is a good thing they were used to install an Islamic Theocracy. Then start a different thread...don't bring your code pink baggage into this one. Now...I'll be civil if you will.
Lol? Civil? You accuse a Combat Vet of lying about his Service then you demand others be civil? Hahaha....
It's even worse when you keep referencing shit like code pink. Is this intellectual dishonesty all you have to offer? What do you say to those who have returned from Iraq and are against the occupation? Do you accuse them of lying and spouting code pink? You represent the worst of the Nationalistic hypocrites. | 
01-24-2010, 10:55 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20227 | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Somewhere in Southeast Asia
Posts: 5,125
Thanks: 465
Thanked 623 Times in 458 Posts
Rep Power: 135 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight You represent the worst of the Nationalistic hypocrites. Ditto.
__________________  "
It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable, that those who will not risk cannot win."
John Paul Jones
"My Country, May She always be right, but My Country, right or wrong."
Steven Decatur | 
01-24-2010, 10:57 AM
| | Registered User Member #21303 | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,855
Thanks: 87
Thanked 212 Times in 164 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by WillowTree
Quote: Originally Posted by CurveLight
Quote: Originally Posted by WillowTree
I think a nice big FUck You is in Order.. When you denigrate America you speak for your own stupid self.. You don't speak for We The People so fuck you..
If you can't handle my posts put me on ignore. You wouldn't be the first who lacks what it takes. Sucks to be you.l You don't get to tell me to put you on ignore. I do get to give you a big "Fuck You" when you deserve it.. Yep.
I didn't tell you to put me on ignore. I said IF YOU CAN'T HANDLE MY POSTS then put me on ignore. Like Ollie did. I pwned him so much all he could do is put me on ignore only to whine about me every chance he gets. Now, can you respond to my posts or are you stuck in pate mode? | 
01-24-2010, 11:00 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20227 | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Somewhere in Southeast Asia
Posts: 5,125
Thanks: 465
Thanked 623 Times in 458 Posts
Rep Power: 135 | | | Yeah...your a real tough internet keyboard commando aren't you...always "pwning" someone....I bet your head must be pretty big right bitch?
__________________  "
It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable, that those who will not risk cannot win."
John Paul Jones
"My Country, May She always be right, but My Country, right or wrong."
Steven Decatur |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |