US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Do You Support The "Gun Show Loophole?"

This is a discussion on Do You Support The "Gun Show Loophole?" within the Law and Justice System forums, part of the US Discussion category; Quote: Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 Quote: Originally Posted by Dubya I have to quote that before you edit it. You people really know your Constitution ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Law and Justice System

Law and Justice System For those who want to speak about legal issues

View Poll Results: Do You Support The "Gun Show Loophole?"
Yes! Maximum freedom no matter what 24 35.82%
No! Criminals and the mentally ill should not be able to obtain firearms 43 64.18%
Voters: 67. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1291 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:13 PM
Dubya's Avatar
Registered User
Member #41871
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,056
Thanks: 7,048
Thanked 375 Times in 307 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote: Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Dubya View Post
I have to quote that before you edit it.

You people really know your Constitution <sarc>!
If you quoted the Constitution, wouldn't you burst into flames?
You fucking idiots are truly delusional.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
USMessageBoard.com is the premier Political Forum Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!
  #1292 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:16 PM
Banned
Member #23837
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kannapolis, N.C.
Posts: 59,478
Thanks: 7,649
Thanked 7,676 Times in 6,057 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute
bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.
Thus, for the keeping and bearing of a firearm to be constitutionally protected, the firearm should be a militia-type arm.

United States v. Miller - 307 U.S. 174 (1939) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center
Reply With Quote
  #1293 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:19 PM
No Party Affiliation
Member #16263
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 7,815
Thanks: 705
Thanked 1,502 Times in 1,136 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 775
nodoginnafight has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by bigrebnc1775 View Post
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.
Thus, for the keeping and bearing of a firearm to be constitutionally protected, the firearm should be a militia-type arm.

United States v. Miller - 307 U.S. 174 (1939) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center
Either that or you have to join the National Guard to get a gun ......
__________________
Nodoginnafight - I took this screen name when I first joined a message board to debate who should be included in the college football national championship game. I've seen folks troll around with different screen names and vowed not to be one of those posters. So I kept the name. Of course, everyone has a dog in the fight when it comes to politics. Don't make the mistake of thinking that my name is a claim to total impartiality. It is not. I am fiscally conservative and socially progressive (mostly).
Reply With Quote
  #1294 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:23 PM
M14 Shooter's Avatar
The Light of Truth
Member #6581
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,430
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1,876 Times in 1,400 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 814
M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve
M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve
Quote: Originally Posted by bigrebnc1775 View Post
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.
Thus, for the keeping and bearing of a firearm to be constitutionally protected, the firearm should be a militia-type arm.

United States v. Miller - 307 U.S. 174 (1939) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.

And so, if there WAS evidence that that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" --- or any other firearm --- at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, they WOULD say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument, as it WOULD be within judicial notice that these weapons are any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.

Doesn't get much more clear than that.
__________________
The dumbest statement ever made:
Quote: Originally Posted by Fender View Post
The US army is made up of civilians, making them the civilian militia that protects citizens.
Reply With Quote
  #1295 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:24 PM
Banned
Member #23837
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kannapolis, N.C.
Posts: 59,478
Thanks: 7,649
Thanked 7,676 Times in 6,057 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute
bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by nodoginnafight View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by bigrebnc1775 View Post
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.
Thus, for the keeping and bearing of a firearm to be constitutionally protected, the firearm should be a militia-type arm.

United States v. Miller - 307 U.S. 174 (1939) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center
Either that or you have to join the National Guard to get a gun ......
The national guard is not the militia

Quote:
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
Plus if you didn't notice the ruling also said

"all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense" and that "when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time."
Notice that? in the guard you don't own the firearm you carry.
Reply With Quote
  #1296 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:26 PM
Uncensored2008's Avatar
Libertarian Radical
Member #27995
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 29,206
Thanks: 9,961
Thanked 8,256 Times in 6,343 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 10678
Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati
Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati
Quote: Originally Posted by nodoginnafight View Post
Background checks for all gun sales, requiring gun dealers to maintain an inventory, and maitaining a database of gun sales don't have any Constitutional ramifications. Period.

So let it be written
So let it be done
Fuck off, thug.

What you scumbags have proposed so far;



Possession of hollow point bullets and similar assault bullets a felony.
Must register and report ammo purchases. Only purchase max 500 rounds.
10 round magazine limit
ALL magazines must be fixed to the gun (can not be removed without the use of a tool)
100% prohibition of all magazines greater than 10 rounds. All previous grandfathered magazines become illegal. Felony if you keep one.
Changing definition of shotgun revolving cylinder — Basically only single shot shotguns will remain legal.
Bullet Buttons will become illegal — All AR and AK style rifles that are currently equipped with them will be designated Assault Weapons. Felony to possess.
All gun owners now must be licensed like drivers.
All gun owners must carry gun liability insurance

List of Proposed California Gun Control Measures -- 500 Round Max, No Grandfathering, No Detachable Mags, Mandatory License | The Truth About Guns

I do say fuck you.
__________________
"If your Health Care cost have risen 30% or more, thank Obamacare."
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Uncensored2008 For This Useful Post:
Jarlaxle (02-17-2013)
  #1297 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:27 PM
Uncensored2008's Avatar
Libertarian Radical
Member #27995
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 29,206
Thanks: 9,961
Thanked 8,256 Times in 6,343 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 10678
Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati
Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati
Quote: Originally Posted by Dubya View Post
You fucking idiots are truly delusional.
Given your hatred of the document and the work you put into dismantling it...
__________________
"If your Health Care cost have risen 30% or more, thank Obamacare."
Reply With Quote
  #1298 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:28 PM
M14 Shooter's Avatar
The Light of Truth
Member #6581
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,430
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1,876 Times in 1,400 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 814
M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve
M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve
Quote: Originally Posted by nodoginnafight View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by bigrebnc1775 View Post
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.
Thus, for the keeping and bearing of a firearm to be constitutionally protected, the firearm should be a militia-type arm.

United States v. Miller - 307 U.S. 174 (1939) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center
Either that or you have to join the National Guard to get a gun ......
The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
__________________
The dumbest statement ever made:
Quote: Originally Posted by Fender View Post
The US army is made up of civilians, making them the civilian militia that protects citizens.
Reply With Quote
  #1299 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:28 PM
No Party Affiliation
Member #16263
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 7,815
Thanks: 705
Thanked 1,502 Times in 1,136 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 775
nodoginnafight has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by nodoginnafight View Post
Background checks for all gun sales, requiring gun dealers to maintain an inventory, and maitaining a database of gun sales don't have any Constitutional ramifications. Period.

So let it be written
So let it be done
Fuck off, thug.

What you scumbags have proposed so far;



Possession of hollow point bullets and similar assault bullets a felony.
Must register and report ammo purchases. Only purchase max 500 rounds.
10 round magazine limit
ALL magazines must be fixed to the gun (can not be removed without the use of a tool)
100% prohibition of all magazines greater than 10 rounds. All previous grandfathered magazines become illegal. Felony if you keep one.
Changing definition of shotgun revolving cylinder — Basically only single shot shotguns will remain legal.
Bullet Buttons will become illegal — All AR and AK style rifles that are currently equipped with them will be designated Assault Weapons. Felony to possess.
All gun owners now must be licensed like drivers.
All gun owners must carry gun liability insurance

List of Proposed California Gun Control Measures -- 500 Round Max, No Grandfathering, No Detachable Mags, Mandatory License | The Truth About Guns

I do say fuck you.
you mad bro?

I told you what I advocate

so clean out your diaper
__________________
Nodoginnafight - I took this screen name when I first joined a message board to debate who should be included in the college football national championship game. I've seen folks troll around with different screen names and vowed not to be one of those posters. So I kept the name. Of course, everyone has a dog in the fight when it comes to politics. Don't make the mistake of thinking that my name is a claim to total impartiality. It is not. I am fiscally conservative and socially progressive (mostly).
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nodoginnafight For This Useful Post:
Dubya (02-15-2013)
  #1300 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:29 PM
Dubya's Avatar
Registered User
Member #41871
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,056
Thanks: 7,048
Thanked 375 Times in 307 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote: Originally Posted by M14 Shooter View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by bigrebnc1775 View Post
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.
Thus, for the keeping and bearing of a firearm to be constitutionally protected, the firearm should be a militia-type arm.

United States v. Miller - 307 U.S. 174 (1939) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.

And so, if there WAS evidence that that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" --- or any other firearm --- at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, they WOULD say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument, as it WOULD be within judicial notice that these weapons are any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.

Doesn't get much more clear than that.
The atomic bomb made the day of militia obsolete. Militia was only mentioned in the 2nd to encourage the states to have them. It didn't involve a requirement.
Reply With Quote
  #1301 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:30 PM
No Party Affiliation
Member #16263
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 7,815
Thanks: 705
Thanked 1,502 Times in 1,136 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 775
nodoginnafight has disabled reputation
Quote:
The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
I agree
__________________
Nodoginnafight - I took this screen name when I first joined a message board to debate who should be included in the college football national championship game. I've seen folks troll around with different screen names and vowed not to be one of those posters. So I kept the name. Of course, everyone has a dog in the fight when it comes to politics. Don't make the mistake of thinking that my name is a claim to total impartiality. It is not. I am fiscally conservative and socially progressive (mostly).
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nodoginnafight For This Useful Post:
Dubya (02-15-2013)
  #1302 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:30 PM
Uncensored2008's Avatar
Libertarian Radical
Member #27995
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 29,206
Thanks: 9,961
Thanked 8,256 Times in 6,343 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 10678
Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati
Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati Uncensored2008 gives orders to the Illuminati
Quote: Originally Posted by nodoginnafight View Post
you mad bro?
Yes.

You leftist want a civil war.

Try to enact this, and you get your wish.

Quote:
I told you what I advocate

so clean out your diaper
And I told you to move to North Korea, where they already have what you want.
__________________
"If your Health Care cost have risen 30% or more, thank Obamacare."
Reply With Quote
  #1303 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:31 PM
Dubya's Avatar
Registered User
Member #41871
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,056
Thanks: 7,048
Thanked 375 Times in 307 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote: Originally Posted by nodoginnafight View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by nodoginnafight View Post
Background checks for all gun sales, requiring gun dealers to maintain an inventory, and maitaining a database of gun sales don't have any Constitutional ramifications. Period.

So let it be written
So let it be done
Fuck off, thug.

What you scumbags have proposed so far;



Possession of hollow point bullets and similar assault bullets a felony.
Must register and report ammo purchases. Only purchase max 500 rounds.
10 round magazine limit
ALL magazines must be fixed to the gun (can not be removed without the use of a tool)
100% prohibition of all magazines greater than 10 rounds. All previous grandfathered magazines become illegal. Felony if you keep one.
Changing definition of shotgun revolving cylinder — Basically only single shot shotguns will remain legal.
Bullet Buttons will become illegal — All AR and AK style rifles that are currently equipped with them will be designated Assault Weapons. Felony to possess.
All gun owners now must be licensed like drivers.
All gun owners must carry gun liability insurance

List of Proposed California Gun Control Measures -- 500 Round Max, No Grandfathering, No Detachable Mags, Mandatory License | The Truth About Guns

I do say fuck you.
you mad bro?

I told you what I advocate

so clean out your diaper
Get him to change Ted Nugent while he's at it!
Reply With Quote
  #1304 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:31 PM
Banned
Member #23837
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kannapolis, N.C.
Posts: 59,478
Thanks: 7,649
Thanked 7,676 Times in 6,057 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute
bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute bigrebnc1775 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Dubya View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by M14 Shooter View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by bigrebnc1775 View Post
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.
Thus, for the keeping and bearing of a firearm to be constitutionally protected, the firearm should be a militia-type arm.

United States v. Miller - 307 U.S. 174 (1939) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.

And so, if there WAS evidence that that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" --- or any other firearm --- at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, they WOULD say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument, as it WOULD be within judicial notice that these weapons are any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.

Doesn't get much more clear than that.
The atomic bomb made the day of militia obsolete. Militia was only mentioned in the 2nd to encourage the states to have them. It didn't involve a requirement.
You're a fucking idiot without a god damn clue.
Reply With Quote
  #1305 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2013, 01:32 PM
M14 Shooter's Avatar
The Light of Truth
Member #6581
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,430
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1,876 Times in 1,400 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 814
M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve
M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve M14 Shooter could run the Federal Reserve
Quote: Originally Posted by bigrebnc1775 View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Dubya View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by M14 Shooter View Post

In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.

And so, if there WAS evidence that that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" --- or any other firearm --- at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, they WOULD say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument, as it WOULD be within judicial notice that these weapons are any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.

Doesn't get much more clear than that.
The atomic bomb made the day of militia obsolete. Militia was only mentioned in the 2nd to encourage the states to have them. It didn't involve a requirement.
You're a fucking idiot without a god damn clue.
A pre-pubescent lunatic. I cannot fathom why anyone responds to him.
__________________
The dumbest statement ever made:
Quote: Originally Posted by Fender View Post
The US army is made up of civilians, making them the civilian militia that protects citizens.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to M14 Shooter For This Useful Post:
Jarlaxle (02-17-2013)
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Law and Justice System
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:36 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.