US Message Board

Go Back   US Message Board > Global Discussion > Iraq
Register FAQ Blogs Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Login to remove all ads

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 09:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,413
Rep Power: 57
DeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddha
Honor Roll

Honor Roll of some of those who were right about Iraq

Quote:
Former President George H. W. Bush and Brent Scowcroft, explaining in 1998 why they didn’t go on to Baghdad in 1991: “Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land.”

Barack Obama, September 2002: “I don’t oppose all wars. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne. I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors...and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars."

Representative Nancy Pelosi, October 2002: “When we go in, the occupation, which is now being called the liberation, could be interminable and the amount of money it costs could be unlimited.”

Senator Russ Feingold, October 2002: “I am increasingly troubled by the seemingly shifting justifications for an invasion at this time. … When the administration moves back and forth from one argument to another, I think it undercuts the credibility of the case and the belief in its urgency. I believe that this practice of shifting justifications has much to do with the troubling phenomenon of many Americans questioning the administration’s motives.”

Representative Ike Skelton, September 2002: “I have no doubt that our military would decisively defeat Iraq’s forces and remove Saddam. But like the proverbial dog chasing the car down the road, we must consider what we would do after we caught it.”

Al Gore, September 2002: “I am deeply concerned that the course of action that we are presently embarking upon with respect to Iraq has the potential to seriously damage our ability to win the war against terrorism and to weaken our ability to lead the world in this new century.”

Representative John Spratt, October 2002: “The outcome after the conflict is actually going to be the hardest part, and it is far less certain.”

Howard Dean, February 2003: “I firmly believe that the president is focusing our diplomats, our military, our intelligence agencies, and even our people on the wrong war, at the wrong time. … Iraq is a divided country, with Sunni, Shia and Kurdish factions that share both bitter rivalries and access to large quantities of arms.”
Reply With Quote


Login to remove all ads

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 09:22 PM
maineman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: guess
Posts: 10,833
Rep Power: 72
maineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddha
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadCanDance View Post
Honor Roll of some of those who were right about Iraq
and they were ALL so right... which only serves to highlight how profoundly WRONG the current batch of republicans has been.

Time to take the fucking keys away.
__________________
"In a rich society, no one should be allowed to suffer from deprivation such as homelessness, starvation and illness. This ideal is essential, not simply as a matter of human good, but as the price we pay for a measure of domestic tranquility. "

John Kenneth Galbraith
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 09:39 PM
Gunny's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 21,692
Rep Power: 366
Gunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religion
Quote:
Originally Posted by maineman View Post
and they were ALL so right... which only serves to highlight how profoundly WRONG the current batch of republicans has been.

Time to take the fucking keys away.
Oh yeah, and give them to Obama or Hillary? Hell, y'all might as well be running that dimwit Carter along with them.
__________________
You can't always be first .... but you CAN be NEXT
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 09:55 PM
maineman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: guess
Posts: 10,833
Rep Power: 72
maineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddha
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunnyL View Post
Oh yeah, and give them to Obama or Hillary? Hell, y'all might as well be running that dimwit Carter along with them.
Obama will do fine. just you wait and see!
__________________
"In a rich society, no one should be allowed to suffer from deprivation such as homelessness, starvation and illness. This ideal is essential, not simply as a matter of human good, but as the price we pay for a measure of domestic tranquility. "

John Kenneth Galbraith
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 06:18 AM
Gunny's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 21,692
Rep Power: 366
Gunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religion
Quote:
Originally Posted by maineman View Post
Obama will do fine. just you wait and see!
No he won't, and I don't want to see. I don't want to suffer through that political moron's crap.

Hopefully, you bandwagon riders will get a good dose of reality prior to voting for him. Wait ... what am I saying?
__________________
You can't always be first .... but you CAN be NEXT
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 08:30 PM
Paulitics's Avatar
I used to be cool
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,116
Rep Power: 104
Paulitics could be the buddhaPaulitics could be the buddhaPaulitics could be the buddhaPaulitics could be the buddhaPaulitics could be the buddhaPaulitics could be the buddhaPaulitics could be the buddhaPaulitics could be the buddhaPaulitics could be the buddhaPaulitics could be the buddhaPaulitics could be the buddha
Don't forget Dick Cheney:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I

What, no more embedding?
__________________
"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is."

-Ronald Reagan

Last edited by Paulitics; 03-21-2008 at 08:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rudy On A Roll red states rule Politics 10 11-10-2007 09:13 AM
On A Roll in Iraq Adam's Apple War on Terrorism 0 10-11-2007 07:14 AM
A Member of the UN Global 500 Roll of Honor Discusses Global Warming boedicca Current Events 0 05-06-2007 01:05 PM
High School stops publishing Honor roll: Merged with "Can you figure this one out?" Hobbit Current Events 23 12-14-2006 04:04 PM
The Fastows Roll Over wonderwench Current Events 12 01-14-2004 06:52 PM

 

Celebrity Gossip, Photography Forum, All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

Poltical Topsites