US Message Board

Go Back   US Message Board > Global Discussion > Iran
Register FAQ Blogs Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Login to remove all ads

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 12:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,413
Rep Power: 57
DeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddha
US Intelligence Agencies: Iran doesn't currently have a Nuclear Weapons Program

Iran halted its nuclear weapons research program years ago, and may be a decade away from developing a nuke, assuming they restarted their nuclear weapons research program



American Intelligence Agencies – New NIE Report on Iran:

Quote:
NIE: Iran ‘Halted’ Nuclear Weapons Program In 2003, Unlikely To Develop A Weapon In This Decade

A new National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) released today concludes with “high confidence” that “in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program.” From the report’s findings:

We assess with moderate confidence Tehran had not restarted its nuclear weapons program as of mid-2007, but we do not know whether it currently intends to develop nuclear weapons.

We continue to assess with moderate-to-high confidence that Iran does not currently have a nuclear weapon.

Tehran’s decision to halt its nuclear weapons program suggests it is less determined to develop nuclear weapons than we have been judging since 2005.

http://www.dni.gov/press_releases/20071203_release.pdf
IAEA Reporting on Iran:
Quote:
UN atomic watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei said Sunday he had no evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons and accused US leaders of adding "fuel to the fire" with recent bellicose rhetoric.

"We haven't received any information there is a parallel, ongoing, active nuclear weapon program," the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency told CNN.

Last edited by DeadCanDance; 12-03-2007 at 12:23 PM.
Reply With Quote


Login to remove all ads

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 12:42 PM
maineman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: guess
Posts: 10,833
Rep Power: 72
maineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddha
listen to the Bushies and it's deja vu all over again!

They'll ignore this just like they ignored the August '01 PDB about OBL!
__________________
"In a rich society, no one should be allowed to suffer from deprivation such as homelessness, starvation and illness. This ideal is essential, not simply as a matter of human good, but as the price we pay for a measure of domestic tranquility. "

John Kenneth Galbraith
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 12:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,598
Rep Power: 45
Larkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond repute
Well shit...if the US intel agencies say they don't have nukes, we should probably assume they do.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 01:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,413
Rep Power: 57
DeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddha
Quote:
Originally Posted by maineman View Post
listen to the Bushies and it's deja vu all over again!

They'll ignore this just like they ignored the August '01 PDB about OBL!
I could have sworn that NeoCons have spent the last few weeks posting here, that they know for a fact Iran is building nuclear bombs, and are merely a year or two away from having a nuclear bomb.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 01:07 PM
Kathianne's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,781
Rep Power: 233
Kathianne could successfully start his own religionKathianne could successfully start his own religionKathianne could successfully start his own religionKathianne could successfully start his own religionKathianne could successfully start his own religionKathianne could successfully start his own religionKathianne could successfully start his own religionKathianne could successfully start his own religionKathianne could successfully start his own religionKathianne could successfully start his own religionKathianne could successfully start his own religion
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadCanDance View Post
Iran halted its nuclear weapons research program years ago, and may be a decade away from developing a nuke, assuming they restarted their nuclear weapons research program



American Intelligence Agencies – New NIE Report on Iran:



IAEA Reporting on Iran:
What's more interesting, they are highly confident Iran stopped 2003, which is when US did what? They may or may not have resumed again.
__________________
"We are fighting today for our life, for our liberty, for our all, we cannot go on being led as we are. Somehow or other, we must get into the Government men who can match our enemies in fighting spirit, in daring, in resolution and in thirst for victory."~Leo Amery 1940, while staring at Chamberlain
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 01:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,413
Rep Power: 57
DeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddha
first, before you backpeddle and dance away from your previous assertions kathy, do you admit it looks like you were wrong when you suggested Iran was currently working on nuclear weapons, and was a year or two away from having a bomb?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 06:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,413
Rep Power: 57
DeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddhaDeadCanDance could be the buddha
Crickets chirping.

Having spent weeks having Bush lovers lecture me that they were simply sure that somehow, somewhere, Iran was building a nuclear bombs. No evidence of course was ever proffered. It was just the collective gut feeling of wingnutotopia.

Gut feelings of neocons on message boards don't count for much:

...because, the collective assessment of all US intelligence agencies (NIE) is that Iran gave up their nuclear weapons program years ago. Though, its still is worth it to keep pressure and inspections on them.

And on the ground inspection by IAEA supports NIE's conclusions: no evidence of a nuclear weapons program.


I guess its good we nipped those lies in the bud, before Bush lovers could trick us into another unneccessary war.



Last edited by DeadCanDance; 12-03-2007 at 06:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 07:19 PM
maineman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: guess
Posts: 10,833
Rep Power: 72
maineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddhamaineman could be the buddha
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadCanDance View Post
Crickets chirping.

Having spent weeks having Bush lovers lecture me that they were simply sure that somehow, somewhere, Iran was building a nuclear bombs. No evidence of course was ever proffered. It was just the collective gut feeling of wingnutotopia.

Gut feelings of neocons on message boards don't count for much:

...because, the collective assessment of all US intelligence agencies (NIE) is that Iran gave up their nuclear weapons program years ago. Though, its still is worth it to keep pressure and inspections on them.

And on the ground inspection by IAEA supports NIE's conclusions: no evidence of a nuclear weapons program.


I guess its good we nipped those lies in the bud, before Bush lovers could trick us into another unneccessary war.


I don't put it past them to still take us into an unjustified unwarranted war in Iran. The PNAC vision is pretty blinding once you've had a drink of that koolaid.
__________________
"In a rich society, no one should be allowed to suffer from deprivation such as homelessness, starvation and illness. This ideal is essential, not simply as a matter of human good, but as the price we pay for a measure of domestic tranquility. "

John Kenneth Galbraith
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 07:37 PM
Alpha1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,216
Rep Power: 27
Alpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the president
12/3/07

the latest NIE concluded: "We do not know whether (Iran) currently intends to develop nuclear weapons."

That marked a sharp contrast to an intelligence report two years ago that stated Iran was "determined to develop nuclear weapons."
====================================
(same NIE?)Now, in late 2007 the NIE "don't know"
a mere 2 years ago (that would be 2005) this same NIE said Iran was "determined to develop nuclear weapons."

SOOOooo...whats you point ?
-----------------------------------
But the new assessment found Iran was continuing to develop technical capabilities that could be used to build a bomb and that it would likely be capable of producing enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon "sometime during the 2010-2015 time-frame."
U.S. Says Iran Halted Nuclear Arms Program

Reuters

U.S. intelligence agencies concluded in findings released on Monday that Iran stopped its nuclear weapons development program in 2003. Following are highlights of the National Intelligence Estimate's key judgments.

-- Iran had a nuclear weapons program but halted it in 2003 and had not restarted it as of mid-2007. The halt applied to design and engineering of an explosive device, such as fuses or shielding, and to covert uranium-conversion activities, according to senior intelligence officials. Other activities such as civilian uranium enrichment and missile development continue.

-- Iran is keeping open the option of developing nuclear weapons, but U.S. intelligence agencies "do not know" whether it currently intends to develop nuclear weapons. This is a major change from a 2005 intelligence estimate which concluded that Iran was "determined to develop nuclear weapons."
http://tinyurl.com/2awtrh
--------------------------------
__________________
_________________________________________
Biden was asked, 'Is he ready?' He answered, 'I think he can be ready but right now, I don't believe he is.
The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training.'
"I think that I stand by the statement," Biden (the smartest of the two)

--------------
"We have met the enemy, and he is us"....POGO
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 07:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,631
Rep Power: 15
Psychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayor
As usual, the chickenhawks cower away in the face of their own horseshit being reflected back to them in the mirrors of their consciences.
__________________
Psychoblues

Turning Mississippi Blue, Again,,,,,,,One Red Assed Republican At A Time
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 07:42 PM
Gunny's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 21,692
Rep Power: 366
Gunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religion
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadCanDance View Post
Iran halted its nuclear weapons research program years ago, and may be a decade away from developing a nuke, assuming they restarted their nuclear weapons research program



American Intelligence Agencies – New NIE Report on Iran:



IAEA Reporting on Iran:
These would be the same US intelligence agencies that you all LOVE to quote about being wrong about Saddam's WMDs, right?

__________________
You can't always be first .... but you CAN be NEXT
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 08:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,631
Rep Power: 15
Psychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayorPsychoblues could be city mayor
Holy Shit!!!!!!! As much information as has been published concerning the collective information by our intelligence agencies being accurate in denying wmd's existed in Iraq and the cherry picking of the bush cabal to the exclusion of those otherwise more important and accurate assessments is astounding!!!!!!!!!!



Quote:
Originally Posted by GunnyL View Post
These would be the same US intelligence agencies that you all LOVE to quote about being wrong about Saddam's WMDs, right?

I actually thought better of you, gunny.
__________________
Psychoblues

Turning Mississippi Blue, Again,,,,,,,One Red Assed Republican At A Time
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 08:26 PM
Gunny's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 21,692
Rep Power: 366
Gunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psychoblues View Post
Holy Shit!!!!!!! As much information as has been published concerning the collective information by our intelligence agencies being accurate in denying wmd's existed in Iraq and the cherry picking of the bush cabal to the exclusion of those otherwise more important and accurate assessments is astounding!!!!!!!!!!





I actually thought better of you, gunny.
What you think of me is irrelevant. Intelligence agencies had 12 years + to collect data on Saddam/Iraq. According to you lefties, it was wrong.

But the second they say what you want to hear ... Iran has no nuclear program ... you'd swear it was Jehovah himself preaching the gospel.

Hypocrites.
__________________
You can't always be first .... but you CAN be NEXT
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 08:36 PM
Alpha1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,216
Rep Power: 27
Alpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the presidentAlpha1 could be the president
While they still ignore the fact that a mere 2 years ago (that would be 2005) this same NIE said Iran was "determined to develop nuclear weapons."
I repeat.....

SOOOooo...whats you point ? Besides the top of their heads...
__________________
_________________________________________
Biden was asked, 'Is he ready?' He answered, 'I think he can be ready but right now, I don't believe he is.
The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training.'
"I think that I stand by the statement," Biden (the smartest of the two)

--------------
"We have met the enemy, and he is us"....POGO
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 08:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,598
Rep Power: 45
Larkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunnyL View Post
What you think of me is irrelevant. Intelligence agencies had 12 years + to collect data on Saddam/Iraq. According to you lefties, it was wrong.

But the second they say what you want to hear ... Iran has no nuclear program ... you'd swear it was Jehovah himself preaching the gospel.

Hypocrites.
So are you saying you believe the intel now and we can expect to see you stop warmongering against Iran?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Russia says could use nuclear weapons Gunny The Flame Zone 19 01-21-2008 10:17 AM
Russia Threatens No Cooperation Regarding Iran Nuke Weapons Program onedomino War on Terrorism 22 06-18-2007 12:58 AM
Color Me Shocked! Iran Has Another Possible Nuclear Weapons Site? Kathianne War on Terrorism 1 06-11-2006 09:50 PM
Did Clinton Give Iran Nuclear Weapons? GotZoom War on Terrorism 0 04-14-2006 02:00 PM
Bush Says Iran Will Not Get Nuclear Weapons onedomino War on Terrorism 0 09-26-2004 10:28 PM

 

Celebrity Gossip, Photography Forum, All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

Poltical Topsites