US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum  

Proposed Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009

This is a discussion on Proposed Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 within the Immigration/Illegal Immigration forums, part of the US Discussion category; This is a long long long long overdue act and it needs to get passed. Too bad Congressman Deal waited until the Democrats took Congress ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Immigration/Illegal Immigration



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2009, 11:09 AM
GHook93's Avatar
Aristotle
Member #5035
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,330
Thanks: 379
Thanked 228 Times in 190 Posts
Rep Power: 45
GHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond repute
GHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond repute
Proposed Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009

This is a long long long long overdue act and it needs to get passed. Too bad Congressman Deal waited until the Democrats took Congress to introduice it. Basically it ends the bastardized interpretation of the 14th amendment that allows citizenship to the children of illegal aliens and creating the quote/unquote anchor babies! Citizenship given to non-Americans should be privilege not a right! I like this law!

Rep. Nathan Deal Reintroduces Bill to End Birthright Citizenship | NumbersUSA - For Lower Immigration Levels
Quote:
Rep. Nathan Deal (R-GA) reintroduced his Birthright Citizenship bill that would eliminate automatic citizenship for children born in the United States. The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 (H.R.1868) would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make it more difficult for children born in the U.S. to gain citizenship.

Under the proposed legislation, a person born in the United States, in order to gain citizenship, must have at least one parent who is:

(1) a U.S. citizen or national;
(2) a lawful permanent resident alien whose residence is in the United States; or
(3) an alien performing active service in the U.S. Armed Forces
__________________
Avatar: The difference - Hamas/Hezbollah/Islamic Jihad hide behind civilians using them as human shields and Israel stands in front of them protecting them like shields!

Help Win the Trade War with China, Japan, India and the 3rd World! Join the Fair Tax Coalition - Repeal the 16h Amendment! http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServ...name=about_faq

Anti-zionism morphs into anti-semitism 100% of the time!
"When people criticize Zionism, they mean Jews - this is God's own truth." - MLK Jr.

Beer, the problem and the solution to all of life's daily problems. - Homer Simpson
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GHook93 For This Useful Post:
tigerbob (06-05-2009)
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2009, 01:27 PM
auditor0007's Avatar
Supporting Member
Member #12997
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 2,433
Thanks: 30
Thanked 249 Times in 180 Posts
Rep Power: 31
auditor0007 could be the presidentauditor0007 could be the presidentauditor0007 could be the presidentauditor0007 could be the presidentauditor0007 could be the president
auditor0007 could be the presidentauditor0007 could be the presidentauditor0007 could be the president
We probably should have done this a long time ago. The question now is whether or not this will actually become law. I imagine there will be some haggling and changes made if it is to become law. For one, I think if you are born in the US, you should have an opportunity to become a citizen. However, I think that it should be in the form of dual citizenship and only when you come of age (an adult). It will be interesting to see where this goes.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2009, 01:29 PM
RodISHI's Avatar
Registered User
Member #15391
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The heart of America
Posts: 4,387
Thanks: 167
Thanked 300 Times in 206 Posts
Rep Power: 72
RodISHI has disabled reputation
It needs to be done.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2009, 01:32 PM
Moderater Microchip
Member #11994
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 23,289
Thanks: 217
Thanked 1,097 Times in 910 Posts
Rep Power: 161
KittenKoder has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by GHook93 View Post
This is a long long long long overdue act and it needs to get passed. Too bad Congressman Deal waited until the Democrats took Congress to introduice it. Basically it ends the bastardized interpretation of the 14th amendment that allows citizenship to the children of illegal aliens and creating the quote/unquote anchor babies! Citizenship given to non-Americans should be privilege not a right! I like this law!

Rep. Nathan Deal Reintroduces Bill to End Birthright Citizenship | NumbersUSA - For Lower Immigration Levels
Quote:
Rep. Nathan Deal (R-GA) reintroduced his Birthright Citizenship bill that would eliminate automatic citizenship for children born in the United States. The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 (H.R.1868) would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make it more difficult for children born in the U.S. to gain citizenship.

Under the proposed legislation, a person born in the United States, in order to gain citizenship, must have at least one parent who is:

(1) a U.S. citizen or national;
(2) a lawful permanent resident alien whose residence is in the United States; or
(3) an alien performing active service in the U.S. Armed Forces
Good law. The only reason it didn't happen earlier is because there were Reps AND Dems in charge for too long, and all they both did was butt heads, not really caring about good policy but caring more about who voted for what.
__________________
If you can dream it, I can code it.
Every hand's a winner, and every hands a loser, the best you could hope for is to die in your sleep.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2009, 03:14 PM
Big Black Dog's Avatar
Supporting Member
Member #19441
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 4,159
Thanks: 238
Thanked 649 Times in 434 Posts
Rep Power: 106
Big Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religion
Big Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religionBig Black Dog could successfully start his own religion
I think it's a good idea. Also, if the baby is born in a US hospital, and it's parents are illegal aliens, I think when the baby is discharged from the hospital we should give all three of them a free ride back to the boarder and promptly expelled.
__________________
Owe Bama doesn't really need a teleprompter. He has his head so far up his own ass he can see what he's thinking!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2009, 03:57 PM
xotoxi's Avatar
Great Contrarian
Member #18625
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dominion of New England
Posts: 12,474
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 216
Thanked 1,074 Times in 840 Posts
Rep Power: 313
xotoxi could successfully start his own religionxotoxi could successfully start his own religionxotoxi could successfully start his own religionxotoxi could successfully start his own religion
xotoxi could successfully start his own religionxotoxi could successfully start his own religionxotoxi could successfully start his own religionxotoxi could successfully start his own religion
Good idea.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2009, 08:08 AM
Registered User
Member #13738
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Joliet IL.
Posts: 99
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Rep Power: 3
Walt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chief
This is insane. We are looking at a bill. To ban something, that is not legal in the first place. They have the American people chasing their proverbial tails.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2009, 08:17 AM
tigerbob's Avatar
Am I bovvered?
Member #7053
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,438
Thanks: 334
Thanked 243 Times in 182 Posts
Rep Power: 112
tigerbob could successfully start his own religiontigerbob could successfully start his own religiontigerbob could successfully start his own religion
tigerbob could successfully start his own religion
Quote: Originally Posted by Walt View Post
This is insane. We are looking at a bill. To ban something, that is not legal in the first place. They have the American people chasing their proverbial tails.
Such is the legal process. Close the 'loophole', let's move on.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2009, 09:09 AM
GHook93's Avatar
Aristotle
Member #5035
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,330
Thanks: 379
Thanked 228 Times in 190 Posts
Rep Power: 45
GHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond repute
GHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond reputeGHook93 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Walt View Post
This is insane. We are looking at a bill. To ban something, that is not legal in the first place. They have the American people chasing their proverbial tails.
NOT TRUE! Read the 14th Amendment and then come back to us!
__________________
Avatar: The difference - Hamas/Hezbollah/Islamic Jihad hide behind civilians using them as human shields and Israel stands in front of them protecting them like shields!

Help Win the Trade War with China, Japan, India and the 3rd World! Join the Fair Tax Coalition - Repeal the 16h Amendment! http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServ...name=about_faq

Anti-zionism morphs into anti-semitism 100% of the time!
"When people criticize Zionism, they mean Jews - this is God's own truth." - MLK Jr.

Beer, the problem and the solution to all of life's daily problems. - Homer Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2009, 05:13 PM
Registered User
Member #13738
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Joliet IL.
Posts: 99
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Rep Power: 3
Walt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chiefWalt could be police chief
Quote: Originally Posted by GHook93 View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Walt View Post
This is insane. We are looking at a bill. To ban something, that is not legal in the first place. They have the American people chasing their proverbial tails.
NOT TRUE! Read the 14th Amendment and then come back to us!
IS TRUE! I posted this before so here it is again.

Quote:
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads in part:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside."

Babies born to illegal alien mothers within U.S. borders are called anchor babies because under the 1965 immigration Act, they act as an anchor that pulls the illegal alien mother and eventually a host of other relatives into permanent U.S. residency. (Jackpot babies is another term).

The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 to protect the rights of native-born Black Americans, whose rights were being denied as recently-freed slaves. In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by writing:

"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."

The original intent of the 14th Amendment was clearly not to facilitate illegal aliens defying U.S. law at taxpayer expense. Current estimates indicate there may be over 300,000 anchor babies born each year in the U.S., thus causing illegal alien mothers to add more to the U.S. population each year than immigration from all sources in an average year before 1965.

The correct interpretation of the 14th Amendment is that an illegal alien mother is subject to the jurisdiction of her native country, as is her baby.

Over a century ago, the Supreme Court correctly confirmed this restricted interpretation of citizenship in the so-called 'Slaughter-House cases' [83 US 36 (1873)] and in [112 US 94 (1884)]. In Elk v.Wilkins, the phrase 'subject to its jurisdiction' excluded from its operation 'children of ministers, consuls, and citizens of foreign states born within the United States.' In Elk, the American Indian claimant was considered not an American citizen because the law required him to be 'not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.'

Congress subsequently passed a special act to grant full citizenship to American Indians, who were not citizens even through they were born within the borders of the United States. The Citizens Act of 1924, codified in 8USCSß1401, provides that:

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe.

American citizens must be wary of elected politicians voting to illegally extend our generous social benefits to illegal aliens and other criminals.
Anchor babies - children born in the United States to illegal alien mothers - THE AMERICAN RESISTANCE FOUNDATION

The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution - Fourteenth Amendment - anchor babies and birthright citizenship - interpretations and misinterpretations - US Constitution

Here is an opinoin from a judge.


Quote:
The question before us has been examined by a writer upon constitutional law whose views are entitled to great respect. Judge COOLEY, referring to the definition of national citizenship as contained in the fourteenth amendment, says: 'By the express terms of the amendment, persons of foreign birth, who have never renounced the allegiance to which they were born, though they may have a residence in this country, more or less permanent, for business, instruction, or pleasure, are not citizens
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2009, 07:35 PM
Againsheila's Avatar
Registered User
Member #13805
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Federal Way WA
Posts: 3,456
Thanks: 89
Thanked 118 Times in 96 Posts
Rep Power: 41
Againsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond repute
Againsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by GHook93 View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Walt View Post
This is insane. We are looking at a bill. To ban something, that is not legal in the first place. They have the American people chasing their proverbial tails.
NOT TRUE! Read the 14th Amendment and then come back to us!
I read it...it specifically denies citizenship to children born to LEGAL DIPLOMATS, how on earth could anyone interpret it to provide citizenship to children born to ILLEGAL ALIENS?????

They are not "under the jurisdiction" of our country and therefore are not citizens.
__________________
'This has been and will be Mexico again' - Alberto Lozano, an official representative of the Mexican government at the Mexican consulate in San Diego on Mar 13, 2008.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2009, 08:05 PM
Soaring's Avatar
Registered User
Member #19537
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 502
Thanks: 0
Thanked 69 Times in 46 Posts
Rep Power: 6
Soaring could be city mayor
Soaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayorSoaring could be city mayor
What don't you guys understand about being born in the United makes you an American citizen? Seems pretty clear and simple to me.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2009, 10:19 PM
Againsheila's Avatar
Registered User
Member #13805
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Federal Way WA
Posts: 3,456
Thanks: 89
Thanked 118 Times in 96 Posts
Rep Power: 41
Againsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond repute
Againsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond reputeAgainsheila has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Soaring View Post
What don't you guys understand about being born in the United makes you an American citizen? Seems pretty clear and simple to me.
Maybe to the simple minded....try reading the amendment to the Constitution. It grants citizenship only to those born in the USA and under the jurisdiction thereof....illegals are not under our jurisdiction, they are under the radar and hence their children are not us citizens.

How can anyone interpret an amendment which specifically denies citizenship to children born to LEGAL DIPLOMATS as granting citizenship to children born to ILLEGAL ALIENS is incomprehensible to me.
__________________
'This has been and will be Mexico again' - Alberto Lozano, an official representative of the Mexican government at the Mexican consulate in San Diego on Mar 13, 2008.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-06-2009, 08:03 AM
Registered User
Member #19034
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 203
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 1
LaLinda75 could be on a school boardLaLinda75 could be on a school boardLaLinda75 could be on a school boardLaLinda75 could be on a school board
Pass the bill. It's long overdue. At least half of the problems due to the illegals would be solved if this bill is passed. Citizenship should ONLY be given to those who are born to people who followed the rules and/or laws of the USA and are here LEGALLY! THOSE WHO ARE BORN HERE TO ILLEGAL PARENTS SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN THAT PRIVILEGE - PERIOD!
__________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have"
Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-06-2009, 08:29 PM
rhodescholar's Avatar
Registered User
Member #19550
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Flying an A-10 over Teheran
Posts: 1,013
Thanks: 194
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 0
rhodescholar is likely a worthless trollrhodescholar is likely a worthless trollrhodescholar is likely a worthless trollrhodescholar is likely a worthless trollrhodescholar is likely a worthless trollrhodescholar is likely a worthless troll
Of course this bill is long overdue, the real question is can it be made retroactive, so that those believing themselves US citizens through the use of an anchor baby and chain-migration can lose their citizenship, and be deported?

The other issue is since illegals manage to still collect welfare and other various social benefits, how do we stop that from happening?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Immigration/Illegal Immigration

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

» Search Forums

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Apple iPad Forum
» Premium Sponsors
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 AM.


Please visit these our friends at the following forums:
Photography Forum - Celebrity Gossip and News - Conceal Carry and Hand Gun Forum - Parrot Forum - iPhone News - iPhone Forums - Motorola Droid Forum


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management by RedTyger