US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum  

Healthcare Bill Hit Parade!!

This is a discussion on Healthcare Bill Hit Parade!! within the Healthcare/Insurance/Govt Healthcare forums, part of the US Discussion category; Quote: Originally Posted by jreeves Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae Quote: Originally Posted by Navy1960 Maggie, I think I have pointed out where in the ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Healthcare/Insurance/Govt Healthcare



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 11:24 AM
MaggieMae's Avatar
Think less, feel better?
Member #18998
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,467
Thanks: 461
Thanked 418 Times in 363 Posts
Rep Power: 61
MaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddha
MaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by jreeves View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Navy1960 View Post

Maggie, I think I have pointed out where in the legislation that Illegal Immigrants will be covered under this bill. In fact in the bill EVERYONE is considered automatically covered if they do not opt for a plan and there is NO proof of residence required in it. See ( Medicare/Medicade Section) As I have pointed out to you and others on here many times when there is a LACK of legislation to the contrary it is up to the commissioner to make the decision on who is covered. Further, when there is no legislation to the contrary it is assumed in the affirmitive.
You have not "proven" anything. I read the exchange with Care, and it is a matter of interpretation, and you are wrong. Go to the 14-page analysis by CBO, below, specifically the last paragraph of Page 4. Throughout the analysis, it refers to LEGAL residents.

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com...-Committee.pdf
Huffington post...chuckle....
Hey, stupid, the link is to the PDF version of the CBO letter. Try sprinkling the top of your head; maybe half of the gray matter will start to move around inside.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 11:30 AM
jreeves's Avatar
Registered User
Member #8708
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,333
Thanks: 71
Thanked 84 Times in 74 Posts
Rep Power: 91
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by jreeves View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post

You have not "proven" anything. I read the exchange with Care, and it is a matter of interpretation, and you are wrong. Go to the 14-page analysis by CBO, below, specifically the last paragraph of Page 4. Throughout the analysis, it refers to LEGAL residents.

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com...-Committee.pdf
Huffington post...chuckle....
Hey, stupid, the link is to the PDF version of the CBO letter. Try sprinkling the top of your head; maybe half of the gray matter will start to move around inside.
Excuse me, I didn't even click on the link, due to your past displays of
__________________
Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.
Will Rogers
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel or envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Winston Churchill
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.

JFK
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session. -- Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 11:32 AM
MaggieMae's Avatar
Think less, feel better?
Member #18998
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,467
Thanks: 461
Thanked 418 Times in 363 Posts
Rep Power: 61
MaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddha
MaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by jreeves View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by jreeves View Post

LMAO...

Sara Robinson | OurFuture.org

Sara has blogged on authoritarian and extremist movements at Orcinus since 2006; and is a founding member of Group News Blog, the successors to Steve Gilliard's original News Blog, where she still posts occasional lighter and more personal pieces. Her recent work has also appeared online at Firedoglake, DailyKos, OpenLeft, and Alternet; and in print at The Progressive Christian and Survival: The Journal of the International Institute of Strategic Studies. She is a consulting partner with the Cognitive Policy Works in Seattle, and a Fellow at the Campaign for America's Future.
So? Shall we all just in lockstep move over to reading your choice of partisan sites and publications? Don't be such a fucking hypocrite by continuing to believe there is only ONE solution to this mess--yours--and that millions of people should be scoffed at for blogging and otherwise writing about the OTHER side.
BTW aren't you the one who said this?
Yeah, I always go to YouTube or Twitter for my facts. I'd much rather my information come from more reliable, less partisan, sources.
Your point? I get my information from a huge variety of sources, not the least of which is Congressional Daily, which is straight reporting. I watch/listen on average 15 hours per week of C-Span and also read THEIR links to sources. You will ever win an argument with me by just parroting opinions of others, so don't even try. On the other hand, if you're ever 'right' about something, I'll let you know.
Reply With Quote
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 11:54 AM
Navy1960's Avatar
Registered User
Member #11841
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,398
Thanks: 342
Thanked 639 Times in 433 Posts
Rep Power: 84
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Navy1960 View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post

Navy, you are quoting ONLY from the House version. The Senate has yet to pass anything, even out of committee, after which the agreed-upon FINAL DRAFT will go to conference committee (between the House and the Senate) for a final version. Go here to see where it's at, right now.

Please stop SCARING people into believing this is a DONE DEAL. IT IS NOT!!!!

Health Care for America NOW - Steps To Win

You mean like how cap and trade changed during the conference right? you mean I should wait and not inform people and let people listen to the propaganda comming from the President on this issue rather than the actual bill that is before the house? No thank you I would rather work from the actual legislation they are talking about rather than listen to the person that has made claims such as "unplolyment will not rise above 8.5% with the passage of this bill". If you find this scarry then good Maggie , you should find it scarry because it is. If you have not noticed our nation is deep in dept and with the advent of proposals like this , in an effort to socially norm everyone, some would take this nation down the same path that states like Ca. have already traveled. Perhaps you may one day like to receive a IOU from social security after you spent years paying into it, but personally I don't. So I will continue to post the REAL legislation and NOT the marketing version that the President would have people believe.
Um, cap and trade isn't a done deal yet either, Navy.

You'll notice I'm not disputing any of your points concerning your aversion to the House bill. I am simply reiterating as I have done a gazillion times before that any health care reform WILL NOT look like the House version that you've spent so many hours dissecting. Not even close.

That said, you constantly go off-topic and ramble on about differences in ideologies, which we all know exist. I get sick of the constant analogy to California; the constant yammering about how Democrats are the ones who will "take us down the road to...[fill in the blank], when it remains that the overall opinion found in poll after poll finds that two-thirds of Americans want SOME KIND of health care reform in order to control the costs. YOu can read that in ALL the polls here, going all the way back to the 90s.

Health Policy
Maggie, I'm not going off topic I'm simply addressing your points and as for Ca. if the bill(s) are perpetuated by the leader of the house who happens to be from Ca. and Mr. Waxman who also happens to be from Ca. and language contained in other bills i.e. cap and trade that point blank refers to Ca. then yes I will keep making reference to it. As for keeping costs down in healthcare , I don't think anyone here who has seen me discuss this issue can dispute that I have always held the position that healthcare costs need to be brought under control. However, I am also not under the mistaken impression that our Govt. is empowered to mandate healthcare for everyone. If you do not like discussing the actual legislation then thats fine with me Maggie, I can I suppose find some propaganda sites and begin to post opinions based as fact.
__________________
God grant me the courage not to give up what I think is right even though I think it is hopeless.
Chester W. Nimitz
Reply With Quote
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 12:01 PM
Navy1960's Avatar
Registered User
Member #11841
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,398
Thanks: 342
Thanked 639 Times in 433 Posts
Rep Power: 84
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Navy1960 View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post

Operative words. Illegal aliens will NOT be automatically covered.
Maggie, I think I have pointed out where in the legislation that Illegal Immigrants will be covered under this bill. In fact in the bill EVERYONE is considered automatically covered if they do not opt for a plan and there is NO proof of residence required in it. See ( Medicare/Medicade Section) As I have pointed out to you and others on here many times when there is a LACK of legislation to the contrary it is up to the commissioner to make the decision on who is covered. Further, when there is no legislation to the contrary it is assumed in the affirmitive.
You have not "proven" anything. I read the exchange with Care, and it is a matter of interpretation, and you are wrong. Go to the 14-page analysis by CBO, below, specifically the last paragraph of Page 4. Throughout the analysis, it refers to LEGAL residents.

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com...-Committee.pdf
Maggie I'm sorry that the contents of the bill disturb you, they should be disturbing to any free thinking American. I have pointed out in the BILL itself both the senate and the house versions on here where it maks reference to coverage. If you choose to to read an analysis from the huffington post and not the bill and have them make up your mind for you then of course your entitled to do that. As for me, I tend look at the text of the language unlike most of the members of congress who don't bother to even read the bills and take it as written. In my last posting from the Senate Version it makes it quite clear who the Senate considers is covered and makes NO REFERENCE to residence requirements or legal status. IF that doesn't make sense to you then of course you can choose to take it as you wish.
__________________
God grant me the courage not to give up what I think is right even though I think it is hopeless.
Chester W. Nimitz
Reply With Quote
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 12:10 PM
Navy1960's Avatar
Registered User
Member #11841
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,398
Thanks: 342
Thanked 639 Times in 433 Posts
Rep Power: 84
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
One more thing worthy of note here Maggie, this thread was started by me as a discussion thread on the merits of the bills themselves, and if I happen to take issue with various sections of the bills then that is within keeping of of this thread topic. Again, you have my apologies if the contents of the bill(s) fly in the face of what your being told by the sources you get your information from. However, I have always contented that perhaps that is why our Govt. spends money needlessly because they hope people will take on face value what they tell them and not bother to read what laws they hope to make us abide by,

"Experience teaches us to be most on our guard to protect
liberty when the government's purposes are beneficent. Men
born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their
liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty
lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning
but without understanding."
-- Justice Louis Brandeis
__________________
God grant me the courage not to give up what I think is right even though I think it is hopeless.
Chester W. Nimitz
Reply With Quote
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 12:19 PM
jreeves's Avatar
Registered User
Member #8708
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,333
Thanks: 71
Thanked 84 Times in 74 Posts
Rep Power: 91
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by jreeves View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post

So? Shall we all just in lockstep move over to reading your choice of partisan sites and publications? Don't be such a fucking hypocrite by continuing to believe there is only ONE solution to this mess--yours--and that millions of people should be scoffed at for blogging and otherwise writing about the OTHER side.
BTW aren't you the one who said this?
Yeah, I always go to YouTube or Twitter for my facts. I'd much rather my information come from more reliable, less partisan, sources.
Your point? I get my information from a huge variety of sources, not the least of which is Congressional Daily, which is straight reporting. I watch/listen on average 15 hours per week of C-Span and also read THEIR links to sources. You will ever win an argument with me by just parroting opinions of others, so don't even try. On the other hand, if you're ever 'right' about something, I'll let you know.
In what way did you not parrot the blogger that has blogged for DailyKOS as well as other liberal websites?
__________________
Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.
Will Rogers
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel or envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Winston Churchill
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.

JFK
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session. -- Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 12:49 PM
jreeves's Avatar
Registered User
Member #8708
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,333
Thanks: 71
Thanked 84 Times in 74 Posts
Rep Power: 91
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by jreeves View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post

Yeah, I always go to YouTube or Twitter for my facts. I'd much rather my information come from more reliable, less partisan, sources.

Mythbusting Canadian Health Care -- Part I | OurFuture.org
LMAO...

Sara Robinson | OurFuture.org

Sara has blogged on authoritarian and extremist movements at Orcinus since 2006; and is a founding member of Group News Blog, the successors to Steve Gilliard's original News Blog, where she still posts occasional lighter and more personal pieces. Her recent work has also appeared online at Firedoglake, DailyKos, OpenLeft, and Alternet; and in print at The Progressive Christian and Survival: The Journal of the International Institute of Strategic Studies. She is a consulting partner with the Cognitive Policy Works in Seattle, and a Fellow at the Campaign for America's Future.
So? Shall we all just in lockstep move over to reading your choice of partisan sites and publications? Don't be such a fucking hypocrite by continuing to believe there is only ONE solution to this mess--yours--and that millions of people should be scoffed at for blogging and otherwise writing about the OTHER side.
BTW she doesn't just write and blog for the other side...

She is a consultant for Cognitive Policy Works, here is a little about CPW.
Cognitive Policy Works
Cognitive Policy Works is an educational center and consulting service that provides strategic guidance to the progressive world.
__________________
Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.
Will Rogers
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel or envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Winston Churchill
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.

JFK
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session. -- Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 01:11 PM
jreeves's Avatar
Registered User
Member #8708
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,333
Thanks: 71
Thanked 84 Times in 74 Posts
Rep Power: 91
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Care4all View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Navy1960 View Post
ILLEGAL ALIEN: An "illegal alien" is a foreigner who (1) does not owe allegiance to our country; and (2) who has violated our laws and customs in establishing residence in our country. He or she is therefore a criminal under applicable U.S. laws.

The term "illegal alien" is used by U.S. citizens who believe that non-citizens entering our country must comply with our immigration laws.

The term "illegal alien" is predicated upon U.S. immigration law which requires foreigners entering the U.S. to comply with our country's rules and laws regarding entry into, and residence within, our country.
FYI

YOU should know, that if you or reeves took the position I am holding on these regs that we have been arguing about, I would have taken the OPPOSITE position.

Not only do I enjoy playing devil's advocate, I find taking the position much more useful in helping me find out more information regarding the topic being argued, so that I can eventually make a decision based off of my own researched arguments or the arguments of those I chose to oppose... for the sake of opposing :, because their arguments or positions ended up better!

So please don't take any of this debating or arguing as some may see it, personally!!!



care
I enjoy debating you, at least your intellectually honest.
__________________
Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.
Will Rogers
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel or envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Winston Churchill
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.

JFK
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session. -- Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 01:20 PM
Navy1960's Avatar
Registered User
Member #11841
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,398
Thanks: 342
Thanked 639 Times in 433 Posts
Rep Power: 84
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
SEC. 2706. PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST INDI22
VIDUAL PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES
23 BASED ON HEALTH STATUS.
24 ‘‘A group health plan and a health insurance issuer
25 offering group or individual health insurance coverage,
13
O:\BAI\BAI09A84.xml [file 1 of 6] S.L.C.
1 may not establish rules for eligibility (including continued
2 eligibility) of any individual to enroll under the terms of
3 the plan or coverage based on any of the following health
4 status-related factors in relation to the individual or a de5
pendent of the individual:
6 ‘‘(1) Health status.
7 ‘‘(2) Medical condition (including both physical
8 and mental illnesses).
9 ‘‘(3) Claims experience.
10 ‘‘(4) Receipt of health care.
11 ‘‘(5) Medical history.
12 ‘‘(6) Genetic information.
13 ‘‘(7) Evidence of insurability (including condi14
tions arising out of acts of domestic violence).
15 ‘‘(8) Disability.
16 ‘‘(9) Any other health status-related factor de17
termined appropriate by the Secretary.


As I have stated in the house version the language is clear for those of you who wish to deny it, it's completly up to the Sec. or commissioner as to who they will force the insurance companies to cover or have converage. This one happens to be from the Senate version
__________________
God grant me the courage not to give up what I think is right even though I think it is hopeless.
Chester W. Nimitz
Reply With Quote
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 01:27 PM
Navy1960's Avatar
Registered User
Member #11841
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,398
Thanks: 342
Thanked 639 Times in 433 Posts
Rep Power: 84
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
2) includes a mechanism, such as a regional
11 medical direction or transport communications sys12
tem, that operates throughout the region to ensure
13 that the patient is taken to the medically appro14
priate facility
(whether an initial facility or a higher15
level facility) in a timely fashion;

Would someone please tell what business the Federal Govt. has or empowered by the constitution to dictate where a patient is taken and treated?
__________________
God grant me the courage not to give up what I think is right even though I think it is hopeless.
Chester W. Nimitz
Reply With Quote
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 03:36 PM
Registered User
Member #19507
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,050
Thanks: 96
Thanked 161 Times in 123 Posts
Rep Power: 11
Political Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayor
Political Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayorPolitical Junky could be city mayor
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by jreeves View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post

You have not "proven" anything. I read the exchange with Care, and it is a matter of interpretation, and you are wrong. Go to the 14-page analysis by CBO, below, specifically the last paragraph of Page 4. Throughout the analysis, it refers to LEGAL residents.

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com...-Committee.pdf
Huffington post...chuckle....
Hey, stupid, the link is to the PDF version of the CBO letter. Try sprinkling the top of your head; maybe half of the gray matter will start to move around inside.
There's no reviving any traces of grey matter there.
Reply With Quote
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 05:52 PM
jreeves's Avatar
Registered User
Member #8708
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,333
Thanks: 71
Thanked 84 Times in 74 Posts
Rep Power: 91
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Political Junky View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by jreeves View Post

Huffington post...chuckle....
Hey, stupid, the link is to the PDF version of the CBO letter. Try sprinkling the top of your head; maybe half of the gray matter will start to move around inside.
There's no reviving any traces of grey matter there.
This coming from a 'junky' who wants to turn their health care over to a government that has nothing but near bankrupt programs to show as a track record.
__________________
Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.
Will Rogers
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel or envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Winston Churchill
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.

JFK
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session. -- Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2009, 09:16 AM
Navy1960's Avatar
Registered User
Member #11841
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,398
Thanks: 342
Thanked 639 Times in 433 Posts
Rep Power: 84
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
I find it somewhat troubling that a thread that's intent is to cite the issues related to the ACTUAL legislation before congress would cause people to become upset over it. In fact if the actualy legislation is not matching the talk comming from those that you support no matter what side of the debate that is, then you should be upset about that. However, this thread is a thread to discuss the actual legislation and not the marketing talk associated with it.
__________________
God grant me the courage not to give up what I think is right even though I think it is hopeless.
Chester W. Nimitz
Reply With Quote
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2009, 09:27 AM
MaggieMae's Avatar
Think less, feel better?
Member #18998
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,467
Thanks: 461
Thanked 418 Times in 363 Posts
Rep Power: 61
MaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddha
MaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddhaMaggieMae could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by jreeves View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by MaggieMae View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by jreeves View Post

BTW aren't you the one who said this?
Yeah, I always go to YouTube or Twitter for my facts. I'd much rather my information come from more reliable, less partisan, sources.
Your point? I get my information from a huge variety of sources, not the least of which is Congressional Daily, which is straight reporting. I watch/listen on average 15 hours per week of C-Span and also read THEIR links to sources. You will ever win an argument with me by just parroting opinions of others, so don't even try. On the other hand, if you're ever 'right' about something, I'll let you know.
In what way did you not parrot the blogger that has blogged for DailyKOS as well as other liberal websites?
I've never visited DailyKOS in my life. The only thing I've EVER read which was posted by them was that Patreaus-Betrayus stuff in 2007. I also don't read Huffington Post on a regular basis, but they are an excellent site for hyperlinking items in PDF form if one doesn't know the exact wording. You can take a guess and often Google will direct me to the HP, which then has a redirect. [Hope Navy sees this as well.]

My opinions are my own, based on analyzing a variety of publications, etc. As for health care, yes, I believe government intervention IS needed, but no, I don't believe that cost containment has been fully explored. So I'm right in the middle, just like two-thirds of the rest of Americans on this. Mine isn't a left or right position based on any one leftist website or talking head.

I have a real problem, however, with the continued yammering from the ideological point of view: SOCIALISM!!! EGADS!!! Done correctly, any government-sponsored health care program does NOT mean the beginning of an era of Stalin-esque Socialism/Communism, or even a carbon copy of the British system.

I was amused listening to C-Span's Washington Journal this morning, once again dealing with the health care issue, only this time the moderator asked a specific question of the callers: How do you currently pay for your health care? The hommina hommina hommina comments from some of the Republican callers preceded the fact that, um, I get mine through Medicare/Medicaid. Surprise surprise. Yet they're against coverage for those who don't qualify for either because it will lead to Socialism? Interesting.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Healthcare/Insurance/Govt Healthcare

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

» Search Forums

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Apple iPad Forum
» Premium Sponsors
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Please visit these our friends at the following forums:
Photography Forum - Celebrity Gossip and News - Conceal Carry and Hand Gun Forum - Parrot Forum - iPhone News - iPhone Forums - Motorola Droid Forum


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management by RedTyger