Brain Scans Point to Homosexuality as Being Genetic

indeed.. the midigating factor seems to be our ability to reason above animals. perhaps this is why such behaviour always seems to pop up in every culture while the same cant be said for the animal kindom. I mean, who hasn't seen a male dog hump a leg? Certainly, this behaviour wouldn't perpetuate canines but.. in an animal that is aware of the proverbial "I"? We have the benefit to behave according to desire rather than reflex or instinct. I could be totally wrong but, in regards to the evolutionary construct of homosexuality, no other animal kills because two males of its specie are humping each other.

LOL....I would certainly hope not. Unless of course they're caught in an ambiguously gay love triangle. This is an interesting topic....unfortunately, I'm all "gayed-out" for today and have to get going. Have a good Thursday!

You too!

humans are much more than simple animals with instinctual drives that rule.

to define homosexuality that way is to misrepresent the human experience. heterosexuals decide to remain child free. where does that fit in your evolutionary theory?

__________________

This space has been leased out. Try again next time.

"I am not so much for State's rights as I am for the people's rights."

Evolution is not a PLAN.

Crediting evolution with having some hidden logic to make it all work is flawed logic.

Answer the questions I/others have posted instead of just posting stupid crap to make other people feel dumb.

Why do you think blue-eyed gene mutation is part of evolution? What purpose does it serve considering brown-eyed people have been shown to see better...? Why do you think homosexuality has to do with evolution? Shogun has stated his opinion and we've had a decent discussion about it. Are you capable of doing so?

Does it make sense to you that people evolving into homosexuals would actually make the species extinct? I've seen gay bulls refuse to mate with a cow but instead hump another younger bull into submission. If you think this is evolution, then the bovine species would simply go extinct. Therefore, if it is genetic, the bull would never reproduce to pass on it's mutation and the homosexual gene would not exist to duplicate from it's original carrier.

I think it's a simple mutation, just like cystic-fibrosis. <----it's a genetic mutation in a certain gene that causes this disease, this is not evolution, considering that it's easier to breath without cystic-fibrosis and not to mention you'll live longer without it. Not all mutations are evolution at work.

I think that his point is that the "why" question doesn't fit well.

There is no purpose to any mutation. They just happen.

Some of them, if they're disastrous or unlucky enough, get selected out over time. But even very bad ones can linger pretty much indefinitely if they often lie unexpressed for generations at a time.

The more advantageous ones will have a higher chance of increasing, but being disadvantageous is no garauntee of going away.

Consider blue eyes. They are a bit disadvantagous vision-wise, which hurt their chances of survival over the long term. But they're also recessive, so not everyone with a gene for blue eyes will have blue eyes, which confers a significant buffer between blue eyes and natrual selection. Thus, you might expect that while blue eyes do keep happening, they would be noticeably rarer than brown eyes. Is that the case?

So, suppose that homosexuality were entirely genetic. Obviously, it is extremely disadvantageous when it comes to reproduction. But it is not a terribly dominant genetic strain, given how often the children of gay people are not gay, and the proportion of gay people born to straight parents. So what would you expect to happen? Much like the case of blue eyes, you'd expect it to be rare, but still bubble up.

Evolution is an extremely sloppy process with lots and lots of randomness. Mutations do not have to be at all reproductively beneficial to survive; being so just gives them better odds at being more wide-spread.

__________________
There are two important rules in life. The first is, never tell someone everything you know.

I agree 100%. My question of (why?) is not merely just a question of why it happens, but why they consider it an evolutionary event. Considering that evolution (in theory) is a mechanism for which organism can adapt to their environment. Therefore, why would a mutation for blue-eyes (worse vision than brown-eyes) be a mechanism for adaptation? And why would homosexuality ( if a gene mutation) be a mechanism in place for the survival of the human race? I really don't know the answer, but I am just asking in case anyone does. I really like your post though...

Blue eyes do not "see worse" than brown eyes. And it, as well as blonde/red hair, came about via sexual selection(AKA attractiveness).

BrianH, evolution is not a plan.

It serves no purpose.

It merely is.

much more, eh? looking at macro interaction between human tribes (nations) say otherwise when compared with packs of animals. Sexual promiscuity does too. Im afriad im going to need a bit more than just the statement that humans are much more than simple animals. Hell, the more we look the more we find out that animals really aren't that simple.

Misrepresent the human experience? what the hell does that even mean? Further, how do you judge your human experience versus that of, say, a 3rd century begger? Heterosexuals may very well decide to not have kids but the natural option remains while it does not for gays. What is the staggering comparison between heteros who choose not to have kids with those who do compared with the sample of gays who opt for natural birthing methods?

who said anything about a "plan"? I theorized about the reason homosexuality could be a social pressure valve to relieve relevant social pressures among varous societies as well as being evident in the animal kingdom. Did you have something youd liek to add?

but at some point there had to be an original mutation. Without this original mutation there would have been no natural selection.

Do brown eyes see better than blue? Quarks, Quirks and Quips

"But does your eye colour influence how you see?

It turns out that it does. The darker the eyes, the more light is absorbed as light waves pass through the eye, and the less light is available to reflect within the eye."

Research says your wrong....

Editec, we're not talking about a plan. Evolution may not have a plan, but it has a purpose. There is a purpose for hurricanes. They may not have a plan, but there is a purpose...to cool down the ocean. Evolution may not have a plan on what it wants to do, but it has a purpose. What is the purpose of evolving into worse vision? Or what is the purpose of evolving into humans/animals that can't/won't reproduce?