Brain Scans Point to Homosexuality as Being Genetic

Afraid? What a silly thing to be afraid of.

Aren't they ALSO a group that many people fear on sight and without any real cause. The anology is apt.

Now you're just being contrary. Are you really tripping over gays in your life?

Infiltrated? ARe you being infiltrated by homos? That not only sounds uncomfortable, but unhygenic, too.


Gays "surrounding" him?

Either you guys live in San Francisco (and then you might ask yourselves why you've chosen to live in a town renound for its gay community) , or I don't really know what you're talking about.

You appear to me to be saying that you are plagued by homosexuals, and that they're infiltrating your lives.

Seems prety simply to me.

If you don't want to be queer, don't be.

If you don't like queers, don't hang around where queers congregate.

Is that really all that hard to understand?

The analogy is anything but Apt, but whatever.

I don't know about you but I don't fear gays, of all people.

"Now you're just being contrary. Are you really tripping over gays in your life?"

You can say that to anyone who thinks differently. Contrary is not equivalent to Wrong.

An' yes, here in the sticks, I've been smothered in the gay agenda, in the Sticks I can't hide from it or keep it from my children. There's some sorta mob mentality surrounding it now, it's picked up so much speed you'd think it'd developed into an American fad, an infatuation.

People are infatuated by the lowliest of things, though.

"You appear to me to be saying that you are plagued by homosexuals, and that they're infiltrating your lives."

That's simplifying.

"Seems prety simply to me.

If you don't want to be queer, don't be."

Nobody said we feared they could indoctrinate us.--You've been indoctrinated already and don't know it.

"If you don't like queers, don't hang around where queers congregate.

Is that really all that hard to understand?[/quote]"

Is it any harder to understand that I should get to pick how my kids come up in the world to some degree I can live with??!!

They also find that whites and asians have bigger brains than blacks, which they can further accurately correlate with measures of intelligence, such as "IQ" and "G".

I don't recall the British Broadcasting of Communism covering those studies, however. What a shock.

SMOTHERED in the gay agenda, eh?


So, I take it you are fending off the urge to suck some cock since all those rainbows have moved to town?

If one is bisexual then there is some element of choice. But you really can't choose who you are attracted to, can you?

I don't know.

But if the spectrum theory is correct, then choice would necessarily have to be part of it. Unless there is a defined tippingpoint along the scale for which one side is gay, one side is straight. But that would undermine the whole spectrum theory since it would make the matter once again black/white.

Basically, unless choice is involved, it has to be a black/white matter.

Or to put it another way, it's logically inconsistent to say it isn't a choice but it's also subjective.

Get it?

__________________
PLEASE READ!: The contents of the above post is the educated opinion of the author. At times, said opinion is so strong it gets stated as fact. This is simply how the author chooses to express his deeply held opinion and should not be misconstrued to suggest more. Or it's a joke. Deal.

I don't know either. It seems to me everyone would have the ability to be either and some combination of factors pushes one either way. Those factors could be hormonal, genetic and/or experience. Kind of like picking chocolate chip cookies over lemon pie...it could be a choice but something is making one choose.

Wouldn't bisexual people be the gray?

btw: While you were replying, I rewrote my post you quoted in an effort to be more clear about my point. I know sometimes I leave too much to the imagination.

Not necessarily. What if attraction to the same sex and attraction to the opposite sex are two different spectrums, with positive and negative ends. Perhaps bisexuals are just on the positive end of both.

__________________
PLEASE READ!: The contents of the above post is the educated opinion of the author. At times, said opinion is so strong it gets stated as fact. This is simply how the author chooses to express his deeply held opinion and should not be misconstrued to suggest more. Or it's a joke. Deal.

I don't know, the entire thing is pretty confusing. What makes anyone attracted to anyone else? I've heard various things...a certain body type, a certain odor, etc., so really being attracted to someone of the same sex probably isn't any more mysterious (or just as mysterious) as me liking a certain type of man. Which brings us back to the question you asked earlier--why does it even matter?

Blame it on the monkeys we descended from.

A question yet to be answered by the way.

I was hoping gnome-deeplume might offer some insight on the matter.

__________________
PLEASE READ!: The contents of the above post is the educated opinion of the author. At times, said opinion is so strong it gets stated as fact. This is simply how the author chooses to express his deeply held opinion and should not be misconstrued to suggest more. Or it's a joke. Deal.

just ask where the illusive source is. people are NOT born gay. it is a preposterous premise. what is acting gay? what does gay look like? what are the quantifying criteria for making the case for gay vs not gay? sexual preference? how silly. how pc, on all sides

__________________

This space has been leased out. Try again next time.

"I am not so much for State's rights as I am for the people's rights."

What could possibly be the evolutionary advantage for blue-eyes? Better vision? How about, if homosexuality is a mutation, what's the evolutionary purpose of it? If a species is supposed to evolve to adapt and to carry on it's species, why would to homosexuality be considered an evolutionary mutation? --That would "DISCONTINUE" our species. And you speak of mutation as "was" like it no longer happens. I believe some mutations are evolution, however, if you expect me to believe that a down-syndrome baby is some kind of evolutionary mutation, you may want to rethink your position.

Do brown eyes see better than blue? Quarks, Quirks and Quips

Brown eyed people have been shown to have better vision that blue-eyed people. Their dark eyes absorb more light waves. So why would the human race need to evolve to blue eyes?

theory
the evolutionary advantage of homosexuality lies in it's nulification of the necessity to fight for the right to procreate the specie. In an overpopulated state animals tear each other apart for the right to mate. homosexual variations deflates this conflict.

Hmmm.............. Great point.
But wouldn't homosexuality (in essence) be a "self-defeating" evolutionary mechanism. In the human world, we have the knowledge to pro-create even if you are a homosexual (i.e. surrogate mothers, test-tube babies, sperm donation) etc. However, in the animal world, homosexual animals would be unable to reproduce, thus not being able to spread their mutated gene. This is interesting.......