 | | 
02-19-2009, 08:02 AM
|  | Yes, I'm just kidding Member #11939 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 11,174
Thanks: 1,074
Thanked 1,074 Times in 738 Posts
Rep Power: 296 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Old Rocks My, my, our mythical physicist chimes in. Well, no, the warming on Mars is not global, it is regional, and has nothing at all to do with our present warming. Nor are we cooling. 11 of the warmest years on record in the last 150 have been in the last 13 years. That is harldly indictutive of a cooling trend. And here is what real physicists have to say; Venus & Mars When you reply to someone, make sure you click 'Quote' so that they know you are responding to their post. Based on the content of your post, I will assume that you were attempting to reply to me.
First off, why do you think I'm a 'mythical' physicist? I am, in fact, a Physicist with the degrees to prove it. You, on the other hand, just have a passing knowledge of the subject with no basis for understanding. You suffer from what is known as 'Arrogance from Ignorance'. In other words, you have a little bit of knowledge which has made you arrogant, yet you are completely ignorant of the subject. No matter. I have seen this many times in my life. You are certainly not the first.
There is a lot of information that the planet is cooling, but since you would rather try to prove your point first and then look at the data later, you don't see it. Many ignorant people do this, even some degreed scientists, so don't feel too bad. As we say in the business, "In God We Trust, all others bring data." I would recommend you look at the data first, but since that is not possible for an 'old rock' like you, I'll merely try to educate the young so that they don't make the same mistakes as you have made.
Global cooling articles: January 2008 - 4 sources say “globally cooler” in the past 12 months « Watts Up With That? Global Cooling? [1998-2005 data shows cooling trend] World Climate Report » The Coming Global Cooling?
I enjoyed the link you posted: Venus & Mars
It's a great history lesson. Everyone who is interested in Science should read it. However, it doesn't support anything you've said. As I said, it is merely a history lesson concerning the study of atmospheres of other planets.
Again, I realize there is no hope for you understanding the data since you have an agenda (or in your case, a religion) that you have chosen to follow, but perhaps people who are younger and/or more open-minded will be more open-minded to the Scientific Method. | | The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to xsited1 For This Useful Post: | | 
02-19-2009, 08:12 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #17949 | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Conservative part of the Northwest
Posts: 5,969
Thanks: 1,872
Thanked 799 Times in 650 Posts
Rep Power: 173 | | | WOW !!! rockhead...you just got spanked. | 
02-19-2009, 08:49 AM
|  | Registered User Member #12116 | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,898
Thanks: 160
Thanked 148 Times in 105 Posts
Rep Power: 58 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1
Quote: Originally Posted by Old Rocks My, my, our mythical physicist chimes in. Well, no, the warming on Mars is not global, it is regional, and has nothing at all to do with our present warming. Nor are we cooling. 11 of the warmest years on record in the last 150 have been in the last 13 years. That is harldly indictutive of a cooling trend. And here is what real physicists have to say; Venus & Mars When you reply to someone, make sure you click 'Quote' so that they know you are responding to their post. Based on the content of your post, I will assume that you were attempting to reply to me.
First off, why do you think I'm a 'mythical' physicist? I am, in fact, a Physicist with the degrees to prove it. You, on the other hand, just have a passing knowledge of the subject with no basis for understanding. You suffer from what is known as 'Arrogance from Ignorance'. In other words, you have a little bit of knowledge which has made you arrogant, yet you are completely ignorant of the subject. No matter. I have seen this many times in my life. You are certainly not the first.
There is a lot of information that the planet is cooling, but since you would rather try to prove your point first and then look at the data later, you don't see it. Many ignorant people do this, even some degreed scientists, so don't feel too bad. As we say in the business, "In God We Trust, all others bring data." I would recommend you look at the data first, but since that is not possible for an 'old rock' like you, I'll merely try to educate the young so that they don't make the same mistakes as you have made.
Global cooling articles: January 2008 - 4 sources say “globally cooler” in the past 12 months « Watts Up With That? Global Cooling? [1998-2005 data shows cooling trend] World Climate Report » The Coming Global Cooling?
I enjoyed the link you posted: Venus & Mars
It's a great history lesson. Everyone who is interested in Science should read it. However, it doesn't support anything you've said. As I said, it is merely a history lesson concerning the study of atmospheres of other planets.
Again, I realize there is no hope for you understanding the data since you have an agenda (or in your case, a religion) that you have chosen to follow, but perhaps people who are younger and/or more open-minded will be more open-minded to the Scientific Method.   owned.jpg
__________________ These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.” - Barney Frank
Idiot test click Here | 
02-19-2009, 01:29 PM
|  | Permanently confused Member #3196 | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: LeFevre Peninsula
Posts: 12,361
Thanks: 1,630
Thanked 486 Times in 379 Posts
Rep Power: 247 | | Come on you blokes, you're easily pleased if X gets you xsited that easily
Have a look at the scientific consensus on the topic. Consensus I wrote, that doesn't mean no objectors. In fact I'd be worried about a total acceptance of the cause of the phenomenon because I'd be smelling a damn big rat.
Now, where are your objections located?
Ideology? Religion? Just don't like all those liberal scientists? Scared?
__________________ This computer has been drinking...not me.
The best foot goes forward.
Last edited by Diuretic; 02-19-2009 at 01:30 PM.
| 
02-19-2009, 01:42 PM
|  | Supporting Member Member #17949 | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Conservative part of the Northwest
Posts: 5,969
Thanks: 1,872
Thanked 799 Times in 650 Posts
Rep Power: 173 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Diuretic Come on you blokes, you're easily pleased if X gets you xsited that easily
Have a look at the scientific consensus on the topic. Consensus I wrote, that doesn't mean no objectors. In fact I'd be worried about a total acceptance of the cause of the phenomenon because I'd be smelling a damn big rat.
Now, where are your objections located?
Ideology? Religion? Just don't like all those liberal scientists? Scared? Fact is D., that Al Gore stated that the "Consensus was in...Man is the cause of global warming." we're just saying that it's still up for debate, and the consensus isn't in. More and more scientists are switching sides, and stepping forward that there is faulty data. | 
02-19-2009, 02:43 PM
|  | Yes, I'm just kidding Member #11939 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 11,174
Thanks: 1,074
Thanked 1,074 Times in 738 Posts
Rep Power: 296 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Diuretic Come on you blokes, you're easily pleased if X gets you xsited that easily
Have a look at the scientific consensus on the topic. Consensus I wrote, that doesn't mean no objectors. In fact I'd be worried about a total acceptance of the cause of the phenomenon because I'd be smelling a damn big rat.
Now, where are your objections located?
Ideology? Religion? Just don't like all those liberal scientists? Scared? The objections are clear: Look at the data. The problem is that people come to a conclusion and attempt to force any new data to conform to their conclusion while criticizing those who have valid objections. That's just what you're doing. Try to be a little more open-minded next time. | 
02-19-2009, 02:59 PM
|  | Registered User Member #8953 | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 25,964
Thanks: 233
Thanked 946 Times in 762 Posts
Rep Power: 444 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1
Quote: Originally Posted by Diuretic Come on you blokes, you're easily pleased if X gets you xsited that easily
Have a look at the scientific consensus on the topic. Consensus I wrote, that doesn't mean no objectors. In fact I'd be worried about a total acceptance of the cause of the phenomenon because I'd be smelling a damn big rat.
Now, where are your objections located?
Ideology? Religion? Just don't like all those liberal scientists? Scared? The objections are clear: Look at the data. The problem is that people come to a conclusion and attempt to force any new data to conform to their conclusion while criticizing those who have valid objections. That's just what you're doing. Try to be a little more open-minded next time. YOU'RE QUOTING FREEREPUBLIC!!! | 
02-19-2009, 03:57 PM
|  | Yes, I'm just kidding Member #11939 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 11,174
Thanks: 1,074
Thanked 1,074 Times in 738 Posts
Rep Power: 296 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Ravi
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1
Quote: Originally Posted by Diuretic Come on you blokes, you're easily pleased if X gets you xsited that easily
Have a look at the scientific consensus on the topic. Consensus I wrote, that doesn't mean no objectors. In fact I'd be worried about a total acceptance of the cause of the phenomenon because I'd be smelling a damn big rat.
Now, where are your objections located?
Ideology? Religion? Just don't like all those liberal scientists? Scared? The objections are clear: Look at the data. The problem is that people come to a conclusion and attempt to force any new data to conform to their conclusion while criticizing those who have valid objections. That's just what you're doing. Try to be a little more open-minded next time. YOU'RE QUOTING FREEREPUBLIC!!!  Give it a rest. I'm quoting data. Those were just the 3 links that came up in a google search. Look at the data, not the religion. | 
02-19-2009, 04:12 PM
|  | Registered User Member #8953 | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 25,964
Thanks: 233
Thanked 946 Times in 762 Posts
Rep Power: 444 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1
Quote: Originally Posted by Ravi
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1
The objections are clear: Look at the data. The problem is that people come to a conclusion and attempt to force any new data to conform to their conclusion while criticizing those who have valid objections. That's just what you're doing. Try to be a little more open-minded next time. YOU'RE QUOTING FREEREPUBLIC!!!  Give it a rest. I'm quoting data. Those were just the 3 links that came up in a google search. Look at the data, not the religion. Here's some data for you, kid...we haven't had a frost in five years. Before that, we had one on average every year. | 
02-19-2009, 04:24 PM
|  | Supporting Member Member #17949 | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Conservative part of the Northwest
Posts: 5,969
Thanks: 1,872
Thanked 799 Times in 650 Posts
Rep Power: 173 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Ravi
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1
Quote: Originally Posted by Ravi YOU'RE QUOTING FREEREPUBLIC!!!  Give it a rest. I'm quoting data. Those were just the 3 links that came up in a google search. Look at the data, not the religion. Here's some data for you, kid...we haven't had a frost in five years. Before that, we had one on average every year. Using your critieria...we've had record snowfalls the last 2 years where I live. Sooo....where does that put us Ravi???? | 
02-19-2009, 06:28 PM
| | Registered User Member #13758 | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Portland, Ore.
Posts: 7,946
Thanks: 2,018
Thanked 539 Times in 432 Posts
Rep Power: 36 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1
Quote: Originally Posted by Old Rocks My, my, our mythical physicist chimes in. Well, no, the warming on Mars is not global, it is regional, and has nothing at all to do with our present warming. Nor are we cooling. 11 of the warmest years on record in the last 150 have been in the last 13 years. That is harldly indictutive of a cooling trend. And here is what real physicists have to say; Venus & Mars When you reply to someone, make sure you click 'Quote' so that they know you are responding to their post. Based on the content of your post, I will assume that you were attempting to reply to me.
First off, why do you think I'm a 'mythical' physicist? I am, in fact, a Physicist with the degrees to prove it. You, on the other hand, just have a passing knowledge of the subject with no basis for understanding. You suffer from what is known as 'Arrogance from Ignorance'. In other words, you have a little bit of knowledge which has made you arrogant, yet you are completely ignorant of the subject. No matter. I have seen this many times in my life. You are certainly not the first.
There is a lot of information that the planet is cooling, but since you would rather try to prove your point first and then look at the data later, you don't see it. Many ignorant people do this, even some degreed scientists, so don't feel too bad. As we say in the business, "In God We Trust, all others bring data." I would recommend you look at the data first, but since that is not possible for an 'old rock' like you, I'll merely try to educate the young so that they don't make the same mistakes as you have made.
Global cooling articles: January 2008 - 4 sources say “globally cooler” in the past 12 months « Watts Up With That? Global Cooling? [1998-2005 data shows cooling trend] World Climate Report » The Coming Global Cooling?
I enjoyed the link you posted: Venus & Mars
It's a great history lesson. Everyone who is interested in Science should read it. However, it doesn't support anything you've said. As I said, it is merely a history lesson concerning the study of atmospheres of other planets.
Again, I realize there is no hope for you understanding the data since you have an agenda (or in your case, a religion) that you have chosen to follow, but perhaps people who are younger and/or more open-minded will be more open-minded to the Scientific Method.
Anthony Watts is a weather presenter for KPAY-AM radio, listed as meteorologist by the radio station[1] but listed as a retired Television Seal Holder (not as a meteorologist) by the American Meteorological Society.[2] In 2007, Watts founded SurfaceStations.org, a website devoted to photographing and documenting the quality of weather stations. [3]
Contents [hide]
1 Career
2 SurfaceStations.org
3 View on Global Warming
4 References
5 External links
[edit] Career
Watts became a television weatherman in 1987 when he joined KHSL-TV, a CBS affiliate based in Chico, California. After 17 years working at KHSL, he was replaced by Kris Kuyper [4] in 2004. He then became the radio weatherman for KPAY-AM, a Fox News affiliate also based in Chico, California. Watts also operates a company called ItWorks[5] which makes weather graphics systems for use on television broadcasts.
[edit] SurfaceStations.org
In 2007 Watts launched the 'Surface Stations' project, whose mission is "Via collaboration, creation of a publicly available photographic database of weather stations and weather station metadata."[6] The project relies on volunteers to gather the data. There are no qualification requirements.[7]
The project has received moral support from Roger A. Pielke and Stephen McIntyre. Pielke described the effort as filling "a very important need for the climate science community".[8] Watts is a regular contributor to McIntyre's website, Climate Audit where he posts some pictures of particularly poorly sited stations. Jay Lawrimore, chief of the climate monitoring branch of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's National Climatic Data Center said "I think any effort to better understand the observation system that's used to collect data and analyze it is helpful."[9]
[edit] View on Global Warming
Watts has stated that he had "at one time been fully engaged in the belief that CO2 was indeed the root cause of the global warming problem" but "later changed my thinking when I learned more about the science involved and found it to be lacking."[10] He established the blog "Watts Up With That?"[11] to popularise his views on global warming and the controversy around the science. Anthony Watts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is this what you call a scientist? That really calls your credentials into question. | 
02-19-2009, 06:30 PM
|  | Super Moderator Member #11827 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: half a bubble off
Posts: 16,061
Thanks: 628
Thanked 1,758 Times in 1,160 Posts
Rep Power: 425 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Old Rocks
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1
Quote: Originally Posted by Old Rocks My, my, our mythical physicist chimes in. Well, no, the warming on Mars is not global, it is regional, and has nothing at all to do with our present warming. Nor are we cooling. 11 of the warmest years on record in the last 150 have been in the last 13 years. That is harldly indictutive of a cooling trend. And here is what real physicists have to say; Venus & Mars When you reply to someone, make sure you click 'Quote' so that they know you are responding to their post. Based on the content of your post, I will assume that you were attempting to reply to me.
First off, why do you think I'm a 'mythical' physicist? I am, in fact, a Physicist with the degrees to prove it. You, on the other hand, just have a passing knowledge of the subject with no basis for understanding. You suffer from what is known as 'Arrogance from Ignorance'. In other words, you have a little bit of knowledge which has made you arrogant, yet you are completely ignorant of the subject. No matter. I have seen this many times in my life. You are certainly not the first.
There is a lot of information that the planet is cooling, but since you would rather try to prove your point first and then look at the data later, you don't see it. Many ignorant people do this, even some degreed scientists, so don't feel too bad. As we say in the business, "In God We Trust, all others bring data." I would recommend you look at the data first, but since that is not possible for an 'old rock' like you, I'll merely try to educate the young so that they don't make the same mistakes as you have made.
Global cooling articles: January 2008 - 4 sources say “globally cooler” in the past 12 months « Watts Up With That? Global Cooling? [1998-2005 data shows cooling trend] World Climate Report » The Coming Global Cooling?
I enjoyed the link you posted: Venus & Mars
It's a great history lesson. Everyone who is interested in Science should read it. However, it doesn't support anything you've said. As I said, it is merely a history lesson concerning the study of atmospheres of other planets.
Again, I realize there is no hope for you understanding the data since you have an agenda (or in your case, a religion) that you have chosen to follow, but perhaps people who are younger and/or more open-minded will be more open-minded to the Scientific Method.
Anthony Watts is a weather presenter for KPAY-AM radio, listed as meteorologist by the radio station[1] but listed as a retired Television Seal Holder (not as a meteorologist) by the American Meteorological Society.[2] In 2007, Watts founded SurfaceStations.org, a website devoted to photographing and documenting the quality of weather stations. [3]
Contents [hide]
1 Career
2 SurfaceStations.org
3 View on Global Warming
4 References
5 External links
[edit] Career
Watts became a television weatherman in 1987 when he joined KHSL-TV, a CBS affiliate based in Chico, California. After 17 years working at KHSL, he was replaced by Kris Kuyper [4] in 2004. He then became the radio weatherman for KPAY-AM, a Fox News affiliate also based in Chico, California. Watts also operates a company called ItWorks[5] which makes weather graphics systems for use on television broadcasts.
[edit] SurfaceStations.org
In 2007 Watts launched the 'Surface Stations' project, whose mission is "Via collaboration, creation of a publicly available photographic database of weather stations and weather station metadata."[6] The project relies on volunteers to gather the data. There are no qualification requirements.[7]
The project has received moral support from Roger A. Pielke and Stephen McIntyre. Pielke described the effort as filling "a very important need for the climate science community".[8] Watts is a regular contributor to McIntyre's website, Climate Audit where he posts some pictures of particularly poorly sited stations. Jay Lawrimore, chief of the climate monitoring branch of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's National Climatic Data Center said "I think any effort to better understand the observation system that's used to collect data and analyze it is helpful."[9]
[edit] View on Global Warming
Watts has stated that he had "at one time been fully engaged in the belief that CO2 was indeed the root cause of the global warming problem" but "later changed my thinking when I learned more about the science involved and found it to be lacking."[10] He established the blog "Watts Up With That?"[11] to popularise his views on global warming and the controversy around the science. Anthony Watts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is this what you call a scientist? That really calls your credentials into question. i always run my choice of scientists past a millwright to make sure i'm making the right choices. | 
02-19-2009, 06:30 PM
|  | Supporting Member Member #17949 | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Conservative part of the Northwest
Posts: 5,969
Thanks: 1,872
Thanked 799 Times in 650 Posts
Rep Power: 173 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Old Rocks
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1
Quote: Originally Posted by Old Rocks My, my, our mythical physicist chimes in. Well, no, the warming on Mars is not global, it is regional, and has nothing at all to do with our present warming. Nor are we cooling. 11 of the warmest years on record in the last 150 have been in the last 13 years. That is harldly indictutive of a cooling trend. And here is what real physicists have to say; Venus & Mars When you reply to someone, make sure you click 'Quote' so that they know you are responding to their post. Based on the content of your post, I will assume that you were attempting to reply to me.
First off, why do you think I'm a 'mythical' physicist? I am, in fact, a Physicist with the degrees to prove it. You, on the other hand, just have a passing knowledge of the subject with no basis for understanding. You suffer from what is known as 'Arrogance from Ignorance'. In other words, you have a little bit of knowledge which has made you arrogant, yet you are completely ignorant of the subject. No matter. I have seen this many times in my life. You are certainly not the first.
There is a lot of information that the planet is cooling, but since you would rather try to prove your point first and then look at the data later, you don't see it. Many ignorant people do this, even some degreed scientists, so don't feel too bad. As we say in the business, "In God We Trust, all others bring data." I would recommend you look at the data first, but since that is not possible for an 'old rock' like you, I'll merely try to educate the young so that they don't make the same mistakes as you have made.
Global cooling articles: January 2008 - 4 sources say “globally cooler” in the past 12 months « Watts Up With That? Global Cooling? [1998-2005 data shows cooling trend] World Climate Report » The Coming Global Cooling?
I enjoyed the link you posted: Venus & Mars
It's a great history lesson. Everyone who is interested in Science should read it. However, it doesn't support anything you've said. As I said, it is merely a history lesson concerning the study of atmospheres of other planets.
Again, I realize there is no hope for you understanding the data since you have an agenda (or in your case, a religion) that you have chosen to follow, but perhaps people who are younger and/or more open-minded will be more open-minded to the Scientific Method.
Anthony Watts is a weather presenter for KPAY-AM radio, listed as meteorologist by the radio station[1] but listed as a retired Television Seal Holder (not as a meteorologist) by the American Meteorological Society.[2] In 2007, Watts founded SurfaceStations.org, a website devoted to photographing and documenting the quality of weather stations. [3]
Contents [hide]
1 Career
2 SurfaceStations.org
3 View on Global Warming
4 References
5 External links
[edit] Career
Watts became a television weatherman in 1987 when he joined KHSL-TV, a CBS affiliate based in Chico, California. After 17 years working at KHSL, he was replaced by Kris Kuyper [4] in 2004. He then became the radio weatherman for KPAY-AM, a Fox News affiliate also based in Chico, California. Watts also operates a company called ItWorks[5] which makes weather graphics systems for use on television broadcasts.
[edit] SurfaceStations.org
In 2007 Watts launched the 'Surface Stations' project, whose mission is "Via collaboration, creation of a publicly available photographic database of weather stations and weather station metadata."[6] The project relies on volunteers to gather the data. There are no qualification requirements.[7]
The project has received moral support from Roger A. Pielke and Stephen McIntyre. Pielke described the effort as filling "a very important need for the climate science community".[8] Watts is a regular contributor to McIntyre's website, Climate Audit where he posts some pictures of particularly poorly sited stations. Jay Lawrimore, chief of the climate monitoring branch of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's National Climatic Data Center said "I think any effort to better understand the observation system that's used to collect data and analyze it is helpful."[9]
[edit] View on Global Warming
Watts has stated that he had "at one time been fully engaged in the belief that CO2 was indeed the root cause of the global warming problem" but "later changed my thinking when I learned more about the science involved and found it to be lacking."[10] He established the blog "Watts Up With That?"[11] to popularise his views on global warming and the controversy around the science. Anthony Watts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is this what you call a scientist? That really calls your credentials into question. What about your credentials..rockhead...what's your credentials??? I bet Watts are better...
This is why I never give out my sources to you. All you can do is attack them. I've stated that before rockhead. You never read what is said, but attack the source because it doesn't agree with you. You are arrogant in ingnorance...by the way, I did notice you didn't refute that.....hmm.
Last edited by Meister; 02-19-2009 at 06:34 PM.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Meister For This Useful Post: | | 
02-19-2009, 06:31 PM
|  | Super Moderator Member #11827 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: half a bubble off
Posts: 16,061
Thanks: 628
Thanked 1,758 Times in 1,160 Posts
Rep Power: 425 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Old Rocks
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1
Quote: Originally Posted by Old Rocks My, my, our mythical physicist chimes in. Well, no, the warming on Mars is not global, it is regional, and has nothing at all to do with our present warming. Nor are we cooling. 11 of the warmest years on record in the last 150 have been in the last 13 years. That is harldly indictutive of a cooling trend. And here is what real physicists have to say; Venus & Mars When you reply to someone, make sure you click 'Quote' so that they know you are responding to their post. Based on the content of your post, I will assume that you were attempting to reply to me.
First off, why do you think I'm a 'mythical' physicist? I am, in fact, a Physicist with the degrees to prove it. You, on the other hand, just have a passing knowledge of the subject with no basis for understanding. You suffer from what is known as 'Arrogance from Ignorance'. In other words, you have a little bit of knowledge which has made you arrogant, yet you are completely ignorant of the subject. No matter. I have seen this many times in my life. You are certainly not the first.
There is a lot of information that the planet is cooling, but since you would rather try to prove your point first and then look at the data later, you don't see it. Many ignorant people do this, even some degreed scientists, so don't feel too bad. As we say in the business, "In God We Trust, all others bring data." I would recommend you look at the data first, but since that is not possible for an 'old rock' like you, I'll merely try to educate the young so that they don't make the same mistakes as you have made.
Global cooling articles: January 2008 - 4 sources say “globally cooler” in the past 12 months « Watts Up With That? Global Cooling? [1998-2005 data shows cooling trend] World Climate Report » The Coming Global Cooling?
I enjoyed the link you posted: Venus & Mars
It's a great history lesson. Everyone who is interested in Science should read it. However, it doesn't support anything you've said. As I said, it is merely a history lesson concerning the study of atmospheres of other planets.
Again, I realize there is no hope for you understanding the data since you have an agenda (or in your case, a religion) that you have chosen to follow, but perhaps people who are younger and/or more open-minded will be more open-minded to the Scientific Method.
Anthony Watts is a weather presenter for KPAY-AM radio, listed as meteorologist by the radio station[1] but listed as a retired Television Seal Holder (not as a meteorologist) by the American Meteorological Society.[2] In 2007, Watts founded SurfaceStations.org, a website devoted to photographing and documenting the quality of weather stations. [3]
Contents [hide]
1 Career
2 SurfaceStations.org
3 View on Global Warming
4 References
5 External links
[edit] Career
Watts became a television weatherman in 1987 when he joined KHSL-TV, a CBS affiliate based in Chico, California. After 17 years working at KHSL, he was replaced by Kris Kuyper [4] in 2004. He then became the radio weatherman for KPAY-AM, a Fox News affiliate also based in Chico, California. Watts also operates a company called ItWorks[5] which makes weather graphics systems for use on television broadcasts.
[edit] SurfaceStations.org
In 2007 Watts launched the 'Surface Stations' project, whose mission is "Via collaboration, creation of a publicly available photographic database of weather stations and weather station metadata."[6] The project relies on volunteers to gather the data. There are no qualification requirements.[7]
The project has received moral support from Roger A. Pielke and Stephen McIntyre. Pielke described the effort as filling "a very important need for the climate science community".[8] Watts is a regular contributor to McIntyre's website, Climate Audit where he posts some pictures of particularly poorly sited stations. Jay Lawrimore, chief of the climate monitoring branch of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's National Climatic Data Center said "I think any effort to better understand the observation system that's used to collect data and analyze it is helpful."[9]
[edit] View on Global Warming
Watts has stated that he had "at one time been fully engaged in the belief that CO2 was indeed the root cause of the global warming problem" but "later changed my thinking when I learned more about the science involved and found it to be lacking."[10] He established the blog "Watts Up With That?"[11] to popularise his views on global warming and the controversy around the science. Anthony Watts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is this what you call a scientist? That really calls your credentials into question. i always run my choice of scientists past a millwright to make sure i'm making the right choices.
if there's no millwright handy, i look for a real estate agent. | 
02-19-2009, 06:36 PM
| | Registered User Member #13758 | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Portland, Ore.
Posts: 7,946
Thanks: 2,018
Thanked 539 Times in 432 Posts
Rep Power: 36 | | January 2008 - 4 sources say “globally cooler” in the past 12 months « Watts Up With That?
OK, X, I looked at this site. The GISS graph from 1880 to Jan08 gives lie to your cooling scenerio. The low point of the Jan08 is higher than any point before 1920. Not only that, but 2008 was a solar minimum, and also a strong La Nina of exceptional duration. Yet it still tied 2001 as the eighth warmest year on record. In fact, 11 of the warmest years on record have occurred in the last 13 years. How does that translate to a cooling trend? |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |