US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

IPCC Insider Admits Climate Consensus Claim Was a Lie

This is a discussion on IPCC Insider Admits Climate Consensus Claim Was a Lie within the Environment forums, part of the US Discussion category; The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Environment

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 04:43 AM
Banned
Member #19207
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: everywhere and nowhere
Posts: 25,613
Thanks: 2,141
Thanked 2,380 Times in 1,876 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness
IPCC Insider Admits Climate Consensus Claim Was a Lie

Quote:
The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, according to Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and IPCC insider. The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was “only a few dozen experts,” he states in a paper for Progress in Physical Geography, co-authored with student Martin Mahony.
“Claims such as ‘2,500 of the world’s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate’ are disingenuous,” the paper states unambiguously, adding that they rendered “the IPCC vulnerable to outside criticism.”
Hulme, Professor of Climate Change in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia—the university of Climategate fame—is the founding Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and one of the UK’s most prominent climate scientists. Among his many roles in the climate change establishment, Hulme was the IPCC’s co-ordinating Lead Author for its chapter on “Climate scenario development” for its Third Assessment Report and a contributing author of several other chapters.
IPCC Insider Admits Climate Consensus Claim Was a Lie | The Beacon
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 06:03 AM
Registered User
Member #13758
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, Ore.
Posts: 33,074
Thanks: 12,762
Thanked 6,962 Times in 5,108 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3406
Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute
Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute
Well, given this paragraph, we know where these people are coming from.


IPCC Insider Admits Climate Consensus Claim Was a Lie | The Beacon

Such a deception could only have gone on as long and far as it has because of the cultural cover provided by contemporary Western elites who have embraced environmentalism as the new secular religion. This development and its implications are examined in detail in the Independent Institute’s award-winning, new book:
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 06:25 AM
RetiredGySgt's Avatar
Registered User
Member #5176
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 34,340
Thanks: 40
Thanked 6,974 Times in 4,267 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 4172
RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute
RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute
You will toss anyone under the bus won't you? No matter who, no matter how well connected, no matter how deep into the elite it was.

You make **** up on this board over and over, you are a true believer, damn facts, who needs facts when you have FAITH.
__________________
The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell

Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to RetiredGySgt For This Useful Post:
Big Fitz (06-21-2010), gslack (06-24-2010), Quantum Windbag (06-24-2010), westwall (06-21-2010)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 06:44 AM
Registered User
Member #13758
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, Ore.
Posts: 33,074
Thanks: 12,762
Thanked 6,962 Times in 5,108 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3406
Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute
Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute
Faith? Is that what has caused the extreme reduction in volume of ice in the Arctic Ocean that is continueing even as we are posting? Is that what is causing the retreat of the glaciers worldwide? How about the present temperatures? Looks like it this year is set to tie or exceed 1998 and 2005 as the warmest on record.

Rather than pratteling on about someone's faith, present real evidence that these things are not occuring. Present evidence that the absorbtion bands of the GHGs are really not what is stated.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 06:54 AM
RetiredGySgt's Avatar
Registered User
Member #5176
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 34,340
Thanks: 40
Thanked 6,974 Times in 4,267 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 4172
RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute
RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute
Faith? Is that what has caused the extreme reduction in volume of ice in the Arctic Ocean that is continueing even as we are posting? Is that what is causing the retreat of the glaciers worldwide? How about the present temperatures? Looks like it this year is set to tie or exceed 1998 and 2005 as the warmest on record.

Rather than pratteling on about someone's faith, present real evidence that these things are not occuring. Present evidence that the absorbtion bands of the GHGs are really not what is stated.
How about you actually provide a shred of evidence that man is causing it? We already know that CO2 follows rising temperatures it does not lead them, we already know that the claim CO2 is causing it is bogus because for 12 years CO2 rose and no temperature increase occurred.

Find a new stick, find some actual evidence man is causing the warming.

By the way dumb ass you keep ignoring the fact that from the 1920's to the early 1950's the temperatures in Antarctica were higher and for a longer period of time. Why was there any ice left in the 1950's?

The Earth works in cycles. This is just another cycle, one that is no where near as dire as you and your little rat boy liars claim.

You have nothing but smoke and mirrors and specially built computer models designed by people that have not got even a fraction of the information to make a world model much less use it to make predictions out a 100 years.

You are the one with no science to back up your claims. Just lies and more lies. And as more people jump ship your little mind will likely explode once forced to accept the facts.
__________________
The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell

Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RetiredGySgt For This Useful Post:
Big Fitz (06-21-2010), fyrenza (06-25-2010), Zoom-boing (06-25-2010)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 07:04 AM
Registered User
Member #13758
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, Ore.
Posts: 33,074
Thanks: 12,762
Thanked 6,962 Times in 5,108 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3406
Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute
Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute Old Rocks has a reputation beyond repute
OK, dumb **** of a sarge, I have posted repeatedly the reason that the temperature leads the CO2 in the Milankovic Cycles.

CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean?

As for your claims concerning Anarctica, post your source.

Melting ice caps and glaciers are not smoke and mirrors, idiot child.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Old Rocks For This Useful Post:
konradv (06-21-2010)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 08:06 AM
RetiredGySgt's Avatar
Registered User
Member #5176
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 34,340
Thanks: 40
Thanked 6,974 Times in 4,267 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 4172
RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute
RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute RetiredGySgt has a reputation beyond repute
OK, dumb **** of a sarge, I have posted repeatedly the reason that the temperature leads the CO2 in the Milankovic Cycles.

CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean?

As for your claims concerning Anarctica, post your source.

Melting ice caps and glaciers are not smoke and mirrors, idiot child.
It was posted and referred to repeatedly a few months ago. You ignored it then I am not going to dig it up for you to ignore again. That is your ploy to ignore links and posts until they drop out of sight and then start making the claims again and demanding links you ignored the first time.

**** you. Your house of cards and mirrors is collapsing and you just keep ignoring it. Your FAITH won't save this. Your FAITH does not change scientific fact. Your FAITH does not change the fact that more and more insiders are coming clean or getting caught lying.
__________________
The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell

Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RetiredGySgt For This Useful Post:
Big Fitz (06-21-2010), elvis (06-21-2010), fyrenza (06-25-2010)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 08:12 AM
westwall's Avatar
Per Ardua Ad Astra
Member #23239
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nevada
Posts: 22,054
Thanks: 17,932
Thanked 8,441 Times in 5,782 Posts
Mentioned: 618 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 17707
westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati
westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati
Faith? Is that what has caused the extreme reduction in volume of ice in the Arctic Ocean that is continueing even as we are posting? Is that what is causing the retreat of the glaciers worldwide? How about the present temperatures? Looks like it this year is set to tie or exceed 1998 and 2005 as the warmest on record.

Rather than pratteling on about someone's faith, present real evidence that these things are not occuring. Present evidence that the absorbtion bands of the GHGs are really not what is stated.



Yep old fraud is a disciple at the cult of AGW.
__________________
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
'Yea, Though I Fly Through the Valley of the Shadow of Death, I Shall Fear No Evil. For I am at 50,000 Feet and Climbing.'
- Sign over SR71 Wing Ops-

"He who asserts must also prove" Aristotle
"We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination... So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest."
- Prof. Stephen Schneider,

Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 08:23 AM
Banned
Member #11952
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 25,882
Thanks: 2,952
Thanked 4,855 Times in 3,329 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute
elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute elvis has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
OK, dumb **** of a sarge, I have posted repeatedly the reason that the temperature leads the CO2 in the Milankovic Cycles.

CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean?

As for your claims concerning Anarctica, post your source.

Melting ice caps and glaciers are not smoke and mirrors, idiot child.
It was posted and referred to repeatedly a few months ago. You ignored it then I am not going to dig it up for you to ignore again. That is your ploy to ignore links and posts until they drop out of sight and then start making the claims again and demanding links you ignored the first time.

**** you. Your house of cards and mirrors is collapsing and you just keep ignoring it. Your FAITH won't save this. Your FAITH does not change scientific fact. Your FAITH does not change the fact that more and more insiders are coming clean or getting caught lying.
all this man-made global warming **** he continually pushes turns chris on. that's why he posts it.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 08:50 AM
Baruch Menachem's Avatar
'
Member #11920
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 14,029
Thanks: 4,771
Thanked 4,481 Times in 2,847 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 2175
Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute
Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute Baruch Menachem has a reputation beyond repute
At one time a flat earth was "settled science."

As was witchcraft and alchemy.

Settled science is a religion. If it is true, you can ask questions and check the numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 10:13 AM
Big Fitz's Avatar
User Quit *****
Member #21726
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 16,917
Thanks: 4,337
Thanked 4,320 Times in 3,280 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1285
Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court
Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court
Quote: Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
You will toss anyone under the bus won't you? No matter who, no matter how well connected, no matter how deep into the elite it was.

You make **** up on this board over and over, you are a true believer, damn facts, who needs facts when you have FAITH.
Chicken Little Cargo Cultists one and all.
__________________
Account Closed
03-18-13

Admin, please delete account.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 01:44 PM
Banned
Member #19207
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: everywhere and nowhere
Posts: 25,613
Thanks: 2,141
Thanked 2,380 Times in 1,876 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness
Quote: Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
You will toss anyone under the bus won't you? No matter who, no matter how well connected, no matter how deep into the elite it was.

You make **** up on this board over and over, you are a true believer, damn facts, who needs facts when you have FAITH.
What the hell are you babbling about?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2010, 05:20 PM
FireFly's Avatar
Bright F**ker
Member #21310
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,114
Thanks: 267
Thanked 332 Times in 232 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1937
FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute
FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute FireFly has a reputation beyond repute
Absence of sunspots make scientists wonder if they're seeing a calm before a storm of energy or will we have another little ice age?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2010, 07:16 PM
Matthew's Avatar
Blue dog all the way!
Member #22889
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 26,279
Thanks: 11,236
Thanked 4,787 Times in 3,662 Posts
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 2204
Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute
Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute Matthew has a reputation beyond repute
Yes global warming is a natural cyclone of warming and cooling within our interglacial period. I used to believe that the ice age was right around to corner myself, but I've came to the conclusion that we're at least 500-1,000 years from the start of the next ice age. Also each warm period be it the med evil, roman warm period lasted at least 200-300 years or longer. This one has only lasted 100 years and I expect it to last clear to 2200-2300 before we go into another cool period.

So yes we could see some more warming...Which is to be expected in the warm phase or what some call the modern maximum. Yes some years could be cooler with small decade long grand-minimum.

Last edited by Matthew; 06-23-2010 at 07:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2010, 03:12 PM
Charles_Main's Avatar
AR15 Owner
Member #11362
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 16,607
Thanks: 332
Thanked 4,997 Times in 3,176 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1415
Charles_Main could be on the Supreme Court Charles_Main could be on the Supreme Court
Charles_Main could be on the Supreme Court Charles_Main could be on the Supreme Court Charles_Main could be on the Supreme Court Charles_Main could be on the Supreme Court Charles_Main could be on the Supreme Court Charles_Main could be on the Supreme Court Charles_Main could be on the Supreme Court Charles_Main could be on the Supreme Court Charles_Main could be on the Supreme Court
OK, dumb **** of a sarge, I have posted repeatedly the reason that the temperature leads the CO2 in the Milankovic Cycles.

CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean?

As for your claims concerning Anarctica, post your source.

Melting ice caps and glaciers are not smoke and mirrors, idiot child.
nor are they proof you are correct or even smart Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
__________________
Quote:
You built a house of cards
And got shocked when you saw them fall
Quote:
If you go lookin’ for hot water Don't act shocked when you get burned a little bit If you really want some hot water I can help you find it, oh oh, ah yeah
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Charles_Main For This Useful Post:
Big Fitz (06-24-2010), Quantum Windbag (06-24-2010)
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Environment
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.