![]() | |
This is a discussion on IPCC Insider Admits Climate Consensus Claim Was a Lie within the Environment forums, part of the US Discussion category; The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, ...
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| IPCC Insider Admits Climate Consensus Claim Was a Lie Quote: The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, according to Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and IPCC insider. The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was “only a few dozen experts,” he states in a paper for Progress in Physical Geography, co-authored with student Martin Mahony. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
USMessageBoard.com is the premier Political Forum Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
| |||
| Well, given this paragraph, we know where these people are coming from. IPCC Insider Admits Climate Consensus Claim Was a Lie | The Beacon Such a deception could only have gone on as long and far as it has because of the cultural cover provided by contemporary Western elites who have embraced environmentalism as the new secular religion. This development and its implications are examined in detail in the Independent Institute’s award-winning, new book: |
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to RetiredGySgt For This Useful Post: | ||
| |||
| Faith? Is that what has caused the extreme reduction in volume of ice in the Arctic Ocean that is continueing even as we are posting? Is that what is causing the retreat of the glaciers worldwide? How about the present temperatures? Looks like it this year is set to tie or exceed 1998 and 2005 as the warmest on record. Rather than pratteling on about someone's faith, present real evidence that these things are not occuring. Present evidence that the absorbtion bands of the GHGs are really not what is stated. |
| ||||
| Faith? Is that what has caused the extreme reduction in volume of ice in the Arctic Ocean that is continueing even as we are posting? Is that what is causing the retreat of the glaciers worldwide? How about the present temperatures? Looks like it this year is set to tie or exceed 1998 and 2005 as the warmest on record. Rather than pratteling on about someone's faith, present real evidence that these things are not occuring. Present evidence that the absorbtion bands of the GHGs are really not what is stated. Find a new stick, find some actual evidence man is causing the warming. By the way dumb ass you keep ignoring the fact that from the 1920's to the early 1950's the temperatures in Antarctica were higher and for a longer period of time. Why was there any ice left in the 1950's? The Earth works in cycles. This is just another cycle, one that is no where near as dire as you and your little rat boy liars claim. You have nothing but smoke and mirrors and specially built computer models designed by people that have not got even a fraction of the information to make a world model much less use it to make predictions out a 100 years. You are the one with no science to back up your claims. Just lies and more lies. And as more people jump ship your little mind will likely explode once forced to accept the facts.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible. -Bertrand Russell Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable -Laurence J. Peters I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing. -Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RetiredGySgt For This Useful Post: | ||
| |||
| OK, dumb fuck of a sarge, I have posted repeatedly the reason that the temperature leads the CO2 in the Milankovic Cycles. CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean? As for your claims concerning Anarctica, post your source. Melting ice caps and glaciers are not smoke and mirrors, idiot child. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Old Rocks For This Useful Post: | ||
konradv (06-21-2010) | ||
| ||||
| OK, dumb fuck of a sarge, I have posted repeatedly the reason that the temperature leads the CO2 in the Milankovic Cycles. CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean? As for your claims concerning Anarctica, post your source. Melting ice caps and glaciers are not smoke and mirrors, idiot child. FUCK you. Your house of cards and mirrors is collapsing and you just keep ignoring it. Your FAITH won't save this. Your FAITH does not change scientific fact. Your FAITH does not change the fact that more and more insiders are coming clean or getting caught lying.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible. -Bertrand Russell Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable -Laurence J. Peters I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing. -Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) |
| ||||
| Faith? Is that what has caused the extreme reduction in volume of ice in the Arctic Ocean that is continueing even as we are posting? Is that what is causing the retreat of the glaciers worldwide? How about the present temperatures? Looks like it this year is set to tie or exceed 1998 and 2005 as the warmest on record. Rather than pratteling on about someone's faith, present real evidence that these things are not occuring. Present evidence that the absorbtion bands of the GHGs are really not what is stated. Yep old fraud is a disciple at the cult of AGW.
__________________ "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman 'Yea, Though I Fly Through the Valley of the Shadow of Death, I Shall Fear No Evil. For I am at 50,000 Feet and Climbing.' - Sign over SR71 Wing Ops- "He who asserts must also prove" Aristotle "We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination... So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest." - Prof. Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC reports |
| |||
| OK, dumb fuck of a sarge, I have posted repeatedly the reason that the temperature leads the CO2 in the Milankovic Cycles. CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean? As for your claims concerning Anarctica, post your source. Melting ice caps and glaciers are not smoke and mirrors, idiot child. FUCK you. Your house of cards and mirrors is collapsing and you just keep ignoring it. Your FAITH won't save this. Your FAITH does not change scientific fact. Your FAITH does not change the fact that more and more insiders are coming clean or getting caught lying. |
| |||
| At one time a flat earth was "settled science." As was witchcraft and alchemy. Settled science is a religion. If it is true, you can ask questions and check the numbers. |
| |||
| What the hell are you babbling about? |
| ||||
| Absence of sunspots make scientists wonder if they're seeing a calm before a storm of energy or will we have another little ice age?
__________________ "My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it." - Barack Obama |
| |||
| Yes global warming is a natural cyclone of warming and cooling within our interglacial period. I used to believe that the ice age was right around to corner myself, but I've came to the conclusion that we're at least 500-1,000 years from the start of the next ice age. Also each warm period be it the med evil, roman warm period lasted at least 200-300 years or longer. This one has only lasted 100 years and I expect it to last clear to 2200-2300 before we go into another cool period. So yes we could see some more warming...Which is to be expected in the warm phase or what some call the modern maximum. Yes some years could be cooler with small decade long grand-minimum. Last edited by Matthew; 06-23-2010 at 07:21 PM. |
| ||||
| OK, dumb fuck of a sarge, I have posted repeatedly the reason that the temperature leads the CO2 in the Milankovic Cycles. CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean? As for your claims concerning Anarctica, post your source. Melting ice caps and glaciers are not smoke and mirrors, idiot child.
__________________ Quote: You built a house of cards And got shocked when you saw them fall Quote: If you go lookin’ for hot water Don't act shocked when you get burned a little bit If you really want some hot water I can help you find it, oh oh, ah yeah |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Charles_Main For This Useful Post: | ||
Big Fitz (06-24-2010), Quantum Windbag (06-24-2010) | ||
![]() |
Lower Navigation
| ||||||
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|