US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Meet the green who doubts ‘The Science’

This is a discussion on Meet the green who doubts ‘The Science’ within the Environment forums, part of the US Discussion category; Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images....


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Environment

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #166 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2010, 04:28 PM
skookerasbil's Avatar
Registered User
Member #20360
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not the middle of nowhere
Posts: 15,796
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3,435 Times in 2,667 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 2762
skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute
skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute skookerasbil has a reputation beyond repute
Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
__________________
What I worry about is that when problems are not addressed people will not know who is responsible, and when the problems get bad enough as they might do with another financial meltdown — some one person will come forward and say: ‘Give me total power and I will solve this problem.’
~ Former Supreme Court Justice David Souter

I drive a flex fuel vehicle! Burns rubber and gas!!
~ Skooks
Reply With Quote
  #167 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2010, 05:45 PM
westwall's Avatar
Per Ardua Ad Astra
Member #23239
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nevada
Posts: 22,053
Thanks: 17,931
Thanked 8,440 Times in 5,782 Posts
Mentioned: 618 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 17707
westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati
westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati

I am not trying to insult you or name call. You have a mental disorder. Psychology was my major in college. You need to seek professional help. Please take my advice.



My wife is a PhD psychologist and one of her grad school friends is the director of the Arapahoe County psych department so I would suggest you be very very careful.
I am not trying to diagnose. I am advising he seek it. gslack, on the other hand has no problem playing psychiatrist.




You need to look up the code of ethics again than pardner. Accusing someone of having a mental disorder when they don't have one is actionable. My wife had an amusing look at the discussion here and had a couple of comments mainly about your "factual postering" as she puts it and gslacks "controlled exasperation". No mental disorders just typical BS as she puts it.
__________________
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
'Yea, Though I Fly Through the Valley of the Shadow of Death, I Shall Fear No Evil. For I am at 50,000 Feet and Climbing.'
- Sign over SR71 Wing Ops-

"He who asserts must also prove" Aristotle
"We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination... So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest."
- Prof. Stephen Schneider,

Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to westwall For This Useful Post:
gslack (06-15-2010)
  #168 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2010, 08:08 PM
gslack's Avatar
Registered User
Member #23002
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,527
Thanks: 934
Thanked 845 Times in 626 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 252
gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator

I tried to tell you, it's not that I am so smart, it's that you are just SO ****ing dumb and obtuse. Your narrative just continues along on a monolithic self absorbed path oblivious to, and unaltered by ANY truths.

Example: I showed you that I did not cut out any of your post. It was solely a function of this site. If you do a little research, you will SEE the truth. When a poster hits the 'Quote' button, it re-posts the most recent 'Quoted bys' I believe the number is 2 or 3. And the site eliminates anything before that. Otherwise, every post where the 'Quote' function is used would create a novel the size of War and Peace.

But you, the TRUE psychopath, have mentally twisted it into a personal attack on YOU, and spew a paranoid 'victim' mentality...
Well you got one thing right you are not so smart...

And you seemed to only want to cry about the quote that was cut out... in fact your entire line of BS was regarding that one link and quote... But some reason it was not there at all... Like I told ya then douchebag, you either cut it out deliberately, or you used an accident to your advantage.. Either way it was dishonest to attack something that not in the quote... And to lie about the link and the quote the way you did??? **** you, you little POS....

And nice try at lying again tool.... You and your pal spent all night crying about me in another thread to anyone who would listen... That and the way you two tried to badger everyone who disagrees with you in my thread is the personal attack part...

now stop lying if you can...

Whats wrong mr."im more educated so shut up" ? Dig yourself another hole you are going to try and avoid again? Come on brainiac enlighten us to your vast knowledge of the human psyche.... LOL... Got slapped for your bull**** again didn't ya boy...Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Listen, I'm not going to continue to argue with you and get tangled in your little self centered 'all about me, I am a victim, he's picking on me, he lied to me mommy' world.

You win...whatever your little pea of a brain believes is true...

I have never put anyone on "Ignore", but if there is an "Ignore' feature, you have earned that distinction.

I will not respond to any of your posts, so save your breath.
AWWWW.... thats it stomp your foot.... now show us your pout face...Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

Ignore me all you want crybaby, its alright....LOL
Reply With Quote
  #169 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2010, 09:24 PM
Bfgrn's Avatar
Registered User
Member #19018
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 14,125
Thanks: 1,702
Thanked 3,262 Times in 2,477 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 2004
Bfgrn has a reputation beyond repute Bfgrn has a reputation beyond repute Bfgrn has a reputation beyond repute
Bfgrn has a reputation beyond repute Bfgrn has a reputation beyond repute Bfgrn has a reputation beyond repute Bfgrn has a reputation beyond repute Bfgrn has a reputation beyond repute Bfgrn has a reputation beyond repute Bfgrn has a reputation beyond repute




My wife is a PhD psychologist and one of her grad school friends is the director of the Arapahoe County psych department so I would suggest you be very very careful.
I am not trying to diagnose. I am advising he seek it. gslack, on the other hand has no problem playing psychiatrist.




You need to look up the code of ethics again than pardner. Accusing someone of having a mental disorder when they don't have one is actionable. My wife had an amusing look at the discussion here and had a couple of comments mainly about your "factual postering" as she puts it and gslacks "controlled exasperation". No mental disorders just typical BS as she puts it.
I am not a psychiatrist, so your warning and accusations are irrelevant. Tell your wife to read a fair sample of gslack's posts. If he doesn't have a mental disorder, he has a social or personality disorder.
__________________
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
John Kenneth Galbraith
Reply With Quote
  #170 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2010, 09:35 PM
westwall's Avatar
Per Ardua Ad Astra
Member #23239
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nevada
Posts: 22,053
Thanks: 17,931
Thanked 8,440 Times in 5,782 Posts
Mentioned: 618 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 17707
westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati
westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati westwall gives orders to the Illuminati

I am not trying to diagnose. I am advising he seek it. gslack, on the other hand has no problem playing psychiatrist.




You need to look up the code of ethics again than pardner. Accusing someone of having a mental disorder when they don't have one is actionable. My wife had an amusing look at the discussion here and had a couple of comments mainly about your "factual postering" as she puts it and gslacks "controlled exasperation". No mental disorders just typical BS as she puts it.
I am not a psychiatrist, so your warning and accusations are irrelevant. Tell your wife to read a fair sample of gslack's posts. If he doesn't have a mental disorder, he has a social or personality disorder.



Sorry to tell you bub but if you're a degreed psychologist the rules apply to you as well. Of course if you never graduated then you are safe. As far as pd's go please point me to a page in the DSM IV that would describe a Personality Disorder that would apply.
__________________
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
'Yea, Though I Fly Through the Valley of the Shadow of Death, I Shall Fear No Evil. For I am at 50,000 Feet and Climbing.'
- Sign over SR71 Wing Ops-

"He who asserts must also prove" Aristotle
"We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination... So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest."
- Prof. Stephen Schneider,

Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports
Reply With Quote
  #171 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2010, 09:40 PM
gslack's Avatar
Registered User
Member #23002
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,527
Thanks: 934
Thanked 845 Times in 626 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 252
gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator gslack could be State Senator

I am not trying to diagnose. I am advising he seek it. gslack, on the other hand has no problem playing psychiatrist.




You need to look up the code of ethics again than pardner. Accusing someone of having a mental disorder when they don't have one is actionable. My wife had an amusing look at the discussion here and had a couple of comments mainly about your "factual postering" as she puts it and gslacks "controlled exasperation". No mental disorders just typical BS as she puts it.
I am not a psychiatrist, so your warning and accusations are irrelevant. Tell your wife to read a fair sample of gslack's posts. If he doesn't have a mental disorder, he has a social or personality disorder.
Still talking about me douchebag?? LOL, you got a little man crush going on??
Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Reply With Quote
  #172 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2010, 07:59 AM
Big Fitz's Avatar
User Quit *****
Member #21726
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 16,917
Thanks: 4,337
Thanked 4,320 Times in 3,280 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1285
Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court
Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court Big Fitz could be on the Supreme Court





You need to look up the code of ethics again than pardner. Accusing someone of having a mental disorder when they don't have one is actionable. My wife had an amusing look at the discussion here and had a couple of comments mainly about your "factual postering" as she puts it and gslacks "controlled exasperation". No mental disorders just typical BS as she puts it.
I am not a psychiatrist, so your warning and accusations are irrelevant. Tell your wife to read a fair sample of gslack's posts. If he doesn't have a mental disorder, he has a social or personality disorder.
Still talking about me douchebag?? LOL, you got a little man crush going on??
Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
G, West.... he's just a yappyass stompdog trying to intimidate a couple of Mastiffs with worthless little barks from his twelve ounce body. He's not worth your time even staying awake for.
__________________
Account Closed
03-18-13

Admin, please delete account.
Reply With Quote
  #173 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2010, 11:16 AM
Annie's Avatar
chillin
Member #401
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 50,612
Thanks: 5,329
Thanked 2,553 Times in 1,821 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1776
Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute
Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute Annie has a reputation beyond repute
More about "settled science".

...

We’re seeing the dangerous development here of a very intolerant political ideology. It is a very strange political and scientific situation, in which vast sums of money are underwriting a bureaucracy of climate accountants and auditors, and in which academic funding is easier to obtain if you put man-made climate change at the top of your research proposal. I have never seen anything like it in the 40 years of my scientific and environmental career.
spiked debate: Meet the green who doubts ‘The Science’ by Peter Taylor[/QUOTE]

And related:

Pajamas Media Writing for PJM Helped Make Me Enemy of the State Number #38

Quote:
Writing for PJM Helped Make Me Enemy of the State Number #38
Posted By Frank J. Tipler On July 7, 2010 @ 12:05 am In Column 2, Conservatism 2.0, Culture Bytes, Environment, Free Speech, Money, Opinion, Politics, Science, Science & Technology, US News | 63 Comments

The National Academy of Sciences, in its official journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has just published a list [1] of scientists whom it claims should not be believed on the subject of global warming. I am number 38 on the list. The list of 496 is in descending order of scientific credentials.

Professor Freeman Dyson [2] of the Institute for Advanced Study, a member of the National Academy of Sciences and a fellow of the Royal Society, is number 3 on the list. Dyson is a friend of mine and is one of the creators of relativistic quantum field theory; most physicists think he should have shared the Nobel Prize in Physics with Richard Feynman. MIT professor Richard Lindzen, a meteorologist who is also a member of the National Academy, is number 4. Princeton physics professor William Happer, once again a member of the National Academy of Sciences, is number 6.

I’m in good company...

...But human bias is human bias. I myself have looked at some of the raw data from surface stations that measure the Earth’s temperature. The raw data are from selected sites in the USA, in New Zealand, in Australia, and in Sweden. I selected these sites because I’m reasonably sure they will not have bias due to changing human habitation, or human wars, or human politics. These sites show no warming in the twentieth century. So I have to conclude that we don’t even know if there was any warming on Earth in the twentieth century.

Notice that I am not saying that there has been no warming, just that the available raw data that I’ve personally been able to check do not show it. Until all the raw temperature data are placed online, so the data can be checked by anybody, a rational person has to suspend belief in global warming, to say nothing of AGW.

The official government adjusted data for these sites do show a warming trend. All the warming is in the “corrections.” Sorry, I don’t buy it. Especially from “scientists” who are known to “correct’ their raw data to “hide the decline.”

There have been calls to silence the 496 scientists on the list. Besides “climate deniers,’ we have been called “traitors.” We all know the penalty for treason.

So far, no federal agents have come to pick me up. But nowhere in Mein Kampf does Adolf Hitler call for the extermination of the Jews. Hitler does repeatedly refer to the Jews as “tuberculosis bacilli.” What does one want to do with tuberculosis bacilli?

I’m an enemy of the state. It’s an honor.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Environment
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.