![]() | |
This is a discussion on $5 a gallon oil in 2012 within the Energy forums, part of the US Discussion category; We are building/have built a refinery in Wyoming I think it was to refine Tar Sands oil from Canada. btw what ever happened to those ...
| |||||||
| Energy Oil, Drilling & Alternative Energies |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links |
|
USMessageBoard.com is the premier Political Forum Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
| ||||
| Or have "we" reduced refining to raise prices of refined products? the Hugo gasoline seems to be the same price as the "US" gas does. "It's a ridiculous decision on the part of the Interior Department," said John W. Kindt, a professor of business and legal policy at Illinois. "The previous 180-day moratorium really hurt a lot of businesses. Well, a seven-year ban is going to sting even more." Kindt says giving the oil companies a public spanking through a seven-year ban isn't going to solve our energy problems, and that unreasonably prohibiting offshore drilling will not only exacerbate the region's economic woes, it also will strengthen U.S. dependence on foreign oil. "Our motto should be 'Drill, Baby, Drill' but 'Safely, Baby, Safely,' " he said. "We have two wars in the Middle East, and while we do need alternate sources of energy, in the interim we still need to safely develop our off-shore resources. That means we need to open up both the East Coast and California for drilling, although California is not going to like that. But we've got to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time." According to Kindt, the author of "Marine Pollution and the Law of the Sea," a six-volume series that examines protecting the world's oceans while encouraging development of essential resources, the real villain in the new contretemps is not BP (formerly British Petroleum), but the Department of the Interior, with the recently announced seven-year moratorium serving as yet another example of what he says is the department's shortsightedness and incompetence. Expert: Seven-year moratorium on gulf oil drilling an unwise decision | News Bureau | University of Illinois |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Intense For This Useful Post: | ||
westwall (12-28-2010) | ||
| |||
| We are building/have built a refinery in Wyoming I think it was to refine Tar Sands oil from Canada. btw what ever happened to those refineries Bush promised to build on abandoned military base land? I never heard about a single application being filed to build one. got a link? |
| ||||
| We are building/have built a refinery in Wyoming I think it was to refine Tar Sands oil from Canada. btw what ever happened to those refineries Bush promised to build on abandoned military base land? I never heard about a single application being filed to build one. Top U.S. Refineries - Energy Information Administration. Energy Rankings |
| ||||
| "It's a ridiculous decision on the part of the Interior Department," said John W. Kindt, a professor of business and legal policy at Illinois. "The previous 180-day moratorium really hurt a lot of businesses. Well, a seven-year ban is going to sting even more." Kindt says giving the oil companies a public spanking through a seven-year ban isn't going to solve our energy problems, and that unreasonably prohibiting offshore drilling will not only exacerbate the region's economic woes, it also will strengthen U.S. dependence on foreign oil. "Our motto should be 'Drill, Baby, Drill' but 'Safely, Baby, Safely,' " he said. "We have two wars in the Middle East, and while we do need alternate sources of energy, in the interim we still need to safely develop our off-shore resources. That means we need to open up both the East Coast and California for drilling, although California is not going to like that. But we've got to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time." According to Kindt, the author of "Marine Pollution and the Law of the Sea," a six-volume series that examines protecting the world's oceans while encouraging development of essential resources, the real villain in the new contretemps is not BP (formerly British Petroleum), but the Department of the Interior, with the recently announced seven-year moratorium serving as yet another example of what he says is the department's shortsightedness and incompetence. Expert: Seven-year moratorium on gulf oil drilling an unwise decision | News Bureau | University of Illinois That being said, if oil companies want to continue to bludgeon their profit margin building vast infrastructure for piddly kiddie pools of oil in our water, I think they should be allowed to do so. WITH abundant safety oversight and severe ramifications for screw ups. They'll learn soon enough there's barely any oil, as the USGS has known for decades.
__________________ "How is the world ruled and how do wars start? Diplomats tell lies to journalists and then believe what they read." -- Karl Krauss Last edited by JiggsCasey; 12-28-2010 at 03:19 PM. |
| ||||
| Quote: We don't drill off our shores because there is barely any oil off our shores. Certainly not enough to make much of a dent in our 86 million barrel per day appetite (and growing). That being said, if oil companies want to continue to bludgeon their profit margin building vast infrastructure for piddly kiddie pools of oil in our water, I think they should be allowed to do so. WITH abundant safety oversight and severe ramifications for screw ups. They'll learn soon enough there's barely any oil, as we've known for decades. |
| |||
| We are building/have built a refinery in Wyoming I think it was to refine Tar Sands oil from Canada. btw what ever happened to those refineries Bush promised to build on abandoned military base land? I never heard about a single application being filed to build one. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to mdn2000 For This Useful Post: | ||
Matthew (12-28-2010) | ||
| |||
| Jiggs the expert, what a tired joke. Given the Gulf of Mexico is supplying over 30% of our oil and we are not producing the oil at half its potential there is enough proven reserves to keep pumping hundreds of years. Since drilling in the Gulf has begun its continually expanded. Hell, BP just suffered what is literally known or previously known as a "Gusher". Of course with Libya about to double the supply of oil they produce, Brazil producing oil with billions of dollars given by Obama, the world has more and more oil than ever before. Oil Field Services: Libya Increases Proven Oil Reserves Quote: Libya Increases Proven Oil Reserves Source: Newswires 8/2/2010, Location: Africa Oil Field Services Share | Libya's proven crude oil reserves rose to 46 billion barrels in the first half of this year after adding 612 million barrels from new fields, local daily Oea said on Friday, quoting the country's top oil official. OPEC member Libya has the biggest crude oil reserves in Africa. 'Libya's oil reserves will increase further in next months because the exploration efforts in the first half accounted for 40 percent of the hydrocarbons search programme for the year,' Oea quoted Shokri Ghanem as saying. 'We expect the discovery of 20 additional oil fields this year,' said Ghanem who is the chairman of Libya's National Oil Corporation (NOC) and top energy official of his country which does not have an oil minister. |
| ||||
| Jiggs the expert, what a tired joke. Given the Gulf of Mexico is supplying over 30% of our oil and we are not producing the oil at half its potential there is enough proven reserves to keep pumping hundreds of years. Since drilling in the Gulf has begun its continually expanded. Hell, BP just suffered what is literally known or previously known as a "Gusher". Of course with Libya about to double the supply of oil they produce, Brazil producing oil with billions of dollars given by Obama, the world has more and more oil than ever before. Oil Field Services: Libya Increases Proven Oil Reserves Quote: Libya Increases Proven Oil Reserves Source: Newswires 8/2/2010, Location: Africa Oil Field Services Share | Libya's proven crude oil reserves rose to 46 billion barrels in the first half of this year after adding 612 million barrels from new fields, local daily Oea said on Friday, quoting the country's top oil official. OPEC member Libya has the biggest crude oil reserves in Africa. 'Libya's oil reserves will increase further in next months because the exploration efforts in the first half accounted for 40 percent of the hydrocarbons search programme for the year,' Oea quoted Shokri Ghanem as saying. 'We expect the discovery of 20 additional oil fields this year,' said Ghanem who is the chairman of Libya's National Oil Corporation (NOC) and top energy official of his country which does not have an oil minister. WOW!
__________________ space! HUGGY QUOTES "Only a fool would make a deal with the devil without looking at the devil in the details" "I would give my left nut to be the guy who invented God" "If you can imagine one thing..You can dream anything" My friend Jay Craig: "Keep your basement clean..You never know when someone might want to go down there" |
| ||||
| there's a recovery? ![]() damn it , you didn't wake me up~!!!!!
__________________ Naphta to Settembrini; “It is ultimately a cruel misunderstanding of youth to believe it will find its heart’s desire in freedom, when truly, its deepest desire is to obey.” ( Der Zauberberg) Obama, SOTU-2013; 'Nothing I'm proposing tonight should increase our deficit by a single dime.' "Right now, we're spending more money to pay interest on debt than we'll spend on education, homeland security, transportation and veterans' benefits combined this year. Surely, there's something better to spend that money on. And those interest payments are a significant tax on Americans -- a debt tax that Washington doesn't want to talk about. And just wait until interest rates rise, because at some point they will".Obama, Senate speech 2006 |
| ||||
| "It's a ridiculous decision on the part of the Interior Department," said John W. Kindt, a professor of business and legal policy at Illinois. "The previous 180-day moratorium really hurt a lot of businesses. Well, a seven-year ban is going to sting even more." Kindt says giving the oil companies a public spanking through a seven-year ban isn't going to solve our energy problems, and that unreasonably prohibiting offshore drilling will not only exacerbate the region's economic woes, it also will strengthen U.S. dependence on foreign oil. "Our motto should be 'Drill, Baby, Drill' but 'Safely, Baby, Safely,' " he said. "We have two wars in the Middle East, and while we do need alternate sources of energy, in the interim we still need to safely develop our off-shore resources. That means we need to open up both the East Coast and California for drilling, although California is not going to like that. But we've got to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time." According to Kindt, the author of "Marine Pollution and the Law of the Sea," a six-volume series that examines protecting the world's oceans while encouraging development of essential resources, the real villain in the new contretemps is not BP (formerly British Petroleum), but the Department of the Interior, with the recently announced seven-year moratorium serving as yet another example of what he says is the department's shortsightedness and incompetence. Expert: Seven-year moratorium on gulf oil drilling an unwise decision | News Bureau | University of Illinois That being said, if oil companies want to continue to bludgeon their profit margin building vast infrastructure for piddly kiddie pools of oil in our water, I think they should be allowed to do so. WITH abundant safety oversight and severe ramifications for screw ups. They'll learn soon enough there's barely any oil, as the USGS has known for decades. Hmmmm China is drilling in the Gulf. Russia's Gazprom is planing on drilling off of Florida, the map in the link shows a whole hell of a lot of rigs and we don't own most of them. Somebody's getting oil there so why isn't it us? Oil Platforms in the Gulf: How Many and Who Owns Them? | Deep Sea News
__________________ "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman 'Yea, Though I Fly Through the Valley of the Shadow of Death, I Shall Fear No Evil. For I am at 50,000 Feet and Climbing.' - Sign over SR71 Wing Ops- "He who asserts must also prove" Aristotle "We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination... So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest." - Prof. Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC reports |
| The Following User Says Thank You to westwall For This Useful Post: | ||
DiveCon (12-28-2010) | ||
| ||||
| Now I feel much more smug than usual. It is the purpose of Message Boards.
__________________ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| ||||
| We are building/have built a refinery in Wyoming I think it was to refine Tar Sands oil from Canada. btw what ever happened to those refineries Bush promised to build on abandoned military base land? I never heard about a single application being filed to build one. Top U.S. Refineries - Energy Information Administration. Energy Rankings
__________________ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| ||||
| thats if there is any oil lefted at all...
__________________ ![]() ^^Me^^ New to the site im in the US army, with the 10th mountain division, as a forward observer. |
| ||||
| We are building/have built a refinery in Wyoming I think it was to refine Tar Sands oil from Canada. btw what ever happened to those refineries Bush promised to build on abandoned military base land? I never heard about a single application being filed to build one. ![]() No. The Canadians (Suncor) want to buy a refinery in Cheyenne to process "Tar Sand Oil" (aka Syncrude), and they have bought a refinery in Denver. Refining Oil is not a terribly profitable business, and it takes about 20 years in the USA just to file all the EPA "Environmental Impact Studies." There are 4 refineries in WY, and several in MT. All have been debottlenecked and expanded, but not necessarily to produce more gasoline. Much of the "expansion" is to produce "Ultra Low Sulfur" deisel at 10 ppm as EPA regulations dictated. The other major expansions have been to tighten Wastewater quality (the water returned from the refinery is better quality than the water entering), and to produce more Coke (and deisel) instead of asphalt (dramatically increasing the cost of building roads).
__________________ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Samson; 12-28-2010 at 09:08 PM. |
![]() |
Lower Navigation
| ||||||
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|