US Message Board

Go Back   US Message Board > US Discussion > Elections 2008
Register FAQ Blogs Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Elections 2008 Polls, views and opinions on the 2008 Presidential Election.


Login to remove all ads

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:10 PM
DavidS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,391
Rep Power: 11
DavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayor
Jesse Jackson's October Surprise

Before you neo-cons post this about Obama, Jesse Jackson doesn't know shit about Obama's plan. He's just running his mouth. Everyone here remembers what kind of controversey Jackson caused a few months ago with his comments about cutting Obama's nuts off.

Well, now he's literally trying to do it.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/newthr...newthread&f=89

EVIAN, FRANCE

PREPARE for a new America: That's the message that the Rev. Jesse Jackson conveyed to participants in the first World Policy Forum, held at this French lakeside resort last week.

He promised "fundamental changes" in US foreign policy - saying America must "heal wounds" it has caused to other nations, revive its alliances and apologize for the "arrogance of the Bush administration."

The most important change would occur in the Middle East, where "decades of putting Israel's interests first" would end.

Jackson believes that, although "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades" remain strong, they'll lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obama enters the White House.

"Obama is about change," Jackson told me in a wide-ranging conversation.
"And the change that Obama promises is not limited to what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks at the world and its place in it."

Jackson warns that he isn't an Obama confidant or adviser, "just a supporter." But he adds that Obama has been "a neighbor or, better still, a member of the family." Jackson's son has been a close friend of Obama for years, and Jackson's daughter went to school with Obama's wife Michelle.

"We helped him start his career," says Jackson. "And then we were always there to help him move ahead. He is the continuation of our struggle for justice not only for the black people but also for all those who have been wronged."

Will Obama's election close the chapter of black grievances linked to memories of slavery? The reverend takes a deep breath and waits a long time before responding.

"No, that chapter won't be closed," he says. "However, Obama's victory will be a huge step in the direction we have wanted America to take for decades."

Jackson rejects any suggestion that Obama was influenced by Marxist ideas in his youth. "I see no evidence of that," he says. "Obama's thirst for justice and equality is rooted in his black culture."

But is Obama - who's not a descendant of slaves - truly a typical American black?

Jackson emphatically answers yes: "You don't need to be a descendant of slaves to experience the oppression, the suffocating injustice and the ugly racism that exists in our society," he says. "Obama experienced the same environment as all American blacks did. It was nonsense to suggest that he was somehow not black enough to feel the pain."

Is Jackson worried about the "Bradley effect" - that people may be telling pollsters they favor the black candidate, but won't end up voting for him?

"I don't think this is how things will turn out," he says. "We have a collapsing economy and a war that we have lost in Iraq. In Afghanistan, we face a resurgent Taliban. New threats are looming in Pakistan. Our liberties have been trampled under feet . . . Today, most Americans want change, and know that only Barack can deliver what they want. Young Americans are especially determined to make sure that Obama wins."

He sees a broad public loss of confidence in the nation's institutions: "We have lost confidence in our president, our Congress, our banking system, our Wall Street and our legal system to protect our individual freedoms. . . I don't see how we could regain confidence in all those institutions without a radical change of direction."

Jackson declines to be more concrete about possible policy changes. After all, he insists, he isn't part of Obama's policy team. Yet he clearly hopes that his views, reflecting the position of many Democrats, would be reflected in the policies of an Obama administration.

On the economic front, he hopes for "major changes in our trading policy."

"We cannot continue with the open-door policy," he says. "We need to protect our manufacturing industry against unfair competition that destroys American jobs and creates ill-paid jobs abroad."

Would that mean an abrogation of the NAFTA treaty with Canada and Mexico?

Jackson dismisses the question as "premature": "We could do a great deal without such dramatic action."

His most surprising position concerns Iraq. He passionately denounces the toppling of Saddam Hussein as "an illegal and unjust act." But he's now sure that the United States "will have to remain in Iraq for a very long time."

What of Obama's promise to withdraw by 2010? Jackson believes that position will have to evolve, reflecting "realities on the ground."

"We should work with our allies in Iraq to consolidate democratic institutions there," he says. "We must help the people of Iraq decide and shape their future in accordance with their own culture and faith."

On Iran, he strongly supports Obama's idea of opening a direct dialogue with the leadership in Tehran. "We've got to talk to tell them what we want and hear what they want," Jackson says. "Nothing is gained by not talking to others."

Would that mean ignoring the four UN Security Council resolutions that demand an end to Iran's uranium-enrichment program? Jackson says direct talks wouldn't start without preparations.

"Barack wants an aggressive and dynamic diplomacy," he says. "He also wants adequate preparatory work. We must enter the talks after the ground has been prepared," he says.

Jackson is especially critical of President Bush's approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict.

"Bush was so afraid of a snafu and of upsetting Israel that he gave the whole thing a miss," Jackson says. "Barack will change that," because, as long as the Palestinians haven't seen justice, the Middle East will "remain a source of danger to us all."

"Barack is determined to repair our relations with the world of Islam and Muslims," Jackson says. "Thanks to his background and ecumenical approach, he knows how Muslims feel while remaining committed to his own faith."

Amir Taheri's next book, "The Persian Night: Iran Under the Khomeinist Revolution," is due out next month.
       

Login to remove all ads

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:17 PM
dilloduck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 25,183
Rep Power: 79
dilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddha
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidS View Post
Before you neo-cons post this about Obama, Jesse Jackson doesn't know shit about Obama's plan. He's just running his mouth. Everyone here remembers what kind of controversey Jackson caused a few months ago with his comments about cutting Obama's nuts off.

Well, now he's literally trying to do it.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/newthr...newthread&f=89

EVIAN, FRANCE

PREPARE for a new America: That's the message that the Rev. Jesse Jackson conveyed to participants in the first World Policy Forum, held at this French lakeside resort last week.

He promised "fundamental changes" in US foreign policy - saying America must "heal wounds" it has caused to other nations, revive its alliances and apologize for the "arrogance of the Bush administration."

The most important change would occur in the Middle East, where "decades of putting Israel's interests first" would end.

Jackson believes that, although "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades" remain strong, they'll lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obama enters the White House.

"Obama is about change," Jackson told me in a wide-ranging conversation.
"And the change that Obama promises is not limited to what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks at the world and its place in it."

Jackson warns that he isn't an Obama confidant or adviser, "just a supporter." But he adds that Obama has been "a neighbor or, better still, a member of the family." Jackson's son has been a close friend of Obama for years, and Jackson's daughter went to school with Obama's wife Michelle.

"We helped him start his career," says Jackson. "And then we were always there to help him move ahead. He is the continuation of our struggle for justice not only for the black people but also for all those who have been wronged."

Will Obama's election close the chapter of black grievances linked to memories of slavery? The reverend takes a deep breath and waits a long time before responding.

"No, that chapter won't be closed," he says. "However, Obama's victory will be a huge step in the direction we have wanted America to take for decades."

Jackson rejects any suggestion that Obama was influenced by Marxist ideas in his youth. "I see no evidence of that," he says. "Obama's thirst for justice and equality is rooted in his black culture."

But is Obama - who's not a descendant of slaves - truly a typical American black?

Jackson emphatically answers yes: "You don't need to be a descendant of slaves to experience the oppression, the suffocating injustice and the ugly racism that exists in our society," he says. "Obama experienced the same environment as all American blacks did. It was nonsense to suggest that he was somehow not black enough to feel the pain."

Is Jackson worried about the "Bradley effect" - that people may be telling pollsters they favor the black candidate, but won't end up voting for him?

"I don't think this is how things will turn out," he says. "We have a collapsing economy and a war that we have lost in Iraq. In Afghanistan, we face a resurgent Taliban. New threats are looming in Pakistan. Our liberties have been trampled under feet . . . Today, most Americans want change, and know that only Barack can deliver what they want. Young Americans are especially determined to make sure that Obama wins."

He sees a broad public loss of confidence in the nation's institutions: "We have lost confidence in our president, our Congress, our banking system, our Wall Street and our legal system to protect our individual freedoms. . . I don't see how we could regain confidence in all those institutions without a radical change of direction."

Jackson declines to be more concrete about possible policy changes. After all, he insists, he isn't part of Obama's policy team. Yet he clearly hopes that his views, reflecting the position of many Democrats, would be reflected in the policies of an Obama administration.

On the economic front, he hopes for "major changes in our trading policy."

"We cannot continue with the open-door policy," he says. "We need to protect our manufacturing industry against unfair competition that destroys American jobs and creates ill-paid jobs abroad."

Would that mean an abrogation of the NAFTA treaty with Canada and Mexico?

Jackson dismisses the question as "premature": "We could do a great deal without such dramatic action."

His most surprising position concerns Iraq. He passionately denounces the toppling of Saddam Hussein as "an illegal and unjust act." But he's now sure that the United States "will have to remain in Iraq for a very long time."

What of Obama's promise to withdraw by 2010? Jackson believes that position will have to evolve, reflecting "realities on the ground."

"We should work with our allies in Iraq to consolidate democratic institutions there," he says. "We must help the people of Iraq decide and shape their future in accordance with their own culture and faith."

On Iran, he strongly supports Obama's idea of opening a direct dialogue with the leadership in Tehran. "We've got to talk to tell them what we want and hear what they want," Jackson says. "Nothing is gained by not talking to others."

Would that mean ignoring the four UN Security Council resolutions that demand an end to Iran's uranium-enrichment program? Jackson says direct talks wouldn't start without preparations.

"Barack wants an aggressive and dynamic diplomacy," he says. "He also wants adequate preparatory work. We must enter the talks after the ground has been prepared," he says.

Jackson is especially critical of President Bush's approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict.

"Bush was so afraid of a snafu and of upsetting Israel that he gave the whole thing a miss," Jackson says. "Barack will change that," because, as long as the Palestinians haven't seen justice, the Middle East will "remain a source of danger to us all."

"Barack is determined to repair our relations with the world of Islam and Muslims," Jackson says. "Thanks to his background and ecumenical approach, he knows how Muslims feel while remaining committed to his own faith."

Amir Taheri's next book, "The Persian Night: Iran Under the Khomeinist Revolution," is due out next month.
Oh the Jews will love that !
Glad to see he's got a brother overseas trying to help him tho.
__________________
"Some men eventually stumble over the truth but they usually pick themselves up and walk on as if nothing ever happened."
-Winston Churchill

"But though there is no difference in this respect between the best demagogue and the worst, both of them having to present their cases equally in terms of melodrama, there is all the difference in the world between the statesman who is humbugging the people into allowing him to do the will of God, in whatever disguise it may come to him, and one who is humbugging them into furthering his personal ambition and the commercial interests of the plutocrats who own the newspapers and support him on reciprocal terms."
-George Bernard Shaw
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:18 PM
1-20-09
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Other Side of Paradise
Posts: 13,540
Rep Power: 350
jillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religion
I don't think I'd much worry about Jesse Jackson. I figured Obama isn't his best friend since he said he was going to "cut his balls off".

just sayin'

But I am wondering why Jackson wants to cost Obama the election.
__________________
"Trust none of what you hear And less of what you see" Springsteen

When the Founding Fathers protected our right to free speech, I think that meant we were supposed to use it.

Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was the world's most unhinged lunatic. He's now dead. So that moves Ann Coulter up to first place - David Letterman

O, when she is angry she is keen and shrewd; / She was a vixen when she went to school, / And though she be but little, she is fierce. — Shakespeare

51 days left http://www.backwardsbush.com/
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:22 PM
DavidS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,391
Rep Power: 11
DavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayor
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillian View Post
I don't think I'd much worry about Jesse Jackson. I figured Obama isn't his best friend since he said he was going to "cut his balls off".

just sayin'

But I am wondering why Jackson wants to cost Obama the election.
Because Obama isn't sympathetic to the lazy, baby-making n*ggers out there who take no responsibility for themselves. Jackson and Sharpton think Obama should be very sympathetic to them. Because he's not, Jackson wants to cost Obama the election.

Quote:
"Barack is determined to repair our relations with the world of Islam and Muslims," Jackson says.
Of course, Jackson may forget it was the world of Islam and Muslims who attacked us on 9/11.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:24 PM
xsited1's Avatar
Yes, I'm just kidding
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 2,538
Rep Power: 16
xsited1 could be state governorxsited1 could be state governorxsited1 could be state governorxsited1 could be state governorxsited1 could be state governorxsited1 could be state governorxsited1 could be state governorxsited1 could be state governorxsited1 could be state governorxsited1 could be state governorxsited1 could be state governor
There are more American Jews that are Democrats than Republicans. This could have a significant impact on the election from the Jewish community.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:24 PM
dilloduck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 25,183
Rep Power: 79
dilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddhadilloduck could be the buddha
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillian View Post
I don't think I'd much worry about Jesse Jackson. I figured Obama isn't his best friend since he said he was going to "cut his balls off".

just sayin'

But I am wondering why Jackson wants to cost Obama the election.
It's a lot harder to sell the poor pitiful black routine if one is president .

That's like killing Jesse's cash cow.
__________________
"Some men eventually stumble over the truth but they usually pick themselves up and walk on as if nothing ever happened."
-Winston Churchill

"But though there is no difference in this respect between the best demagogue and the worst, both of them having to present their cases equally in terms of melodrama, there is all the difference in the world between the statesman who is humbugging the people into allowing him to do the will of God, in whatever disguise it may come to him, and one who is humbugging them into furthering his personal ambition and the commercial interests of the plutocrats who own the newspapers and support him on reciprocal terms."
-George Bernard Shaw
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:26 PM
1-20-09
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Other Side of Paradise
Posts: 13,540
Rep Power: 350
jillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religion
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidS View Post
Because Obama isn't sympathetic to the lazy, baby-making n*ggers out there who take no responsibility for themselves. Jackson and Sharpton think Obama should be very sympathetic to them. Because he's not, Jackson wants to cost Obama the election.
Well, I'm not sure I'd characterize it the way that you did. But there is certainly a difference in Jackson and Sharpton's agenda from Obama's.... given that Obama isn't a race hustler and they are.

Quote:
Of course, Jackson may forget it was the world of Islam and Muslims who attacked us on 9/11.
Well, I'm not sure that he's all that concerned about Hymietown.
__________________
"Trust none of what you hear And less of what you see" Springsteen

When the Founding Fathers protected our right to free speech, I think that meant we were supposed to use it.

Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was the world's most unhinged lunatic. He's now dead. So that moves Ann Coulter up to first place - David Letterman

O, when she is angry she is keen and shrewd; / She was a vixen when she went to school, / And though she be but little, she is fierce. — Shakespeare

51 days left http://www.backwardsbush.com/
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:29 PM
DavidS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,391
Rep Power: 11
DavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayor
Quote:
Originally Posted by xsited1 View Post
There are more American Jews that are Democrats than Republicans. This could have a significant impact on the election from the Jewish community.
I don't think so. Us Jews are smarter than to listen to some blithering idiot who runs his mouth and isn't an advisor to the Obama campaign. Jesse Jackson's son, who is an advisor, has made public his request to get his father to apologize in the past. I doubt JJ Jr. agrees with his father.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:30 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,697
Rep Power: 0
manifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religion
Wow! Just wow! Jackson apparently really really really wants Obama to lose. What a worthless, self-serving, racist sack of shit.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:33 PM
1-20-09
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Other Side of Paradise
Posts: 13,540
Rep Power: 350
jillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religion
Quote:
Originally Posted by xsited1 View Post
There are more American Jews that are Democrats than Republicans. This could have a significant impact on the election from the Jewish community.
older jews are already uncomfortable with him. I don't think it will make a difference among younger jews.
__________________
"Trust none of what you hear And less of what you see" Springsteen

When the Founding Fathers protected our right to free speech, I think that meant we were supposed to use it.

Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was the world's most unhinged lunatic. He's now dead. So that moves Ann Coulter up to first place - David Letterman

O, when she is angry she is keen and shrewd; / She was a vixen when she went to school, / And though she be but little, she is fierce. — Shakespeare

51 days left http://www.backwardsbush.com/
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:34 PM
1-20-09
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Other Side of Paradise
Posts: 13,540
Rep Power: 350
jillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religionjillian could successfully start his own religion
Quote:
Originally Posted by manifold View Post
Wow! Just wow! Jackson apparently really really really wants Obama to lose. What a worthless, self-serving, racist sack of shit.
Has he ever been anyhing else?
__________________
"Trust none of what you hear And less of what you see" Springsteen

When the Founding Fathers protected our right to free speech, I think that meant we were supposed to use it.

Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was the world's most unhinged lunatic. He's now dead. So that moves Ann Coulter up to first place - David Letterman

O, when she is angry she is keen and shrewd; / She was a vixen when she went to school, / And though she be but little, she is fierce. — Shakespeare

51 days left http://www.backwardsbush.com/
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:34 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,697
Rep Power: 0
manifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religionmanifold could successfully start his own religion
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillian View Post
Has he ever been anyhing else?
No, but at least he used to try to hide it better.
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:38 PM
hjmick's Avatar
Over 40 Victim of Fate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,321
Rep Power: 37
hjmick has a reputation beyond reputehjmick has a reputation beyond reputehjmick has a reputation beyond reputehjmick has a reputation beyond reputehjmick has a reputation beyond reputehjmick has a reputation beyond reputehjmick has a reputation beyond reputehjmick has a reputation beyond reputehjmick has a reputation beyond reputehjmick has a reputation beyond reputehjmick has a reputation beyond repute
Jesse hates Jews. I've known this for almost 25 years.
__________________
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:45 PM
DavidS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,391
Rep Power: 11
DavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayor
Quote:
Originally Posted by manifold View Post
Wow! Just wow! Jackson apparently really really really wants Obama to lose. What a worthless, self-serving, racist sack of shit.


Couldn't have said it better myself.
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2008, 03:52 PM
DavidS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,391
Rep Power: 11
DavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayorDavidS could be city mayor
Quote:
Originally Posted by hjmick View Post
Jesse hates Jews. I've known this for almost 25 years.
Yeah, we're not too thrilled with him either.
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
October surprise.... Alpha1 Current Events 2 10-09-2008 03:48 PM
October Surprise: Confrontation with Iran DavidS Elections 2008 3 10-07-2008 11:27 AM
October surprise bush lover Canada 9 09-24-2006 05:17 PM
no October Surprise dilloduck Politics 7 10-29-2004 11:50 AM
An October Surprise? Annie War on Terrorism 13 07-27-2004 11:56 PM

 

Celebrity Gossip, Photography Forum, All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

Poltical Topsites