US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum  

GM to turn Government Motors?

This is a discussion on GM to turn Government Motors? within the Economy forums, part of the US Discussion category; Siddharth Vinayak Patankar Tuesday, April 28, 2009 (New Delhi) General Motors’ new Chief Executive, Fritz Henderson has the tough task of transforming what was once ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Economy


Economy Discuss economic policy and wallstreet


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2009, 10:42 AM
Registered User
Member #12010
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,242
Thanks: 9
Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts
Rep Power: 15
NOBama could be state governorNOBama could be state governorNOBama could be state governorNOBama could be state governor
NOBama could be state governorNOBama could be state governorNOBama could be state governorNOBama could be state governorNOBama could be state governorNOBama could be state governorNOBama could be state governor
GM to turn Government Motors?

Quote:
Siddharth Vinayak Patankar
Tuesday, April 28, 2009 (New Delhi)

General Motors’ new Chief Executive, Fritz Henderson has the tough task of transforming what was once the world’s largest [COLOR=blue! important][COLOR=blue! important]car[/color][/color] making dinosaur, into a fleet footed, agile and flexible beast that suits today’s environment. Henderson says, “"I think we're going to be lean, flexible, very customer focused. And, really get behind and win with four core brands, rather than try to figure out how we allocate lots of resources across, frankly, too many things.” But in doing so, GM could very well end up turning into Government [COLOR=blue! important][COLOR=blue! important]Motors[/color][/color].

In its latest plan, GM says it wants the government to write off half its loans to GM so far, in exchange for 50 per cent stake in the company. It also wants the unions to accept shares in the co in lieu of 50 per cent of $20 billion it has to pay to the health care trust.

Besides this GM says it will cut 21,000 more jobs and close 13 more plants over the next year. Another move that is not getting a very popular response is an offer to give bondholders new shares, to help reduce 90 per cent of its bond debt. “89 per cent of the shares of the company would be owned by a combination of the Treasury and the UAW VEBA. The second thing the prospectus does is it talks about as a condition, that the Treasury would equitise approximately 50 per cent, at least 50 per cent of their pre-June 1 debt. So, about $10 billion." Henderson said on Monday.

http://profit.ndtv.com/2009/04/28173...nt-Motors.html
What about all those bailout bucks we gave them to "save millions of jobs"?

I’ve offered to help them with a new advertisement:

“GM: Closing plants and dealerships near you. Get'em while they last!
In the interest of disclosure: please be advised that we will not honor Pontiac warranties because we got away with not honoring Oldsmobile warranties, besides, complaints would be bad for your investment. Thank you for your patronage!”

Last edited by NOBama; 04-28-2009 at 10:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2009, 01:11 PM
midcan5's Avatar
liberal
Member #5464
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philly
Posts: 4,531
Thanks: 190
Thanked 260 Times in 209 Posts
Rep Power: 87
midcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddha
midcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddhamidcan5 could be the buddha
I don't buy this BS, GM makes cars American wanted and still want, it is just that foreign car makers have none of the employee responsibility GM does. Our GM cars are all excellent and fit our needs. But another aspect is the cheap aspect, Walmart isn't popular because they are a good citizen and treat their employees well, they are popular because they are cheap, and cheap sells whether it makes sense or not to the country.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Economy

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

» Search Forums

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Apple iPad Forum
» Premium Sponsors
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Please visit these our friends at the following forums:
Photography Forum - Celebrity Gossip and News - Conceal Carry and Hand Gun Forum - Parrot Forum - iPhone News - iPhone Forums - Motorola Droid Forum


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management by RedTyger