US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Unemployment Worse Today than when Obama took Office

This is a discussion on Unemployment Worse Today than when Obama took Office within the Economy forums, part of the US Discussion category; Unemployment Worse Today than when Obama took Office BLS Employment Situation January 2009: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/arch...t_02062009.pdf BLS Employment Situation December 2013: Employment Situation Summary Change in Unemployment ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Economy

Economy Discuss economic policy and wallstreet

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2014, 10:07 PM
Publius1787's Avatar
Registered User
Member #27496
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,027
Thanks: 111
Thanked 1,102 Times in 760 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 777
Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve
Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve
Unemployment Worse Today than when Obama took Office

Unemployment Worse Today than when Obama took Office

BLS Employment Situation January 2009: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/arch...t_02062009.pdf
BLS Employment Situation December 2013: Employment Situation Summary

Change in Unemployment
7.6% Jan 2009
6.7% Dec 2013
Difference = 0.9%

Change in Number of Unemployed
11,616,000 Jan 2009
10,351,000 Dec 2013
Difference = 1,265,000 less workers unemployed

Change in the Number of Employed
142,099,000 Jan 2009
144,586,000 Dec 2013
Difference = + 2,487,000 net jobs created

Change in Labor Force Participation Rate
65.5% Jan 2009
62.8% Dec 2013
Difference = 2.7% of the labor force stopped participating.

Total Not in Labor Force
49,455,000 Jan 2009
55,220,000 Dec 2013
Difference = 5,765,000 people dropped out of the labor force.

Jobs to Dropouts
Average net Jobs Created Per Year: 497,400
Average # of Labor Force Dropouts per Year: 1,153,000
Difference: For Every 1 net job created under Obama 2.32 people have given up looking for work.

Since Obama took office in 2009 the unemployment rate has dropped 0.9% and the labor force participation rate has dropped 2.7%. Had the labor force participation rate stayed the same our current employment situation would be an unemployment rate of 9.4%, a total difference of -1.8% employment since Obama took office. In real numbers, Obama can boast that 2,487,000 net jobs were created for Americans under his stewardship in 5 years (497,400 net jobs per year average). He can also boast that those eligible for work and able to work while not looking for work increased by 5,765,000 (A labor force participation drop out rate of 1,153,000 per year). In other words, for every net job created since January 2009, 2.32 people have given up looking for work. If we were to start on the month Obama took office, fair or not, and compared the employment situation to today, we are still worse off today in terms of employment than the day he took office.

Conclusion: Ceteris paribus (and they are not) Thus far, though we look to be catching up and the economy is growing, the economy has not grown enough in accordance with the increase in workforce population so as to maintain an employment rate that would be less than that of when Obama took office.

I hope I used ceteris paribus correctly Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

Your Thoughts?
__________________
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams -

Last edited by Publius1787; 01-24-2014 at 10:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2014, 10:57 PM
Avorysuds's Avatar
Registered User
Member #24076
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 12,092
Thanks: 3,862
Thanked 3,108 Times in 2,156 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1970
Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute
Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute
It's like many said in the past and now the media is finally unable to not report on... The UE rate going down is due to people leaving the work force and that is a bad thing. Less people are working today than 1-2-3-4-5 years ago, take your pick. Obama and his policies have been devastating coming after 8 years of horrible policies under Bush.

If the FED-R actually starts to taper off spending, things will probably get far worse and the media simply can't avoid reporting it. Make no mistake, the Media will place the blame on anyone and anything other than the policies in place that caused the problem.

Last edited by Avorysuds; 01-25-2014 at 11:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2014, 11:10 PM
S.J.'s Avatar
Registered User
Member #41356
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 7,687
Thanks: 2,746
Thanked 2,983 Times in 1,903 Posts
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 4138
S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute
S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute
Those numbers will be manipulated for the uninformed until they get all the guns, then they won't care who knows.
__________________
Quote:
It's been a while since I read this but as I recall George Bush still can't account for his whereabouts in Paris (?) sometime in October '80. Just as he can't account for his whereabouts in Dallas on November 22nd of 1963.

But hey, I'm sure it's just a lapse of memory, it's not like he was CIA or something.

Oh wait...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politi...ml#post8888989
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to S.J. For This Useful Post:
Avorysuds (01-25-2014)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2014, 11:28 PM
Publius1787's Avatar
Registered User
Member #27496
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,027
Thanks: 111
Thanked 1,102 Times in 760 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 777
Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve
Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve
It's like many said in the passed and now the media is finally unable to not report on... The UE rate going down is due to people leaving the work force and that is a bad thing. Less people are working today than 1-2-3-4-5 years ago, take your pick. Obama and his policies have been devastating coming after 8 years of horrible policies under Bush.

If the FED-R actually starts to taper off spending, things will probably get far worse and the media simply can't avoid reporting it. Make no mistake, the Media will place the blame on anyone and anything other than the policies in place that caused the problem.
Indeed, less people as a percentage of the total labor force are working than 5 years ago, however, more people are in fact working due to a small amount of economic expansion. Nevertheless, the expansion has not been enough to bring employment back up to the amount Obama started with. The labor force has in fact grown due to kids graduating into the workforce, which makes unemployment go down all the slower and labor force participation go down all the faster.
__________________
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams -
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2014, 07:17 AM
Joe Steel's Avatar
Class Warrior
Member #21894
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 938
Thanks: 3
Thanked 121 Times in 99 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 59
Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Publius1787 Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
... Your Thoughts?
You're trying to blame Obama for circumstances beyond his control.

The mere fact of his presidency does not mean he created the unemployment phenomenon you highlighted. It is the result of many factors, not all of which are subject to the President's power.
__________________
Building a better America by hammering the Right.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2014, 11:48 AM
Avorysuds's Avatar
Registered User
Member #24076
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 12,092
Thanks: 3,862
Thanked 3,108 Times in 2,156 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1970
Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute
Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Publius1787 Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
... Your Thoughts?
You're trying to blame Obama for circumstances beyond his control.

The mere fact of his presidency does not mean he created the unemployment phenomenon you highlighted. It is the result of many factors, not all of which are subject to the President's power.
I think the real issue is accountability and credibility. If there is good news people give all that credit to Obama, and he arrogantly accepts that credit. When things are bad, get worse or are discovered under Obama's watch and policies.... It's Republicans fault, or conservatives, or ATM's, or Rush L, Glenn B, TP, Bush. Reagan, Harding and all whites that don't agree with Obama.

On one had many claim Obama saved the US from a depression, Obama accepts that. On the other hand less people are working, the poor and middle class are more poor than when Obama took over and that can all be explained by "It's out of the Presidents power!" Yet staving off a depression was well with in Obama's powers apparently....
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2014, 12:36 PM
S.J.'s Avatar
Registered User
Member #41356
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 7,687
Thanks: 2,746
Thanked 2,983 Times in 1,903 Posts
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 4138
S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute
S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute S.J. has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Publius1787 Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
... Your Thoughts?
You're trying to blame Obama for circumstances beyond his control.

The mere fact of his presidency does not mean he created the unemployment phenomenon you highlighted. It is the result of many factors, not all of which are subject to the President's power.
Nothing's ever his fault.
__________________
Quote:
It's been a while since I read this but as I recall George Bush still can't account for his whereabouts in Paris (?) sometime in October '80. Just as he can't account for his whereabouts in Dallas on November 22nd of 1963.

But hey, I'm sure it's just a lapse of memory, it's not like he was CIA or something.

Oh wait...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politi...ml#post8888989
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2014, 12:59 PM
Publius1787's Avatar
Registered User
Member #27496
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,027
Thanks: 111
Thanked 1,102 Times in 760 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 777
Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve
Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve
Quote: Originally Posted by Publius1787 Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
... Your Thoughts?
You're trying to blame Obama for circumstances beyond his control.

The mere fact of his presidency does not mean he created the unemployment phenomenon you highlighted. It is the result of many factors, not all of which are subject to the President's power.
I agree. I thought I made this clear when I noted "rightfully or wrongfully" in the above post. Nevertheless, Obama was the one who has noted many times that the government can play a role in creating jobs and thus far in his presidency he is at a net loss in employment as a percentage of the population. Indeed it was him who coined terms such as "recovery summer," and his administration, that predicted such a demonstrably inaccurate economic reaction to his recovery plan, that according to the White House's own predictions it did nothing to help the employment situation.

Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

How many pivots toward jobs has Obama made?
How many times have we seen Obama state that he has a "laser like focus" on jobs?
Wasn't the trillion dollar stimulus supposed to create jobs?
Wasn't Obamacare supposed to create jobs?
Wasn't cash for clunkers supposed to create jobs?
Wasn't a two year unemployment extension supposed to create jobs?
How many other Democrat championed bills has Obama signed into law that were supposed to create jobs?
If the chart above was supposed to be the case for stimulus job creation then shouldn't all of Obamas "job creating" measures have at least brought employment back to the blue/lightblue line?
The fact of the matter is that the White house assumed that the job market was within their control, which is why they released the above chart. Therefore it is only right that Obama should be held accountable to such economic assumptions and promises.
__________________
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams -

Last edited by Publius1787; 01-25-2014 at 01:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2014, 01:29 PM
Avorysuds's Avatar
Registered User
Member #24076
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 12,092
Thanks: 3,862
Thanked 3,108 Times in 2,156 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1970
Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute
Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute Avorysuds has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Publius1787 Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Quote: Originally Posted by Publius1787 Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
... Your Thoughts?
You're trying to blame Obama for circumstances beyond his control.

The mere fact of his presidency does not mean he created the unemployment phenomenon you highlighted. It is the result of many factors, not all of which are subject to the President's power.
I agree. I thought I made this clear when I noted "rightfully or wrongfully" in the above post. Nevertheless, Obama was the one who has noted many times that the government can play a role in creating jobs and thus far in his presidency he is at a net loss in employment as a percentage of the population. Indeed it was him who coined terms such as "recovery summer," and his administration, that predicted such a demonstrably inaccurate economic reaction to his recovery plan, that according to the White House's own predictions it did nothing to help the employment situation.

Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

How many pivots toward jobs has Obama made?
How many times have we seen Obama state that he has a "laser like focus" on jobs?
Wasn't the trillion dollar stimulus supposed to create jobs?
Wasn't Obamacare supposed to create jobs?
Wasn't cash for clunkers supposed to create jobs?
Wasn't a two year unemployment extension supposed to create jobs?
How many other Democrat championed bills has Obama signed into law that were supposed to create jobs?
If the chart above was supposed to be the case for stimulus job creation then shouldn't all of Obamas "job creating" measures have at least brought employment back to the blue/lightblue line?
The fact of the matter is that the White house assumed that the job market was within their control, which is why they released the above chart. Therefore it is only right that Obama should be held accountable to such economic assumptions and promises.

I fully agree, we have trillion spent on stimulus that the use was defined to be for "creating jobs." Here we are at a net loss of jobs and even pointing the the incredibly misleading and inaccurate u3 UE stats we are still doing terrible. We look at the workforce participation rate for one reason under Obama, because ever single person knows things are worse off and claiming the official UE rate at 7% is bull****.

Obama himself has made looking at the UE pointless. Obama used it as a lie to cover his tracks on trillions spent with no actual "recovery' in jobs. We are in the first ever recorded "recovery" in the history of the world were we have less jobs than when we started (where no mass death has taken place from a war).

I despise Obama because he is in fact so bad at his job that an honest person that wanted the best would have not run a second term, an honest person would resign. Then again, Obama said he wouldn't run a second term if things were not fixed and yet he did.... because it's well documented Obama is not an honest person.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2014, 01:48 PM
expat_panama's Avatar
Registered User
Member #29282
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,461
Thanks: 102
Thanked 454 Times in 349 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 417
expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness
...trying to blame Obama for circumstances beyond his control...
The administration's website says--
Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
--but I agree with you that current government policy has been unable to provide any beneficial affect. Now that we know what doesn't work let's decide what we want. I want lower taxes so I can hire people. So if we got no better ideas on the table (which we don't yet) let's just go w/ lower taxes.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to expat_panama For This Useful Post:
Avorysuds (01-25-2014)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2014, 02:09 PM
Publius1787's Avatar
Registered User
Member #27496
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,027
Thanks: 111
Thanked 1,102 Times in 760 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 777
Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve
Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve
Quote: Originally Posted by expat_panama Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
...trying to blame Obama for circumstances beyond his control...
The administration's website says--
Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
--but I agree with you that current government policy has been unable to provide any beneficial affect. Now that we know what doesn't work let's decide what we want. I want lower taxes so I can hire people. So if we got no better ideas on the table (which we don't yet) let's just go w/ lower taxes.
The White Houses claim of 7.2 million jobs created does not take into account jobs lost under his stewardship, but only the job gains. Essentially they just ignored the job losses and paid attention to the job gains when the job losses should have canceled out a very large portion of the job gains. If he is going to take credit for one he might as well take credit for the other. They also have a very screwed up way of measuring job creation via counting jobs "created/saved." In any case, there is no evidence that his policies have worked, more people as a percentage of the total US population are still out of work than the day he took office, and the labor force participation rate is the lowest since the Carter years?
__________________
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams -

Last edited by Publius1787; 01-25-2014 at 02:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2014, 03:12 PM
Publius1787's Avatar
Registered User
Member #27496
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,027
Thanks: 111
Thanked 1,102 Times in 760 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 777
Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve
Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve Publius1787 could run the Federal Reserve
Quote: Originally Posted by Publius1787 Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
... Your Thoughts?
You're trying to blame Obama for circumstances beyond his control.

The mere fact of his presidency does not mean he created the unemployment phenomenon you highlighted. It is the result of many factors, not all of which are subject to the President's power.
Nothing's ever his fault.
Unless it's positive of course. If something positive happens he was instrumental in seeing it through to achievement. Just think about the brave decision he made to single handedly take out OBL with his bare fists before the SEALS asked his benevolence for permission to do the job so as to boast up the reputation of the military already overshadowed by their dear leaders combat skills. Indeed, the president spent days personally researching OBL's whereabouts and personally did a number of undercover missions to Pakistan so as to gather the intel that only his expertise could accomplish. Then he was kind enough to allow the SEALS to get 2% of the credit! What a great man! In this case, the death of OBL was all Obamas fault. The underperforming recovery? No, that belongs to his racist and homophobic political opposition who has waged a war on jobs, a war on minorities, and a war on women as they scheme to take poor peoples healthcare away, sabotage the Obamacare website, deport the parents of Mexican children, and shove granny over a cliff.
__________________
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams -
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Publius1787 For This Useful Post:
S.J. (01-25-2014)
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2014, 06:23 PM
Registered User
Member #19604
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 2,870
Thanks: 8
Thanked 401 Times in 307 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 214
pinqy could be State Senator pinqy could be State Senator pinqy could be State Senator pinqy could be State Senator pinqy could be State Senator pinqy could be State Senator pinqy could be State Senator pinqy could be State Senator pinqy could be State Senator pinqy could be State Senator pinqy could be State Senator
Quote: Originally Posted by Publius1787 Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Unemployment Worse Today than when Obama took Office

BLS Employment Situation January 2009: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/arch...t_02062009.pdf
BLS Employment Situation December 2013: Employment Situation Summary

Change in Unemployment
7.6% Jan 2009
6.7% Dec 2013
Difference = 0.9%

Change in Number of Unemployed
11,616,000 Jan 2009
10,351,000 Dec 2013
Difference = 1,265,000 less workers unemployed

Change in the Number of Employed
142,099,000 Jan 2009
144,586,000 Dec 2013
Difference = + 2,487,000 net jobs created

Change in Labor Force Participation Rate
65.5% Jan 2009
62.8% Dec 2013
Difference = 2.7% of the labor force stopped participating.

Total Not in Labor Force
49,455,000 Jan 2009
55,220,000 Dec 2013
Difference = 5,765,000 people dropped out of the labor force.

Jobs to Dropouts
Average net Jobs Created Per Year: 497,400
Average # of Labor Force Dropouts per Year: 1,153,000
Difference: For Every 1 net job created under Obama 2.32 people have given up looking for work.

Since Obama took office in 2009 the unemployment rate has dropped 0.9% and the labor force participation rate has dropped 2.7%. Had the labor force participation rate stayed the same our current employment situation would be an unemployment rate of 9.4%, a total difference of -1.8% employment since Obama took office. In real numbers, Obama can boast that 2,487,000 net jobs were created for Americans under his stewardship in 5 years (497,400 net jobs per year average). He can also boast that those eligible for work and able to work while not looking for work increased by 5,765,000 (A labor force participation drop out rate of 1,153,000 per year). In other words, for every net job created since January 2009, 2.32 people have given up looking for work. If we were to start on the month Obama took office, fair or not, and compared the employment situation to today, we are still worse off today in terms of employment than the day he took office.

Conclusion: Ceteris paribus (and they are not) Thus far, though we look to be catching up and the economy is growing, the economy has not grown enough in accordance with the increase in workforce population so as to maintain an employment rate that would be less than that of when Obama took office.

I hope I used ceteris paribus correctly Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

Your Thoughts?
You can't use the archived news release for seasonally adjusted numbers, as they get revised every December

Your Not in the Labor Force numbers are way off…it was 80,259,000 and 91,808,000

And an increase in Not in the Labor Force is not necessarily a decrease in the Labor Force, or people "dropping out.
__________________
If you build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day.
But if you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2014, 02:49 AM
Registered User
Member #30967
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 10,237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2,194 Times in 1,649 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1478
Politico could be on the Supreme Court Politico could be on the Supreme Court
Politico could be on the Supreme Court Politico could be on the Supreme Court Politico could be on the Supreme Court Politico could be on the Supreme Court Politico could be on the Supreme Court Politico could be on the Supreme Court Politico could be on the Supreme Court Politico could be on the Supreme Court Politico could be on the Supreme Court Politico could be on the Supreme Court Politico could be on the Supreme Court
Quote: Originally Posted by Publius1787 Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
... Your Thoughts?
You're trying to blame Obama for circumstances beyond his control.

The mere fact of his presidency does not mean he created the unemployment phenomenon you highlighted. It is the result of many factors, not all of which are subject to the President's power.
Quit toting the party line. Pukilus hates Obammy because he's black but he happens to be right. He is 6 years into his term. It is his baby like it or not.
__________________
If you want a neg make a clueless comment about my political affiliation.

Last edited by Politico; 01-27-2014 at 01:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2014, 08:46 AM
Joe Steel's Avatar
Class Warrior
Member #21894
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 938
Thanks: 3
Thanked 121 Times in 99 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 59
Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha Joe Steel could be the Buddha
You're trying to blame Obama for circumstances beyond his control.

The mere fact of his presidency does not mean he created the unemployment phenomenon you highlighted. It is the result of many factors, not all of which are subject to the President's power.
I think the real issue is accountability and credibility. If there is good news people give all that credit to Obama, and he arrogantly accepts that credit. When things are bad, get worse or are discovered under Obama's watch and policies.... It's Republicans fault, or conservatives, or ATM's, or Rush L, Glenn B, TP, Bush. Reagan, Harding and all whites that don't agree with Obama.

On one had many claim Obama saved the US from a depression, Obama accepts that. On the other hand less people are working, the poor and middle class are more poor than when Obama took over and that can all be explained by "It's out of the Presidents power!" Yet staving off a depression was well with in Obama's powers apparently....
In this case, yes. The Republicans explicitly declared their opposition to the President. Obama saved the economy so he had a record of success. The Republicans obstructed him so the blame is their's.
__________________
Building a better America by hammering the Right.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Economy
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:03 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.