US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Why can't Republicans explain their "Fiscal Policy"?

This is a discussion on Why can't Republicans explain their "Fiscal Policy"? within the Economy forums, part of the US Discussion category; I'm watching Michael Steele talk about Republican "fiscal policy". His only policy is "cut taxes". He said cutting taxes will lift people out of poverty. ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Economy

Economy Discuss economic policy and wallstreet

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 05:52 AM
rdean's Avatar
rddean
Member #20394
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chicago
Posts: 39,456
Thanks: 996
Thanked 7,080 Times in 5,290 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 780
rdean is faster than a speeding bullet
rdean is faster than a speeding bullet rdean is faster than a speeding bullet rdean is faster than a speeding bullet rdean is faster than a speeding bullet rdean is faster than a speeding bullet rdean is faster than a speeding bullet rdean is faster than a speeding bullet rdean is faster than a speeding bullet
Why can't Republicans explain their "Fiscal Policy"?

I'm watching Michael Steele talk about Republican "fiscal policy". His only policy is "cut taxes". He said cutting taxes will lift people out of poverty.

No mention of education.

No mention of the job's bill Republicans blocked.

No mention of building up American infrastructure.

Just "cut taxes".

I hate to break it to him, if you don't have a job, you aren't worrying about "taxes".

So is that it? Cut taxes? Nothing else? If there is more, what is it?
__________________
Grampa Murked U - Where, if anywhere, does personal responsibility fit into that? I made shit wages when I started out in life. In fact my first two bosses only hired me because of the tax incentives they got for hiring an ex con.
Mr. H. - Punk ass nigger meets deserved end. (referring to 17 year old Martin who was chased down and shot dead while armed with a bag of Skittles and a can of Ice Tea)
Rottweiler commenting on Healthcare: That's exactly right. The American people don't deserve shit.
Quantum Windbag on whites committing suicide: I have enough to deal with caring about my friends and family, why the fuck should I care about a bunch of dead people?
Sunni Man - Slavery wasn't addressed or condemned in the Bible.
Tank: Homosexuality, welfare, unemployment, dropouts, STD.s. obesity, fatherless children, abortion, rape, murder are not Republican values, so thats why blacks, hispanics and gays are democrats
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
USMessageBoard.com is the premier Political Forum Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 06:27 AM
rightwinger's Avatar
Sewer Worker
Member #20321
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 66,095
Thanks: 19,604
Thanked 22,331 Times in 14,608 Posts
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 10036
rightwinger has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by rdean View Post
I'm watching Michael Steele talk about Republican "fiscal policy". His only policy is "cut taxes". He said cutting taxes will lift people out of poverty.

No mention of education.

No mention of the job's bill Republicans blocked.

No mention of building up American infrastructure.

Just "cut taxes".

I hate to break it to him, if you don't have a job, you aren't worrying about "taxes".

So is that it? Cut taxes? Nothing else? If there is more, what is it?
That is their solution to every problem

Economy good? Cut taxes
Economy bad? Cut taxes
Need Jobs? Cut taxes
Reduce debt? Cut tasxes
Healthcare? Cut taxes
__________________
.

If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rightwinger For This Useful Post:
Dot Com (01-19-2013)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 07:28 AM
Registered User
Member #37424
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: LaConner, WA
Posts: 3,665
Thanks: 204
Thanked 360 Times in 315 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 85
Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by rdean View Post
I'm watching Michael Steele talk about Republican "fiscal policy". His only policy is "cut taxes". He said cutting taxes will lift people out of poverty.

No mention of education.

No mention of the job's bill Republicans blocked.

No mention of building up American infrastructure.

Just "cut taxes".

I hate to break it to him, if you don't have a job, you aren't worrying about "taxes".

So is that it? Cut taxes? Nothing else? If there is more, what is it?
That is their solution to every problem

Economy good? Cut taxes
Economy bad? Cut taxes
Need Jobs? Cut taxes
Reduce debt? Cut tasxes
Healthcare? Cut taxes
And they can never, ever show when decreasing taxes has helped in a bad economy. So they commission a study by the Congressional Research Service, a non partisan group, and then suppress the findings when the study is released. Because the study finds that tax decreases have no effect on economic growth. "In fact, the study found that higher tax rates for the wealthy are statistically associated with higher levels of growth."
Study: Tax Cuts for the Rich Don

So, the tax decrease "policy" is meant to make the gov smaller and put more $ in the back pocket of those with very high incomes. Because, after all, those very wealthy are the very ones who support the repubs. What a surprise.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rshermr For This Useful Post:
rightwinger (11-29-2012)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 09:46 AM
Registered User
Member #34008
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,600
Thanks: 1
Thanked 938 Times in 789 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 379
EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness
Quote: Originally Posted by Rshermr View Post
And they can never, ever show when decreasing taxes has helped in a bad economy.

too stupid and perfectly 1000% liberal. Cutting taxes and so government always helps an economy because government bureaucrats do not invent products; so they can only waste our money.

We got huge economic growth from the stone age to here because the private sector used its hard earned money to invent new products.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EdwardBaiamonte For This Useful Post:
PredFan (01-13-2013)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 10:09 AM
American Communist's Avatar
Controlled by Bankers
Member #11944
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Workers Paradise!
Posts: 18,010
Thanks: 6,153
Thanked 6,758 Times in 4,250 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3305
American Communist has disabled reputation
Do you mean "Republicans" or "Conservatives"?
__________________
Obama DOJ pushes Immunity for George Bush on War Crimes:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-d...aq-war/5346637
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to American Communist For This Useful Post:
RightNorLeft (01-22-2013)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 10:37 AM
The Rabbi's Avatar
<<<Miss him yet?
Member #20947
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nashville
Posts: 37,994
Thanks: 8,146
Thanked 8,819 Times in 5,980 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote: Originally Posted by rdean View Post
I'm watching Michael Steele talk about Republican "fiscal policy". His only policy is "cut taxes". He said cutting taxes will lift people out of poverty.

No mention of education.

No mention of the job's bill Republicans blocked.

No mention of building up American infrastructure.

Just "cut taxes".

I hate to break it to him, if you don't have a job, you aren't worrying about "taxes".

So is that it? Cut taxes? Nothing else? If there is more, what is it?
Michael who?

What is the Democrats' fiscal policy?
Oh yeah, spend, baby, spend!
__________________
Rabbi's Rule#1: No liberal can argue without posting a logical fallacy or a factual error within 2 posts.

Ron Paul? No. Join the RuPaul RuVolution! It's Fabulous!

"The only people that watch fox are sheep and the most ignorant among us." Black Label, in a thread based on his watching Fox.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 10:37 AM
Registered User
Member #34008
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,600
Thanks: 1
Thanked 938 Times in 789 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 379
EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness
Quote: Originally Posted by Mad Scientist View Post
Do you mean "Republicans" or "Conservatives"?
they are very similar since 100% of those who sign the Norquist pledge to limit taxes and government as our Founders intended are Republicans
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 10:40 AM
Registered User
Member #34008
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,600
Thanks: 1
Thanked 938 Times in 789 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 379
EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness
Quote: Originally Posted by The Rabbi View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by rdean View Post
I'm watching Michael Steele talk about Republican "fiscal policy". His only policy is "cut taxes". He said cutting taxes will lift people out of poverty.

No mention of education.

No mention of the job's bill Republicans blocked.

No mention of building up American infrastructure.

Just "cut taxes".

I hate to break it to him, if you don't have a job, you aren't worrying about "taxes".

So is that it? Cut taxes? Nothing else? If there is more, what is it?
Michael who?

What is the Democrats' fiscal policy?
Oh yeah, spend, baby, spend!
Yes even when $16 trillion in debt headed to $50 trillion. Greece here we come!! Liberals are totally irresponsible.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2013, 10:48 PM
waltky's Avatar
Supporting Member
Member #27951
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okolona, KY
Posts: 11,009
Thanks: 12,257
Thanked 1,314 Times in 1,082 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1205
waltky could be on the Supreme Court
waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court waltky could be on the Supreme Court
Angry

Mebbe `cause the Dems can't explain theirs - payroll tax holiday ends for all wage earners...

Obama supporters shocked, angry at new tax increases
Sunday, January 6, 2013 - Sometimes, watching a Democrat learn something is wonderful, like seeing the family dog finally sit and stay at your command.
Quote:
With President Obama back in office and his life-saving “fiscal cliff” bill jammed through Congress, the new year has brought a surprising turn of events for his sycophantic supporters. “What happened that my Social Security withholding’s in my paycheck just went up?” a poster wrote on the liberal site DemocraticUnderground.com. “My paycheck just went down by an amount that I don’t feel comfortable with. I guarantee this decrease is gonna’ hurt me more than the increase in income taxes will hurt those making over 400 grand. What happened?”

Shocker. Democrats who supported the president’s re-election just had NO idea that his steadfast pledge to raise taxes meant that he was really going to raise taxes. They thought he planned to just hit those filthy “1 percenters,” you know, the ones who earned fortunes through their inventiveness and hard work. They thought the free ride would continue forever.

So this week, as taxes went up for millions of Americans — which Republicans predicted throughout the campaign would happen — it was fun to watch the agoggery of the left. “I know to expect between $93 and $94 less in my paycheck on the 15th,” wrote the ironically named “RomneyLies.” “My boyfriend has had a lot of expenses and is feeling squeezed right now, and having his paycheck shrink really didn’t help,” wrote “DemocratToTheEnd.” “BlueIndyBlue” added: “Many of my friends didn’t realize it, either. Our payroll department didn’t do a good job of explaining the coming changes.”

So let’s explain something to our ill-informed Democratic friends. In 2009, Mr. Obama enacted a “holiday” on the payroll tax deduction from employees’ paychecks, dropping the rate from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent. But like the holidays, the drop ended, and like New Year‘s, the revelers woke up the next morning with a massive hangover and a pounding head.

Read more: CURL: Obama supporters shocked, angry at new tax increases - Washington Times
__________________
Kinda funny how, instead of a 'sequester', the Wall Street bankers got bailed out.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2013, 07:54 AM
Registered User
Member #37424
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: LaConner, WA
Posts: 3,665
Thanks: 204
Thanked 360 Times in 315 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 85
Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor
Quote: Originally Posted by waltky View Post
Mebbe `cause the Dems can't explain theirs - payroll tax holiday ends for all wage earners...

Obama supporters shocked, angry at new tax increases
Sunday, January 6, 2013 - Sometimes, watching a Democrat learn something is wonderful, like seeing the family dog finally sit and stay at your command.
Quote:
With President Obama back in office and his life-saving “fiscal cliff” bill jammed through Congress, the new year has brought a surprising turn of events for his sycophantic supporters. “What happened that my Social Security withholding’s in my paycheck just went up?” a poster wrote on the liberal site DemocraticUnderground.com. “My paycheck just went down by an amount that I don’t feel comfortable with. I guarantee this decrease is gonna’ hurt me more than the increase in income taxes will hurt those making over 400 grand. What happened?”

Shocker. Democrats who supported the president’s re-election just had NO idea that his steadfast pledge to raise taxes meant that he was really going to raise taxes. They thought he planned to just hit those filthy “1 percenters,” you know, the ones who earned fortunes through their inventiveness and hard work. They thought the free ride would continue forever.

So this week, as taxes went up for millions of Americans — which Republicans predicted throughout the campaign would happen — it was fun to watch the agoggery of the left. “I know to expect between $93 and $94 less in my paycheck on the 15th,” wrote the ironically named “RomneyLies.” “My boyfriend has had a lot of expenses and is feeling squeezed right now, and having his paycheck shrink really didn’t help,” wrote “DemocratToTheEnd.” “BlueIndyBlue” added: “Many of my friends didn’t realize it, either. Our payroll department didn’t do a good job of explaining the coming changes.”

So let’s explain something to our ill-informed Democratic friends. In 2009, Mr. Obama enacted a “holiday” on the payroll tax deduction from employees’ paychecks, dropping the rate from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent. But like the holidays, the drop ended, and like New Year‘s, the revelers woke up the next morning with a massive hangover and a pounding head.

Read more: CURL: Obama supporters shocked, angry at new tax increases - Washington Times
Wow, waltky. The Washington Times. Nice. A really, really nut case con source. Lets vet this claim of tax increases caused by Obama.

If you actually go out and look on the web, useing IMPARTIAL sources, you will find all kinds of sources explaining that there was a small decrease in SS that had an end Jan 1. Obama requested that it be extended. Congress did not do so.

So, me boy, you are posting con dogma. Bullshit, in other words. Which is why you should NEVER use a source lie the Wn. Times, for christ sake, with out vetting the story carefully.

Here are the facts:
Social Security taxes had been 6.2 percent of gross pay since 1990 and they remained at 6.2 percent until 2011 when Congress and President Obama agreed to temporarily reduce the tax from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent as part of an economic stimulus package. The reduction in the tax rate shocked many and was the first time Social Security taxes had been reduced since 1968. The two percent reduction in tax wasn’t anything substantial, but it certainly made a difference for those scraping to get by and living from paycheck to paycheck.
Now, the honeymoon is over. The Social Security tax holiday is behind us and taxes are now back at their original 6.2 percent rate. This means that any American who pays Social Security taxes (i.e., almost every one of us) will witness a drop in net pay effective immediately.
Social Security taxes to increase in 2013 - Houston Finance | Examiner.com

Obama made overtures to continue the tax holiday, but got no takers in congress. Neither dems nor repubs had any interest. So, thanks a lot Congress. An actual stimulative tax cut has no interest to them, since it is to low income folks. Maybe because they do not finance politicians.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2013, 01:08 PM
Registered User
Member #34008
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,600
Thanks: 1
Thanked 938 Times in 789 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 379
EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness
Quote: Originally Posted by rdean View Post
So is that it? Cut taxes? Nothing else?
it like saying to a doctor, "Is that it, all you're going to do is cut the blood supply to the cancerous tumor"
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EdwardBaiamonte For This Useful Post:
PredFan (01-13-2013)
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2013, 06:58 PM
Rozman's Avatar
Supporting Member
Member #20981
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brooklyn,NY
Posts: 9,920
Thanks: 1,244
Thanked 4,031 Times in 2,587 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3073
Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute
Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute
And the Libs solution for everything is spend....SPEND....SPEND....
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2013, 07:30 PM
Registered User
Member #37424
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: LaConner, WA
Posts: 3,665
Thanks: 204
Thanked 360 Times in 315 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 85
Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor
Quote: Originally Posted by Rozman View Post
And the Libs solution for everything is spend....SPEND....SPEND....
Bozman, you are a poor ignorant con. Lets look:
You see, Bozman, most people may actually know that Reagan tried the republican plan, which was the same then as now. And it drove the unemployment rate up to 10.8%. Worst all time except for the great depression. Then, Reagan raised taxes 11 times, borrowed enough to triple the national debt, and used stimulus spending. And it worked.

And then, of course, we had W. He cut taxes heavily, and created fewer jobs than any president since the great depression started. And brought us the Great Republican Recession of 2008.

So, yeah, that tax cutting really works.

So, this pres has a jobs bill. And most people remember the Clinton admin, who used similar techniques to lower unemployment, create more jobs than any president ever, have a booming economy, and end up with a DEFICIT.

Here is what people think of the jobs bill:
Quote:
But when the legislation's details are included in a follow-up question -- that it would cut payroll taxes, fund new road construction, extend unemployment benefits, and that it would be paid for by increasing taxes on the wealthy -- 63 percent say they favor the bill and 32 percent oppose it.
What's more, 64 percent of respondents agree with the statement that it is a "good idea" to raise taxes on the wealthy and corporations, because they should pay their fair share and can afford to pay more to help fund programs and government operations.
NBC/WSJ poll: Despite defeat, Obama's jobs bill is popular - First Read
So, the public by every poll, likes the Jobs Bill. But repubs have defeated it, and pieces of it, every time it has come up for a vote in Congress. Because, of course, that is what the minority leader in the senate said he would do.

Last edited by Rshermr; 01-08-2013 at 07:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2013, 02:10 PM
Registered User
Member #34008
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,600
Thanks: 1
Thanked 938 Times in 789 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 379
EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness EdwardBaiamonte may be on a path to greatness
Quote: Originally Posted by Rshermr View Post
You see, Bozman, most people may actually know that Reagan tried the republican plan, which was the same then as now.
too stupid as usual! Federal Reserve policy drove interest rates to 20%. What happened then had nothing to do with Reagan. Only a total liar would pretend otherwise.

For the longest time you thought you were being so profound about Reagan only to learn that you were tricking yourself out of desperation to finally win just only argument.

Are you ashamed of yourself. Would your mother be ashamed of your Nazi-like ego mania?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2013, 04:41 AM
Registered User
Member #37424
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: LaConner, WA
Posts: 3,665
Thanks: 204
Thanked 360 Times in 315 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 85
Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor Rshermr could be City Mayor
now, being mentally ill, ed is ok with himself. Being that ignorant would make a sane person kill himself. But ed is not sane. So he just keeps on. And it is not his fault. Just plain bad luck.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Economy
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.