US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Minimum wage

This is a discussion on Minimum wage within the Economy forums, part of the US Discussion category; Decreasing or eliminating the federal minimum wage will generally decrease ALL labor compensations’ purchasing powers more than otherwise. The proportional extent of minimum rate’s affect ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Economy

Economy Discuss economic policy and wallstreet

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:35 PM
Registered User
Member #20145
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 775
Thanks: 10
Thanked 54 Times in 53 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 21
Supposn has disabled reputation
Minimum wage

Decreasing or eliminating the federal minimum wage will generally decrease ALL labor compensations’ purchasing powers more than otherwise.

The proportional extent of minimum rate’s affect is inversely related to the wages’ amounts thus the lowest earners will be the most severely affected.

The additional jobs induced by eliminating the minimum wage do not now exist because those tasks are not now worthy of the minimum wage’s purchasing power.


The numbers of qualified employed and unemployed potential employees, (i.e. the labor pool) now exceeds the number of filled and unfilled jobs. Because there’s a minimum wage, employers refrain from filling such lower paying jobs with lesser qualified people (unless filling the position becomes necessary). Hiring less qualified or motivated workers, (ever at lesser pay rates) is usually a very expensive mistake.


Because there’s a minimum wage, people refrain as best they can from accepting lower wage employment. That’s why so few jobs are actually now offered at the absolute legal minimum rate. There are some real expenses and penalties attached to any job. The commuting costs of an individual and many other expenses will remain similar regardless of that employee’s pay scale.


It’s generally agreed that the elimination of the minimum wage will increase the number of lowest wage jobs that are worthy of the labor market’s pay scales, (which will then become severely reduced). The elimination of the minimum wage does create a larger pool of employable labor due to the decreased purchasing power of the lowest wage jobs. With no minimum child labor is financially justified.


The “ripple effect” due to decreasing or eliminating the minimum rate is decreasing ALL labor compensations’ but particularly lower wage earners’ purchasing powers, inducing greater school drop-outs, and increasing those needing public assistance.


I’m a proponent of increasing the federal minimum rate and there after annually cost of living adjusting that rate.


Respectfully, Supposn
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:39 PM
Two Thumbs's Avatar
Registered User
Member #25186
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.
Posts: 23,610
Thanks: 27,916
Thanked 8,627 Times in 5,873 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 8185
Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow
Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow Two Thumbs is cooler than the underside of a pillow
Forced minimum is nothing short of tyranny.

And it's a failed idea.

It was meant to allow people to afford a ****ty car and place to live. With each increase the cost of a ****ty car and place to live went up in cost.

It's gotten to the point we are no longer competative on an international scale.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Two Thumbs For This Useful Post:
AquaAthena (07-21-2011)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:44 PM
rightwinger's Avatar
Paid Messageboard Poster
Member #20321
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 70,325
Thanks: 26,033
Thanked 25,121 Times in 16,236 Posts
Mentioned: 134 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 15226
rightwinger has disabled reputation
Minimum wage doesn't buy **** now

Back in the early 70s I worked minimum wage at $2.10 an hour

I could afford to pay for college, buy a car and get myself started in life. You can't do **** on min wage now
__________________
.

If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rightwinger For This Useful Post:
auditor0007 (08-04-2011), editec (07-22-2011), Old Rocks (08-05-2011)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:46 PM
Mr Clean's Avatar
Registered User
Member #20594
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,942
Thanks: 2,871
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,300 Posts
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 2048
Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute
Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute Mr Clean has a reputation beyond repute
Yes, by all means what America needs now is even cheaper labor to compete with the Chinese.

"Prosperity Through lower Wages!"
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mr Clean For This Useful Post:
auditor0007 (08-04-2011), uscitizen (07-21-2011)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:50 PM
imbalance's Avatar
Registered User
Member #30879
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,202
Thanks: 268
Thanked 370 Times in 241 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 92
imbalance could be City Mayor imbalance could be City Mayor imbalance could be City Mayor imbalance could be City Mayor imbalance could be City Mayor imbalance could be City Mayor imbalance could be City Mayor imbalance could be City Mayor
Minimum wage can serve its intended purpose only in a closed protectionist economy.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to imbalance For This Useful Post:
editec (07-22-2011), Two Thumbs (07-22-2011)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:56 PM
Registered User
Member #31023
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Philadelphia PA
Posts: 6
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
Itsthejobsstupi is an unknown quantity at this point
Here's a fact for your useless information file: Ronald Reagan is the only US president in modern times not to have raised the minimum wage. It stayed at $3.35 throughout his eight year presidency. He did however manage to decrease the top marginal tax rate to 28%. We've been paying for it ever since.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Itsthejobsstupi For This Useful Post:
editec (07-22-2011), Old Rocks (08-05-2011)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 06:48 PM
expat_panama's Avatar
Registered User
Member #29282
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,461
Thanks: 102
Thanked 454 Times in 349 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 417
expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness expat_panama may be on a path to greatness
...decreasing or eliminating the minimum rate is decreasing ALL labor compensations’...
Many people believe that because it's reasonable, and these same poeple don't bother to actually look to see if it happens in real life. The conflict between conventional wisdom and observable fact brings to mind ancient Greece where scientific observation was ridiculed and replaced with official logic structures.

If anyone here's interested we could go and take a look at the actual records available for historical minimum wages and compare them to labor compensation. The thing is that blanket statements about economics tend to go over better when they agree with fact.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to expat_panama For This Useful Post:
Two Thumbs (07-22-2011)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 07:36 PM
Registered User
Member #20145
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 775
Thanks: 10
Thanked 54 Times in 53 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 21
Supposn has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by expat_panama Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
...decreasing or eliminating the minimum rate is decreasing ALL labor compensations’...
Many people believe that because it's reasonable, and these same poeple don't bother to actually look to see if it happens in real life. The conflict between conventional wisdom and observable fact brings to mind ancient Greece where scientific observation was ridiculed and replaced with official logic structures.

If anyone here's interested we could go and take a look at the actual records available for historical minimum wages and compare them to labor compensation. The thing is that blanket statements about economics tend to go over better when they agree with fact.
Expat Panama, by truncating my sentence you changed the sentences meaning. Similar to quoting out of context, you have misquoted me.
The sentence as posted was “Decreasing or eliminating the federal minimum wage will generally decrease ALL labor compensations’ purchasing powers more than otherwise”.

It is a valid statement. I’m sure you can find others who disagree. Despite our space program you can find others who believe the earth is flat.

I can’t conceive how you can prove or disprove my statement since it is very much dependent upon interpretation.
An economy is similar to a complex environment of many different living creatures. Causes and effects are not always empirical determinations. If you want to try, knock yourself out.

Respectfully, Supposn
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 07:45 PM
Rozman's Avatar
Supporting Member
Member #20981
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brooklyn,NY
Posts: 11,034
Thanks: 1,387
Thanked 4,566 Times in 2,929 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 4158
Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute
Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute Rozman has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Itsthejobsstupi Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Here's a fact for your useless information file: Ronald Reagan is the only US president in modern times not to have raised the minimum wage. It stayed at $3.35 throughout his eight year presidency. He did however manage to decrease the top marginal tax rate to 28%. We've been paying for it ever since.
Quote:
He did however manage to decrease the top marginal tax rate to 28%. We've been paying for it ever since

Yeh,why in the world would we want to have been allowed to keep more of the money we earned?

Last edited by Rozman; 07-21-2011 at 07:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rozman For This Useful Post:
Two Thumbs (07-22-2011)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 07:49 PM
uscitizen's Avatar
unregistered user
Member #5174
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: My Shack
Posts: 45,943
Thanks: 7,022
Thanked 9,097 Times in 6,633 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 2671
uscitizen has disabled reputation
Yes, by all means what America needs now is even cheaper labor to compete with the Chinese.

"Prosperity Through lower Wages!"
Yepper lower wages will make people buy more and will jump start our consumer spending driven economy.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to uscitizen For This Useful Post:
editec (07-22-2011), kiwiman127 (08-06-2011)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 07:53 PM
ShackledNation's Avatar
Libertarian
Member #30607
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: California
Posts: 1,207
Thanks: 265
Thanked 293 Times in 222 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 50
ShackledNation kicks locomotives off the tracks ShackledNation kicks locomotives off the tracks ShackledNation kicks locomotives off the tracks ShackledNation kicks locomotives off the tracks ShackledNation kicks locomotives off the tracks ShackledNation kicks locomotives off the tracks ShackledNation kicks locomotives off the tracks
Decreasing or eliminating the federal minimum wage will generally decrease ALL labor compensations’ purchasing powers more than otherwise.
Completely false. You are wrongly assuming that if minimum wage is abolished everyone will be paid less. This is clearly not the case, for people are paid more than minimum wage already. Purchasing power has to do with the value of the dollar. Because minimum wage results in unemployment, more people are on welfare, and welfare is often funded by money creation. This devalues the dollar and the purchasing power of the dollar.

Quote:
The proportional extent of minimum rate’s affect is inversely related to the wages’ amounts thus the lowest earners will be the most severely affected.
To be honest that sentence makes little sense. The proportional extent of minimum rate's affect is very unclear, and the effect of "minimum rate" is not stated. Please rephrase that argument because I literally cannot comprehend it in its current state, no offense intended.

Quote:
The additional jobs induced by eliminating the minimum wage do not now exist because those tasks are not now worthy of the minimum wage’s purchasing power.
Basically you seem to be saying that without minimum wage, people will be making less money and thus will be able to buy less. This may be true of some people, but those unemployed because of minimum wage will get those lower paying jobs. Those jobs do not exist because minimum wage does. To say they do not exist because nobody would take them is completely false. Many immigrants from Mexico are taking these jobs willingly because Americans cannot. Also, if nobody will take a lower paying job, which is incredibly unlikely, if the company wants workers it will have to raise wages.

Quote:
The numbers of qualified employed and unemployed potential employees, (i.e. the labor pool) now exceeds the number of filled and unfilled jobs. Because there’s a minimum wage, employers refrain from filling such lower paying jobs with lesser qualified people (unless filling the position becomes necessary). Hiring less qualified or motivated workers, (ever at lesser pay rates) is usually a very expensive mistake.
Exactly. And if there was no minimum wage, such lower paying jobs would be more likely to come into existence because they would not be prohibited. Keep in mind these lower paid workers would be performing tasks they could perform well. Hiring idiots is possible with or without minimum wage. Workers paid less would be doing simpler tasks worth the value of their labor.

Quote:
Because there’s a minimum wage, people refrain as best they can from accepting lower wage employment.
No ****, its illegal.

Quote:
That’s why so few jobs are actually now offered at the absolute legal minimum rate. There are some real expenses and penalties attached to any job. The commuting costs of an individual and many other expenses will remain similar regardless of that employee’s pay scale.
Correct, and if such costs are so high that they outweigh the benefits of getting a lower paying job, people will demand higher wages or seek employment somewhere else. Nobody would ever take a job in which the wage is lower than the cost of driving to work. That is insane.

Quote:
It’s generally agreed that the elimination of the minimum wage will increase the number of lowest wage jobs that are worthy of the labor market’s pay scales, (which will then become severely reduced). The elimination of the minimum wage does create a larger pool of employable labor due to the decreased purchasing power of the lowest wage jobs.
So you would rather have a smaller pool of employable labor with people making nothing and having no job than a larger pool of employable labor with people who once made nothing now making something? You are assuming that current low paying jobs will be replaced by even lower paying jobs. That is not how it works at all.

Quote:
With no minimum child labor is financially justified.
Yes, repeal minimum wage and our children will work in sweatshops. That is absurd. You are completel forgetting that people getting these lower paying jobs were unemployed before. Earning a little money and having a job does not encourage child labor when the alternative is having no job and making no money.

Quote:
The “ripple effect” due to decreasing or eliminating the minimum rate is decreasing ALL labor compensations’ but particularly lower wage earners’ purchasing powers, inducing greater school drop-outs, and increasing those needing public assistance.
That is not true at all, and you have nothing to back up those claims. Ending minimum wage results in greater school drop outs? It increases those needing public assistance? That is simply not true. Because of minimum wage you have people who are unemployable, thus they are trapped on public assistance. Without minimum wage, they would actually make money. The notion that minimum wage decreases public assistance is contrary to reality.

Demand for labor is downward sloping. The supply of labor is upward sloping. This establishes an equilibrium wage where the quantity demanded and supplied are equal. A minimum wage, if it does anything at all, pushes the wage above this level, so that there is a greater quantity supplied than demanded. We call this surplus supply “unemployment”.


Quote:
I’m a proponent of increasing the federal minimum rate and there after annually cost of living adjusting that rate.
Why not increase minimum wage to $30 an hour?

The Keynesian framework that supports minimum wage is dead wrong. The argument against minimum wage amounts to this: The problem is that the marginal revenue product of labor depends on demand for the product – but that demand depends on income, and income depends on wages. So, if wages fall, then incomes fall, which drives down the demand for the product – which, in turn, drives down the demand for labor – in the same proportion that wages fell. So, in the end, there’s no impact on employment. The decrease in wages caused a corresponding decrease in employment.

Keynes was critically wrong, and misunderstood how wages work.
1. The demand for labor depends on the expected discounted marginal revenue product. So, what matters is not the present demand for the product, but the expected future demand. For Keynes’s original argument to work, we need a feedback from present prices to expected future prices, so that as one falls the other does so – and does so proportionally. This is not necessarily true – in fact, it’s probably not true.

Suppose that right now the price of oil is $50 a barrel, and I expect it to go up to $100 a barrel next year. Then, tomorrow, the price of oil shoots up to $75 a barrel. Do I revise my expected future price up to $150, to keep the proportions the same? Maybe, maybe not. But, I will say that “not” certainly feels more likely.

So, what happens if demand doesn’t fall in proportion with the current price of the product? Employment increases as wages fall. Even if a decreased current price arising from the fall in income does decrease the expected price to some degree, as long as it is less than the fall in present wages, the level of employment will increase.

2. The entire apparatus fails to realize that there is significant variation in wages across workers – even within the same industry or even the same firm.

Why does this matter? Because it breaks the argument down entirely. For example, suppose that workers are divided into groups based on seniority. In that case, the fact that new workers are hired at lower wages than before doesn’t mean that ALL workers are paid lower wages. So, wages don’t fall in proportion with the minimum wage – which means that incomes don’t fall by that proportion, so demand for the product doesn’t fall in proportion, so product prices don’t fall in proportion, so demand for labor doesn’t fall in proportion. In the end, what does this mean? In short, that the Principles of Microeconomics story is basically right. When marginal wages fall, employment goes up – and the fact that not all wages move together prevents the Keynesian feedback.

If you rely on Keynesian economics, you will almost always come to the wrong conclusions. Keynes was wrong.
__________________
"We shall not grow wiser before we learn that much that we have done was very foolish."
Friedrich August von Hayek

"Every bad idea in the history of the universe seemed like a good idea at some point in time."
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 07:55 PM
uscitizen's Avatar
unregistered user
Member #5174
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: My Shack
Posts: 45,943
Thanks: 7,022
Thanked 9,097 Times in 6,633 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 2671
uscitizen has disabled reputation
So now we have people telling us how great is it to learn to live with less?

Amazing fraggling amazing.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to uscitizen For This Useful Post:
editec (07-22-2011)
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 07:57 PM
uscitizen's Avatar
unregistered user
Member #5174
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: My Shack
Posts: 45,943
Thanks: 7,022
Thanked 9,097 Times in 6,633 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 2671
uscitizen has disabled reputation
Ok the minimum wage does not apply to all workers, tell us how much better those classes of workers are doing because of that exception.

waitresses and farm workers are getting rich?

Last edited by uscitizen; 07-21-2011 at 07:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 08:00 PM
rightwinger's Avatar
Paid Messageboard Poster
Member #20321
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 70,325
Thanks: 26,033
Thanked 25,121 Times in 16,236 Posts
Mentioned: 134 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 15226
rightwinger has disabled reputation
Republicans blocked minimum wage enhancements for 15 years. Now instead of a wage you can start out at, it doesn't even pay the rent
__________________
.

If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 08:00 PM
shintao's Avatar
Take Down ~ Tap Out
Member #24733
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,150
Thanks: 95
Thanked 649 Times in 563 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 62
shintao could be the Buddha shintao could be the Buddha shintao could be the Buddha shintao could be the Buddha shintao could be the Buddha shintao could be the Buddha shintao could be the Buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Two Thumbs Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Forced minimum is nothing short of tyranny.

And it's a failed idea.

It was meant to allow people to afford a ****ty car and place to live. With each increase the cost of a ****ty car and place to live went up in cost.

It's gotten to the point we are no longer competative on an international scale.
Minimum wage was never meant to buy a car or place to live. You are thinking of living wage.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shintao For This Useful Post:
Iridescence (07-23-2011)
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Economy
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.