Quote: Originally Posted by NObama  Rather you defend a company which employs a payroll methodology that by design, has no checks and balances which inherently invites fraud by their employees.
Are you aware that Acorn has been known to use ex-convicts as ‘temporary’ employees?
As to your assertion that Acorn has no culpability for fraud committed by employees there may be exceptions such as; prior knowledge that same or similar crimes have been perpetrated by previous employees under identical circumstances.
Its not a company its a non profit and there is no law against giving a con a temp job.
Do you suggest no one with a record should be allowed to work anywhere?
WHY DO YOU REFUSE TO SEE THAT THE VICTIM IN THIS CASE IS ACORN.
who lost the money in these cases?
__________________
"The essence of the Liberal outlook lies not in what opinions are held, but in how they are held: instead of being held dogmatically, they are held tentatively, and with a consciousness that new evidence may at any moment lead to their abandonment." -Bertrand Russell | 
A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. 
Linear Mode
