US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Terrorist Aquited on over 200 counts.

This is a discussion on Terrorist Aquited on over 200 counts. within the Current Events forums, part of the US Discussion category; I've had to have said this at least 100 times. The world changed on 9-11-01 and if we don't accept that as fact and do ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Current Events

Current Events Current News and Events

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #136 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 08:12 AM
SFC Ollie's Avatar
Still Marching
Member #21357
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: If I stand on my porch facing East I can Hit PA with a rock
Posts: 28,563
Thanks: 6,402
Thanked 13,658 Times in 7,748 Posts
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 16550
SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati
SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati SFC Ollie gives orders to the Illuminati
I've had to have said this at least 100 times. The world changed on 9-11-01 and if we don't accept that as fact and do a little changing with it then this great experiment called the USA will fail.

For decades we treated terrorists as criminals, we said it was a police problem. President Bush, if nothing else, will be remembered as the President who made terrorism a Military problem, and declared the terrorist not criminals but the enemy. We need to remember that they want us dead, not just you and I, but our friends and families as well.

They are in deed and in fact our enemy.
__________________
Don't worry about what other people think, Most of them don't use their brains much anyway.!

22 / 4.27
MMMPBB
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SFC Ollie For This Useful Post:
Meister (11-19-2010), Trajan (11-19-2010)
  #137 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 10:01 AM
Immanuel's Avatar
Registered User
Member #5262
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 16,787
Thanks: 4,530
Thanked 3,760 Times in 2,725 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1660
Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute
Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute Immanuel has a reputation beyond repute
So let me get this straight, according to you leftists:

1) Soldiers in the field of battle now have to also become witnesses to later testify in court as well as detectives to collect evidence to be used in courts.

2) Every captured terrorist must now be shipped all the way back to the US, and given show trails. ALL of them. Costing taxpayers millions, if not billions in the long run.

3) Soldiers who captured these terrorists red-handed and are busy fighting a war must now also be rotated back to the states to testify as witnesses in court.

4) Since these terrorists are just like any other criminal, we should allow them to be able to post bail so they can freely walk the streets until they are found guilty.

You see the slipperly slope we're going down?
I hate to say it that is better than the policy of "just shoot everyone you come in contact because they might be terrorists".

My apologies, but I have a frigging problem with treating every human being in the middle east as something to be squashed under our feet. If that is your intention then you guys may as well just send a frigging atomic bomb over there and get this thing over with.

Immie
__________________
"To confess you were wrong yesterday, is only to acknowledge that you are a little wiser today; and instead of being a reflection on yourself, it is an honor to your judgment, and shows that you are improving in the knowledge of the truth." Charles H. Spurgeon in his sermon on Election.
Reply With Quote
  #138 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 12:34 PM
Registered User
Member #20285
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 44,915
Thanks: 4,981
Thanked 13,390 Times in 9,730 Posts
Mentioned: 259 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 10753
Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati
Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati
I've had to have said this at least 100 times. The world changed on 9-11-01 and if we don't accept that as fact and do a little changing with it then this great experiment called the USA will fail.

For decades we treated terrorists as criminals, we said it was a police problem. President Bush, if nothing else, will be remembered as the President who made terrorism a Military problem, and declared the terrorist not criminals but the enemy. We need to remember that they want us dead, not just you and I, but our friends and families as well.

They are in deed and in fact our enemy.
Agreed. We need to distinguish between Act's of War, Illegal Act's of War, And Civil Crime.
Reply With Quote
  #139 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 12:42 PM
Urbanguerrilla's Avatar
Registered User
Member #24727
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 827
Thanks: 234
Thanked 101 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
Urbanguerrilla is off the scale Urbanguerrilla is off the scale Urbanguerrilla is off the scale Urbanguerrilla is off the scale Urbanguerrilla is off the scale Urbanguerrilla is off the scale Urbanguerrilla is off the scale
You're not "innocent" if you are fingered by other terrorists under interrogation techniques someone doesn't like.

Torture doesn't work, when you're tortured you'd sell your granny to save yourself Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Reply With Quote
  #140 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 12:46 PM
Registered User
Member #20285
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 44,915
Thanks: 4,981
Thanked 13,390 Times in 9,730 Posts
Mentioned: 259 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 10753
Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati
Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati Intense gives orders to the Illuminati
Quote: Originally Posted by Urbanguerrilla Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
You're not "innocent" if you are fingered by other terrorists under interrogation techniques someone doesn't like.

Torture doesn't work, when you're tortured you'd sell your granny to save yourself Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Didn't Obama even do that before being Tortured. Tortured by having to answer a direct question. Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images. Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Reply With Quote
  #141 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 01:40 PM
Banned
Member #19207
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: everywhere and nowhere
Posts: 25,613
Thanks: 2,141
Thanked 2,380 Times in 1,876 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness
278 counts dropped 1 count stuck...yeah, civilian courts are a real *****.
The fact that only one count stuck, tells you a lot...

About the failure of the American intelligence community to gather any reliable evidence through any means they're willing to have brought out into the light?
Reply With Quote
  #142 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 01:43 PM
Banned
Member #19207
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: everywhere and nowhere
Posts: 25,613
Thanks: 2,141
Thanked 2,380 Times in 1,876 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness
So let me get this straight, according to you leftists:

1) Soldiers in the field of battle now have to also become witnesses to later testify in court as well as detectives to collect evidence to be used in courts.

2) Every captured terrorist must now be shipped all the way back to the US, and given show trails. ALL of them. Costing taxpayers millions, if not billions in the long run.

3) Soldiers who captured these terrorists red-handed and are busy fighting a war must now also be rotated back to the states to testify as witnesses in court.

4) Since these terrorists are just like any other criminal, we should allow them to be able to post bail so they can freely walk the streets until they are found guilty.

You see the slipperly slope we're going down?
1) Yes
Surely you see the problem with this? Why not simply allow their reports to be entered into evidence?


Quote:
2) Yes

Surely you see the feasibility concerns when it comes to this? This is where there is a case for tribunals- they can be held anywhere our military is present, from what I understand.
Reply With Quote
  #143 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 01:44 PM
Banned
Member #19207
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: everywhere and nowhere
Posts: 25,613
Thanks: 2,141
Thanked 2,380 Times in 1,876 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness
* * * *
The criminal gang that attacked the US at its embassies and here on 9/11 are not "enemies", they are "criminals" * * * *
I snipped the rest of your post, Maddy, because that one sentence jumped off the page when I skimmed your post.

You are absolutely, totally, 100% wrong.

They are NOT mere criminals. They attacked an embassy. They did so AS terrorists to affect the actions and determinations of a government.

They are THE enemy.

It astounds me that you have it so completely backwards.

You seriously could not be more wrong if your goal was to be wrong.
so Mcveigh's not a criminal?
Reply With Quote
  #144 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 01:52 PM
Banned
Member #19207
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: everywhere and nowhere
Posts: 25,613
Thanks: 2,141
Thanked 2,380 Times in 1,876 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness
you make it a fact that there is no difference ( see above) between a solider and a saboteur, terrorist etc. ....
Was the continental army an army? Were they soldiers? Or were they criminals, saboteurs, and terrorists? Depends what side you were on. Just like Bush's 'enemy combatants', they're just labels applied to serve one's own purposes.
Quote:

and collateral damage tragic as it is or victims of a larger war, bombing victims from berlin to Afghanistan etc,
A stray bomb or bullet is 'collateral damage'. WTC or Dresden is targeting civilians. There is difference.
Quote:

your strong emotional identification with and statements along these lines has no place in the argument unless you just want declare straight up that you see no difference, none zip zero between say; Zarqawai and private snuffy smith US Amy infantryman with a rifle...then we can just call it a day.
Depends on what they do. If Private Smith razes a Vietnamese village and kills the women and children, it's a different matter than if he only fires on armed persons present a clear and present danger.
Quote:

and this-
Quote:
Same excuses and justifications for carrying out fundamentally the same actions. The only difference is where you happen to be born and who you were taught the good and the bad guys are.
Moral relativism in a nutshell.
Fail. It's applying one standard equally. You're the one applying moral relativism by claiming that when they do it, it;'s bas but when we do it, that's somehow 'different'. Is OBL and his ilk are successful in creating a world caliphate, someone exactly like you will say the exact same thing you did- but they'll be throwing a fit about comparing an honourable Jihadi fighting the infidels to an evil Westerner terrorist and neocolonialist.


Quote:
exit question- do you object to the Nuremberg Tribunal?
Ideally, I would have seen a German court convict Hitler and his ilk for their crimes. Just as I would see, ideally, a court in a muslim country convict OBl and his ilk. For a number of legal, ethical, and sociological reasons.

Last edited by JBeukema; 11-19-2010 at 01:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #145 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 01:53 PM
Banned
Member #19207
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: everywhere and nowhere
Posts: 25,613
Thanks: 2,141
Thanked 2,380 Times in 1,876 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness
I've had to have said this at least 100 times. The world changed on 9-11-01
Nothing changed on 9-11.

We’ve been told that 9/11 changed everything.
Is it true?
Let’s look:
  • The Afghanistan war was planned before 9/11 (see this and this)
  • Cheney apparently even made Iraqi’s oil fields a national security priority before 9/11
  • Cheney dreamed of giving the White House the powers of a monarch long before 9/11
  • Cheney and Rumsfeld actively generated fake intelligence which exaggerated the threat from an enemy in order to justify huge amounts of military spending long before 9/11. And see this
  • Cheney and the rest of the neocons lamented – before 9/11 – that America could not truly project its power globally without the justification of a “new Pearl Harbor”
  • The decision to threaten to bomb Iran was made before 9/11
  • The government knew that terrorists could use planes as weapons — and had even run its own drills of planes being used as weapons against the World Trade Center and other U.S. high-profile buildings, using REAL airplanes — all before 9/11
  • The government heard the 9/11 plans from the hijackers’ own mouths before 9/11
  • It was known long before 9/11 that torture doesn’t work to produce accurate intelligence, but is an effective way to terrorize people
So did 9/11 really “change everything”? Or was it simply an excuse to implement existing plans?


source

Reply With Quote
  #146 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 02:13 PM
Locked Account.
Member #19862
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mansion in Ravi's Head
Posts: 35,453
Thanks: 3,671
Thanked 10,659 Times in 7,522 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3562
Liability has disabled reputation
I've had to have said this at least 100 times. The world changed on 9-11-01
Nothing changed on 9-11.

We’ve been told that 9/11 changed everything.
Is it true?
Let’s look:
  • The Afghanistan war was planned before 9/11 (see this and this)
  • Cheney apparently even made Iraqi’s oil fields a national security priority before 9/11
  • Cheney dreamed of giving the White House the powers of a monarch long before 9/11
  • Cheney and Rumsfeld actively generated fake intelligence which exaggerated the threat from an enemy in order to justify huge amounts of military spending long before 9/11. And see this
  • Cheney and the rest of the neocons lamented – before 9/11 – that America could not truly project its power globally without the justification of a “new Pearl Harbor”
  • The decision to threaten to bomb Iran was made before 9/11
  • The government knew that terrorists could use planes as weapons — and had even run its own drills of planes being used as weapons against the World Trade Center and other U.S. high-profile buildings, using REAL airplanes — all before 9/11
  • The government heard the 9/11 plans from the hijackers’ own mouths before 9/11
  • It was known long before 9/11 that torture doesn’t work to produce accurate intelligence, but is an effective way to terrorize people
So did 9/11 really “change everything”? Or was it simply an excuse to implement existing plans?


source


THIS: http://web.archive.org/web/200304230...sapa.911.p.htm

in NO WAY establishes this: "The Patriot Act was planned."

So, it would appear that your entire post is unworthy of being taken very seriously.
__________________
The very existence of Ravi is an argument in favor of burkas. Oh, and Zona is a liar. What a shock.
Reply With Quote
  #147 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2010, 02:14 PM
Locked Account.
Member #19862
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mansion in Ravi's Head
Posts: 35,453
Thanks: 3,671
Thanked 10,659 Times in 7,522 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3562
Liability has disabled reputation
* * * *
The criminal gang that attacked the US at its embassies and here on 9/11 are not "enemies", they are "criminals" * * * *
I snipped the rest of your post, Maddy, because that one sentence jumped off the page when I skimmed your post.

You are absolutely, totally, 100% wrong.

They are NOT mere criminals. They attacked an embassy. They did so AS terrorists to affect the actions and determinations of a government.

They are THE enemy.

It astounds me that you have it so completely backwards.

You seriously could not be more wrong if your goal was to be wrong.
so Mcveigh's not a criminal?
No. He's not. He's nothing. He's dead.

He WAS a criminal, however.
__________________
The very existence of Ravi is an argument in favor of burkas. Oh, and Zona is a liar. What a shock.
Reply With Quote
  #148 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2010, 02:11 PM
Banned
Member #19207
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: everywhere and nowhere
Posts: 25,613
Thanks: 2,141
Thanked 2,380 Times in 1,876 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 0
JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness JBeukema may be on a path to greatness
http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/11/19/...th-the-courts/
Reply With Quote
  #149 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2010, 11:31 PM
theHawk's Avatar
Registered Conservative
Member #2921
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 6,797
Thanks: 991
Thanked 1,981 Times in 1,270 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1125
theHawk could be on the Supreme Court
theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court
So let me get this straight, according to you leftists:

1) Soldiers in the field of battle now have to also become witnesses to later testify in court as well as detectives to collect evidence to be used in courts.
1)Nobody said that
2)their reports can be entered into evidence
3)isn't the whole point of the intelligence community to gather evidence in order to determine who's involved in plots/attacks against the nation? Where's all the evidence they supposedly had of this guy's involvement?
Quote:
2) Every captured terrorist must now be shipped all the way back to the US, and given show trails. ALL of them. Costing taxpayers millions, if not billions in the long run.
The only ones interested in show trials are those on the Right who want a quick 'Welcome. Guilty. Hang him' tribunals.

Of course, it never occurs to people that our foreign policy is a huge part of why we have this problem in the first place. When the British sent troops in response to the FF's complaints, did that not simply strengthen their resolve to fight?
Quote:

3) Soldiers who captured these terrorists red-handed and are busy fighting a war must now also be rotated back to the states to testify as witnesses in court.
Again, their reports can be entered.

There is a case to be made for tribunals for many of those captured. You touched on it. Yet that case isn't being made by the right, which reveals their true concerns.
Quote:
4) Since these terrorists are just like any other criminal, we should allow them to be able to post bail so they can freely walk the streets until they are found guilty.
Lots of people are denied bail. See, for instance 'flight risk'
1)Soldiers in the field of battle does not equate to "the intelligence community".

2)Since when have military tribunals ever been "show trials" put on by the right? Nice strawman.

3) Their "reports" can be entered into court, but will be shredded by any lawyer when the witness is not there to cross examine.

4) I know "lots of people are denied bail", but since we're now treating terrorists as regular criminals with constitutional rights, who is to say they will never be given bail?
__________________
The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism. - Karl Marx
Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. --John Adams
You can't spell LIBERALS without LIES !
Reply With Quote
  #150 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2010, 11:36 PM
theHawk's Avatar
Registered Conservative
Member #2921
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 6,797
Thanks: 991
Thanked 1,981 Times in 1,270 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1125
theHawk could be on the Supreme Court
theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court theHawk could be on the Supreme Court
4) A serial killer or murderer is hardly ever allowed bail.
Gee, thats reassuring. Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.

5) What slippery slope? Treating a person innocent until proven guilty? That slippery slope? Gee, how un-American of them...Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
Yea, treating foreign terrorists like the war criminals they are is "un-American". Guests cannot see images in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see images.
__________________
The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism. - Karl Marx
Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. --John Adams
You can't spell LIBERALS without LIES !
Reply With Quote
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Current Events
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.