obama birth certificate issue may not be dead...

Zoom-boing · #31 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 11:22 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by Zoom-boing

I watched the video in the OP.

Can someone explain to me how a document that has been scanned into a computer would come up as layers upon layers rather than just the single image that was scanned?

My daughter scanned in a pic she drew and while she can brighten it or color it or resize it, etc., it's just one image, there aren't any 'layers' to it.

The investigator is saying that Obama's BC is in 8 or 9 links and layers and that each layer can be taken apart on the computer . . that the entire document was built and exists in cyberspace, never a 'real' document was scanned in.

They compared it to a controlled document that was scanned in and the two are not the same.

How can that be?

Didn't Trump's wailing about this have Obama reveal this BC just before . . like a day or two before . . OBL was killed? I remember the BC was a big deal then bang, OBL was dead and no more BC talk. It all just seemed to disappear.

Now this?

So can anyone answer my question? How does a document that has been scanned into a computer come up as layers upon layers rather than just the single image that was scanned?

**rightwinger** · #32 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 11:37 AM

I really feel sorry for the sane citizens of Arizona. With a whacky governor, Crazy Sheriff Joe and now ground zero at birther central

**rightwinger** · #33 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 11:39 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by Zoom-boing

I watched the video in the OP.

Can someone explain to me how a document that has been scanned into a computer would come up as layers upon layers rather than just the single image that was scanned?

My daughter scanned in a pic she drew and while she can brighten it or color it or resize it, etc., it's just one image, there aren't any 'layers' to it.

The investigator is saying that Obama's BC is in 8 or 9 links and layers and that each layer can be taken apart on the computer . . that the entire document was built and exists in cyberspace, never a 'real' document was scanned in.

They compared it to a controlled document that was scanned in and the two are not the same.

How can that be?

Didn't Trump's wailing about this have Obama reveal this BC just before . . like a day or two before . . OBL was killed? I remember the BC was a big deal then bang, OBL was dead and no more BC talk. It all just seemed to disappear.

Now this?

So can anyone answer my question? How does a document that has been scanned into a computer come up as layers upon layers rather than just the single image that was scanned?

Ohhh...ohh

Me? Me?....can I answer?

In terms of accepting the credibility of the President of the United States and the State of Hawaii vs the credibility of known birthers

I choose the President and Hawaii

candycorn · #34 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 12:09 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by washamericom

Quote: Originally Posted by candycorn

Quote: Originally Posted by washamericom

Confirmed: Obama's Birth Certificate Not Authentic 2012 - YouTube!

i know... but the evidence is mounting. the mainstream media is complicit and corrupt.

the obamas may be connected somehow to bill ayers, bernardine dhorn and the chicago way, and may not be as pure as the media has portrayed him to be.

see you in conspiracy theories because this will never be "current events" or politics or even recognised by obama moderated forums (not this one). google is burning up since last night. it will be interesting to see how the "trusted news agencies" find their way back.

my website WashingtonAmerica.Com

incidentally, now all you have to do is google the words "birth certificate" and use search tool "past week" or "two days" or "past 24 hours". and it's all about obama... the subject is being ingrained in our national history. there is no turning back. congress should investigate before the election... my guess is that "president" obama won't be on some ballots this fall.
watch the way google arranges the results sometimes to favor obama's making it a joke. this is no joke folks...

Nobody cares.
Racist scumbag.

you should care... anti american terrorist.

meh...fuck you.

washamericom · #35 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 12:49 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by candycorn

Quote: Originally Posted by washamericom

Quote: Originally Posted by candycorn

Nobody cares.
Racist scumbag.

you should care... anti american terrorist.

meh...fuck you.

jagoff... your messiah is a crook.

fuck you too gauxtee... chickenshit.

washamericom · #36 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 12:51 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger

I really feel sorry for the sane citizens of Arizona. With a whacky governor, Crazy Sheriff Joe and now ground zero at birther central

the whitehouse is ground central for birther scandal...

geauxtohell · #37 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 12:54 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by washamericom

Quote: Originally Posted by candycorn

Quote: Originally Posted by washamericom

you should care... anti american terrorist.

meh...fuck you.

jagoff... your messiah is a crook.

fuck you too gauxtee... chickenshit.

Answer my question, dipshit.

Did you get suckered by yet another Corsi money making scheme?

washamericom · #38 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 12:55 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by Zoom-boing

I watched the video in the OP.

Can someone explain to me how a document that has been scanned into a computer would come up as layers upon layers rather than just the single image that was scanned?

My daughter scanned in a pic she drew and while she can brighten it or color it or resize it, etc., it's just one image, there aren't any 'layers' to it.

The investigator is saying that Obama's BC is in 8 or 9 links and layers and that each layer can be taken apart on the computer . . that the entire document was built and exists in cyberspace, never a 'real' document was scanned in.

They compared it to a controlled document that was scanned in and the two are not the same.

How can that be?

Didn't Trump's wailing about this have Obama reveal this BC just before . . like a day or two before . . OBL was killed? I remember the BC was a big deal then bang, OBL was dead and no more BC talk. It all just seemed to disappear.

Now this?

So can anyone answer my question? How does a document that has been scanned into a computer come up as layers upon layers rather than just the single image that was scanned?

you won't get an answer in this cesspool, go to youtube and search obama birth certificate forgery... in fact, here's the link.. obama birth certificate forgery layers - YouTube

don't listen to the asshole obots here, they know it's all true. tails tucked...

Zoom-boing · #39 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 02:00 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger

Quote: Originally Posted by Zoom-boing

I watched the video in the OP.

Can someone explain to me how a document that has been scanned into a computer would come up as layers upon layers rather than just the single image that was scanned?

My daughter scanned in a pic she drew and while she can brighten it or color it or resize it, etc., it's just one image, there aren't any 'layers' to it.

The investigator is saying that Obama's BC is in 8 or 9 links and layers and that each layer can be taken apart on the computer . . that the entire document was built and exists in cyberspace, never a 'real' document was scanned in.

They compared it to a controlled document that was scanned in and the two are not the same.

How can that be?

Didn't Trump's wailing about this have Obama reveal this BC just before . . like a day or two before . . OBL was killed? I remember the BC was a big deal then bang, OBL was dead and no more BC talk. It all just seemed to disappear.

Now this?

So can anyone answer my question? How does a document that has been scanned into a computer come up as layers upon layers rather than just the single image that was scanned?

Ohhh...ohh

Me? Me?....can I answer?

In terms of accepting the credibility of the President of the United States and the State of Hawaii vs the credibility of known birthers

I choose the President and Hawaii

So you can't explain how a single document can be scanned into a computer and turned into a multi-layer document.

'K

Zoom-boing · #40 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 02:04 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by geauxtohell

Quote: Originally Posted by washamericom

Quote: Originally Posted by candycorn

meh...fuck you.

jagoff... your messiah is a crook.

fuck you too gauxtee... chickenshit.

Answer my question, dipshit.

Did you get suckered by yet another Corsi money making scheme?

And suppose that's all this is . . some money making scheme for this guy to sell books. So he's just making shit up? So no one will look into the 'proof' that he has? If it's all b.s. then the jig is up. If it isn't? Can you explain the multi-layering appearing from a single document scanned? How would that happen? He makes the claim that a single document is scanned into a computer and is now a multi-layer document . . . which, by logic, can't happen -- can it? (I'm asking)

geauxtohell · #41 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 02:11 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by Zoom-boing

Quote: Originally Posted by geauxtohell

Quote: Originally Posted by washamericom

jagoff... your messiah is a crook.

fuck you too gauxtee... chickenshit.

Answer my question, dipshit.

Did you get suckered by yet another Corsi money making scheme?

And suppose that's all this is . . some money making scheme for this guy to sell books. So he's just making shit up? So no one will look into the 'proof' that he has? If it's all b.s. then the jig is up. If it isn't? Can you explain the multi-layering appearing from a single document scanned? How would that happen? He makes the claim that a single document is scanned into a computer and is now a multi-layer document . . . which, by logic, can't happen -- can it? (I'm asking)

Yes. Because the investigation is irreparably biased. No conclusions from such an investigation can be legitimate. It's akin to a juror admitting after a trial that they had it out for the defendant the whole time.

Zoom-boing · #42 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 02:35 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by geauxtohell

Quote: Originally Posted by Zoom-boing

Quote: Originally Posted by geauxtohell

Answer my question, dipshit.

Did you get suckered by yet another Corsi money making scheme?

And suppose that's all this is . . some money making scheme for this guy to sell books. So he's just making shit up? So no one will look into the 'proof' that he has? If it's all b.s. then the jig is up. If it isn't? Can you explain the multi-layering appearing from a single document scanned? How would that happen? He makes the claim that a single document is scanned into a computer and is now a multi-layer document . . . which, by logic, can't happen -- can it? (I'm asking)

Yes. Because the investigation is irreparably biased. No conclusions from such an investigation can be legitimate. It's akin to a juror admitting after a trial that they had it out for the defendant the whole time.

He started out to prove that the BC was not a fake.

I still don't understand the 'multi-layers from a single document' part. Someone else in another thread is explaining it and put a link to the BC that's on the WH page . . but when I clicked on that link I got a 404 error, page cannot be found type thing. Hmm . . .

washamericom · #43 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 02:48 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by geauxtohell

Quote: Originally Posted by washamericom

Quote: Originally Posted by candycorn

meh...fuck you.

jagoff... your messiah is a crook.

fuck you too gauxtee... chickenshit.

Answer my question, dipshit.

Did you get suckered by yet another Corsi money making scheme?

the question is... did obama... ?? lol...
watch hannity's ratings go up this week...

Katzndogz · #44 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 03:19 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by Zoom-boing

I watched the video in the OP.

Can someone explain to me how a document that has been scanned into a computer would come up as layers upon layers rather than just the single image that was scanned?

My daughter scanned in a pic she drew and while she can brighten it or color it or resize it, etc., it's just one image, there aren't any 'layers' to it.

The investigator is saying that Obama's BC is in 8 or 9 links and layers and that each layer can be taken apart on the computer . . that the entire document was built and exists in cyberspace, never a 'real' document was scanned in.

They compared it to a controlled document that was scanned in and the two are not the same.

How can that be?

Didn't Trump's wailing about this have Obama reveal this BC just before . . like a day or two before . . OBL was killed? I remember the BC was a big deal then bang, OBL was dead and no more BC talk. It all just seemed to disappear.

Now this?

So can anyone answer my question? How does a document that has been scanned into a computer come up as layers upon layers rather than just the single image that was scanned?

I went to a art seminar a couple of weeks ago where a photoshop expert showed us how to build a photo by layering. I still don't know exactly how it works. Essentially you scan in the foundation of whatever you're trying to make then add elements that you want to include layer by layer. One of the issues in he BC case is that the green tinted background was the last layer added when if the whole document had been scanned, the background wouldn't be separable. It would have been scanned as one image.

Katzndogz · #45 (**permalink**) 03-05-2012, 03:21 PM

As long as the issue reignites it will have served its purpose.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

obama birth certificate issue may not be dead...

is the obama birth certificate issue now dead?

obama birth may 2013

birth certificate issue dead

The Following User Says Thank You to candycorn For This Useful Post:
geauxtohell (03-05-2012)

The Following User Says Thank You to Katzndogz For This Useful Post:
Zoom-boing (03-05-2012)