holy fuck you are an ignorant asshole!!!
you are telling me that we are not supposed to question the things you say? thats the most ridiculous fucking argument you have ever made!!

the fallacy of your statement is that the 100 ton jetliner isnt really a 100 ton jetliner. you arent even smart enough to know what you are looking at when you quote specs. 100 tons is the maximum take-off weight. it is NOT what the 757 actually weighs, you dumbfuck. yet you keep saying over and over and over again that its 100 tons actually only weighs 64 tons. YOU CANT EVEN GET YOUR MOST BASIC DETAILS RIGHT!!!!
Boeing 757-200 | Airliners.net

then you keep showing the outside of the building looking for the 757 when the plane crashed INTO the building. most of the debris is INSIDE, jackass.












and with your thousands and thousands of hours you claim that you spent i'm sure you were thorough enough to check on the windows, right? obviously not.
you do know that the windows were blast resistant and cost about $10,000 a piece, right? i guess not. fucking moron!!
Viracon to Receive Award for Blast Resistant Windows in Pentagon

how fucking dumb can you possibly be? its really sad that i need to point this out to you but do you think that maybe..... just possibly.... that the fact that it is standing on the landing gear and wheels might possibly add to its overall height on the "cotton picking" runway?

you mean the $10,000 per item blast proof windows survived the blast of a 757 hitting the building? how odd that something the government bought actually did what it was designed to do.

so you think the size of the hole has nothing to do with anything? why is that? because it proves that your A-3 could not possibly have made the hole!!!

you fucking ignorant moron. as soon as somebody proves your hoax to be incorrect you say "it doesnt mean anything" and go into your delusional denial mode.

well it does mean something. it means you are a fucking delusional moron that refuses to look at ALL the evidence and instead only see what you want to see.

__________________

"This image is self verifying" -Christophera

Let us not forget that Terrels missile was able to knock over at least one light pole in its wake but was unable to move empty cable reels.

__________________

"If men make war in slavish obedience to rules, they will fail."
- Ulysses S. Grant

Hi Mr.Fizz ():

Mr. Fizz ran out of Official Cover Story Arguments to begin his swearing really fast. Asking me a thousand questions does NOT make any Official Cover Story Case. Period. Mr. Fizz uses Disinformation Trickery in order to hide the fact that no pictures of any crashed AA77 even exist and the Pentagon evidence DOES NOT even begin to match 'his' Official Cover Story LIES. Once again I am looking at a post from this guy that makes a case for NOTHING ...

No sir. The maximum takeoff weight of a Boeing 757-200 class Jetliner is 255, 000 pounds or well over 125 tons (specs). However, AA77 was canceled on 9/11 (#1) and nothing like that ever crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11 or any other day.


Mr. Fizz is tired of being sent here every day to lose Official Cover Story Debates, so he escalates into a swearing frenzy from time to time. :0)

No sir. A real 100-ton Boeing 757-200 Jetliner has a 60-ton Titanium Frame and two (2) 6-ton Rolls-Royce Engines, before you add the indestructible landing gear, fuel, cargo, water, people, etc., etc.. These Aviation/Military Experts agree with me that we are talking about a "100-Ton Jetliner."


This Official Cover Story LIAR is trying to reduce the size of 'his' mythical AA77 Jetliner by almost half! :0)

When all else fails for Mr. Fizz, then he just starts lying!



You are looking at the aftermath of the 9:31:39 AM Missile Strike 'and' the 9:36:27 AM A-3 Jet Crash (imprint + story) that struck the second-story concrete slab elevation to explode into a kazillion little bits. What Really Happened at the Pentagon has NOTHING to do with any AA77 100-ton Jetliner. Period. That is 'your' Official Cover Story LIE that gave the Corrupt Inside-job FBI jurisdiction over the Pentagon Case, even though the FBI helped to carry out the attacks ...

Do you kiss your mommy with that mouth? In other words, this Official Cover Story Stooge thinks that expensive glass windows can remain unbroken after being struck by a 100-ton Jetliner going 530 miles per hour! :0)

Once again this guy offers his big mouth and no third-party support for anything, and I was hoping the DoD would actually send me a competent Disinfo Stooge ...

GL,

Terral

__________________
I have made myself available to the Center For 911 Justice (link) since early 2009, because your case has all of the primary components to establish inconsistencies in the Official 9/11 Govt Cover Story. For example, April Gallop and I know for certain that the Pentagon was first attacked at 9:31:39 AM (Link #1) and NOT at the Official Cover Story time of 9:37:46 (9:38 ACAAR) AM. The very first piece of evidentiary support for your case should have been the Executive Summary Chronology of a Multiple Hijacking Crisis September 11, 2001 (Link #2) dated 09/17/2001 saying: "0932 ATC AEA reports aircraft crashes into west side of Pentagon." My Email To Bill Veale, April Gallop And Lloyde England. My Work.

Wasn't martial law supposedly going to be imposed sometime last year?

__________________

WILL YOU PLEASE PICK A CONSPIRACY THEORY AND STICK TO IT?

funny thing about these pictures is that it completely disproves terral's missile shockwave hoax and his A-3 hoax....



for instance, his shock wave was supposed to be able to knock over much more sturdy light poles yet they leave this temporary fencing in place. this is where the engine from the 757 passed through on the way to the pentagon. it is too far from the centerline of the damage to be an A-3. also notice that the damage is all bent TOWARDS the pentagon indication that it could not have possibly been caused by an explosion.

__________________

"This image is self verifying" -Christophera

i'll curse as much as i fucking want and the more you complain about me doing it the more i will bring to everyone's attention what a complete fucking moronic asshole you are.

you have this ridiculous double standard that its ok for you to question everything about 9/11 but its not ok for anyone to question your absurd hoax.

there is an infinately larger percentage of 757 parts at the pentagon than there are A-3 or missile parts.

you also have ZERO pictures of a missile and ZERO pictures of an A-3.

there are hundreds of witnesses that saw ONE airplane go towards and crash into the pentagon. some even name the plane as a 757. there is not one witnesses that says they saw an A-3 or a missile. so you have no pictures, no debris and no witnesses to back up any of your hoax.

well then i have no idea where you are getting your 100 ton aircraft statement from. all i know is that it's wrong. the weight of a 757-200 with two rolls royce RB211s is 127,810lb.

from Boeing 757-200 | Airliners.net
Weights
Operating empty with P&W engines 57,840kg (127,520lb), with RB211s 57,975kg (127,810lb). Basic max takeoff 99,790kg (220,000lb),

every flight that didnt make it to their destination by the time the FAA cleared the skies is listed as cancelled.

surely you arent going to try to make the argument that flight 77 would have reached its destination by the time the skies were cleared.

nevermind. scratch that. you are are DUMBFUCK and probably will try to make that argument.

you want to tell all the american airline employees that checked the passengers in, loaded the airplane with bags and pushed the aircraft back from the gate.... as well as the tower personal at Dulles that gave it clearance to take off that the flight was cancelled.

oh, you might want to tell the passengers and crew that died on the plane it was cancelled. you can also tell the families of those people it was cancelled too.

you really are a dumbfuck!!!



tired of being sent here?

and miss all your delusional statements such as i am a government agent and a bow shockwave from a missile knocked over light poles but left car windows intact?

you cant pay for entertainment like that!!!

if you think calling you a moronic dumbfuck is a swearing frenzy then you should see what happens when i get pissed off!!
i call you are moronic dumbfuck because thats the best description for you. its not a frenzy.



i'm sorry... but now you are changing your statement. your claim is that we should find a 100 ton jetliner AFTER it crashes into the pentagon. do you really think that the jet fuel and the water would remain intact after it crashes into the pentagon? the people?

as i just showed above, the weight of a COMPLETE 757-200 is 127,810lb (about 64 tons). this includes the engines (that means you just LIED above) and the landing gear (again you LIED above) unless of course you think that a 757 can operate without them.

you are a moronic dumbfuck.

your video is a complete joke. it talks about a "ten foot high hole"

DOES THIS LOOK LIKE A TEN FOOT HIGH HOLE TO YOU IGNORANT MORONIC DUMBFUCKS!!



no. i am showing the actual weight of your "100 ton jetliner" because either you are too much of a moronic dumbfuck to know what it weighs even after being shown or you are a complete fucking LIAR.
you choose which one better suits you.

where is your proof that a missile hit the pentagon? your eyewitnesses? how about the proof of your A-3? your witnesses for that?

you keep saying a 757 didnt hit the pentagon...well something hit it, right? so PROVE what hit it!!!

dont just say it was a missile and draw pretty flight path graphics of it. PROVE IT WITH ACTUAL EVIDENCE!!!

i have just as much evidence that the pentagon was hit by a train as you have that it was hit by a missile and an A-3.

i also have the exact same amount of witnesses.

did i say a dirty word and hurt your little feelings? awwww...... i'm sorry....




NOT!!!


so now you are claiming that a 100 ton jetliner actually smashed into the reinforced blast proof windows and they didnt break? or are you claiming that they survived the blast of a jetliner hitting the building.... because considering they were blast proof windows the fact that they survived a blast would make them......

nevermind.... your right. blast proof windows should shatter even when they arent hit with anything...

__________________

"This image is self verifying" -Christophera

Terral

You had best stop digging, the hole is getting deep

Hi Mr. Fizz and Ollie:

We should all remember that Mr. Fizz is here to push Official Cover Story LIES, which includes a 100-ton Jetliner (AA77 to be specific) crashing into the Wedge One E-ring Wall location at 9:38 AM (ACAAR page 200) on a 45-degree angle from the southwest going a whopping 530 miles per hour. Rather than make 'his' Official Cover Story Case, he is desperately trying to convince these readers that a problem exists with 'my' What Happened At The Pentagon Explanations.

No sir. First of all, the light poles have 'breakaway bolts' and are made to snap off when struck by a VW Rabbit at low speeds (PentagonResearch.com). These idiots are trying to say that a Raytheon Missile exploding 'inside' the Pentagon did not move the cable spools ...



... but two of these four cable spools are leaning back in our direction, because the 'explosions' detonated inside the Pentagon (9:31:39 AM) and against the E-ring Wall (9:36:27 AM)!!!! However, the Official Cover Story LIE says AA77 crashed into the first floor going 530 miles per hour from our right on a 45-degree angle; which means these cable spools should have been dragged inside the Pentagon!! Take a good look around in the fiery picture above to realize the E-ring Wall is still standing and there is no room for any 100-ton Jetliner! You can see the corner of the generator fence that appears in Mr. Fizzle's picture:

Picture Link #1

Picture Link #2

This idiot is 'hotlinking' pictures off the internet, which is a definite no-no, so click on the link to see his photograph of the 'generator fire.' The Raytheon Missile made the final approach on a 45-degree angle from the southwest (green flight path) to plow directly through this generator fence and explode inside the Pentagon at the Column Line (CL) 14 location. However, the generator did not catch fire during the 9:31:39 AM Missile Strike, but caught fire during the 9:36:27 AM A-3 Jet Crash (lower pic).



We know this is 'the' 911Truth, because Terry Cohen and her construction associates ran to the impact hole (CL-14 location) to see "Just Smoke."


The 'fire' dominated the E-ring Wall environment 'after' Terry Cohen's "Terrible Explosion," which she perceived to be "15 minutes later" (shock skewed the perception of time), but actually took place exactly 4 minutes and 48 seconds after the original 9:31:39 AM Missile Strike. If a real 100-ton Jetliner plowed through the generator fence, the starboard wing would have taken out all of the temporary construction trailers and these standing light poles!



Again, the five light poles (pic) have breakaway bases/bolts (pic and info) that are 'designed' to snap off. The construction fence is anchored at every fence pole location, but the Hypersonic Raytheon Missile simply plowed through the generator fence to detonate inside the E-ring Wall 'and' throw debris back in our direction.

No sir. Again, all of the construction trailers stand directly in the flight path of any approaching 100-ton Jetliner!!!! These guys (Ollie, Fizz) act like a missile is supposed to move the cable spools, but not their 100-ton Jetliner!!! :0) The 9:31:39 AM Raytheon Missile plowed through the Pentagon to create Terry Cohen's 'Boom' from the News Video, which knocked ceiling tiles down. However, she did NOT even begin to describe any crashing 100-Ton Jetliner that would have plowed through the trailer and killed her with all of her construction companions.

This guy is just talking without one clue. The A-3 Jet flew over the E-ring Wall during the 9:31:39 AM Missile Strike, but returned to strike the Pentagon Wall at 9:36:27 AM using the "North Of Citgo Flight Path" (in blue). The DoD Flying BOMB impacted at the second-story concrete slab location (imprint pic + story) to become Terry Cohen's "Terrible Explosion" and Lloyde England's "Big Boom" (LibertyPost.org Story). Lloyde England also saw "Just Smoke" coming up out of the little entry hole (Barbara Honegger's Paper), until the 'Big Boom' created the 400-foot long fiery inferno during the 9:36:27 AM A-3 Jet Strike.



Lloyde is standing in the lower left-hand corner of this fiery photograph ...

Mr. Fizz is trying to say a 100-ton Jetliner crashed into this Pentagon Wall ...



... as if Terry Cohen and her coworkers are going to see "Just Smoke" from a crashing 100-ton Jetliner (pic)!!!! No sir. Lloyde England's Taxi Cab was struck by Pole #1 (pic) and he stood on Washington Blvd to report ONLY "inside-the-building fires" (Barbara Honegger's Paper again), which matches Terry Cohen's Testimony TO A TEE.

The 'only' explanation that reconciles 'all' the evidence is my 'Two Attack Pentagon Working Hypothesis' adopted by Bill Veale (CenterFor911Justice) for the April Gallop/Dick Cheney Lawsuit (link) ... Period ...

GL,

Terral

__________________
I have made myself available to the Center For 911 Justice (link) since early 2009, because your case has all of the primary components to establish inconsistencies in the Official 9/11 Govt Cover Story. For example, April Gallop and I know for certain that the Pentagon was first attacked at 9:31:39 AM (Link #1) and NOT at the Official Cover Story time of 9:37:46 (9:38 ACAAR) AM. The very first piece of evidentiary support for your case should have been the Executive Summary Chronology of a Multiple Hijacking Crisis September 11, 2001 (Link #2) dated 09/17/2001 saying: "0932 ATC AEA reports aircraft crashes into west side of Pentagon." My Email To Bill Veale, April Gallop And Lloyde England. My Work.

Hi Mr. Fizz:



GL (#7-#10),

Terral

__________________
I have made myself available to the Center For 911 Justice (link) since early 2009, because your case has all of the primary components to establish inconsistencies in the Official 9/11 Govt Cover Story. For example, April Gallop and I know for certain that the Pentagon was first attacked at 9:31:39 AM (Link #1) and NOT at the Official Cover Story time of 9:37:46 (9:38 ACAAR) AM. The very first piece of evidentiary support for your case should have been the Executive Summary Chronology of a Multiple Hijacking Crisis September 11, 2001 (Link #2) dated 09/17/2001 saying: "0932 ATC AEA reports aircraft crashes into west side of Pentagon." My Email To Bill Veale, April Gallop And Lloyde England. My Work.

Wheres that martial law you promised us? Well terral; WTF is it?

__________________

WILL YOU PLEASE PICK A CONSPIRACY THEORY AND STICK TO IT?

HAHAHAhahahahah!!!!

so you are saying that the missile physically hit these fence posts.... then made a left turn and travelled along the face of the pentagon.... then made a right turn into the building and exploded creating the huge hole??!!!


the fence posts in question are in the lower right of the picture.

__________________

"This image is self verifying" -Christophera

so the shockwave that knocked over light poles did nothing to the flimsy wooden stairs of the construction trailer after physically hitting the fence only inches away!!!

__________________

"This image is self verifying" -Christophera

Hi Mr. Fizz ():

No.



The Raytheon Missile traveled from the Route 47 (Washington Blvd) Cloverleaf (south/right of Pole #1), on this flight path, to pass right through the generator fence (like this), before striking the E-ring Column Line (CL) 14 location.



The five downed light poles 'and' the generator fence 'and' the E-ring CL-14 Location 'and' the 45-degree damage to the Pentagon (3 bomblets = my 911Truth Blog Entry), including the C-Ring Explosion Hole ...



... are 'all' on the same 45-degree angle line of destruction corresponding to the "Column Line 14 Death Corridor." The A-3 Jet flew over the Pentagon Roof at 9:31:39 AM to return 4-minutes and 48-seconds later for the 'second attack' (What Happened).

GL,

Terral

__________________
I have made myself available to the Center For 911 Justice (link) since early 2009, because your case has all of the primary components to establish inconsistencies in the Official 9/11 Govt Cover Story. For example, April Gallop and I know for certain that the Pentagon was first attacked at 9:31:39 AM (Link #1) and NOT at the Official Cover Story time of 9:37:46 (9:38 ACAAR) AM. The very first piece of evidentiary support for your case should have been the Executive Summary Chronology of a Multiple Hijacking Crisis September 11, 2001 (Link #2) dated 09/17/2001 saying: "0932 ATC AEA reports aircraft crashes into west side of Pentagon." My Email To Bill Veale, April Gallop And Lloyde England. My Work.

Hi Mr. Fizz:

Let's see: Mr. Fizz is supposed to be proving that this wall ...



... was struck by a 100-ton Jetliner (AA77) at 530 miles per hour at 9:38 AM, but all he can do is whine about my "What Really Happened At The Pentagon" Explanations that he in NO WAY even begins to understand.

Your supposition that the Hypersonic Raytheon Missile Bow Shockwave 'did nothing' is impossible to prove, as if we have photographs of the position before 'and' after the attacks. Again, the "missile" (Donald Rumsfeld Testimony) 'exploded INSIDE' the Pentagon! There was 'no fire' outside the Pentagon after the 9:31:39 AM Missile Strike and I am not going to repeat myself to this DoD Stooge in every post. The corner of the generator fence is the very location where the Hypersonic Missile passed on the way to striking the CL-14 Location directly behind those Cable Spools.



This is a picture of the aftermath of the 9:31:39 AM Missile Strike 'and' the 9:36:27 AM A-3 Jet Crash 'after' the fire was put out 'and' before the E-ring Roof collapsed at 10:15 AM (my Pentagon Timeline).

GL,

Terral

__________________
I have made myself available to the Center For 911 Justice (link) since early 2009, because your case has all of the primary components to establish inconsistencies in the Official 9/11 Govt Cover Story. For example, April Gallop and I know for certain that the Pentagon was first attacked at 9:31:39 AM (Link #1) and NOT at the Official Cover Story time of 9:37:46 (9:38 ACAAR) AM. The very first piece of evidentiary support for your case should have been the Executive Summary Chronology of a Multiple Hijacking Crisis September 11, 2001 (Link #2) dated 09/17/2001 saying: "0932 ATC AEA reports aircraft crashes into west side of Pentagon." My Email To Bill Veale, April Gallop And Lloyde England. My Work.

Explain to us again how the hole in the first floor was made by an A3 but is twice the length that would have made so it doesn't matter......it was still an A3.........

__________________

"If men make war in slavish obedience to rules, they will fail."
- Ulysses S. Grant