 | | 
11-06-2008, 06:45 AM
|  | Cupid gets the point Member #11861 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,455
Thanks: 150
Thanked 225 Times in 163 Posts
Rep Power: 55 | | | Benchmarks for success in the Obama administration? I hear so many Republicans are whetting their appetite for revenge in 2012, they're almost SURE that Obama will mess up!
So - with that in mind, I'd like to know just how Obama will mess up?
What are your benchmarks that you want in place, as a standard, a goal for Obama to hit by October 2012 in order to consider his 4 years a success or a failure?
Unemployment numbers? GDP numbers? Dow figures? Foreign policy measures?
You name it. This is your chance to state loudly and clearly what your goals are for the Obama administration. Hopefully if we're all still around here in 4 years, we can go back to this thread. Of course, there's one catch - if Obama meets these goals, you have to vote for him in 2012. | 
11-06-2008, 06:53 AM
|  | Army Vet Member #11393 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 480
Thanked 378 Times in 274 Posts
Rep Power: 61 | | | I do not accept your caveat that we "have to" vote for him in the next election.. if I or anyone else would feel that the opposing candidate better suits our criteria, our stances, etc, I would still indeed vote for the other person
__________________ Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system). http://obamaclock.org/ | 
11-06-2008, 06:53 AM
|  | European American Member #11947 | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21,758
Thanks: 1,603
Thanked 1,260 Times in 952 Posts
Rep Power: 220 | | | What are yours? | 
11-06-2008, 07:02 AM
| | Mr. Forgot-it-All Member #11278 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Maine
Posts: 16,820
Thanks: 1,071
Thanked 1,022 Times in 778 Posts
Rep Power: 161 | | | If Main Street's economy is turning around, if the nosedive that describes the trajectory of the quality of life for the majority of American, so much as turns into a bellyflop, I'll call Obama a genius.
Obama alluded to doing something about fixing our insane trade policies.
Given that so few Americans seem to understand that that is the major problem facing us, I understand why he didn't make that one of his major talking points.
But surely the *cognogensia understand what the fundamental problem is and has been for some time.
Now all they have to do is change those laws from FREE TRADE to something approaching fair trade.
If I see that happening, then I'll know this Democratic regime is serious about saving this nation.
Some of you MUST REALIZE that I sound more like a 1950's radical Republican than a Liberal, when I harp on this issue, right?
I'm not entirely howling in the winderness here, am I?
Can I get a witness?
* "cognogensia" don't bother looking it up. I just coined the word. | 
11-06-2008, 07:20 AM
|  | Times Square Member #11758 | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Times Square
Posts: 1,837
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 6 | | | In no particular order I will be happy if:
1. Oceans stop rising.
2. Famine is no longer spreading.
3. Storms do not devastate our lands.
4. Children in Bangladesh are lifted out of poverty.
5. The scourge of AIDS is banished.
6. Bloggers in Iran are free to blog.
__________________ The Internet Newsstand here 
ABC'S CHARLIE GIBSON: In each instance, when the Capital Gains rate was dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down. So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?
OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I've said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness. | 
11-06-2008, 07:47 AM
|  | Registered User Member #11841 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,398
Thanks: 342
Thanked 639 Times in 433 Posts
Rep Power: 84 | | | I submit that President-Elect Obama's first term will see little in the way of real improvement in the economy as we see it now or the world security situation. In fact I see his first 4 years as more of a hold the line and and plug the leaks period. Let me explain my opinion, First if the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire which they will at this point be allowed to do, that won't happen until 2010. Then you will have most likely a long protracted congressional fight over the very same tax cuts during a time when the mid term elections are in play, when no Middle Class tax cut has been instituted yet. This by itself will be a good item for candidates to run on in the mid-term elections. When and if the Middle Class-Tax cuts come into being and at this point no one is sure what they will look like now as the Obama Administration seems to be putting the brakes on the timing because the receission at best case will come into being by late FY2011 which at that time candidates for president for 2012 will have already been announced.
President-Elect Obama has indicated a willingness to listen and Democratic congressional members have indicated that they intend to institute another economic stimulus package of approx. 150 billion dollars soon after President-Elect Obama takes office. This will add an additional 150 Billion to the already 700 billion added to the deficit with not one penny spent to reducing it yet. Further, Nancy Pelosi has indicated a willingness to listen to further "bailouts" of the auto industry.
President-Elect Obama and his staff have indicated that a top priority is green jobs and energy. So most likely you will see the Gore model cap and trade legislation come into being and large amounts of additional funding to wind, solar, and tidal, with no funding to nuclear, coal, or any industries that the environmental lobby considers off limits.
President-Elect Obama will sign SCHIP almost immediatly or within the first 60 days of his administration which was vetoed by President Bush. He will most likely push for increased funding for Education and revisit other bills vetoed by President Bush.
President-Elect Obama will give Cent-Com an overall new mission in Iraq and that is to withdraw and do so as soon as possible which he has indicated can be no sooner than 16 months and then redeploy part of those Brigades to Afghanistan. Well considering the fact that is starting now and the draw down will begin from 16 to 14 as of next month that order is a little late in comming. However, on that model that would mean that US ground forces will be withdrawn from Iraq totally by late 2010. considering the 2011 Budget would have already been signed and approved and funding for those troops on the ground would need to be there till the time they leave. The real cost savings will not be realized until his re-election year of 2012.
In conclusion, given all the factors above, IMHO President-Elect Obama will be very busy just trying to keep things stable. His ambitions and spending plans will simply not be able to be implemented until 2012. If however, he decied to push the window of those social spending plans given the deficit, the economy, two wars, and a recession, he will inviting a disaster of epic proportions IMHO.
__________________ God grant me the courage not to give up what I think is right even though I think it is hopeless.
Chester W. Nimitz | 
11-06-2008, 07:54 AM
|  | European American Member #11947 | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21,758
Thanks: 1,603
Thanked 1,260 Times in 952 Posts
Rep Power: 220 | | | I expect him to live up to every single one of his promises. It was important enough to make them now I expect him to keep them.
I want my taxes cut.
I want the soldiers home
I want to run my car on farts
I want someone to pay for my medical bill
I want my mortgage paid for
oh, and I want all my children enrolled in college.
Thanks in advance. | 
11-06-2008, 09:42 AM
|  | Cupid gets the point Member #11861 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,455
Thanks: 150
Thanked 225 Times in 163 Posts
Rep Power: 55 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by DiamondDave I do not accept your caveat that we "have to" vote for him in the next election.. if I or anyone else would feel that the opposing candidate better suits our criteria, our stances, etc, I would still indeed vote for the other person Your criteria? Your stances?
So if the war in Iraq is over, we've found bin laden and the economy is doing much better, because someone opposes abortion but won't stack the supreme court's deck to make abortion illegal, you'd vote for him instead of obama?
This is blind party loyalty. Our guy could be the best in the world, your guy could be the worst, but as long as he meets your "moral" crtieria, boom he's got your vote? | 
11-06-2008, 09:45 AM
|  | Army Vet Member #11393 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 480
Thanked 378 Times in 274 Posts
Rep Power: 61 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by DavidS Your criteria? Your stances?
So if the war in Iraq is over, we've found bin laden and the economy is doing much better, because someone opposes abortion but won't stack the supreme court's deck to make abortion illegal, you'd vote for him instead of obama?
This is blind party loyalty. Our guy could be the best in the world, your guy could be the worst, but as long as he meets your "moral" crtieria, boom he's got your vote? If someone more closely supports equality in taxation, the elimination of the entitlement mantra, having more conservative appointees to the SCOTUS, etc... YES... I would vote for them over Obama... UNLESS Obama would renouce his liberal stances and govern from a true middle/moderate position and work along those lines within my stances...
No... it is not "blind party loyalty"... it is standing by one's convictions and beliefs... I don't care if the candidate is from the Dr. Seuss party... But I do care and will always fight against the extreme liberals such as Pelosi and Obama
__________________ Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system). http://obamaclock.org/ | 
11-06-2008, 10:14 AM
| | Registered User Member #11845 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Florida
Posts: 912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Rep Power: 3 | | | He will spend the first 2 or 3 years doing damage control, he was honest before he was elected by saying it could take 10 years to balance the budget and he knows that there is no way he can turn shit into shinola in 1 term. Where does he even start, We have the ongoing issues in Iraq and Afganistan and Russia is going to be that test that Biden was talking about, then he needs to somehow stabilize the credit markets so people will start buying instead of selling off every day. What a fricken mess. | 
11-06-2008, 10:16 AM
|  | European American Member #11947 | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21,758
Thanks: 1,603
Thanked 1,260 Times in 952 Posts
Rep Power: 220 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by jschuck12001 He will spend the first 2 or 3 years doing damage control, he was honest before he was elected by saying it could take 10 years to balance the budget and he knows that there is no way he can turn shit into shinola in 1 term. Where does he even start, We have the ongoing issues in Iraq and Afganistan and Russia is going to be that test that Biden was talking about, then he needs to somehow stabilize the credit markets so people will start buying instead of selling off every day. What a fricken mess.
he can start with his promise of medical care just like he gets for all of us. Just like he gets. nothing less. and as quickley as he gets it.
Then he can lower my taxes.
If he can do just those too then I'll kiss his shoes. | 
11-06-2008, 10:29 AM
|  | Cupid gets the point Member #11861 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,455
Thanks: 150
Thanked 225 Times in 163 Posts
Rep Power: 55 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by DiamondDave If someone more closely supports equality in taxation, Please, tell me what your version of equality in taxation is. Quote: having more conservative appointees to the SCOTUS, Why would we want social conservatives sitting on the Supreme Court? Bush appointed two judges to the court... what socially conservative programs have they voted for that you agree with? Quote: etc... YES... I would vote for them over Obama... UNLESS Obama would renouce his liberal stances What's wrong his liberal stances? Quote: No... it is not "blind party loyalty"... it is standing by one's convictions and beliefs... You may have convictions and beliefs that do well for you, but what about the rest of the country? Isn't it selfish to want to ban abortion because YOU don't like it? What about the rest of the country? | 
11-06-2008, 10:33 AM
|  | Cupid gets the point Member #11861 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,455
Thanks: 150
Thanked 225 Times in 163 Posts
Rep Power: 55 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by WillowTree he can start with his promise of medical care just like he gets for all of us. Just like he gets. nothing less. and as quickley as he gets it.
Then he can lower my taxes.
If he can do just those too then I'll kiss his shoes. Do you make less than $200,000 a year? | 
11-06-2008, 10:43 AM
|  | Army Vet Member #11393 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 480
Thanked 378 Times in 274 Posts
Rep Power: 61 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by DavidS Please, tell me what your version of equality in taxation is. Blind equality... on income tax.. everyone is taxed the same % on every dollar earned... no loopholes... no determinations of class... the rich still pay more in total, and the poor still pay less Quote: Why would we want social conservatives sitting on the Supreme Court? Bush appointed two judges to the court... what socially conservative programs have they voted for that you agree with? IMHO the court is still left leaning.. and this is not a good thing Quote: What's wrong his liberal stances? Wealth redistribution.. being beholden to the enviro-nazis... being pro-late term abortion... all wrong Quote: You may have convictions and beliefs that do well for you, but what about the rest of the country? Isn't it selfish to want to ban abortion because YOU don't like it? What about the rest of the country? I do not want to ban abortion... but ban it in terms of birth control... preserve the sanctity of the most innocent of human life... but still have the choice option in terms of women with their health in danger, incest, rape, etc... I fully believe stances and conviction that more closely match the stances of the founding fathers.. I believe in personal freedoms (that do not infringe on the rights and property of others)... I believe that the government is not responsible for your personal responsibilities... and these are good for the country, whether there are a bunch of people who think they are entitled to the earnings of others because they want it
__________________ Socialism will only work with a society of prisoners, slaves, and robots who can be controlled by the ruling elite (which will always exist in that type of system). http://obamaclock.org/ | 
11-06-2008, 10:47 AM
|  | European American Member #11947 | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21,758
Thanks: 1,603
Thanked 1,260 Times in 952 Posts
Rep Power: 220 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by DavidS Please, tell me what your version of equality in taxation is.
Why would we want social conservatives sitting on the Supreme Court? Bush appointed two judges to the court... what socially conservative programs have they voted for that you agree with?
What's wrong his liberal stances?
You may have convictions and beliefs that do well for you, but what about the rest of the country? Isn't it selfish to want to ban abortion because YOU don't like it? What about the rest of the country?
your title was misleading. I thought you wanted to hear from us not argue with us. my bad. |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |