 | | 
10-12-2008, 09:44 PM
|  | cool Member #11254 | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Colbert Nation
Posts: 11,709
Thanks: 179
Thanked 340 Times in 257 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Charles_Main Frankly I have been saying since I joined this board that Obama would likely win.
We will all get what we deserve for putting the socialists(democrats) in full charge of our entire government at exactly the worst time to do it. The very people who gave us Freddie and Fanny and the CRA. The very people most responsible for the sub prime mess causing this economic collapse.
Americans are at their core reactionary fools, and they are living up to that label in this election.
Democrats will not fix anything, in 4 years things will be worse not better.
Enjoy your victory Libs, and enjoy watching the further decline of America under your savior. Barrack Obama.
About the only thing good to come of this election will be no more GWB, the destroyer of the Republican Party and Conservative movement. I will enjoy it immensely.
We will get out of Iraq and begin to develop alternative energy. | 
10-12-2008, 09:48 PM
|  | Riddle Me This Member #11819 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Dodge City
Posts: 20,574
Thanks: 689
Thanked 1,027 Times in 808 Posts
Rep Power: 179 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1 I'm with you. The GOP should lose. And as I've pointed out, this actually might be a good thing. The Democrat-controlled Congress is almost done and Obama is a relatively weak politician, so we might have a repeat of the glorious 90s (after 1994, of course). You do realize that Democrats actually have a chance to get 60 seats by the time this election is over?
And Obama isn't a "relatively weak politician."
Unless you can find loads of politicians that have beaten the Clinton machine in their career?
__________________ "We didn't start the fire
It was always burning
Since the world's been turning
We didn't start the fire
No we didn't light it
But we tried to fight it"
- Billy Joel, "We Didn't Start The Fire" | 
10-12-2008, 09:51 PM
|  | Dive Control Specialist Member #11636 | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Richmond, ME
Posts: 28,332
Thanks: 6,099
Thanked 1,056 Times in 856 Posts
Rep Power: 171 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Chris I will enjoy it immensely.
We will get out of Iraq and begin to develop alternative energy. keep dreaming | 
10-13-2008, 06:26 AM
|  | Yes, I'm just kidding Member #11939 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 11,121
Thanks: 1,058
Thanked 1,058 Times in 730 Posts
Rep Power: 290 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Robert_Santurri You do realize that Democrats actually have a chance to get 60 seats by the time this election is over?
And Obama isn't a "relatively weak politician."
Unless you can find loads of politicians that have beaten the Clinton machine in their career? Yes. I'm talking about 2010.
Obama is a very weak politician. He's the most inexperience politicians in more than a hundred years to run for President. Furthermore, he flip-flops on major issues to get votes. He should be easily manipulated if he wins.
The Clinton machine, as you call it, only works if there is a spoiler candidate like Ross Perot. | 
10-13-2008, 06:38 AM
|  | Super Moderator Member #11827 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: half a bubble off
Posts: 15,985
Thanks: 613
Thanked 1,732 Times in 1,146 Posts
Rep Power: 419 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Dr Grump Carter wasn't even close to being worse.... bullshit.
__________________ "Nothing is more unreliable than the populace, nothing more obscure than human intentions, nothing more deceptive than the whole electoral system."- Marcus Tullius Cicero | 
10-13-2008, 06:39 AM
| | Mr. Forgot-it-All Member #11278 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Maine
Posts: 16,793
Thanks: 1,057
Thanked 1,015 Times in 771 Posts
Rep Power: 159 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Robert_Santurri You do realize that Democrats actually have a chance to get 60 seats by the time this election is over?
And Obama isn't a "relatively weak politician."
Unless you can find loads of politicians that have beaten the Clinton machine in their career?
True dat, blood. | 
10-13-2008, 07:19 AM
|  | born again pagan Member #11703 | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: blue ridge mtns nc
Posts: 15,468
Thanks: 555
Thanked 876 Times in 637 Posts
Rep Power: 375 | | | does anyone really think anything will change? do you really? i dont. i see it as just smoke and mirrors the two party system and all..nothing changes...only the names to protect the innocent.
__________________ The Wire - “A lie ain’t a side of a story. It’s just a lie" There is no greater sorrow than to recall in misery the time when we were happy.
- Dante | 
10-13-2008, 08:04 AM
|  | An Individual Member #5531 | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 3 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by strollingbones does anyone really think anything will change? do you really? i dont. i see it as just smoke and mirrors the two party system and all..nothing changes...only the names to protect the innocent. No. Because the parties are now Populist and Populist lite with fringe issues for extra flavor.
Quote: Originally Posted by Chris I will enjoy it immensely.
We will get out of Iraq and begin to develop alternative energy. We will have an agreement to be out in X amount of years. But the signing of it will be heralded as great accomplishment.
We will not have and alternative to oil and coal in 8 years no matter who is elected.
Quote: Originally Posted by Chris I think you are right.
They are watching football, and their team is losing. Why do so many people treat politics as if it were a sport? They take more pride in their side winning than the actual results of who they elect. I'm sure which ever side wins will be here gloating November 5th that there team won and they're better than the losers.
Some honest questions for the supporters of either candidate.
Isn't McCain just a more "liberal" version of GWB? (btw Bush is Neocon NOT a conservative)
What is Obama going to "fix" from the Bush administration? Is he going to repeal the patriot act? Is he going to correct all of things the Bush did to defy the constitution? | 
10-13-2008, 08:43 AM
|  | cool Member #11254 | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Colbert Nation
Posts: 11,709
Thanks: 179
Thanked 340 Times in 257 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | | | What is Obama going to "fix" from the Bush administration?
Everything
Is he going to repeal the patriot act?
Hopefully
Is he going to correct all of things the Bush did to defy the constitution?
Absolutely | 
10-13-2008, 09:08 AM
| | Mr. Forgot-it-All Member #11278 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Maine
Posts: 16,793
Thanks: 1,057
Thanked 1,015 Times in 771 Posts
Rep Power: 159 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by strollingbones does anyone really think anything will change? do you really? i dont. i see it as just smoke and mirrors the two party system and all..nothing changes...only the names to protect the innocent.
I think things are changing DEPITE the best efforts of the insider party to keep a lid on things, personally. | 
10-13-2008, 09:08 AM
|  | An Individual Member #5531 | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 3 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by editec I think things are changing DEPITE the best efforts of the insider party to keep a lid on things, personally. like what?
__________________ Who is John Galt? | 
10-13-2008, 11:08 AM
| | Mr. Forgot-it-All Member #11278 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Maine
Posts: 16,793
Thanks: 1,057
Thanked 1,015 Times in 771 Posts
Rep Power: 159 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by heretic like what? Like the banking system for one, but really the whole damned set of paradigms currently passing as smart economics.
Oh, I know that currently the insiders are planning on bailing out the banks in the hopes that the band will play on while they find some safe harbors for their cash, but there really are no safe harbors, so that strategy is not going to work much longer.
Sooner or later the insiders (worldwide) are going to come to realize that they cannot continue getting richer and richer by dominating governments and raping the working classes.
Eventually they're recognize, as their grandfathers did in the last great worldwide depression, that there has to be a balance between what the working class makes and what the master class are making.
Sooner or later some clever economist is going to prove that there is a direct connection between profits on Wall Street and a healthy economy on Maine street.
Sooner or later some clever economist is going to prove that over inflated stock prices (or real estate prices, or bond prices or any prices of investments of any kind) are just as disruptive (and inflationary) to a healthy economy as the cost of labor climbing too quickly.
Sooner or later somebody is going to realize that just as we need capital ready willing and able to invest in new projects and new industries, so too do we need a healthy and well educated and basically happy working class ready willing and able to become part of the new economies that are going to become a continuous development of this highly technical and rapidly changing world.
We keep stop applying the rules of scarcity to our economy when in fact our economy is more often screwed up by abundance than by scarcity.
This is the 21st century, not the 15th and the cooner we recognize that fact, the sooner we can rethink the social contract which is a tad outdated and cuasing us these boom and bust cycles.
Time to rethink nearly everything we think we know about economics.
the answers to our problem will NOT be found by studying the economic thoughts of people like Adam Smith, folks.
He was right for his time and his economy, but there is damned little economic similarity between his 18th century and our 21st.
Last edited by editec; 10-13-2008 at 11:10 AM.
| 
10-13-2008, 11:12 AM
| | Registered User Member #5690 | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,598
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 46 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by xsited1 Yes. I'm talking about 2010.
Obama is a very weak politician. He's the most inexperience politicians in more than a hundred years to run for President. Furthermore, he flip-flops on major issues to get votes. He should be easily manipulated if he wins. A weak politician? Really? He is somehow the "most inexperienced politician to run in more than a hundred years", but is going to win anyway, and that makes him weak? That makes him damned skilled at what he does. Quote: The Clinton machine, as you call it, only works if there is a spoiler candidate like Ross Perot. So who exactly was the spoiler candidate in 1996 when Clinton won with 49.24% of the vote? | 
10-13-2008, 02:29 PM
|  | Karma Chameleon Member #3136 | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: From the Back of Beyond
Posts: 7,791
Thanks: 43
Thanked 237 Times in 185 Posts
Rep Power: 377 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by del bullshit. Bullshit yourself...
__________________ "Religion attacks us in our deepest integrity by saying we wouldn't be able to make a moral decision without it, and that a supernatural dictatorship is our only hope. That makes us all into serfs. And chess and Tantric sex and Chinese food are pointless if you must enjoy them as a serf.'' Christopher Hitchens. | 
10-13-2008, 02:34 PM
|  | Super Moderator Member #11827 | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: half a bubble off
Posts: 15,985
Thanks: 613
Thanked 1,732 Times in 1,146 Posts
Rep Power: 419 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Dr Grump Bullshit yourself... well put. Carter was the worst president domestically in my lifetime. full stop.
his only accomplishment of note was the Camp David accords, and i give him credit for that. otherwise, horrible. nice man, terrible president.
__________________ "Nothing is more unreliable than the populace, nothing more obscure than human intentions, nothing more deceptive than the whole electoral system."- Marcus Tullius Cicero |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |