Did Gibson have a double standard for Palin?

Even though the two interviews were clearly different -one intended to lob some softballs for one candidate, and the other hoping to embarrass and discredit the VP candidate from the other ticket -people aren't stupid. Even though Democrats and the liberal media believe they are and will believe whatever they tell them to believe.

People can see which person was dealt the tougher questions -AND the motivation for the stark difference in questions. The majority of people in this country already believed that the media was intent on helping Obama win anyway, even before the Palin pick -and this only confirms that belief. For good reason. They are.

But if they do the same thing in the VP debate, people will be outraged about it which can only result in ANOTHER backlash -and not one that will benefit Obama. Maybe Obama's camp and the media haven't figured this out yet -but McCain LOVES this blatantly disparate treatment of Palin compared to Obama who wants an even higher office. At least McCain knows that people really aren't as stupid as the left believes. Too bad that is a founding premise of liberalism though -because I don't expect the liberal media to change a thing here. And McCain is certainly hoping they don't either.

Repped. Gibson's hit piece (which I believe Obama was involved in, BTW) has backfired.

The Obama/Biden is melting down, and we have the pleasure of watching it happen right before our very eyes

__________________



I've got news for you. Every President in history has had the power and authority to a pre-emptive attack in order to prevent an enemy from attacking us first. And always will. Our Constitution is not a suicide pact no matter how many liberals squeal that is really is. Our Constitution doesn't demand that we must first have tens of thousands of dead before acting to protect the people of this country. If you think otherwise, you live in the wrong country -but I don't actually know of one that believes they must first have a bunch of dead people before taking their enemy's threats seriously. So I don't know which country you need to be in -but if you NEED to see tens of thousands of dead Americans first, it sure isn't THIS country.

As for the part about any country that finances or harbors terrorists being the same as the terrorists themselves -exactly which part of that do YOU find objectionable? Since international terrorists cannot survive at all without that kind of support from a government -what would you change about that? Bush got hit up broadside with reality -that we couldn't take on every single country that financed and harbored international terrorists all at the same time. But that sure as hell doesn't mean they aren't terrorist suppporting states and no better than the terrorists they are making sure can continue with their terrorist activities, does it?

Bingo. When the fuck did we become Japan?

__________________



the part i find offensive is the yo-bama supporters claiming palin didn't know what the bush doctrine is when gibson didn't know himself. oh and i'm sure most those yo-bama supporters don't know and don't care to know.

__________________
Reasons why I support Barack Hussein Obama
http://www.usmessageboard.com/electi...ein-obama.html

That Gibson didn't actually know doesn't surprise me at all. It has been misstated so often by the left now, you'd think it means we get to bomb Canada for no other reason than we feel like it.

apology accepted.

__________________
Reasons why I support Barack Hussein Obama
http://www.usmessageboard.com/electi...ein-obama.html

Here's what jumped out at me on the first reading:

He got lost in a blizzard of words and didnt think she answered is question ?
Sorry Charlie---I ain't buying the feigned confusion on this one.

__________________
"Some men eventually stumble over the truth but they usually pick themselves up and walk on as if nothing ever happened."
-Winston Churchill

"In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the questions at issue, but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing." -Mark Twain

I read a suggestion to politicians to bring their own camera crew to any interviews, seems good advice when you read the unedited transcripts:

The Mark Levin Show Gibson Interview

btw, I've never heard the Mark Levin Show, just found the transcripts there.

__________________
"We are fighting today for our life, for our liberty, for our all, we cannot go on being led as we are. Somehow or other, we must get into the Government men who can match our enemies in fighting spirit, in daring, in resolution and in thirst for victory."~Leo Amery 1940, while staring at Chamberlain