US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum  

Obama FlipFlops on gay marriage

This is a discussion on Obama FlipFlops on gay marriage within the Congress forums, part of the US Discussion category; Quote: Originally Posted by Steerpike I don't think the Constitution requires gay marriage, but States are free to provide for it if they wish (and ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Congress


Congress The latest greatest antics of our elected representatives.


Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 08:00 PM
Born Free
Member #10256
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: u.s.a.
Posts: 874
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 44
Glori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddha
Glori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Steerpike View Post
I don't think the Constitution requires gay marriage, but States are free to provide for it if they wish (and they should in my view).
i said the constitution requires equality.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 08:02 PM
Steerpike's Avatar
Registered User
Member #7851
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,527
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
Rep Power: 36
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Glori.B View Post
i said the constitution requires equality.
Yeah, but thats subject to interpretation. Your post implies that you think that equality means gay marriage. I disagree.
__________________
"There ain't no devil, there's just God when he's drunk." - Tom Waits
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 08:06 PM
Born Free
Member #10256
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: u.s.a.
Posts: 874
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 44
Glori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddha
Glori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Steerpike View Post
Yeah, but thats subject to interpretation. Your post implies that you think that equality means gay marriage. I disagree.
ok...so, who decided that couples who are married get tax benefits?
who decided couples who are married get social security benefits?
why?

why are some american citizens allowed to be deprived of equal benefits?
equality is not an opinion.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 08:08 PM
Chris's Avatar
cool
Member #11254
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Colbert Nation
Posts: 11,720
Thanks: 180
Thanked 345 Times in 262 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Chris could be the presidentChris could be the president
Chris could be the presidentChris could be the presidentChris could be the presidentChris could be the presidentChris could be the presidentChris could be the presidentChris could be the presidentChris could be the presidentChris could be the presidentChris could be the presidentChris could be the presidentChris could be the presidentChris could be the president
Quote: Originally Posted by ScreamingEagle View Post
Obama used to say marriage was between a man and a woman....no longer...
Why are Repubicans so obsessed with gay marriage?
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 08:09 PM
Steerpike's Avatar
Registered User
Member #7851
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,527
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
Rep Power: 36
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Glori.B View Post
ok...so, who decided that couples who are married get tax benefits?
who decided couples who are married get social security benefits?
why?

why are some american citizens allowed to be deprived of equal benefits?
equality is not an opinion.
There are all sorts of inequalities in the country. The question is whether the inequalities are a problem Constitutionally. If they're based on race, for example, then they probably are (at least if the government is behind it). Not every inequality is a Constitutional issue.
__________________
"There ain't no devil, there's just God when he's drunk." - Tom Waits
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 08:28 PM
Gunny's Avatar
Administrator
Member #2435
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 37,616
Thanks: 58
Thanked 1,802 Times in 1,297 Posts
Rep Power: 692
Gunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religion
Gunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religionGunny could successfully start his own religion
Quote: Originally Posted by Glori.B View Post
well, but it does cover equality...and since our government provides special benefits to those who are married, why shouldn't people who choose a same sex partner, receive equal benefits?

because God said so? what about separation of church and state? and certainly, given the current rate of infidelity and divorce, the whole social stability argument is laughable, no?
The Constitution also states that those powers not specifically delegated to the Fed falls to the states. Marriage is not a Constitutional Right.

If states choose to enact legislation that denies a privilege, not a right, it is within their power to do so. At least on paper.

You're projecting. When have you ever seen me use God as a basis for any argument other than one that pertains to religion? You haven't because I haven't.
__________________
She helped me with my suitcase, She stands before my eyes
Driving me to the airport, And to the friendly skies.
Going through security I held her for so long.
She finally looked at me in love, And she was gone.
Just a song before I go, A lesson to be learned.
Travelling twice the speed of sound It's easy to get burned.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 08:30 PM
Steerpike's Avatar
Registered User
Member #7851
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,527
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
Rep Power: 36
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by GunnyL View Post
The Constitution also states that those powers not specifically delegated to the Fed falls to the states. Marriage is not a Constitutional Right.
It has been since at least Loving and Zablocki, at least according to the Supreme Court. So for legal purposes it is one. But that doesn't necessarily mean that restrictions on gay marriage are violative.
__________________
"There ain't no devil, there's just God when he's drunk." - Tom Waits
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 08:33 PM
Born Free
Member #10256
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: u.s.a.
Posts: 874
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 44
Glori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddha
Glori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddhaGlori.B could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by GunnyL View Post
The Constitution also states that those powers not specifically delegated to the Fed falls to the states. Marriage is not a Constitutional Right.

If states choose to enact legislation that denies a privilege, not a right, it is within their power to do so. At least on paper.

You're projecting. When have you ever seen me use God as a basis for any argument other than one that pertains to religion? You haven't because I haven't.
i didn't mean to direct the God part at you...just in general, that is usually the attitude in the opposite argument...

btw, social security is not a state issue.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 08:49 PM
greenpartyaz's Avatar
Corporate Watchdog
Member #11352
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Valley of the Sun
Posts: 682
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 2
greenpartyaz could be on a school boardgreenpartyaz could be on a school boardgreenpartyaz could be on a school board
Gay Rights

The more gay dudes there are. The more ladies for me! Woo Hoo! Yes to gay rights!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 11:24 PM
My Winter Storm's Avatar
I Walk Alone
Member #11321
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 2
My Winter Storm could be on a school boardMy Winter Storm could be on a school boardMy Winter Storm could be on a school boardMy Winter Storm could be on a school boardMy Winter Storm could be on a school boardMy Winter Storm could be on a school board
If McCain can change his mind on everything, so can Obama.

Good on him, I say. At least he isn't as blatently homophobic as that McCain dude.
__________________
I Walk Alone
Every Step I Take I Walk Alone My Winter Storm
Holding Me Awake It's Never Gone When I Walk Alone
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2008, 12:02 AM
RetiredGySgt's Avatar
Registered User
Member #5176
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 19,324
Thanks: 30
Thanked 942 Times in 634 Posts
Rep Power: 262
RetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religion
RetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religion
Quote: Originally Posted by Glori.B View Post
well, but it does cover equality...and since our government provides special benefits to those who are married, why shouldn't people who choose a same sex partner, receive equal benefits?

because God said so? what about separation of church and state? and certainly, given the current rate of infidelity and divorce, the whole social stability argument is laughable, no?
How about Plural marriages? I mean whats wrong with them if your argument is just one of choice? Or marriage of human and animal? How about the right to marry and keep your dead loved one? Not to mention the desire by adults to marry children?
__________________
The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell

Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters

I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007)
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2008, 12:22 AM
Charlie Bass's Avatar
Right of Center True Con
Member #11320
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vicksburg, Missisippi
Posts: 5,223
Thanks: 28
Thanked 66 Times in 61 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Charlie Bass could be town mayor
Charlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayor
Quote: Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt View Post
How about Plural marriages? I mean whats wrong with them if your argument is just one of choice? Or marriage of human and animal? How about the right to marry and keep your dead loved one? Not to mention the desire by adults to marry children?
Exactly, if people allow gay marriage they're opening the flood gates for more potentially sexuallly aberrant type marriages, soon people will be saying, "So what if that man wants to marry his sister and have sex with, they should have the same rights as two unrelated people in a marriage", thats the direction things are headed for if gay marriage is allowed. Liberals sometimes don't realize how much they're deteriorating morals and society when they support such nonsense.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2008, 12:25 AM
Charlie Bass's Avatar
Right of Center True Con
Member #11320
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vicksburg, Missisippi
Posts: 5,223
Thanks: 28
Thanked 66 Times in 61 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Charlie Bass could be town mayor
Charlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayorCharlie Bass could be town mayor
Quote: Originally Posted by My Winter Storm View Post
If McCain can change his mind on everything, so can Obama.

Good on him, I say. At least he isn't as blatently homophobic as that McCain dude.
One thing the Bass doesn't get and hates with a passion, how come people like myself who disagree with the homosexual lifestyle are automatically labelled "homophobes"? Please quit labelling people that term who disagree with the homosexual lifestyle, whats next, bestialphobia for those of us who find bestiality disgusting and wrong? Liberal Jew media and its terms.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2008, 03:25 AM
Ravi's Avatar
Registered User
Member #8953
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 25,970
Thanks: 233
Thanked 950 Times in 765 Posts
Rep Power: 444
Ravi has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt View Post
How about Plural marriages? I mean whats wrong with them if your argument is just one of choice? Or marriage of human and animal? How about the right to marry and keep your dead loved one? Not to mention the desire by adults to marry children?
RGS, are you stupid or just a hateful prick? Because I know you already know the answer to these asinine questions of yours.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2008, 04:02 AM
RetiredGySgt's Avatar
Registered User
Member #5176
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 19,324
Thanks: 30
Thanked 942 Times in 634 Posts
Rep Power: 262
RetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religion
RetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religionRetiredGySgt could successfully start his own religion
Quote: Originally Posted by Ravi View Post
RGS, are you stupid or just a hateful prick? Because I know you already know the answer to these asinine questions of yours.
Really? The plural marriage one is nothing more than personal choice between consenting adults. And what if the dead person puts in their will that they WANT the other person to keep their dead body?

The others are just down the road from the list of perversions you do not mind.
__________________
The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell

Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters

I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Congress

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.usmessageboard.com/congress/55051-obama-flipflops-on-gay-marriage.html
Posted By For Type Date
The Republic of T. - Black. Gay. Father. Vegetarian. Buddhist. Liberal. This thread Refback 07-03-2008 05:56 PM

» Search Forums

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Apple iPad Forum
» Premium Sponsors
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:44 AM.


Please visit these our friends at the following forums:
Photography Forum - Celebrity Gossip and News - Conceal Carry and Hand Gun Forum - Parrot Forum - iPhone News - iPhone Forums - Motorola Droid Forum


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management by RedTyger