 | | 
07-02-2008, 08:00 PM
| | Born Free Member #10256 | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: u.s.a.
Posts: 874
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 44 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Steerpike I don't think the Constitution requires gay marriage, but States are free to provide for it if they wish (and they should in my view). i said the constitution requires equality.
__________________ | 
07-02-2008, 08:02 PM
|  | Registered User Member #7851 | | Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,527
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
Rep Power: 36 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Glori.B i said the constitution requires equality. Yeah, but thats subject to interpretation. Your post implies that you think that equality means gay marriage. I disagree.
__________________ "There ain't no devil, there's just God when he's drunk." - Tom Waits | 
07-02-2008, 08:06 PM
| | Born Free Member #10256 | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: u.s.a.
Posts: 874
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 44 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Steerpike Yeah, but thats subject to interpretation. Your post implies that you think that equality means gay marriage. I disagree. ok...so, who decided that couples who are married get tax benefits?
who decided couples who are married get social security benefits?
why?
why are some american citizens allowed to be deprived of equal benefits?
equality is not an opinion.
__________________ | 
07-02-2008, 08:08 PM
|  | cool Member #11254 | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Colbert Nation
Posts: 11,720
Thanks: 180
Thanked 345 Times in 262 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by ScreamingEagle Obama used to say marriage was between a man and a woman....no longer... Why are Repubicans so obsessed with gay marriage? | 
07-02-2008, 08:09 PM
|  | Registered User Member #7851 | | Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,527
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
Rep Power: 36 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Glori.B ok...so, who decided that couples who are married get tax benefits?
who decided couples who are married get social security benefits?
why?
why are some american citizens allowed to be deprived of equal benefits?
equality is not an opinion. There are all sorts of inequalities in the country. The question is whether the inequalities are a problem Constitutionally. If they're based on race, for example, then they probably are (at least if the government is behind it). Not every inequality is a Constitutional issue.
__________________ "There ain't no devil, there's just God when he's drunk." - Tom Waits | 
07-02-2008, 08:28 PM
|  | Administrator Member #2435 | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 37,616
Thanks: 58
Thanked 1,802 Times in 1,297 Posts
Rep Power: 692 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Glori.B well, but it does cover equality...and since our government provides special benefits to those who are married, why shouldn't people who choose a same sex partner, receive equal benefits?
because God said so? what about separation of church and state? and certainly, given the current rate of infidelity and divorce, the whole social stability argument is laughable, no? The Constitution also states that those powers not specifically delegated to the Fed falls to the states. Marriage is not a Constitutional Right.
If states choose to enact legislation that denies a privilege, not a right, it is within their power to do so. At least on paper.
You're projecting. When have you ever seen me use God as a basis for any argument other than one that pertains to religion? You haven't because I haven't.
__________________ She helped me with my suitcase, She stands before my eyes
Driving me to the airport, And to the friendly skies.
Going through security I held her for so long.
She finally looked at me in love, And she was gone.
Just a song before I go, A lesson to be learned.
Travelling twice the speed of sound It's easy to get burned. | 
07-02-2008, 08:30 PM
|  | Registered User Member #7851 | | Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,527
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
Rep Power: 36 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by GunnyL The Constitution also states that those powers not specifically delegated to the Fed falls to the states. Marriage is not a Constitutional Right. It has been since at least Loving and Zablocki, at least according to the Supreme Court. So for legal purposes it is one. But that doesn't necessarily mean that restrictions on gay marriage are violative.
__________________ "There ain't no devil, there's just God when he's drunk." - Tom Waits | 
07-02-2008, 08:33 PM
| | Born Free Member #10256 | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: u.s.a.
Posts: 874
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 44 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by GunnyL The Constitution also states that those powers not specifically delegated to the Fed falls to the states. Marriage is not a Constitutional Right.
If states choose to enact legislation that denies a privilege, not a right, it is within their power to do so. At least on paper.
You're projecting. When have you ever seen me use God as a basis for any argument other than one that pertains to religion? You haven't because I haven't. i didn't mean to direct the God part at you...just in general, that is usually the attitude in the opposite argument...
btw, social security is not a state issue.
__________________ | 
07-02-2008, 08:49 PM
|  | Corporate Watchdog Member #11352 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: The Valley of the Sun
Posts: 682
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 2 | | | Gay Rights The more gay dudes there are. The more ladies for me! Woo Hoo! Yes to gay rights! | 
07-02-2008, 11:24 PM
|  | I Walk Alone Member #11321 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Australia
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 2 | | | If McCain can change his mind on everything, so can Obama.
Good on him, I say. At least he isn't as blatently homophobic as that McCain dude.
__________________ I Walk Alone
Every Step I Take I Walk Alone My Winter Storm
Holding Me Awake It's Never Gone When I Walk Alone | 
07-03-2008, 12:02 AM
|  | Registered User Member #5176 | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 19,324
Thanks: 30
Thanked 942 Times in 634 Posts
Rep Power: 262 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Glori.B well, but it does cover equality...and since our government provides special benefits to those who are married, why shouldn't people who choose a same sex partner, receive equal benefits?
because God said so? what about separation of church and state? and certainly, given the current rate of infidelity and divorce, the whole social stability argument is laughable, no? How about Plural marriages? I mean whats wrong with them if your argument is just one of choice? Or marriage of human and animal? How about the right to marry and keep your dead loved one? Not to mention the desire by adults to marry children?
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
07-03-2008, 12:22 AM
|  | Right of Center True Con Member #11320 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Vicksburg, Missisippi
Posts: 5,223
Thanks: 28
Thanked 66 Times in 61 Posts
Rep Power: 10 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt How about Plural marriages? I mean whats wrong with them if your argument is just one of choice? Or marriage of human and animal? How about the right to marry and keep your dead loved one? Not to mention the desire by adults to marry children? Exactly, if people allow gay marriage they're opening the flood gates for more potentially sexuallly aberrant type marriages, soon people will be saying, "So what if that man wants to marry his sister and have sex with, they should have the same rights as two unrelated people in a marriage", thats the direction things are headed for if gay marriage is allowed. Liberals sometimes don't realize how much they're deteriorating morals and society when they support such nonsense. | 
07-03-2008, 12:25 AM
|  | Right of Center True Con Member #11320 | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Vicksburg, Missisippi
Posts: 5,223
Thanks: 28
Thanked 66 Times in 61 Posts
Rep Power: 10 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by My Winter Storm If McCain can change his mind on everything, so can Obama.
Good on him, I say. At least he isn't as blatently homophobic as that McCain dude. One thing the Bass doesn't get and hates with a passion, how come people like myself who disagree with the homosexual lifestyle are automatically labelled "homophobes"? Please quit labelling people that term who disagree with the homosexual lifestyle, whats next, bestialphobia for those of us who find bestiality disgusting and wrong? Liberal Jew media and its terms. | 
07-03-2008, 03:25 AM
|  | Registered User Member #8953 | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 25,970
Thanks: 233
Thanked 950 Times in 765 Posts
Rep Power: 444 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt How about Plural marriages? I mean whats wrong with them if your argument is just one of choice? Or marriage of human and animal? How about the right to marry and keep your dead loved one? Not to mention the desire by adults to marry children? RGS, are you stupid or just a hateful prick? Because I know you already know the answer to these asinine questions of yours. | 
07-03-2008, 04:02 AM
|  | Registered User Member #5176 | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 19,324
Thanks: 30
Thanked 942 Times in 634 Posts
Rep Power: 262 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Ravi RGS, are you stupid or just a hateful prick? Because I know you already know the answer to these asinine questions of yours. Really? The plural marriage one is nothing more than personal choice between consenting adults. And what if the dead person puts in their will that they WANT the other person to keep their dead body?
The others are just down the road from the list of perversions you do not mind.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |